Optimal placement of SVC & TCSC devices in order to reduce losses in transmission systems using genetic algorithm

Number of pages: 81 File Format: word File Code: 32223
Year: 2014 University Degree: Master's degree Category: Electrical Engineering
  • Part of the Content
  • Contents & Resources
  • Summary of Optimal placement of SVC & TCSC devices in order to reduce losses in transmission systems using genetic algorithm

    Dissertation for Master's Degree (M.S)

    Power Electricity Trend

    Abstract

    With the ever-increasing expansion of energy consumption in the world, the development of power networks is essential. But the creation of new transmission lines requires time and high costs, so if it is possible to use the same lines with a higher transmission capacity, it is very cost-effective. Today, the power grid system is facing problems such as high-risk voltage instability and power losses. This phenomenon is caused by the lack of reactive power control in heavy operating conditions due to the increase in load demand and the development of power systems in the world. In general, the reactive power control problem can be investigated from two perspectives: load compensation and voltage support. For this purpose, in order to reduce the power loss of the whole system or voltage deviation as a goal, by calculating the optimal settings of reactive power output and terminal voltage of power plants, tap transformer and output settings of other compensating devices such as capacitor bank and synchronous generator are used. In this regard, the settings of FACTS flexible alternating current devices have been considered as added controllers so that by applying the parameters of the transmission system, we can see its effect on reducing transmission losses in the power system.  From the static models of compensators, two types of FACTS devices including: reactive power parallel compensator (SVC) and thyristor controlled series capacitor compensator (TCSC), are included in the problem solving formula. In this thesis, by optimal placement of these devices in the power network by genetic algorithm, by controlling reactive power, it will be helped to reduce the losses as much as possible and increase the energy transfer capacity in the lines, and at the end, this will be proven by simulating the test network of 6 and 24 bus IEEE and placing FACTS tools in it.

    Key words: FACTS tools, SVC, TCSC, placement, genetic algorithm. GA). rtl;"> Reactive power control and loss reduction index

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    1-1 Introduction

    One ??of the most important concerns of mankind today is energy supply. Energy is one of the main pillars of the economy, and electricity has a special place as the highest type of energy. Today, the production and consumption of electricity is considered as an indicator of the economic growth of societies and one of the criteria for measuring well-being. On the other hand, the decrease in oil and gas reserves and the increase in energy consumption in the world, on the other hand, prompted researchers to pay serious attention to the optimization of energy production and transmission in power networks in order to increase the efficiency and improve the efficiency of power plants, reduce losses and protect the environment. Along these lines, in recent years, with the expansion of the power electronics industry, flexible alternating current transmission systems (FACTS[1]) and due to their many capabilities and wide applications, were quickly used in power transmission networks and created a change in transmission systems so that it provides the possibility of improving electric current transmission. The technology of these systems provides a higher speed than old electronic devices. The choice of FACTS devices is used to control the reactive power of the system to control the voltage in the load buses. Many studies show that the technology of FACTS devices, by maintaining the voltage profile and affecting the transmission parameters, increases the transmission capacity and reduces the power system losses, and reduces the load density of the lines, improves reliability, and increases performance and control. In recent years, controlling the reactive power and reducing losses in power systems through the optimal placement of FACTS devices It is done using different smart algorithms. Genetic Algorithm (GA[2]) is one of the search techniques in computer science to find an approximate solution for optimization and search problems.

    1-2 Flexible alternating current transmission systems FACTS

    (power system) extended and continuous. .  It can be said that the power system is the most complex tool of human construction today. One of the main components of the systems is transmission lines.  The task of these electric transmission lines is from power plants to consumption centers. It is obvious that transmission lines must have high reliability and efficiency and low losses. On the other hand, the consumption of electrical energy is increasing day by day and the need for power transmission is felt. Therefore, either new transmission lines should be built or the existing lines should be equipped to enable more use at the lowest cost. Besides, in some cases, the construction of new transmission lines is difficult and sometimes impossible due to natural problems and environmental conditions and huge costs, and we have to make maximum use of the existing lines [5]. FACTS equipment was first presented by [3] EPRI in 1990 in America [6]. These equipments are devices that, in addition to increasing the system's load capacity, bring the power under control to a great extent, and with their high speed, they are able to improve the system's stability [7]. rtl;"> 

