Stress analysis, estimation of behavior and elastic properties of carbon nanotubes under tensile loading

Number of pages: 91 File Format: word File Code: 32289
Year: 2009 University Degree: Master's degree Category: Facilities - Mechanics
  • Part of the Content
  • Contents & Resources
  • Summary of Stress analysis, estimation of behavior and elastic properties of carbon nanotubes under tensile loading

    Master's Thesis

    Mechanical Engineering - Applied Design

    Abstract

    In recent years, most of the research has been focused on compressive and combined loading in order to investigate the buckling of nanotube structures, and for this purpose, the work done on tensile loading is very limited. Since the results of compressive and tensile loading in carbon nanotubes are completely different (due to the effect on repulsive and attractive interactions in these structures, which are of different nature and amount), so the research works on these structures are still under the optimal tensile load of the researchers and are still being investigated.

    Linear and high-order approximations as well as software modeling using Lamps specialized software show that the changes in the elastic modulus are inversely proportional to the changes in diameter or index of nanotubes, and with the increase in diameter and decrease in the effect of curvature, the elastic modulus of nanotubes also decreases. Also, the stress-strain diagrams are similar to the diagrams of brittle materials, with the difference that the percentage of elongation and maximum stress are observed in them. The mechanical behavior of nanotubes has been simulated in software modeling up to the breaking point of the first link in these structures, and the difference in stress and strain values ??between software modeling and analytical method charts is caused by the effects of environmental factors such as temperature and pressure, intrastructural instabilities in the non-linear region, and the effect of length parameters, strain rate, etc. which is consistent with reality and logical.

    Introduction

    After the first practical experiment in 1991 by Ijima [1] on carbon nanotubes, most of the attention was drawn towards these materials and the estimation of their different properties. Very high mechanical properties against low weight, excellent electrical and thermal properties, are among the unique properties that have turned carbon nanotubes into unique structures in today's world and the focus of all kinds of engineering sciences, especially mechanical engineering. Analyzing the structural mechanics of these materials and estimating their mechanical properties using different methods and ideas has always been the focus of researchers. The general results show that mechanically, carbon nanotubes have a tensile strength of about 20 times that of steel with the highest tensile strength in nature, as well as the modulus of elasticity (Young's modulus) at the terapascal limit (TPa). Of course, these extraordinary properties also have a clear scientific justification, and that is due to the very strong SP2 hybrid carbon-carbon bond in this structure, which is also the strongest type of bond in nature. A person named Kian 2 [2] recently reported that adding only 1% by weight of carbon nanotubes increases the tensile strength of polystyrene composite films by 25%. In estimating the properties of carbon nanotubes, many researchers have used continuous medium models, especially the skin sheet model, which matches well with the geometric structure of nanotubes. Although these theories also have limitations, they have shown good results compared to the results of practical and laboratory work, and they are easier to use than other methods. In general, it is very difficult and expensive to measure the properties of carbon nanotubes practically and in a laboratory at nanoscale.

    -

    Iijima

    Qian

    Of course, in recent years a very powerful tool has been used to estimate and check the mechanical properties of nanotubes with very high accuracy. It is known that the simulation is called molecular dynamics method 1. This method is a suitable tool to get rid of the difficulties of the experimental method and confirm the results obtained by analytical theories. The researches conducted on carbon nanotubes are numerous and diverse due to their extraordinary reported properties. Different people have always tried to achieve more accurate results with new theories and simpler methods.Based on this, characteristics such as Young's modulus, Poisson's ratio, stress-strain relationships and their values, maximum stress, failure strain, etc. It has always been considered by researchers. The first test to measure the modulus of elasticity in multi-walled carbon nanotubes resulted in the value of 1.8 ± 0.9 TPa [3], and then Wang [4] reported a slightly lower value of 1.28 ± 0.59 TPa. Yu 3 [5] found the tensile strength and Young's modulus of single-walled carbon nanotubes in the range of 11-63 GPa and 0.27-0.95 TPa, respectively. Krishnan 4 [6] also measured the elastic modulus of single-walled carbon nanotubes in the diameter range of 1.5-1 nm for 27 nanotubes at about 1.25 TPa. Low 5 [8, 7] and Lier 6 [9] have also obtained the Young's modulus 0.97 and 1 TPa with the experimental force constant models 7 and basic principles calculations 8. All the above results even considering their error show that the mechanical properties of carbon nanotubes are very high. rtl;">Krishnan

    Lu

    Lier

    Emperical force constant model

    ab initio

    Srivastava

    Among the other works done, we can mention the research of Sri Vastava 9 [10] for carbon nanotubes (0 and 8) using the molecular dynamics method indicated that this structure can be compressed up to 12% and under such an elastic limit, the stress is in the range of 110-125 GPa. In recent years, most of the researches have been focused on compressive and combined loading in order to investigate the buckling of nanotubes structure, and for this purpose, the works done on tensile loading are very limited. Since the results of compressive and tensile loading in carbon nanotubes are completely different (due to the effect on repulsive and attractive interactions in these structures, which are of different nature and amount), therefore, research works on these structures under the optimal tensile load of the researchers are still being investigated.

    let's pay In terms of structure, carbon nanotubes are generally divided into two general categories, which are single-walled carbon nanotubes 1 and multi-walled carbon nanotubes 2. A single-walled carbon nanotube can schematically be the result of bending a graphite sheet and turning it into a cylindrical tube, and a multi-walled carbon nanotube is a collection of single-walled carbon nanotubes that are aligned and centered inside each other. The direction of bending and bending of the graphite sheet is defined by a vector called Chiral 3 or Ch(n,m). Figure 1-1 represents this vector in the nanotube structure. Using this vector, you can define all kinds of atomic structure arrangements.

