Contents & References of Investigating the possibility of reducing energy consumption in the Cat Cracker Unit (FCCU) of Abadan Refinery through the optimization of process variables
List:
Chapter One Introduction .. 1
Introduction .. 2
1-1- Modeling and simulation .. 2
1-2- Applications of simulation .. 3
1-2-1- Applications of simulation in research and development of processes . 3
1-2-2- Applications of simulation in process design. 3
1-2-3- Applications of simulation in optimal exploitation of existing facilities. 4
The second chapter of theory. 6
2-1- General description .. 7
2-2- Density and particle size .. 8 2-3- Activity 9
2-4- Carbon content on the catalyst. . 9
2-5- Conversion .. 10
2-6- Analogy of Kat Graker unit .. 10
2-7- Cracking chemical reactions .. 11
2-8- Cracking kinetic model .. 12
.2-9- General description of Abadan FCCU unit .. 15
2-9-1- Feed preheater system. 16
2-9-2- Reactor 17
Title
Page 2-9-3- Feed injection to reactor. 17
2-9-4- reaction zone. 18
2-9-5- Catalyst recovery in the reactor (Reactor catalyst recovery). 19
2-9-6- Spent catalyst stripper. 20
2-9-7- Spent catalyst stand pipe & slide valves
(Spent catalyst stand pipe & slide valves). 21
2-9-8- Catalyst regenerator (Regenerator section). 22
2-9-9- Air blower .. 22
2-9-10- Regenerator .. 23
2-9-11- Cottrell (cottrell percipitator) .. 25
2-9-12- Separation section of reactor products (Fractionation section) .. 25
2-9-13-Slurry system 26-9-14-Dor settler 26-15-Heavy cycle oil system 27-16 Light cycle oil system 2-9-17 Top circulating reflux system 28 Chapter 4 Background and tables 31 Results and discussion 74
Title
5-1- Discussion and conclusion .. 75
5-2- Feed .. 75
5-3- Riser .. 76
5-4- Reactor .. 78 5-5- Catalyst 79 6-5- Experimental data 80 Chapter 6 Conclusion. 84
Sources .. 86
Source:
1-Hayward C.M. and Winkler W.S. "FCC :matrix/zeolite" hydrocarbon processing February 1990 pp.55-56.
2-Upson L.L "What FCC Catalyst tests Show," Hydrocarbon Processing, November 1981, pp.253-258.
3-Pine, L.A., Maher, P.J, and Wachter, W.A.," Prediction of cracking catalyst behavior by a zeolite unit cell size model ,"Journal of catalysis, no 85,1984,pp.466-476.
4-Magnusson, j, and Pudas, r., Activity and Product distribution characteristics of the currently used FCC catalyst systems, "presented at Cabalistic 6th Annual FCC symposium, Munich, Germany, May 22-23, 1985.
5-John G.S. and Mikovsky, R.J.," Calculation of the average activity of cracking catalysts," Chemical Engineering Science, Vol. 15, 1961, pp.172-175.
6-Gaughan, J.R., "Effect of catalyst retention on inventory replacement," oil & gas"Effect of catalyst retention on inventory replacement," oil & gas journal, December 26, 1983, pp, 141-145. Munich, Germany, May 22-23, 1985.
8-Thiel, P. G., "Additive R,"Grce Davis Catalog, No. 71, 19859- Engelhard Corporation, “Reduced Unit Cell Size Catalysts Offer Improved Octane For FCC Gasoline,” TI-762, 1984. 10- Engelhard Corporation, “Increasing Motor Octane by Catalytic Means, Part 2,” The Catalyst Report, EC6100P, May 1987.
11- Pine, L.A., Maher, P.J, and Wachter, W.A.,” Prediction of cracking catalyst behavior by a zeolite unit cell size model,” Journal of catalysis, no 85, 1984, pp.480-490
12- John G.S. and Mikovsky, R.J.," Calculation of the average activity of cracking catalysts," Chemical Engineering Science, Vol. 15, 1961, pp. 100-107.
13- Tamborski, G.A, Magnabosco, L.M, Powell, w., and Yoo, J.S.," Catalyst technology improvements make so emissions control affordable" Presented at catalytic 6th annual fcc symposium, Munich, Germany, May 22-23, 1985.
14- Gaughan, J.R.,” Effect of catalyst retention on inventory replacement,” oil & gas journal, December 26, 1983, pp,171-175.
15- Upson L.L. “What FCC Catalyst tests Show,” Hydrocarbon Processing, November 1981, pp.307-315.
16- Thiel, P. G., “Additive R,”Grce Davis Catalog, No.