Comparison of electron transfer of choline oxidase enzyme by three types of carbon nanotubes

Number of pages: 88 File Format: word File Code: 32080
Year: 2012 University Degree: Master's degree Category: Paramedical
  • Part of the Content
  • Contents & Resources
  • Summary of Comparison of electron transfer of choline oxidase enzyme by three types of carbon nanotubes

    Dissertation to receive a master's degree in the field of medical nanotechnology

    Abstract

    Choline is one of the components of phospholipids and plays an important role in fat metabolism. It is also necessary for the formation of acetylcholine, which is involved in the transmission of nerve impulses. Lack or increase of choline in the body causes complications and diseases in humans; Therefore, it seems necessary to detect its amount in the body. To detect choline, electrochemical biosensors based on choline oxidase enzyme are often used. Since the redox group of the enzyme is buried inside it, to make an electrochemical sensor using it, electrodes modified with factors such as carbon nanotubes/ionic liquid composites should be used. In this research, three types of bamboo-like, multi-walled and single-walled carbon nanotubes were used for this purpose and the results were compared. The ionic liquid used was 1-allyl 3-methylimidazolium bromide.

    Electrochemical parameters, including the apparent electron transfer constant ks, were obtained by cyclic voltammetry. The value of ks for bamboo-like, multi-walled and single-walled nanotubes was 23.11 s-1, 1.75 s-1 and 1.49 s-1, respectively. In the next step, the analytical parameters of the biosensor for choline detection were obtained. The detection limit for biosensors made with bamboo-like, multi-walled and single-walled carbon nanotubes was 0.28 Mµ, 3.08 Mµ and 1.97 Mµ, respectively. The linear range of these three designed biosensors is respectively 1-10×0.7-3-10×2.1 mM for Bombo nanotubes, 1-10×8.2-2-10×2.1 mM and 1-10×3-1-10×3.1 mM for multi-walled nanotubes and 1-10×9.5-1-10×9.1 mM and 2-10×4.6-2-10×2.1 was obtained for single-walled nanotubes. The sensitivity of these three biosensors was calculated as 294 ?A/mM.cm2 for Bombo, 51.67 ?A/mM.cm2 and 136.276/mM.cm2 for multi-walled nanotubes and 45.226.?A/mM.cm2 and 56.213.?A/mM.cm for single-walled nanotubes. The results showed that the biosensor designed using Bombo-like carbon nanotube has better electrocatalytic activity and direct electron transfer.

    Key words

    Carbon nanotube, choline oxidase enzyme, ionic liquid and direct electron transfer

     

    1-1. Choline oxidase enzyme

    1-1-1. Enzyme introduction

    Choline oxidase enzyme is one of the types of oxidoreductase enzymes. Oxidoreductases, which constitute about 25% of known enzymes, play an important role in the metabolism of living cells. This group of enzymes includes all enzymes that catalyze oxidation and reduction reactions. From the enzymes of this group, we can mention oxidases, peroxidases, dehydrogenases, catalase and many other enzymes [3]. The importance of studying oxidoreductases lies in the nature of the reactions they catalyze. In fact, because these enzymes catalyze difficult reactions, such as selective oxidation and reduction of organic molecules, they are of particular importance in the environmental field. In addition, since oxidoreductases are widely used in the synthesis of organic compounds, they have applications in pharmaceuticals [4-5]. Among oxidoreductases, oxidases are particularly important because they use oxygen as an oxidizing agent and do not need cofactors. The choline oxidase enzyme that is examined in this treatise is one of the types of oxidases.

    1-1-2. History

    Choline oxidase enzyme was first discovered in 1933 by Bernheim [1] in animal tissue [6]. Among animal tissues, choline oxidase is found mostly in mouse liver. This form of the enzyme was also found in the kidney, but not in the blood, muscle or heart [7]. In 1952, Kelly [2] proved the existence of the prosthetic group of flavin adenine dinucleotide (FAD) in this enzyme.. Despite the fact that the first samples of choline oxidase were extracted from animal tissues with great difficulty and impurities, later this enzyme was also obtained from other species of micro-organisms, including the extraction of the enzyme in 1977 from Arthrobacter [3] [8].

