Contents & References of Laboratory comparison of different microleakage evaluation methods in class five composite resin restorations
List:
Title.. page
Persian abstract .. 1
Chapter one: Introduction and review of articles
Introduction.. 4
Composite resins.. 6
Physical properties of composite resin. 7
Application features of composite resins. 9
Optical properties of composite resins. 10
Normal composites.. 12
Microfil composites.. 13
Hybrid composites.. 14
Silanable composites.. 14
Condensable composites.. 15
Nanofil composites.. 16
Adhesion to enamel and dentine.. 17
Challenges in adhesion to dentine. 19
Classification of adhesives.. 22
Etch & Rinse adhesives or Total H. 22
Etch & rinse three-step versus two-step adhesives. 25
Self-etch adhesives.. 26
The first generation of bonding materials.. 31
The second generation of bonding materials.. 33
The third generation of bonding materials.. 34
The fourth generation of bonding materials. 36
The fifth generation of bonding materials. 37
The sixth generation of bonding materials. 38
The seventh generation of bonding materials. 39
Using adhesive resin.. 40
Micro leakage.. 41
Types of laboratory methods to check micro leakage. 44
Review of the articles.. 48
Statement of the problem.. 56
General objective.. 56
Specific objectives.. 56
Chapter two: materials and methods
Materials and methods.. 58
Selection and preparation of samples.. 60
Performing evaluation methods Micro leakage.. 63
Variables.. 71
Data analysis method.. 72
Chapter three: findings
Findings.. 73
Part one.. 73
Part two: data analysis.. 75
Chapter four: discussion
Discussion..81
Chapter Five: Conclusions and Suggestions
Conclusions and Suggestions. 87
Resources..88
Abstract
Source:
Schwartz RB, Hilton TJ, et al. Bonding to enamel and dentin. Fundamentals of Operative Dentistry 2006; 3 th edition: Chapter 5.
Theodore M. Roberson, Harald O. Heymann, et al. Art and science of operative dentistry 2006; 5 th edition: Chapter 5.
Davidson CL, Abdolla AI. Effect of occlusal load cycling on the marginal integrity of adhesive class V restorations, Am J dent 1994; 7: 111-114.
Stansbury JW. Synthesis and evaluation of novel multifunctional oligomers for dentistry. J Dent Res 1992; 71: 434-437.
Leinfelder, KF Suzuki S. Invitro wear device for determining posterior composite wear. J Am Dent Assoc 1999; 130: 1347-1353.
Feilzer Aj, De Gee Aj, et al. Curing contraction of composites and glass-ionomer cements, J Prosthet Dent 1988; 59: 297-300.
Crim G, Chapman K. Effect of placement techniques on microleakage of dentin-bonded composite resin, Quintessence. Int. 1986; 17: 21-24.
Lutz F, Krejci I, et al. Quality and durability of marginal adaptation inbonded composite restorations, Dent Mater 1991; 7: 107-113.
Alster D, Feilzer AJ, et al. Aging affects two modes of nanoleakage expression in bonded dentin, J Dent Res 2003; 82: 537-541.
Craig RG. Restorative dental materials, ed 11. St. Louis: Mosby 2001.
Eick JD, Robinson SJ, et al. Adhesives and nonshrinking dental resins of the future, Quintessence Int 1993; 24: 632-640.
Levailoj C, Cochran MA, , et al. Microleakage of posterior packable resin composite with and without flawable liners, Oper Dent 2001; 26: 302-307.
Tjan AHL, Glancy JF. Effects of four lubricants used during increment insertion of two types of visible light-activated composites. J Prosthet Dent 1988; 60: 189-194.
Craig RG: Chemistry, composition, and properties of composite resins, Dent Clin North Am 1981; 25: 219. Heymann Ho, et al. Examination tooth flexure effects on cervical restorations: a two-year clinical study. J Am Dent Assoc 1991; 122: 44-47.
Degrange M, Roulet JF. Minimally Invasive Restorations with bonding. Chicago: Quintessence
Bouschlicher MR, Reinhardt JW, et al. Surface treatment techniques for resin composite repair, Am J Dent 1997; 10: 279-283.
