Investigating functional barriers of intensive care units (ICU) from the point of view of nurses working in hospitals affiliated to Gilan University of Medical Sciences in 2013

Number of pages: 172 File Format: word File Code: 32072
Year: 2012 University Degree: Master's degree Category: Medical Sciences
  • Part of the Content
  • Contents & Resources
  • Summary of Investigating functional barriers of intensive care units (ICU) from the point of view of nurses working in hospitals affiliated to Gilan University of Medical Sciences in 2013

    Dissertation for obtaining a special nursing master's degree

    Abstract:

    Introduction:  The work environment of nurses working in intensive care units can have a major impact on the outcomes related to nurses as well as on patient safety.  Studying the factors in the working environment of nurses can provide useful and specific information for redesigning the work and thus improving the work of nurses and increasing patient safety. Functional barriers are factors related to the work environment that prevent special care nurses from providing care and performing their duties.

    Aim: The present study was conducted with the aim of determining and investigating functional barriers in care departments from the point of view of nurses, which covers all parts of the work system model, determining the relationship between different types of functional barriers and determining the relationship between individual-occupational characteristics and functional barriers.

    Materials and methods: This study was descriptive. The studied samples included all available nurses (130 people). This study was conducted in 10 special departments located in hospitals affiliated to Gilan University of Medical Sciences. The data obtained from the study were analyzed using multivariate statistical tests. Functional barriers reported by nurses and also the relationship between them were calculated.

    Results: The results of the study show that nurses working in intensive care units experience a wide range of functional barriers, which cover all parts of the work system model. The most common functional barriers experienced include: Lack of tools and equipment in the department (50%), forced to use worn out tools and equipment (49.6%), failure to provide sufficient information about patients from the doctor (41.5%), talking too much on the phone of the patient's family (37.7%), inadequately equipping the beds or rooms assigned to the nurse (33.8%), spending too much time for inter-departmental coordination in the hospital (32.3%), malfunctioning due to the excessive presence of the family The patient (25.4%), disorderly placement of equipment in the ward (24.6%), prolongation of shift delivery due to providing information with unnecessary details (20.8%), spending significant time to educate patients and their families (20%) and lack of medicines needed by the patient in the ward (19.2%).   .                                                                                                                                      

    Conclusion: functional barriers cover all parts of the work system model (environment, organization, technology and equipment and tasks).  Nurses working in intensive care units experience a wide range of functional barriers. Future research should be done on the impact of these obstacles on the workload of nurses, the quality of their work life, the quality and safety of the care provided, and also on the system of special departments to remove these obstacles.

    Keywords: Special care, special care nurse, functional barriers, working environment

    Statement of the problem:

    The term special care includes a series of activities that are carried out in the form of providing continuous, accurate and dedicated care by a skilled care team and using advanced equipment and facilities (1). Studies have shown that providing care to patients hospitalized in special departments who are in critical situations has been able to reduce irreversible outcomes or mortality by 60% (2). The skill and experience of special nurses, which is the result of their work experience in the special care department and performing many complex treatment processes and interventions, and their ability to respond to potential issues and problems of critically ill patients with complex problems during admission or during hospitalization, adds to the quality of care in these departments (3). This shows the importance of the key role of nurses working in these departments in order to provide and maintain the recovery of sick patients hospitalized in the special department (4).Therefore, in many cases, their immediate unavailability at the bedside of patients, or the lack of the number of these nurses, who are also a source of information and support for nurses and doctors with less experience, increases the risks and deaths caused by potential and irreparable complications in them (3).

    Abi[1], during a study he conducted on ensuring the quality of care in the special department, states that special department nurses spend almost two-thirds of their time on care. directly and the rest of it is spent on indirect care of the patient (5). Gliss [2] considers direct nursing care to be the care that is performed at the patient's bedside, such as: feeding, changing position, massage, exercise, etc. Also, indirect care refers to matters such as: preparing medicine, recording information, establishing business relationships, accompanying visitors, etc., which are done away from the patient's bedside (6). Since the method of division of work in special departments is the case method [3] and in the case method, each nurse is responsible for providing all nursing care (direct and indirect), so in many cases, irreparable consequences can be the result of disruption in the performance of nurses due to the simultaneous provision of direct and indirect care (7, 6). Another important point is that the direct care that special department nurses provide to patients is used to predict the allocation of labor. On the same basis, Buchen [4] suggests that paying attention to the nursing workforce is a method of guaranteeing the quality of care in the health care system. Therefore, it is better to examine the quality of care with patient-related outcomes in acute care units.