    1-1-3. Enzyme reaction

    choline oxidase enzyme catalyzes the oxidation reaction of choline to glycine betaine. For the first time in 1952, the presence of the flavin adenine dinucleotide (FAD) prosthetic group in this enzyme was proved. In fact, choline oxidase enzyme oxidizes the substrate with the help of its FAD prosthetic group. Choline oxidation is done in two stages; In the first step, by transferring the hydride ion (H- from choline to molecular oxygen, the substrate becomes an intermediate product (betaine aldehyde). In the next step, betaine aldehyde produces the final product betaine by transferring two more electrons. The overall scheme of this reaction is shown in the figure below [9]. Figure 1-1. Two-step oxidation reaction scheme of choline to glycine Betaine catalyzed by choline oxidase enzyme

    The active site of enzyme

    choline oxidase enzyme is in dimer form and there are two domains important for substrate and FAD binding. Meanwhile, the 23Ser sequence creates many interactions with the flavin. The active site of the enzyme is located between the flavin binding domain and a conserved loop structure.

     

     

    Figure 1-2. Schematic of the active site of choline oxidase enzyme

    1-1-5. The importance of the study

    The enzyme choline oxidase has received much attention due to its biotechnological and medical applications. The importance of studying this enzyme can be mentioned as follows:

    1) From a chemical point of view, the oxidation reaction catalyzed by choline oxidase enzyme is of particular importance. Because breaking the covalent carbon-hydrogen bond of the substrate without the presence of the enzyme is not energetically favorable [10]. Glycine betaine is a compatible dissolved substance that accumulates in the cytoplasm of pathogenic bacteria and plants cells and causes them to resist osmotic pressure and heat stress. This reaction is very important in biotechnology and medicine, because it prevents dehydration and cell death of plants and pathogenic bacteria [11]. The study of choline oxidase enzyme is of great interest in the field of genetic engineering, especially during osmotic stress; Because in this way, the effective factors that increase the synthesis of this enzyme in cultivated plants such as rice and potatoes can be identified and used, which is very important from an economic point of view.

    3) Chaperones are proteins that maintain the real structure of proteins, and glycine betaine is one of these proteins [12]. Glycine betaine protects the translation and transcription machinery by reducing the melting temperature of two DNA strands [13].

    4) Another application of this enzyme is the measurement of organic phosphorus substances. These substances are increasingly used as insecticides, pesticides and chemical warfare agents. Organic phosphorus inhibits the choline oxidase enzyme. Based on this, biosensors for measuring organic phosphorus substances can be made based on the inhibition of choline oxidase enzyme [14].

    5) Another clinical application of choline oxidase is its use in making enzyme biosensors for choline measurement [15]. Choline is found abundantly in nature in free form, acetylcholine or in more complex compounds such as phospholipids and their metabolic intermediates. This substance is a necessary and complementary part of lestin, which exists in all plant and animal cells. Choline in unsupplemented diets is also mainly in the form of lecithin, less than 10% of which is released in free form or in the combination of sphingomyelin [15].

  • Contents & References of Comparison of electron transfer of choline oxidase enzyme by three types of carbon nanotubes

    List:

