Determining the productivity of irrigation water in Fomanat area of ??Gilan province

Number of pages: 94 File Format: word File Code: 32416
Year: 2013 University Degree: Master's degree Category: Agricultural Engineering
  • Part of the Content
  • Contents & Resources
  • Summary of Determining the productivity of irrigation water in Fomanat area of ??Gilan province

    Academic Thesis for Master's Degree

    Field: Agricultural Engineering, Agricultural Management Orientation

    Abstract

    In Iran, the agricultural sector is the biggest water user. The low relative input price of irrigation water used in the mentioned sector causes the lack of proper investment in water collection technologies and its waste up to more than 80%. One of the important issues of the water sector is the unjustified low price or tariff of agricultural water. The present research for the first time, by accurately measuring the amount of irrigation water consumed in the paddy fields of the Fomanat irrigation area in Gilan province, considered the suitability of different forms of production function and the selection of the best form in order to estimate the economic price of irrigation water. The data used were obtained from 110 paddy fields in Fomanat district in the crop year of 2011-2019. According to the results of the research, the transcendental functional form was recognized as the best form of the production function, and the shadow price of irrigation water was determined based on it equal to 9272 rials.

    Key words: shadow price, final productivity value, Fomanat field, economic value of water Irrigation

    - Introduction

    In recent years, population growth, climate change and the phenomenon of industrialization have limited water resources. The agricultural sector is the largest water consumer and has the lowest water consumption efficiency. Therefore, in recent years, extensive efforts have been made to estimate the economic value of water consumption in the agricultural sector in order to improve development planning. In this chapter, firstly, the problem considered in the present research is stated, then the variables of the research, the characteristics of the studied area, and the methods and tools used are introduced. Also, the necessity of the research, the goals and hypotheses of the research are presented to the interpretation and finally the definition of the specific concepts and vocabulary of the research is developed. Therefore, water resources management is considered one of the priorities of political programs in the country. Management of water resources, as the most important renewable but limited natural resource, is one of the most important challenges of the current century and has caused major global concerns (Liner [1], 2009). Water resources are exposed to increasing stress caused by the mutual effects of population growth, economic development, climatic diversity and heterogeneous temporal and spatial distribution of water resources, climate change and ecosystem protection (Wada[2], 2010). These cases cause serious issues such as poverty, disrupting the process of sustainable socio-economic growth and development, threatening global food production and instability of natural resources (Angles [3], 2011).

    Agriculture, with 85% of global water consumption as the largest consumer of this resource, plays an important role in balancing the amount of water between competing uses (Pongkiurasin[4], 2007). In the coming decades, more than two-thirds of the growing supply of food needed by the growing world population will be provided by irrigation-based agriculture (Al-Jaidi[5], 2009). And it is predicted that the demand for agricultural water will double in 2050 (Pfister et al.[6], 2011).

    Achieving self-sufficiency in the production of agricultural products has been on the agenda of the Ministry of Agricultural Jihad for many years. But the factor that challenges the realization of this goal is the limitation of resources and the lack of sufficient funds inside the country, which inevitably leads the practitioners and researchers to the methods of optimal and economical use of production resources. Emphasis on productivity in the use of available resources and allocation of resources and funds to uses that create maximum efficiency are the principles that everyone agrees on. In this regard, water is of great importance as the most limiting factor of production in agriculture, and planning for its proper allocation in such a way that the maximum efficiency in the production of agricultural products is created and at the same time the well-being of future generations and the environment is maintained is very important.. In fact, the increasing demand for water resources and the limitation of the country's water resources increase the gap between water supply and demand day by day, and today, the limitation of water resources determines the pattern of cultivation, and in this regard, one of the most effective ways to achieve self-sufficiency, more domestic production, and greater productivity is the appropriate allocation of water based on economic criteria. From Pareto's point of view, the allocation of production resources will be economically optimal when it is not possible to increase the utility or economic efficiency in any of the operations by re-allocating it. In this regard, various economic criteria and tools can represent the economic and physical efficiency of inputs among different exploitations and crops, the most important of which is the economic value. In fact, the comparison of the economic value between different agricultural products shows how much the current allocation pattern is in line with economic principles.

    The debates and studies that have been conducted around the issue of water as one of the most central components of sustainable development, blame the weak, inefficient and unstable management of water and not the actual physical limitations of supply as responsible for today's challenges (Stratton [7], 2008), so that many problems are solved by efficient and sustainable water management. Irrigation can be managed, which requires the protection of water resources and increasing the producer's net income (OECD, 2009). The World Bank and other related organizations recognize the assessment of demand as the central core of the process of dealing with the aforementioned crises, and an estimate of the nature of demand is a prerequisite for the sustainable design of projects and programs and guiding investment decisions in the water sector (Darden [8], 1998). Therefore, extracting the irrigation water demand function and determining the economic value and productivity of this scarce input is the first step in designing an optimal exploitation strategy.

