Analytical and numerical study of propulsion vector orientation by non-aligned fluid method

Number of pages: 147 File Format: word File Code: 32600
Year: 2014 University Degree: Master's degree Category: Facilities - Mechanics
  • Part of the Content
  • Contents & Resources
  • Summary of Analytical and numerical study of propulsion vector orientation by non-aligned fluid method

    Dissertation for Master Degree in Mechanical Engineering

    Energy Conversion

    Abstract:

    Fluid propulsion vector orientation has emerged as an important technology for high performance air vehicles. This technology can improve the maneuverability of the aircraft by changing the nozzle flow and its deviation from its axial direction. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of the secondary suction flow in the main output flow of a small jet engine that is integrated with a cylindrical duct and a diverging horn, as well as to investigate the effect of fluid and geometric parameters and to evaluate the performance of the fluid propulsion vector orientation. Numerical and analytical studies of the orientation of the propulsion vector were performed for the first time in the form of non-aligned flow on this nozzle, and then a series of researches and investigations were carried out in the direction of geometric optimization with the help of numerical analysis. Numerical calculations for different flow conditions with and without secondary flow suction and at different heights of the secondary gap and different curvature radii of Kevlar [1] have been investigated. Numerical simulation of the nozzle flow has been performed by solving the Navier-Stokes equations, and the input parameters have been adjusted to better match the experimental conditions. These studies have been investigated in the primary mass flow rate and different suction pressures for three secondary gap heights of 1, 1.5 and 2 mm and three Kevlar curvature radii of 106, 120 and 300 mm and the arc cutting angle of 42 degrees. The effect of these fluidic and geometrical parameters on the orientation of the propulsion vector and the performance of the nozzle have been discussed, and the results show that these parameters have a direct effect on the performance of the orientation and control of the propulsion vector. In analytical studies, two new methods have been developed in order to better analyze this phenomenon in Shipoureh. In the first method, by considering a control volume and in accordance with the laws of linear momentum and a series of assumptions, simplified relationships have been developed, and in the second method, the analysis of this phenomenon has been realized using the equations of flow movement on wavy or sinusoidal walls.

    Keywords: propulsion force direction, non-aligned flow, Quanda surface, wavy wall, computational fluid dynamics

    1-1- Research goals and motivations

    The high performance of flying objects requires innovative specialized developments in the design of their power units. Propulsion vector orientation[1] is emerging as a key and promising technology for existing and future flying objects. This technology is aimed at spreading knowledge and information about the response of exhaust gases from turbine engines. Thrust vectoring nozzles are effective under all flight conditions, and they can meet design constraints such as low cost, low noise, light weight, short take-off distance, and improved radar evasion characteristics. Thrust vectoring is done by two known methods, which are mechanically oriented method[2] and fluid oriented method[3]. accepts In the mechanical direction method, mechanical parts are used to divert the outgoing gases. This not only increases the weight and complexity of the system, but also increases the costs, repairs and maintenance required. These factors motivated researchers to research new methods to achieve the same capabilities of vector orientation of the driving force but without using moving parts. Orientation of the propulsion vector through fluid was proposed as an alternative method to mechanical methods. This method uses a secondary jet flow to divert the flow path of the main exhaust gases. Potentially, the fluidic thrust vector control nozzle not only provides effective flow deflection but also eliminates the problems associated with additional mechanical parts. The technology of directing the propulsion vector through fluid has not been implemented yet. This point indicates that it is still necessary to carry out more research and progress on its effects and the variety of its applications.

    In the present study, obtaining the highest efficiency and the highest directionality of the propulsion force vector with the least amount of energy is the first goal of this research.Examining effective and efficient geometrical parameters and primary and secondary flow parameters on nozzle performance can help to know this method more accurately. Also, one of the other goals of this research is to perform an analytical solution and validate the results of numerical simulations.