    Abstract:

    In this research first we have estimated elastic modulus of zigzag and armchair single walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) under uniaxial tension using a new combined method and then verify obtained results from analytical method with results of other analytical and experimental works. Results shown when diameter or indices of SWCNTs increases the young modulus of SWCNTs decreases and in the same diameter the modulus of an armchair SWCNT is more than a zigzag SWCNT. materials.

    In last chapter using a computer modeling we modeled armchair SWCNT (10,10) and zigzag SWCNT (17,0) based on suitable boundary condition with LAMPS software and applying axial tensile loading and checking strain energy in small strains, elastic modulus and stress-strain diagrams of both of zigzag and armchair SWCNTs obtained.

  • Contents & References of Stress analysis, estimation of behavior and elastic properties of carbon nanotubes under tensile loading

    List:

    Chapter One (Introduction)        

    1-1 Introduction. 2

    2-1 Modified Morse potential function. 9

    3-1 Tersoff-Brenner and Tersoff potential functions. 11

    4-1 second-generation potential functions of reactive experimental coupling order and Leonard Jones 6-12 12

    Chapter II (Estimation of elastic modulus)

    1-2 Reference formulation. 18

    1-1-2 Energy potential. 20

    2-1-2 Modified Morse potential function. 20

    3-1-2 Tresov potential function. 21

    4-1-2 Formulation using modified Morse potential function. 22

    5-1-2 Formulation using the Tresov potential function. 23

    2-2 structural analysis. 24

    1-2-2 curvature effect 31

    2-2-2 armchair structure. 31

    3-2-2 zigzag structure. 32

    3-2 Results and discussions. 35

    Chapter 3 (estimation of mechanical behavior)

    1-3 Introduction. 42

    2-3 reference formulation. 42

    3-3 structural analysis. 44

    1-3-3 armchair structure. 48

    2-3-3 zigzag structure. 49

    3-3-3 The effect of curvature 50

    4-3 Results and discussions. 53

    Chapter Four (Software Modeling)

    1-4 Modeling. 59

    2-4 topics and results. 61

    Chapter Five (Conclusions and Suggestions)

    Conclusions and Suggestions. 67

    List of presented articles. 70

    List of references. 71

     

    Source:

     

    Since the above thesis, the following articles and conferences have been presented:

    Title of paper:

    Prediction of elastic modulus of single walled carbon nanotubes under tension with a new combined method

    Submitted in: Journal of Acta Mechanica (ISI) - 21/09/2010.

    Title of conference:

    Prediction of elastic modulus of zigzag single walled carbon nanotube under tension with a new combined method

    Submitted in: 3rd International Conference on Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, 9-11 November 2010, Shiraz, Iran (ICNN2010).

    Title of conference:

    A novel analytical molecular structural model for the calculation of young's modulus of zigzag single walled carbon nanotubes in presence of vacancies

    Submitted in: 3rd International Conference on Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, 9-11 November 2010, Shiraz, Iran (ICNN2010).

    Title of conference:

    A theoretical study to predict the young modulus of zigzag single walled carbon nanotubes containing vacancy

    Submitted in: Nanocon2010 czech republic, 12-14 October.

    Title of conference:

    Defect of unit cell length on young modulus of zigzag single walled carbon nanotubes

    Submitted in: Nanocon2010 czech republic, 12-14 October.

     

     

    List References

    [1] S. Iijima, Helical microtubules of graphitic carbon, Nature 354 (1991)56–68.

    [2] Qian D, Dickey EC, Andrews R, Rantell T. Load transfer and deformation mechanisms in carbon nanotube-polystyrene composites. Appl Phys Lett 2000; 76(20):2868–70.

    [3] Treacy MMJ, Ebbesen TW, Gibson JM. Exceptionally high young's modulus observed for individual nanotubes. Nature 1996; 381(6584):678–80.

    [4] Wong EW, Sheehan PE, Lieber CM. Nanobeam mechanics: elasticity, strength, and toughness of nanorods and nanotubes. Science 1997; 277(26):1971–5.

    [5] Yu MF, Lourie O, Dyer MJ, Moloni K, Kelly TF, Ruoff RS. Strength and breaking mechanism of multi-walled carbon nanotubes under tensile load. Science 2000; 287(28):637–40.

    [6] Krishnan A, Dujardin E, Ebbesen TW, Yianilos PN, Treacy MMJ. Young's modulus of single-walled nanotubes. Phys Rev B 1998; 58(20):14013–9.