    Fomnat irrigation area in the Sefidroud irrigation and drainage network consists of five construction units that cover 49.66 thousand hectares of agricultural land. According to the latest available information, the share of different crops in the cultivation pattern of this irrigation area is high-quality long-grain rice with 88.73%, high-yielding long-grain rice with 9.56% and other crops with 1.71%. Long grain rice cultivars with 29.98% of the cultivated area are the dominant crops in this irrigation area. On the other hand, the total gross profit of agriculture in Fomanat irrigation area is estimated based on the monetary values ??of the agricultural period of 2019-2019 equivalent to 0.96 thousand billion rials. Irrigation water supply in this area is provided by four main sources including Sefidroud irrigation network, local rivers and streams, drains, dams and underground sources. Considering the consumption of irrigation water amounting to 487 million cubic meters in this irrigation area, the share of each of the above four sources in providing irrigation water is equal to 60.06, 31.08, 2.24 and 6.62%, respectively. Extracting the irrigation water demand function, determining the economic value and productivity of this input in the study area has a significant role in improving the water resource management policies in the lands downstream of the Sefidroud dam and network. rtl;">The necessity of adjusting the pricing policies and determining the irrigation water tariff based on economic value.

    Providing a suitable perspective to estimate the lost economic benefits due to changing the conditions of irrigation water allocation.

  • Contents & References of Determining the productivity of irrigation water in Fomanat area of ??Gilan province

    List:

     

    The first chapter. 1

    General. 1

    1-1- Introduction. 2

    1-2- statement of the problem. 2

    1-3- Necessity of research. 4

    1-4- Research questions. 5

    1-5- research objectives. 5

    1-5-1- Main goals. 5

    1-5-2- Special goals (sub) 5

    1-6- Research hypotheses. 5

    1-7- Fomanat irrigation area. 6

    1-8- Methods and tools for collecting information. 6

    1-9- Method of data analysis 7

    1-10- Keywords 7

    1-11- Research organization. 8

    The second chapter. 9

    Theoretical foundations and research background. 9

    2-1- Introduction. 10

    2-2- The role of water in agriculture. 10

    2-3- Efficiency of water consumption in the agricultural sector. 11

    2-4- Water market. 12

    2-4-1- Characteristics of the water market. 13

    2-4-2- Input water demand in agriculture. 14

    2-5- The importance of water demand management. 16

    2-5-1- demand management and the role of economic valuation in water demand management. 16

    2-5-2- Water demand management tools. 19

    2-6- Water pricing and its effects. 20

    2-7- Water pricing methods. 22

    2-7-1- Water price determination methods from farmers' point of view. 22

    2-7-1-1- Non-parametric methods. 22

    A- Marginal pricing method. 23

    B- Budgeting method. 23

    C- Linear programming method. 24

    2-7-1-2- Parametric methods (econometrics) 25

    2-7-1-2-1- Estimating the economic value of water using the production function. 26

    2-7-1-2-2- Estimating the economic value of water using the bound profit function. 30

    2-7-1-2-3- Estimating the economic value of water using the bound cost function. 31

    2-7-2- Direct and indirect methods. 32

    2-7-2-1- Hedonic pricing method. 32

    2-7-2-2- direct method. 33

    2-7-3- Experimental methods of water pricing in Iran. 33

    2-7-3-1- volumetric methods. 34

    2-7-3-1-1- single-rate volumetric method. 34

    2-7-3-1-2- Two-rate volume method (multi-rate) 35

    2-7-3-2- Non-volume receiving methods. 35

    2-7-3-2-1- Obtaining water price based on the amount of production. 35

    2-7-3-2-2- Obtaining water price based on cultivated area. 37

    2-7-3-2-3- Pricing based on the right of quality. 38

    2-8- Theoretical foundations of demand for water input. 39

    2-9- An overview of the conducted studies. 42

    2-9-1- Internal studies. 42

    2-9-2- Foreign studies. 45

    2-10- Summary. 47

    The third chapter. 49

    Materials and methods 49

    3-1- Introduction. 50

    3-2- Production function. 50

    3-3- important production functions in agriculture. 50

    3-3-1- Cobb-Douglas production function. 51

    3-3-2- Transcendental production function. 52

    3-3-3-Translog production function. 53

    3-3-4- generalized quadratic production function. 53

    3-4- Derivation of irrigation water input demand function in the general state. 54

    3-4-1- Water demand function extraction in this research. 55

    3-4-2- Calculating the economic value of irrigation water. 57

    3-5- Society, statistical sample and sampling method. 57

    3-6- Summary. 58

    Chapter Four. 59

    Results and discussion. 59

    4-1- Introduction. 60

    Descriptive statistics. 60

    4-1-1 - age status. 60

    4-1-2- Education status. 61

    4-1-3- The extent of the farmer's experience. 63

    4-1-4- Amount of consumption of inputs 64

    4-1-4-1- Quantity of water used. 64

    4-1-4-2- chemical fertilizer. 65

    4-1-4-3-stem-eating poison 66

    4-1-4-4-herbicide poison. 67

    4-1-4-5- seed 68

    4-1-4-6- labor force 69

    4-1-4-7- cost of machines. 70

    4-1-5- variable costs of rice cultivation. 70

    4-1-5-1- total variable costs. 71

    4-1-5-2 came. 72

    Results of fitting Cobb-Douglas functional form. 73

    Results of fitting the transcendental functional form. 79

    Translog functional form fitting results. 85

    The results of fitting the generalized quadratic functional form. 90

    Superior functional form and determining the economic value of irrigation water. 95