    1-2- Introduction of propulsion vector control and the advancements of this technology

    Propulsion vector direction technology can improve the maneuverability of flying objects by controlling the outflow from the nozzle and diverting it from its longitudinal axis. In addition, this technology offers many advantages for modern flying objects. Directional thrust vector nozzles can control flying objects at high angles of attack from the stall zone, while this efficiency and ability is lost in conventional aerodynamic flights [1]. Since thrust vector control nozzles may effectively generate yaw [4] and yaw [5] forces or torques with relatively low drag, these nozzles can be enhanced and even possibly a suitable alternative to aerodynamic controllers [2]. In flights that use thrust vector control nozzles instead of traditional nozzles, the need to use vertical and horizontal tails can be reduced or even eliminated [1]. One of the advantages of separating the rear tail of the aircraft can be mentioned is the reduction in weight and even their radar evasion compared to their conventional models. In addition, maintenance costs related to the tail of the aircraft are also reduced. Flying objects that are integrated with such nozzles can use less propulsion power to achieve the desired results such as maneuvering, patrolling, climbing and descending, and since the need for propulsion power is less, these flying objects can consume less fuel by achieving a greater flight range. Strengthen for short sitting and rising [3]. By using these nozzles and turbofan engines, flying objects can deviate the propulsion force vector even up to 90 degrees and provide the possibility of vertical landing and takeoff. With the possibility of landing and taking off in small areas, flying objects can perform well in smaller environments such as aircraft carriers and even damaged airports [4]. Propulsion vector direction technology has become a popular and promising technology due to its efficiency and more useful and effective performance in new flying objects.

    1-2-1- Limitations of traditional control systems

    A basic issue regarding the performance of any flying object is maneuverability, the ability to create and produce a change in its trajectory, position, speed and acceleration. A maneuver is the aircraft's response to a control input by the pilot and is typically performed using aerodynamic control surfaces. These surfaces include the moving parts of the airplane wing such as aileron [6], rudder [7], elevator [8] and canard [9] [5]. Control surfaces are located in specific parts of the bird's body, including the wings and tail. The deviation of these surfaces changes the external shape of the device at the critical points of the structure, and leads to a change and imbalance in the aerodynamic forces acting on the device, and this action leads to a rotation around the center of gravity, which is called maneuvering. But these conventional aerodynamic control systems are limited by constraints, because control is lost in situations where aerodynamic forces are small, such as low-speed stalls or high angles of attack. Normally, an airplane during a maneuver takes advantage of the deviation of the control surfaces in order to correct its external shape. Due to the aerodynamic limitations, this deviation is very small for a passenger plane and up to 80% of its range for a fighter plane.

    An aerodynamic force for a given surface is proportional to the square of the speed. Therefore, only above a certain threshold of speed will deviation from a control level become effective. According to the angle of attack, the aerodynamic forces increase only up to a maximum value as this angle increases, and then when the angle of attack exceeds the maximum value, it causes the flow to separate and the appearance of aerodynamic drag.

  • Contents & References of Analytical and numerical study of propulsion vector orientation by non-aligned fluid method

    List:

    Abstract: D

    Chapter 1: Preface 1

    1-1- Research goals and motivations. 2

    1-2- Introduction of propulsion vector control and advances in this technology. 2