    First chapter 1

    1-1. Choline oxidase enzyme 2

    1-1-1. Enzyme introduction. 2

    1-1-2. History. 2

    1-1-3. Enzymatic reaction. 3

    1-1-4. The active site of the enzyme. 3

    1-1-5. Importance of study. 4

    1-2. Biosensor 7

    1-2-1. first generation 8

    1-2-2. second generation 9

    1-2-3. The third generation. 10

    1-3. Electrochemical techniques 10

    1-3-1. Voltammetry or amperometry. 10

    1-3-2. Cyclic voltammetry. 11

    1-3-3. Chronoamperometry. 12

    1-4. Carbon nanotubes 13

    1-4-1. introduction 13

    1-4-2. Structure. 13

    1-4-3. Special properties of carbon nanotubes. 14

    1-4-4. Types of carbon nanotubes. 15

    1-4-5. Synthesis of carbon nanotubes. 19

    1-4-5-1. electric arc 19

    1-4-5-2. Laser abrasion. 20

    1-4-5-3. Chemical vapor deposition. 21

    1-4-6. Purification of carbon nanotubes 23

    1-4-6-1. Oxidation. 23

    1-4-6-2. acid work 24

    1-4-6-3. Annealing. 24

    1-4-6-4. Using ultrasonic vibrations. 24

    1-4-6-5. Magnetic filtration. 25

    1-4-6-6. Microfiltration. 25

    1-4-7. Functionalization of carbon nanotubes 25

    1-4-7-1. The necessity of functionalizing nanotubes and its methods. 26

    1-4-7-2. Methods of verifying the functionalization of nanotubes 27

    1-4-7-2-1. Raman spectroscopy. 27

    1-4-7-2-2. FT-IR spectroscopy. 30

    1-5. Using ionic liquids as stabilizers 31

    1-6. The purpose of the research: 34

    Chapter Two. 36

    Materials and methods 36

    2-1. Material. 37

    2-2. Equipment and devices: 38

    2-3-1. Functionalization of nanotubes 39

    2-3-2. Preparation of carbon nanotube suspension. 40

    2-3-3. Electrode preparation. 40

    2-3-4. Stabilization method. 41

    2-3-5. Voltammetry studies of protein film 41

    2-3-6. Measurement of enzyme activity 42

    2-3-7. Preparation of electron microscope images 43

    Chapter three. 44

    Results. 44

    3-1. The degree of functionalization of nanotubes 45

    3-2. Surface morphology of electrodes modified with nanotubes 50

    3-3. Direct electron transfer of enzyme on modified electrodes with nanotubes 55

    3-4. The reversibility of the oxidation reaction and enzyme reduction 57

    3-5. The amount of electroactive enzyme on electrodes modified with nanotubes 57

    3-6. Effective stabilization of enzyme on carbon nanotubes 58

    3-7. Electron transfer rate of enzyme immobilized on nanotube and ionic liquid 61

    3-8. Electrocatalytic activity of enzyme on electrodes modified with carbon nanotubes 63

    Chapter IV. 66

    Discussion and suggestions. 66

    4-1. Functionalization of nanotubes 67

    4-2. Comparison of analytical parameters of sensors designed with three types of carbon nanotubes 69

    4-2-1. Linear range. 70

    4-2-2. sensitivity 71

    4-2-3. Detection limit. 72

    4-3. Comparison of enzyme electron transfer 72

    4-3-1. The amount of electroactive enzyme immobilized on carbon nanotubes. 73

    4-3-2. Electron apparent speed constant (ks) 74

    4-3-3. Comparison of formal potential changes in three types of biosensors. 75

    4-4. Conclusion 77

     

     

     

     

    Source:

    1.         M. Daenen, R.D.d.F, B. Hamers, P.G.A. Janssen, The Wondrous World of Carbon Nanotubes. Eindhoven University of Technology, 2003.

    2.         Chaplin, M., What are biosensors? Faculty of Engineering, Science and the Built Environment, December 20, 2004.

    3.         Sharareh Sajjadia, H.-A.R.-P., Parvaneh Rahimib, Hedayatollah and A.-H.K. Ghourchianb, Electrochemistry and Electrocatalysis of Choline Oxidase Based on Ionic-liquid/NH2-MWCNTs Nano-composite. 2011.

    4.         Niyogi, S., et al., Chemistry of single-walled carbon nanotubes. Accounts of chemical research, 2002. 35(12): p. 1105-1113.

    5.         S. Lutz-Wahl, et al., Performance of d-amino acid oxidase in the presence of ionic liquids, Journal of Biotechnology, 2006. 124(1): p.

    6.         Bernheim, F. and M.L.C. Bernheim, Oxidation of acetylcholine by tissues. American Journal of Physiology-Legacy Content, 1933. 104(2): p. 438.

