Investigating the fracture resistance of endodontic teeth with different types of crown and root restorations

Number of pages: 89 File Format: word File Code: 32040
Year: 2013 University Degree: Master's degree Category: Medical Sciences
  • Part of the Content
  • Contents & Resources
  • Summary of Investigating the fracture resistance of endodontic teeth with different types of crown and root restorations

    Dissertation for receiving the degree of Doctor of Dentistry

    Dental Materials Research Center

    Abstract

    Aim: One of the objectives of this study was to investigate the resistance to fracture of teeth coated with various crown and root restorations.

    Materials and materials Methods: 60 freshly extracted human premolar teeth were selected and randomly divided into five groups of twelve. In 48 teeth, their crowns were cut 3 mm above the CEJ. Then the MOD cavities were cut to 3 mm dimensions in the buccolingual dimension and the gingival floor at the CEJ level. After the endodontic treatment, in the first group, pin number one of the same color as the tooth, approximately 8 mm long, was restored with Estelite Core Quick (Tokuyama) resin cement and the crown with Estelite Sigma Quick (Tokuyama) composite. In the second group, the root and crown were reconstructed with Tokuyama Bond Force adhesive and Estelite Sigma Quick light cure composite. In the third group, Master Dent (USA) self-cure composite and the adhesive included in its packaging were used for crown and root reconstruction. In the fourth group, Panavia F2.0 resin cement (Kuraray) was used to cement the posts, and the tooth crown was repaired with Clearfil AP-X composite (Kuraray). In the control group (group 5), the teeth remained intact. The samples were kept in distilled water at 37°C for 24 hours, then the samples were subjected to 1000 thermal cycles and mounted in acrylic resin. The samples were placed in the universal test machine at a speed of 1 mm per minute for the fracture resistance test. The values ??of fracture resistance and the mode of failure of the samples were recorded. The data were statistically analyzed with ANOVA, Tukey and Fisher's Exact tests (P < 0.05). Findings: The fourth group had the highest and the third group had the lowest resistance to failure. It was found that there is a significant difference in the average values ??of resistance to failure of the test groups (P<0.05). There were significant differences in the average values ??of fracture resistance between groups 4 and 5 with other experimental groups (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in fracture resistance of groups 1, 2, 3 (P>0.05).

    Conclusion: For root canal treatment teeth, root reconstruction with clear post and Panavia resin cement and making a crown with optical resin composite increased the fracture resistance of teeth to the level of healthy teeth.

    Keywords: fracture resistance, fiber Post, resin cement, resin composite

    First chapter

    Review of texts and articles

     

     
     
     

     

    Introduction

             Treatment of root-treated teeth whose crown structure has suffered severe destruction has always been considered. To restore such teeth, patients and dentists have been looking for a method that has more durability and survival and is exempt from exorbitant costs and complicated procedures. Today, many dentists prefer the use of prefabricated post systems because they are more practical, less expensive, and in some cases more conservative than cast posts and blinds.

    In severely degraded roots, an adhesively bonded fiber post may improve fracture toughness and provide better stress distribution and transfer, thus strengthening the tooth.

    Among the methods of restoring endodontic teeth, using post and blind casting, prefabricated posts, crown build-ups with the help of restorative materials such as amalgam, composite, etc. Of course, each has its advantages and disadvantages. Due to the wide use of this type of treatment, and considering that most of the canal filling material (gutta-percha) is drained to create the post space, and there is also the possibility of sub-canals, and the remaining gutta-percha in the apical part of the canal cannot provide the necessary flood for the canal, it is important and necessary to create a flood by means of post and blind materials and adhesive material.

    Bonding between cement and post is always one of the problems of cementing posts. It seems that by using a composite instead of a cemented post, one of the bonding interfaces is removed, and the bonding issue is only postponed to the adequacy of the bond between the teeth/adhesive/composite, and also the problem of high C-factor during cementing the posts is eliminated. If we imagine that actually one of the main causes of failure in restorative treatments is the reduction of tooth fracture resistance and restoration, so the purpose of this study is to investigate the fracture resistance of endodontic teeth with different methods of crown and root restoration. rtl;"> 

    general

    resin composite

            Composite is a physical mixture of different materials to obtain an average of the desired properties of these materials. Following efforts to improve the properties of unfilled acrylic resin, Bowen in 1962 developed a polymer restorative material reinforced with silica particles. This material became the basis for the materials that today are called composite resin and is the most common tooth-colored restorative material (1 and 2). Composite resins were introduced in 1960 as a combination of inorganic fillers (hard) bonded with dimethacrylate (soft) polymer. so that their physical characteristics were close to the characteristics of ivory and enamel. Their improvements include light curing, bonding to tooth components, reducing wear, and so on. and even their progress has led to the fact that they are now also used in posterior conservative restorations (2). Construction of composites. The components of today's composites include resin matrix (organic ground) or continuous phase, filler particles or dispersed phase (inorganic), bonding agents (intermediate layer) (Silan) and other factors (1 and 3). which we will examine:

    Organic part (Organic matrix=continuous phase)

    The organic matrix phase includes the following compounds:

    Monomer: The main monomer used in most composites is Bis, GMA
    It was introduced by Bowen in 1957, and from its polymerization, a cross-linked polymer is created, which is an exothermic reaction. Compared to acrylic resins, these polymers are harder and have less shrinkage. Another monomer used is UDMA, which is a modified version of Bis GMA. UPMA-Bis-GMA has a high molecular weight and therefore low fluidity at room temperature, so diluting monomers must be added to it.