    1-2-1- limitations of traditional control systems. 3

    1-2-2- Advantages of propulsion vector control. 4

    1-2-3- mechanical method of driving force vector orientation. 5

    1-2-3-1- first generation. 5

    1-2-3-2- second generation. 7

    1-2-4- Fluid method of driving force vector orientation. 9

    1-2-4-1- Control method by shock wave. 12

    1-2-4-2- method of beveling the throat. 14

    1-2-4-3- Combined jet method (oscillating diaphragm). 16

    1-2-4-4- parallel flow method. 18

    1-2-4-5- non-aligned flow method. 19

    1-3- Defining the problem. 28

    1-4- Reviewing the history and previous research. 30

    1-5- Outline and structure of the current research. 33

    Chapter 2: Equations governing the flow field 34

    2-1- Introduction. 35

    2-2- Navier-Stokes equations. 35

    2-3- Modeling fluid field fluctuations. 37

    2-3-1- Confusion. 37

    2-3-2- Reynolds averaging method. 39

    2-3-2-1- Buzinsk method. 41

    2-3-2-2- Reynolds stress transmission method. 41

    2-3-3- method of simulating large eddies. 42

    2-4- Confusion models. 42

    2-4-1- zero equation models. 43

    2-4-2- one-equation models of the Spalart-Almaras method. 43

    2-4-3- Two-equation models. 44

    2-4-3-1- standard k-? model. 44

    2-4-3-2- k-? RNG model. 45

    2-4-3-3- Realizable k-? model. 46

    2-4-3-4- standard k-? model. 46

    2-4-3-5- k-? shear transfer model. 46

    2-4-4- Reynolds stress model. 47

    2-5- Selection of chaotic model. 48

    Chapter 3: Numerical and analytical solution method of fluid direction by non-aligned flow method 49

    3-1- Numerical analysis of fluid direction by non-aligned flow method. 50

    3-1-1- Computational fluid dynamics. 50

    3-1-2- Networking. 53

    3-1-2-1- Investigating grid near the wall in confined turbulent flows. 55

    3-1-2-2-Description of the grid network of the desired nozzle set for the problem of fluid orientation. 58

    3-1-3- Designing by Gambit software and using the journal method. 59

    3-1-3-1- Introduction of Gambit. 59

    3-1-3-2- Journal writing environment. 60

    3-1-4- Effective geometric parameters. 61

    3-1-5- computing network. 63

    3-1-6- Numerical analysis with the help of Fluent software. 65

    3-1-6-1- Introducing Fluent. 65

    3-1-6-2- Influential fluid parameters. 65

    3-1-6-3- setting boundary conditions and solution parameters. 66

    3-1-6-4- Numerical solution method. 70

    3-2- Analytical method of fluid orientation by non-aligned flow method. 71

    3-2-1- Analysis of control volume. 71

    3-2-2- Analysis using the equations of flow movement on a wavy wall. 76

    Chapter 4: Examining the results 81

    4-1- Introduction. 82

    4-2- Determining levels for graphical display of results. 82

    4-3- Qualitative results of numerical analysis. 84

    4-3-1- Convergence of residuals. 84

    4-3-2- Examination of temperature, speed and pressure contours. 85

    4-3-3- Examination of route lines and velocity vectors. 92

    4-4- Quantitative results of numerical analysis. 94

    4-4-1- Orientation angle changes with geometrical parameters at different pressures. 94

    4-4-2- Changes in orientation angle with different secondary to primary mass flow rates. 97

    4-4-3- Thrust losses and changes in thrust ratio are related to geometric and fluid parameters. 100

    4-5- Validation. 102

    4-6- Summarizing and presenting suggestions. 106

    4-6-1- Conclusion. 106

    4-6-2- Suggestions to continue the research. 108

    List of references. 109

    Appendix 113

    Appendix A) Development of a text file in the Gambit environment (journal file). 114

    Appendix B) Types of numerical solution algorithms in Fluent software. 124

    Appendix C)         Fluent software settings. 127

    Appendix d)           Details of solving the subsonic flow equations over a sinusoidal wall. 130

     

    Source:

     

    Hunter C.A., Deere K.A., “Computational Investigation of Fluidic Counterflow Thrust Vectoring”, AIAA, PP. 99-2669, June 

    John S. Orme, Ross Hathaway, “Initial Flight Test Evaluation of the F-15 ACTIVE Axisymmetric Vectoring Nozzle Performance”, NASA/TM, 206558, 1998.

    Dores D., Madruga Santos M., Krothapalli A., Lourenco L., Collins Jr.E., Alvi F., and Strykowski P.J., “Characterization of a counterflow thrust vectoring scheme on a gas turbine engine exhaust jet", 3rd AIAA Flow Control Conference, PP. 2006-3516, 5-8 June 2006, San Francisco.