    7.         Bernheim, F. and M.L.C. Bernheim, The choline oxidase of liver. American Journal of Physiology-Legacy Content, 1937. 121(1): p. 55.

    8.         IKUTA, S., et al., Purification and characterization of choline oxidase from Arthrobacter globiformis. Journal of Biochemistry, 1977. 82(6): p. 1741.

    9.         F. Fan, a.G.G., An internal equilibrium preorganizes the enzyme-substrate complex for hydride tunneling in choline oxidase. Biochemistry, 2007. 46: p. 6402-6408.

    10.       Northrop, D.B., Enzymatic mechanisms. Vol. 27. 1999: iOS Pr Inc.

    11.       Umezawa, T., et al., Engineering drought tolerance in plants: discovering and tailoring genes to unlock the future. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 2006. 17(2): p. 113-122.

    12.       Sharma, P. and R. Shanker Dubey, Modulation of nitrate reductase activity in rice seedlings under aluminum toxicity and water stress: role of osmolytes as enzyme protector. Journal of plant physiology, 2005. 162(8): p. 854-864.

    13.       Hoffmann, Vitamin Nutrition for poultry Chapter 15 "choline" Animal Health and Nutrition 1989: La Roche-Inc.

    14.       Zhang, S., H. Zhao, and R. John, Development of a quantitative relationship between inhibition percentage and both incubation time and inhibitor concentration for inhibition biosensors-theoretical and practical considerations. Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 2001. 16(9-12): p. 1119-1126.

    15.       Cremisini, C., et al., Evaluation of the use of free and immobilized acetylcholinesterase for paraoxon detection with an amperometric choline oxidase based biosensor. Analytica Chimica Acta, 1995. 311(3): p. 273-280.

    16.       McDonald, P., J. Greenhalgh, and C. Morgan, Animal nutrition. 2002: Addison-Wesley Longman Ltd.

    17.       Workel, H., et al., Choline-The rediscovered vitamin. Poultry International, 1999. 38: p. 44-47.

    18.       Kidd, M., P. Ferket, and J. Garlich, Nutritional and osmoregulatory functions of betaine. World's Poultry Science Journal, 1997. 53(2): p. 125-140.

    19.       Griffiths, D. and G. Hall, Biosensors-what real progress is being made? Trends in biotechnology, 1993. 11(4): p. 122-130.

    20.       Turner, A.P.F., I. Karube, and G.S. Wilson, Biosensors: fundamentals and applications. 1987: Oxford University Press, USA.

    21.       Clark, L.C., The enzyme electrode. Biosensors: Fundamentals and Applications, 1987. 1: p. 3-12.

    22.       Turner, M.F.C.a.A.P.F., The realization of electron transfer from biological molecules to electrodes Biosensors: Fundamentals and Applications, 1987. 15: p. 257-275.

    23.       Bartlett, P.N., The use of electrochemical in the study of modified electrodes Biosensors: Fundamentals and Applications, 1987. 13 p. 211-246.

    24.       Bartlett, P.N. and R.G. Whitaker, Strategies for the development of amperometric enzyme electrodes. Biosensors, 1988. 3(6): p. 359-379.

    25.       Bard, A.J. and L.R. Faulkner, Electrochemical Methods, Fundamentals and Applications, John Wiley & Sons. Inc., New York, 2001.

    26.       Van Benschoten, J.J., et al., Cyclic voltammetry experiment. Journal of Chemical Education, 1983. 60(9): p. 772.

    27.       Cranston, W.J.A.a.D.H., Amperometric enzyme electrodes. Biosensors: Fundamentals and Applications, 1987. 12: p. 180-210.

    28.       Ye, L., et al., High current density "wired" quinoprotein glucose dehydrogenase electrode. Analytical Chemistry, 1993. 65(3): p. 238-241.

    29.       Georgakilas, V., et al., Purification of HiPCO carbon nanotubes via organic functionalization. J Am Chem Soc, 2002. 124(48): p. 14318-9.

    30.       Heinze, T

Comparison of electron transfer of choline oxidase enzyme by three types of carbon nanotubes