    (b Diluent: To increase the fluidity of UDMA-Bis-GMA monomers, diluting monomers such as triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEG-DMA) and methyl acrylate (MMA) are added to them. Nowadays, in some composites, aromatic di Methacrylate is used as the main monomer, which has good fluidity and does not need a diluent (4 and 2). - Filler (Filler)

    It decreases (4.2). The type, size of particles, distribution rate, refractive index and hardness of filler are factors that affect the properties of the composite.

  • Contents & References of Investigating the fracture resistance of endodontic teeth with different types of crown and root restorations

    List:

    Title.. page

    Persian summary.. 1

    Chapter one: Review of texts and articles

    Introduction.. 2

    Overview.. 4

    Resin composite.. 4

    Construction of composites.. 5

    Classification of composites.. 8

    Properties of composites.. 10

    Mechanical properties.. 12

    Fiber post.. 14

    FRC post.. 15

    Advantages of FRC post.. 18

    Effective factors in choosing posts. 19

    Resin cements.. 26

    Uses.. 27

    Physical properties.. 29

    Dentin adhesive materials.. 35

    Fracture resistance.. 38

    Measurement of fracture resistance.. 40

    Chewing forces and stress.. 42

    A review of articles.. 43

    Chapter two: materials and methods

    Consumable materials.. 59

    Method of project implementation.. 60

    Chapter three: findings

    Findings.. 67

    Description of experimental groups.. 69

    Chapter four: discussion

    Discussion.. 74

    Chapter Five: Conclusion

    Conclusion.. 81

    Resources.. 82

    Abstract

    Source:

    References:

    Kugel G. Direct and indirect adhesive restorative materials: A review. Am J Dent 2000 Nov; 13: 35-40.

    Bowen RL. Properties of silica rein forced polymer for restorations. J Dent 1963 Jan; 66: 57-69.

    Kvilmann W. grondlagen zanhnaerziticher restoration skunstsoffe in: Kullman, atlas der zahnerhaltung mit glasionomer zemtenet and composit kunst offen; 1989.

    Roberson TM, Heymann HO, Swift EJ. Sturdevant, s art and sciences of operative dentistry. 5th ed. St Lovis: Mosby Inc.2007.

    Phillips RW. Skinner's science of dental materials. 9th ed. Philadelphia: WB Sanders; 1991.

    Alani AH, Toh CG. Detection of microleakage around dental restorations. Oper Dent. 1997 Jul-Aug; 22:173-185.

    Pilo R, Oelgiesser D, Cardash HS. A survey of output intensity and potential for depth of care among light curing units in clinical use. J Dent 1999 Mar; 27(3): 235-41.

    Yap AUG, Senviratine C. Influence of light energy density on effectiveness of composite care. Oper Dent. 2001 Sep-Oct; 26(5): 460-6.

    Mc Donald RE, Avery DR, Dean JA. Dentistry for the child and adolescent. 8th ed USA Patricia Taaniafl, 2004P: P 344-6.

    Sidu SK. The effect of acid-etched dentin on marginal seal. Quintessence Int. 1994 Nov;25(11):797-800.

    Ferracane JL. Current trends in dental composites. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 1995; 6(4):302-18.

    Chaung SF, Tin YT, Liu JK, Chang CH, Shieh DB. Influence of flowable composite lining thickness on class II composite restorations. Oper Dent. 2004 May-Jun; 29(3):301-8.

    Mitchell C. Dental Materials in Operative Dentistry. 1st ed. London: Quintessence Pub Co; 2008. P. l, l7, 18.

    Franca FM, Worschech CC, Paulillo LA, Martins LR, Lovadino JR. Fracture resistance of premolar teeth restored with different filling techniques. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2005 August; 6(3):62-9.

    Rees JS, Jagger DC, Williams DR, Brown G, Duguid W. A reappraisal of the incremental packing technique for light cured composite resins. J Oral Rehabil, 2004 Jan; 31(l): 81-4.

    Al-Boni R, Raja 0. Microleakage evaluation of silorane based versus methacrylate based composite. J Conserv Dent. 2010 Jul;13(3):152-5.

    Charton C, Colon P, Pla F. Shrinkage stress in light-cured composite resins: Influence of material and photoactivation mode. Dent Master 2007 Aug; 23(8):91 1-20.

    Belli S, Erdernir A, Ozcopur M, Eskitascioglu G. The effect of fiber insertion on fracture resistance of root filled molar teeth with MOD preparations restored with composite. Int Endod J. 2005 Feb;38(2):73-80.