     

     

    Among the most important and widely used FACTS tools, the following can be mentioned [9,10] [:

    Reactive static power compensator [4] SVC

    Series capacitor controller with thyristor TCSC[5]

    Integrated power controller UPFC[6]

    Static compensator STATCOM[7]

    Among the above, the first two items have been discussed in this thesis. , SVC TCSC are very similar in structure. SVC is connected in parallel to the line by a step-down transformer [11], but TCSC are placed in series in the line. Since the price of this equipment is almost high, the use of these devices is still not very common and it is expected that the prices will decrease and the field of using this equipment in the transmission system will increase. is, locating and determining their capacity. So that they are optimal both economically and in terms of influence. The methods used depend on the desired goal.

    1-3 Genetic Algorithm (GA)

    Genetic algorithms are algorithms that work based on natural evolution and survival of the fittest. And in evolutionary calculations, it is abstractly inspired from the basic concepts of natural evolution in the search to find different optimal solutions. Genetic Algorithm is one of the principles of Darwin's natural selection used to find the optimal formula to predict or match the pattern. Genetic algorithms are often a good option for prediction techniques based on chance. Briefly, it is said that genetic algorithm (GA) is a programming technique that uses genetic evolution as a problem-solving model.

    In the 1970s, a scientist from the University of Michigan named John Holland in his book called (Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems), proposed the idea of ??using genetic algorithms in engineering optimization. The basic idea of ??this algorithm is the transmission of hereditary characteristics by genes. In this algorithm (GA), the problem to be solved is the input, and the solutions are coded according to a pattern (binary, real), which is called the fitness function.  The fitting function evaluates candidates, most of which are randomly selected, and consists of the following parts: fitting function, display, selection and change (crossover, mutation).

  • Contents & References of Optimal placement of SVC & TCSC devices in order to reduce losses in transmission systems using genetic algorithm

    List:

    Page

    Abstract.. 1

    The first chapter is an overview of FACTS tools and genetic algorithm and the definition of loss reduction index. 2. Introduction 1-1. 3. 1-2 FACTCS flexible alternating current transmission systems. 4

    1-3 Genetic Algorithm. 6

    1-4 Definition of loss index. 7

    1-4-1 Calculation of loss index. 8

    The second chapter of FACTCS alternating current flexible transmission systems. 10

    2-1 Introduction. 11

    2-2 static reactive power compensator. 13

    2-2-1 thyristor-controlled reactor TCR. 15

    2-2-2 SVC equivalent circuit. 23

    2-2-3 SVC control and limits. 24

    2-2-4 behavior of SVCs in small disturbances. 26

    2-2-5 The effect of SVC in increasing the power transfer limit. 27

    2-3 TCSC dynamic model and its generated harmonics. 29

    The third chapter, determining the location and size of TCSC and SVC devices with genetic algorithm (GA). 35

    3-1 Introduction. 36

    3-2 TCSC and SVC modeling. 37

    3-3 Advantages of using FACTS equipment. 37

    3-4 TCSC modeling. 38

    3-5 SVC modeling. 40

    3-6 degrees of parallel compensation (Kd). 42

    Title

    3-7 Loss minimization objective function. 43

    3-8 Optimal placement algorithm with real genetic coding. 44

    3-9 Algorithm for placement of TCSC and SVC in the system. 45

     

    The fourth chapter of simulation results. 46

    4-1 Introduction. 47

    4-2 The results of the 6-shin sample system. 47

    4-3 Checking the loss reduction index in the system with 6 buses. . 48

    4-3-1 Investigating the loss reduction index in the system with 6 buses without installing tools. 48

    4-3-2 Investigating loss reduction index by installing SVC in the system with 6 buses. 48

    4-3-3 Investigating loss reduction index by installing TCSC in the system with 6 buses. 48

    4-3-4 Checking the loss reduction index with the combined installation of SVC and TCSC in the system with 6 buses. 49

    4-4 Results for the system with 24 buses. 51

    4-4 Checking the loss reduction index in the 24 bus system. 53

    4-4-1 Investigating the loss reduction index in the 24-bus system without installing tools. 53

    4-4-2 Investigating loss reduction index in 24 bus IEEE system with SVC installation. 53

    4-4-3 Investigating loss reduction index in IEEE 24-bus system with TCSC installation. 53

    4-4-4 Investigating the loss reduction index in the 24-bus system with the combined installation of TCSC and SVC in the IEEE 24-bus system. 54

     

    The fifth chapter. Conclusions and suggestions. 59

    5-1 Conclusion. 60

    5-2 Proposals. 60

    References. 61

    Appendices. 64

    ABSTRACT.