    Approaching the nature of the special department and the patients admitted in it, it can be said that there are many situations in the special department that are associated with work pressure on nurses (8). Employees of special departments, in order to provide care that includes a series of multifaceted activities, are constantly faced with a large amount of information, multiplicity of tasks, time limit and interventions of others (9). Special department nurses, in order to provide care services that are always performed with the aim of maintaining the function of critical body systems of critically ill patients, on the one hand, they must investigate, separate and resolve a complex network of factors that cause imagined and unimagined outcomes in patients. And on the other hand, at the same time, they should provide clear and correct information to clients and their families who are facing mental tensions and actually interact with their most intense emotional angles, which is indicative of their workload (10, 8, 4). Decision making and problem solving should be low. Interference between time limits and the extent of job expectations and tasks leads to stress in care providers and as a result increase the workload and subsequently reduce the quality of patient care. These factors cause patient and staff dissatisfaction (11). French [6] and his colleagues also found in a study that workload is the most specific stress in the work environment and a higher level of stress is associated with a lower level of job satisfaction (12).

    The results of other studies conducted regarding the workload of nurses in special care departments indicate that in 28% of cases, nurses or employees working in these departments face heavy and intense workload. Heavy workload is considered as the biggest factor of occupational stress affecting the performance of special care nurses, which in 13% of cases causes adverse complications, including deaths due to the low quality of care provided (13). Therefore, the category of workload and manpower, as well as time limitations, insufficient supervision and support, chaos and generally stressful environment, which are part of the set of factors related to the work and work environment of the special care department, are important as influencing factors on issues related to patients and nurses of special departments (14).      

    Since the performance of professional nurses as providers of care services is related to the environment in which these actions are performed, the inappropriate conditions and facilities of the work environment can have adverse effects on the patient, his family and also the employees.

  • Contents & References of Investigating functional barriers of intensive care units (ICU) from the point of view of nurses working in hospitals affiliated to Gilan University of Medical Sciences in 2013

    List:

    Title

    1-1 Introduction (statement of the problem).

    1-4 scientific definitions of words.13 and 12

    1-5 practical definitions of words.13 and 12

    1-6 limitations of the research.13

    1-7 presuppositions..14

                    Chapter Two: background and research background

    2-1 research framework.16

    2-2 An overview of the studies carried out.38

                        Chapter Three: Research Implementation Method

    3-1 Research Method..61

    3-2 Type of Research..61

    3-3 Research Community..61

    3-4 Characteristics of Research Units.61

    3-5 Determining the Volume Sample..62

    3-6 research environment..62

    3-7 data collection tools.62

    3-8 validity and scientific reliability of tools.64

    3-9 data collection methods.66

    3-10 methods of statistical data analysis.66

    3-11 ethical considerations..68

    Chapter 4: Research results: 4-1 research findings. Final. 127

    3-5 application of findings..131

    4-5 suggestions for further research. Special care units. Scientific research journal of Ardabil University of Medical Sciences, 8th volume, 4th issue, winter 2017, pp: 420-423

    2-Takrouri MSM. Intensive care unit. The Internet Journal of Health, 2004; 3(2)            

    3- Taylor M., Odell M., Nursing care for critically ill patients. The intensive care society, 2011; 12(1); 10 4- Gurses A P., Carayon P., Performance obstacle of intensive care nurses. Nursing research, 2007; 56(3); 185-194

    5-Abbey M P., Understanding the work of intensive care nurses; a time and motion study. Thesis of master degree, School of nursing and midwifery, Griffith University, 2008

    6- Hosseini, M.M., principles of nursing service management. Tehran: Bushra Publications, 1387, first edition

    7- Yagoubian, M., Nursing and midwifery management, Tehran: Bushra Publications, 1376, first edition

    8- Gurses AP., Carayon P., Exploring performance obstacle of intensive care nurses.  Applied ergonomics, 2009; 40 ;509-518

    9- Zhang J,. Patel V. Shortliffe E., Shabot M., Rucker D., Cognition factors and decision making in critical care environment.  University of Texas Health Science Center, 2005

    10- Azoulay E ., Timsit j F., Sprung C L ., Soares M ., Rusinova K ., Lababrie A ., etal. Prevalence and factors of intensive care unit conflict. American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine, 2009;180; 853-860

    11-Kosnik L., Breakthrough Demand-Capacity Management Strategies to Improve Hospital Flow, Safety, and Satisfaction. IN: Hall R W., Patient Flow: Reducing Delay in Healthcare Delivery. Accessibe from url: http://www.springerlink.com