    [7] Lu JP. Elastic properties of single and multilayered nanotubes. J Phys Chem Solids 1997; 58(11):1649–52. [8] Lu JP. Elastic properties of carbon nanotubes and nanoropes. Phys Rev Lett 1997; 79(7):1297–9.

    [9] Lier GV, Alsenoy CV, Doren VV, Geerlings P. Ab initio study of the elastic properties of single-walled carbon nanotubes and graphene. Chem Phys Lett 2000; 326:181–5.

    [10] Srivastava D, Menon M, Cho

    [10] Srivastava D, Menon M, Cho K. Nanoplasticity of single-wall carbon nanotubes under uniaxial compression. Phys Rev Lett 1999; 83(15):2973–6.

    [11] T. Belytschko, S. Xiao, G. Schatz, R. Ruoff, Atomistic simulations of nanotube fracture, Physical Review B 65 (25) (2002) 235430.

    [12] J.R. Xiao, B.A. Gama, J.W. Gillespie Jr., An analytical molecular structural mechanics model for the mechanical properties of carbon nanotubes, International Journal of Solids and Structures 42 (2005) 3075–3092.

    [13] X. Sun, W. Zhao, Prediction of stiffness and strength of single-walled carbon nanotubes by molecular-mechanics based finite element approach, Materials Science and Engineering 390 (2005) 366–371. [14] D.W. Brenner, Phys. Rev. B 42 (1990) 9458.

    [15] J. Tersoff, Phys. Rev. B 39 (1989) 5566.

    [16] M. Sammalkorpi, A. Krasheninnikov, A. Kuronen, K. Nordlund, K. Kaski, Phys. Rev. B 70 (2004) 245416.

    [17] Tersoff J. New empirical model for the structural properties of silicon. Phys Rev Lett 1986; 56:632–5.

    [18] Tersoff J. New empirical approach for the structure and energy of covalent systems. Phys Rev B 1988; 37:6991–7000. [19] Brenner DW. Empirical potential for hydrocarbons for use in simulating the chemical vapor deposition of diamond films. Phys Rev B 1990; 42:9458–71.

    [20] Lennard-Jones LE. The determination of molecular fields. I. From the variation for molecular simulation. Proc Roy Soc London 1924; 106A:441–62.

    [21] Mahmood M. Shokrieh, Roham Rafiee. Prediction of Young's modulus of graphene sheets and carbon nanotubes using nanoscale continuum mechanics approach. Tehran 2009; 16846-13114.

    [22] Li C, Chou T. A structural mechanics approach for the analysis of carbon nanotubes. Int J Solid Struct 2003;40:2487–99.

    [23] Kudin KN, Scuseria GE, Yakobson BI. C2F, BN, and C nanoshell elasticity from ab initio computations. Phys Rev B 2000;64(23):1–10 [Article ID 235406].

    [24] Reddy CD, Rajendran S, Liew KM. Equivalent continuum modeling of graphene sheets. Int J Nanosci 2005;4(4):631–6.

    [25] Kelly BT. Physics of graphite. London: Applied Science Press; 1981. [26] Toshiaki Natsuki, et al. Prediction of elastic properties for single walled carbon nanotube. Carbon 42(2004) 39-45.

    [27] Paras M. Agrawal, et al. A comparison of different methods of young modulus determination for single walled carbon nanotube using molecular dynamic simulation.  Computational Materials Science 38 (2006) 271–281.

    [28] B Jalalahmadi, R Naghdabadi. Finite element modeling of single-walled carbon nanotubes with introducing a new wall thickness. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 61 (2007) 497–502.

    [29] Gao X L and Li K 2003 Int. J. Solids Struct. 40 7329-37.

    [30] Yakobson B I, Brabec C J and Bernholc J 1996 Phys. Rev. Lett. 76 2511-4.

    [31] Zhou X, Zhou J J and Ou-Yang Z C 2000 Phys. Rev. B 62 13692–6.

    [32] Tu Z and Ou-Yang Z 2002 Phys. Rev. B 65 233407.

    [33] Pantano A, Parks DM and Boyce MC 2004 J. Mech. Phys. Solids 52 789-821.

    [34] Kudin K N, Scuseria G E and Yakobson B I 2001 Phys. Rev. B 64 235406. [35] Lu J P 1997 Phys. Rev. Lett. 79 1297–300.

    [36] Hernandez E, Goze C, Bernier P and Rubio A 1998 Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 4502–5.

    [37] Jin Y and Yuan F G 2003 Compos. Sci. Technol. 63 1507-15.

    [38] Meo M, Rossi M. Prediction of Young's modulus of single wall carbon nanotubes by molecular-mechanics based finite element modeling. Composites Science and Technology 66 (2006) 1597–1605.

    [39] Odegard G M, Gates T S, Nicholson L M and Wise K E 2002 Compos. Sci. Technol. 62 1869-80.

    [40] Chang T, Gao H. Size-dependent elastic properties of a single-walled carbon nanotube via a molecular mechanics model. J Mech Phys Solid 2003;51:1059–74.

    [41] Xiao JR, Gama BA, Gillespie Jr JW.

Stress analysis, estimation of behavior and elastic properties of carbon nanotubes under tensile loading