    Corcoran M., Matthewson T., “Thrust Vectoring”, Aeronautical Engineering I, 2006.

    Madruga Santos M., “Experimental Study on Counter Flow Thrust Vectoring of a Gas Turbine Engine”, Ph.D. Dissertation, 2004, The Florida State University.

    Lord W.K., MacMartin D.G., Tillman T.G., “Flow Control Opportunities in Gas Turbine Engines”, 2000.

    Rauth G., Herrmann O., “Thrust Vectoring for Advanced Fighter Aircraft”, RTOMP AVT-100, 2003.

    Snow B.H., “Thrust Vector Control Concepts and Issues", SAE Aerospace Conference and Exposition, 1-4 October 1990, Long Beach California.

    Banazadeh A., Saghafi F., Ghoreyshi M., Pilidis P., "Multi-Directional Co-Flow Fluidic Thrust Vectoring intended for a Small Gas Turbine", AIAA, PP. 2007-2940, 7-10 May 2007. Flamm J.D., "Experimental Study of a Nozzle Using Fluidic Counterflow for Thrust Vectoring", AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE, 34th Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, PP. 98-3255, 13-15 July 1998.

     Taylor J.G., “A Static Investigation of a Simultaneous Pitch and Yaw Thrust Vectoring 2-D C-D Nozzle”, AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE, 24th Joint Propulsion Conference, PP. 88-2998, 11-13 July 1988. Berrier B.L., "Results from NASA Langley Experimental Studies of Multiaxis Thrust Vectoring Nozzles", SAE, PP. 881481, 1988.

    Alireza Hedayatzadeh Razavi, "Design of a model airplane with fluid control of thrust vector", Master's thesis, Sharif University of Technology, December 2017.

    Ehsan Rahat Vernosfadarani, "Design, construction and control of a laboratory system of propulsion vector orientation by fluid method in small dimensions", Master's thesis, Sharif University of Technology, December 1387.

    Li Li., "Numerical and Experimental Studies of Fluidic Thrust Vectoring Mechanisms", Ph.D. Dissertation, Mar 2012, Muroran Institute of Technology.

    Wikipedia (the free encyclopedia), http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thrust_vectoring

    Mason M.S., Crowther W.J., “Fluidic Thrust Vectoring Of Low Observable Aircraft”, CEAS Aerospace Aerodynamic Research Conference, 10-12 June 2002, Cambridge, UK.

    Deere K.A., "Summary of Fluidic Thrust Vectoring Research Conducted at NASA Langley Research Center", 21st AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, 23-26 June 2003, Orlando, Florida. Wu C.C., "A Computational Study of Secondary Injection Thrust Vector Control", 13th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, PP. 95-1787, 19-22 June 1995, San Diego, California.

    Carroll G.R., Cox H., "A missile flight control system using boundary layer thrust vector control", AIAA, PP. 83-1149, 1983. Porzio A.J., Franke M.E., "Experimental Study of a Confined Jet Thrust Vector Control", 24th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting & Exhibit, PP. 86-0448, 6-9 January 1986, Reno, NV.

    Hawkes T.M., Franke M.E., “Design Variables for Two-Dimensional Confined Jet Thrust Vector Control Nozzles”, 33rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting & Exhibit, PP. 95-0646, 9-12 January 1995, Reno, NV.

    Brendan A., "Numerical Investigation of Fluidic Injection as a Means of Thrust Control", Initial Thesis Report, ACME, 2009.

    Afshin Banazadeh, "Conceptual Study of Propulsive Force Orientation in Optimizing the Transitional Flight Phase of a Tail Jet UAV", Ph.D. Thesis, University of Technology Sharif, Shahrivar 2017. Andrew J.N., Fernando N.G., "Performance Studies of Shock Vector Control Fluidic Thrust Vectoring", 43rd AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit, PP. 2007-5086, July 8-11, 2007, Cincinnati, OH.

    Wing D.J.

Analytical and numerical study of propulsion vector orientation by non-aligned fluid method