     

    12- French S E., Lenton R., Walters V., Eyles J., An empirical evaluation of an expanded nursing stress scale. Journal of nursing measurement, 2000; 8(2); 161-178

     

    13- Gurses A P., Performance obstacle and facilitators, workload, quality of working life, quality and safety of care among intensive care nurses. PHD dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 2005

    14-Unruh L., Nurse staffing and patient, nurse and financial outcome. AJN, 2008; 108; (1) 2-71

    15- Dixon JF., The American association of critical care: Standards for establishing and sustaining healthy work environments: off the printed, The American association of critical care: Nnrses standards for establishing and sustaining healthy work environments: off the printed page and into practice.  Critic care nurse,2008;20 ;393-401

    16-Almeddineh M., Dainty K., Deber R., Sibbald WJ., The intensive care unit work environment: Current challenges and recommendations for the future. Journal of critical care, 2009; 24; 243-248

    17- Scott L D., Rogers AE., Hwang W., Zhang Y., Effct of critical care nurses work hours on vigilance and patient safety.   American journal of critical care, 2006;15(1);  30-37

    18- Garroust MG., Timsit JF., Vesin UM., Schwebel C., Arnodo P., Lefrant JY., etal. Selected medical errors in the ICU: Result of the iatroref study. American thoracic society, 2009; Part 1,2

    19- Rothschild Jf., Landrigan CP., Cronin JW., Kaushal R., Lockley Sw., Burdick E., et al.  The critical care safety study: The incidence and nature of adverse events and serious medical errors in intensive care. Crit Care Med, 2005; 33(8)

    20- Kiekkas P., Sakellaropoulos GC., Borkalaki H., Manolis E., Samios A., Skartsani C., et al. Association between nursing workload and mortality of intensive care unit patients. Journal of nursing scholarship, 2008; 40(4); 385-390

    21-Anderson J., Improving patient safety through human factors engineering and usability testing. NCPS, 2011; 11(6)

     

    22- Carayon P ., Alvarado C J ., Workload and patient safety among critical care nurses. Critical care nursing of north America, 2007;19;121-129

    23-Hewson-conroy K M., Elliott D., Burrell AR., Quality and safety in intensive care – a means an end is critical.  Australian critical care, 2010

    24- Sousa P., Uva A., Serranherira F., Pinto F., Ovretveit J., Klazinga N., Sunol R., et al. The patient safety journey in Portugal: Challenges and opportunities from a public health perspective. Health promotion, 2009; 25

    25- Odendaal V., Support to critical care nursing personnel. SAJCC, 2005; 21(2); 95-99

     

    26- Mir Farhadi, Sayedeh Nastern. Investigating the role of life satisfaction factors in nurses working in educational-therapeutic centers of Rasht city in 2018-2019. Master's thesis, internal-surgery, Gilan University of Medical Sciences. 1389

    27-Rosseter R., A new role for nurses: Making room for clinical nurse leaders. The joint commission perspective on patient safety, 2009; 9(80)

    28-Carayon P., Hundt AS., Karsh B., Gurses AP., Alvarado CJ., et al. Work system design for patient safety: the SEIPS model. Qual saf health care, 2006;15;50-58

    29-Karsh BT., Holden RJ., Alper CK., A human factor engineering paradigm for patient safety. : designing to support the performance of the healthcare professional. Quality health care, 2006; 15(1)  59-65

    30-Tucker AL., The impact of operational failures on hospital nurses and their patients. Journal of operational management, 2004; 22; 151-169

    31- Treggiari MM ., Martin DP., Yanez ND., Caldwell E ., Hudson LD., Rubenfeld GD., Effect of Intensive Care Unit Organizational Model and Structure on Outcomes in Patients with Acute Lung Injury. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2007; 176; 685-690

    32-Intensive care society., Standards for intensive care units. Guideline; 1997

     

    33- Urden., Critical Care Nursing: Diagnosis and Management. 2009, mosby, 6th ed Saudi med J,2003;24(2);131-137

    35-College of intensive care medicine of Australia and New Zealand. Minimum standards for intensive care units. 2010

     

    36-Valentib A., Ferdinande P., et al.  Recommendations on basic requirements for intensive care units: structural and organizational aspects. Intensive care med, 2001; DOI 10.1007/s00134-011-2300-7

     

    37-Faye H., Carayon P., Karsh BT., Rivera J., Murray ME., Scanlon M.

Investigating functional barriers of intensive care units (ICU) from the point of view of nurses working in hospitals affiliated to Gilan University of Medical Sciences in 2013