    Irrigation water demand function in Fumanat area. 96

    Summary of the fourth chapter. 96

    The fifth chapter. 97

    Summary, 97

    Conclusion, discussion and suggestions 97

    5-1- Overview of the research. 98

    5-1-1- Introduction. 98

    5-1-2- Objectives and questions.99

    5-1-3- Scope of research. 99

    5-1-4- Research limitation. 99

    5-1-5- Method and type of research. 99

    5-1-6- Research variables. 100

    5-1-6-1- independent variables. 100

    5-1-6-2- dependent variable. 100

    5-1-7- Research hypotheses. 100

    5-2- Conclusion. 100

    5-2-1- Descriptive findings. 100

    - age groups. 100

    - Education level. 101

    - The amount of experience of the farmers. 101

    - Amount of consumption of inputs 101

    - Quantity of water used. 101

    - Chemical fertilizer. 101

    - Stem-eating poison 101

    - Herbicide poison. 101

    - Seed 102

    - Labor 102

    - Cost of machinery. 102

    - variable costs of rice cultivation. 102

    - total variable costs. 102

    - Came. 102

    5-1-2- Inferential findings. 103

    - Cobb-Douglas functional form fitting results. 103

    - Results of fitting the transcendental functional form. 103

    - Translog functional form fitting results. 104

    - Results of fitting the generalized quadratic functional form. 105

    - Superior functional form and determining the economic value of irrigation water. 106

    - The economic value of each cubic meter of irrigation water. 106

    5-3- Discussion. 106

    5-4- Suggestions 106

    5-4-1- Suggestions of the current research. 106

    5-4-2- Suggestions for future research. 107

    Resources. 108

     

    Source:

     

    Abonuri, A; Mohammadi, H.; Nowrozinejad, M. (2016), "Estimating the economic value of water in the agricultural sector by Hednik method (case study of Sabzevar city)". Journal of Agricultural Economics, No. 2, pp. 57-21.

    Aminian, F; Dashti, A.; Hosseinzad, J. (2008), "Estimating the economic value of water in pistachio production (case study: underground water resources of Damghan city)". 6th Iranian Agricultural Economics Conference.

    Tahamipour, M. (2004), "Determining the economic value of water in pistachio production in Zarand". Master's thesis in the field of agricultural economics, Zabul: Zabul University. Zarepour, Z; Tahamipour, M.; Shawardi, A. (2018), "Estimating the economic value of water in urban and rural uses in Khuzestan province". Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development, No. 76.

    Salami, H; Hosseinzad, J.; Sadr, K; Liaqat, A. (2016), "Final report on determining the appropriate method of water pricing in the agricultural sector and providing an optimal cultivation model (case study of Alaviyan Dam)". Amirtimori, S. (2016) "Determining the economic value of underground water: a case study of Raver city (Kerman province)". Journal of Economic Research, No. 98, pp. 113-128.

    Shams Aldini, A.; Mohammadi, H; Rezaei, M. (2009), "Determining the economic value of water in sugar beet cultivation in Morodasht city". Cheghandarqand Magazine, No. 1, pp. 93-103.

    Mohammadinejad, A. (2010), "Economic Value of Water in Saveh Plain". Master's Thesis, Faculty of Agriculture, Tehran: University of Tehran.

    Makhlooghi Azad, S. (2012), "Effect of targeted water subsidies on water consumption in rice production in Gilan Province". Master's thesis in environmental economics, Tehran: Allameh Tabatabai University.

    Najafi, A; Najafi, B. A. (2009), "Factors affecting water demand in fish farms in Kohgiluyeh and Boyer Ahmad provinces". Journal of Agricultural Economics, No. 1, pp. 191-207.

    Ministry of Energy and Executive Technical System Affairs, Vice President for Strategic Planning and Supervision (2017), "Guideline for Determining the Economic Value of Water for Agricultural Uses". Publication No. 567.

    Abernethy, C.L. , K. Lonsway & C. Maman (2000), "Farmer-based financing of operations in the Niger valley irrigation schemes", Research Report 37. Colombo, Srilanka: International water management institute.

    Acharya, G & E.B. Barbier (2000), "Valuing Groundwater recharge through agricultural production in the Hedejia-Nguru wetlands in Northern Nigeria". Agricultural economics, vol 22, pp: 247-259.

    Al-Juaidi, A. E. (2009), "Water allocation for agricultural use considering treated wastewater, public health risk, and economic issues". Ph.D dissertation in civil and environmental engineering, School of Graduate Studies, Utah State University.

    Angeles, G. L. G. (2011), "Sustainable water management in Ciudad Juarez". Ph.D dissertation, Arizona State University

Determining the productivity of irrigation water in Fomanat area of ??Gilan province