    Source:

     

    [1] Karami, M.; Mariun, N.; Ab Kadir, M.Z.A. Determining optimal location of StaticVar Compensator by means of genetic algorithm, pp. 172-177, IEEE, 2011.

    [2] MadhusudhanaRao, G. Ramarao, P.V. ; Kumar, T.J. Optimal location of TCSC and SVC for enhancement of ATC in a de-regulated environment using RGA, International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Computing Research (ICCIC), 2010 IEEE.

    [3] H. Farahmand, M. Rashidi-Nejad and M. Fotuhi-Firoozabad Implementation of FACTS Devices for ATC Enhancement Using RPF Technique, Power Engineering Large Engineering systems Conference (LESCOPE), IEEE, 2004.

    [4] Etemad, Reza Navabi, Reza Shayanfar, Heidar Ali, Optimal location and setting of TCSC under single line contingency using Mixed Integer Nonlinear Programming, 9th International Conference on Environment and Electrical Engineering (EEEIC), 2010 IEEE.

    [5] D. Marakutulam, editor, Pros. FACTS Conference I-The Future In High Voltage Transmission, TR-100504, EPRI, March 1992.

    [6] Z.T.Faure,"Effects of FACTS devices on static voltage collapse phenomena Master's Thesis,University of Waterloo,1996.

    [7] T.J.Overbye, D.Btown,"Use of FACTS devices for power system stabilityenhancement",Proceeding of the IEEE 36th Midwest Symposium on Circuit and Systems, USA, pp.1936-1019, 1993.

    [8] F.D.Galiana et al.,"Assessment and control of the impact of,"Assessment and control of the impact of FACTS devices on power system performance",IEEE Trans on Power System,Vol.11,No.4,pp.158-165,November 1996.

    [9] G.K.Morison, P.Kundure,"Voltage stability analysis using static and dynamic approaches",IEEE Trans.Power Systems,Vol.8,No.3,pp.1159-1172.

    [10] L.Gyugyi,"Dynamic compensation of ac transmission lines by solid-state synchronous voltage source",IEEE Trans on Power Delivery,Vol.9,No.2,pp.904-911,April 1994.

    [11] "Static Var Compensators",technical report of task force 2,CIGRUE,1986.

    [12] Laszlo Gyugyi,"Power electronics in electric utilities :static var compensators",Proc.of the IEEE,Vol.76,No.4,pp.483-494,April 1988.

    [13] Claudio A.Canizraes,Zeno T. Faur,"using FACTS controller to maximize pp.158-165,February 1999.

    [14] H.F.Wang,F.J.swift,"A unified model for the analysis of FACTS devices in damping power systems oscillations Part I :single machine infinite-bus power system",IEEE Trans.Power Delivery,Vol.12,No.2,pp.941-946,April 1997.

    [15] A.T.Johns,U.H.Song,"Flexible ac transmissions system(FACTS)",IEEE Power and energy,London,T.J International Ltd,1999.

    [16] J.F.Gronquist et al,"Power oscillation damping control strategies for FACTS devices using locally measurable quantities",IEEE Trans.Power Systems Vol.10,No.3,pp.1598-1605,August 1995.

    [17] M.Moghavvemi,M.O.Faruqe,"Effects of FACTS devices on static voltagestability",IEEE,2000.

    [18] Hingorani,N.G.,"High power electronics in ac transmission systems",International Symposium on Electrical Energy Conversion in Power Systems,Invated paper,No.TIP.4,Capri,Italy,1989.

    [19]Mathur,R.M.(Ed),"Static compensators for reactive power control",Canadian Electrical Association,1984.

    [20] Roland Priemer,"Introductory Signal Processing", World Scientific, 1991.

    [21] Reactive power control in electrical systems, authored by T. J. E. Miller, translated by Reza Ghazi, Mashhad University Press.

Optimal placement of SVC & TCSC devices in order to reduce losses in transmission systems using genetic algorithm