    Donley KJ, Wild TW, Bowen RL, Jensen ME. An in vitro investigation of the effect of glass inserts on the effective composite resin polymerization shrinkage. J Dent Res. 1989 August; 68(8): 1234-7.

    Lazarchik DA, Hammond BD, Sikes CL, Looney SW, Rueggeberg FA. Hardness comparison ofHardness comparison of bulk-filled/transtooth and incremental filled/occlusally irradiated composite resins. J Prosthet Dent. 2007 August; 98(2): 129-40.

    El-Mowafy O, El-Badrawy W, Eltanty A, Abbasi K, Habib N. Gingival microleakage of class II resin composites with fiber inserts. Opera Dent. 2007 May-Jun; 32(3): 298-305.

    Hilton TJ, Broome JC. Direct Posterior Aesthetic Restorations. In: Sumitt JB, Hilton TJ, Schwartz RS. Fundamentals of Operative Dentistry: A Contemporary Approach. 3rd ed. London: Quintessence Pub Co; 2006. P. 297-8, 314, 317.

    Powers JM, Sakagushi RL. Editors. Craig's restorative dental i ed. St Louis: Mosby Co; 2006.p.l 90-192,194,198,5,63, 64.

    Sorensen & Martinoff. Type of posts Jurnal of Endodontic. J Prosthet Dent. 2004 May; 30(5): 289-301.

    Hornbrook D, Hasting RJ. Use of bondable reinforcement fiber for post and core build-up in an endodontically treated tooth. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent. 1995 Jun-Jul; 7(5): 33-42.

    Isador F, Odman P, Brondum K. Intermittent loading of teeth restored using prefabricated carbon fiber post. Intj prosthocont. 1996 Mar-Apr; 9(2): 131-6.

    King PA, Setchell KJ. An in vitro evaluation of a prototype CFRC prefabricated post developed for the restoration of pulpless teeth. J Oral rehabil. 1990 November; 17(6): 599-606. Karna JC. A fiber composite laminate endodontic post and core. Am J Dent 1996 Oct; 9(5): 230-237.

    Martinez-lnsua A. Comparison of fracture resistance of pulpless teeth restored with a cast post and core or carbon-fiber post with a composite core. J Prosthet Dent. 1998 November; 80(5):527-32.

    Nash RW. The use of posts for endodontically treated teeth. compend contin educ dent. 1998 October; l9(10):1054-6.

    Aquaviva S, Sharat S, Ivy C. Factors determining post selection: A literature review. J Prosth Dent 2003; 90(63): 556-62.

    Pilel M, Hicks N. Evolving technology in endodontic posts. Compend Contin Educe Dent. 2003 January; 24(1): 13-29.

    Hori S, Minami H, Minesaki Y, Matsumura H, Tanaka T. Effect of hydrofluoric acid etching on shear bond strength of an indirect resin composite to an adhesive cement. Dent Mater J. 2008 Jul; 27(4): 515-22.

    Piwowarczyk A, Bender R, Ottl P, Lauer HC. Long-term bond between dual polymerizing cementing agents and human hard dental tissue. Dent Mater. 2007 February; 23(2): 211-7.

    Piwowarczyk A, Lauer HC, Sorensen JA. Microleakage of various cementing agents for full cast crowns. Dent Mater. 2005 May; 21(5): 445-53.

    Mak YF, Lai SC, Cheung GS, Chan AW, Tay FR, Pashley DH. Microtensile bond testing of resin cements to dentin and an indirect resin composite. Dent Mater. 2002 December; 18(8): 609-621.

    Nikaido T, Nakaoki Y, Ogata M, Foxton R, Tagami J. The resin-coating technique. Effect of a single-step bonding system on dentin bond strength. J Adhes Dent. 2003 Winter; 5(4): 293-300.

    Sabbagh J. Vrene J. Ielou PG. Dynamic and static moduli of elasticity of resin based materials. Dent Mater. 2002 January; 18(1): 64-71.

    Smith DC, Ruse ND. Acidity of glass ionomer cements during setting and its relation to pulp sensitivity. J Am Dent Assoc. 1986 May; 112(5): 654-7.

    Truelove EL, Mitchell DF, Phillips RW. Biological evaluation of a carboxylate cement. J Dent Res. 1971 Jan-Feb; 50(1): 166.

    Schwartz RS, Robbins JW. Post placement and restoration of endodontically-treated teeth: a literature review. J Endod. 2004 May; 30(5): 289-301.

    Aksommuang J, Nakajima M, Foxton RM, Tagami J. Regional bond strength of four self-etching primer/adhesive systems to root canal dentin. Dent Mater J. 2005 Jun; 24(2): 261-7.

    Foxton RM, Nakajima M, Tagami J, Miura H. Bonding of photo and dual-cure adhesives to root canal dentin. Opera Dent. 2003 Sep-Oct; 28(5): 543-51.

    Pegoretti, A Fambri L, Zappini G, Bianchetti MFinite element analysis of a glass fiber reinforced composite endodontic post. Biomaterials.

Investigating the fracture resistance of endodontic teeth with different types of crown and root restorations