Van Meerbeek B, Peumans M, et al. Clinical status of ten dentin adhesive systems. J Dent Res 1994; 73: 1690-1702.
Gaengler P. Hayer I, et al. Micromorphological evaluation of posterior composite restorations-a 10-year report. J Oral Rehabil 2004; 31: 991-1000.
Van Meerbeek B, Vargas M, et al. Adhesives and cements to promote preservation dentistry, Oper Dent 2001; Suppl 6: 119-144. Brannstrom M, et al. Movement of dentinal and pulpal fluid caused by clinical procedures, J Dent Res 47; 1968: 679-682.
Terkla LG, et al. Testing sealing properties of restorative materials against moist dentin, J Dent Res 1987; 66: 1758-1764.
Pashley DH. Dentin: a dynamic substrate - a review, scanning microsc 1989; 3: 161-176. Marchetti C, et al. Morphometric computerized analysis on the dentinal tubules and the collagen fibers in the dentin of human permanent teeth, Bull Group Int Rech Sci Stomatol Odontol 1992; 35: 125-129.
Tao L, et al. Pulpal pressure and bond strengths of super bond and Gluma, Am J Dent 1991; 4: 73-76.
Pashley DH, et al. Regional resistances to fluid flow in human dentin in vitro, Arch Oral Biol 1987; 23: 807-810. Sepetcioglu F, Ataman BA. Long-term monitoring of microleakage of cavity varnish and adhesive resin with amalgam, J Prosthet Dent 1998; 79: 136-139.
Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, et al. Microtensile bond strengths of an etch & rinse and self-etch adhesive to enamel and dentin as a function of surface treatment, Oper Dent 2003; 28: 647-660.
Van Meerbeek B, Conn LJ, et al. Correlative transmission electron microscopy examination of nondemineralized and demineralized resin-dentin interfaces formed by two dentin adhesive systems, J Dent Res 1996; 75: 879-888.
Sano H, Yoshiyama M, et al. Comparative SEM and TEM observations of nanoleakage with in the hybrid layer, Oper Dent 1995; 20: 160-167.
Van Meerbeek B, Yoshida Y, et al. A TEM study of two water-based adhesive systems bonded to dry and wet dentin, J Dent Res 1998; 77: 50-59.
Perdigao J, Ramos CJ, et al. In vitro interfacial relationship between human dentin and one-bottle dental adhesives, Dent Mater 1997; 13: 218-227.
Labella R, Van Meerbeek B, et al. Marginal gap distribution of two-step versus three-step adhesive systems, Trans Acad Dent Mat 1998; 12: 237.
Blunck V, Roulet J-F. Effect of one-bottle adhesives on the marginal adaptation of composite resins and compomers in class V cavities in vitro, J Dent Res 1998; 77: 910.
Inoue S, Vargas MA, et al. Microtensile bond strength of eleven contemporary adhesives to dentin, J Adhes Dent 2001; 3: 237-245.
Tay FR, Pashley DH. Have dentin adhesives become too hydrolytic. J Can Dent Assoc 2003; 69: 726-731.
Van Meerbeek B, Yoshida Y, et al. Bonding mechanism and micro-tensile bond strength of a 4-MET based self-etching adhesive, J Dent Res 2000; 76 (Special issue).
De Munck J, Vargas M, et al. One-day bonding effectiveness of new self-etch adhesives to bur-cut enamel and dentin, Oper Dent 2005; 30: 39-49.
Inoue S, Vargas MA, et al. Microtensile bond strength of eleven contemporary adhesives to enamel, Am J Dent 2003; 16: 329-334. Yoshida Y, Nagakane K, et al. Comparative study on adhesive performance of functional monomers, J Dent Res 2004; 83: 454-458.
Sano H, Yoshikawa T, et al. Long-term durability of dentin bonds made with a self-etching primer, J Dent Res 1999; 78: 906-911.
Fritz VB. Finger WJ. Bonding efficiency of single bottle enamel/dentin adhesives. Am J Dent 1999; 12: 277-282.
Tay FR, Pashley DH, et al. Two modes of nanoleakage expression in single-step adhesives, J Dent Res 2002; 81: 472-476.
Van Landuyt K, De Munck J, et al.