Contents & References of Investigating the effect of biofeedback therapy on the range of motion of hand joints in stroke patients
List:
The first chapter: Generalities of the research (1-1) Introduction. 1
(2-1) statement of the problem. 2
(3-1) The importance and necessity of research. 4
(4-1) Definition of concepts. 6
(1-4-1) biofeedback. 6
(2-4-1) stroke. 6
(3-4-1) range of motion of hand joints. 6
(4-4-1) cognitive status. 6
(5-4-1) daily functioning of life. 7
(6-4-1) The amount of spasticity muscle tone. 7
(1-5) research objectives. 7
(1-5-1) General purpose. 7
(2-5-1) Specific goals. 7
(3-5-1) practical goals. 8
(1-6) Questions and assumptions. 8
The second chapter: Theoretical scope and research background. 10
(1-2) Introduction. 10
(2-2) Definition of stroke. 10.
(3-2) etiology and prevalence. 11
(4-2) Causes of stroke. 12
(1-4-2) Ischemic stroke. 12
(2-4-2) hemorrhagic stroke. 12
(2-5) stroke symptoms. 13
(2-6) Consequences of stroke. 13
(1-6-2) Premature complications. 13
(2-2-6) Late complications. 13
(7-2) Prognosis. 14
(2-8) Effects and complications of stroke. 14
(1-8-2) cognitive problems. 14
(2-8-2) movement control disorders and muscle tone. 15
(2-9) Stroke treatment. 16
(10-2) Rehabilitation and occupational therapy in stroke. 16
(11-2) Treatments used in occupational therapy. 18
(1-11-2) Approach to neural development. 18
(2-11-2) Modality of Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES). 18
(3-11-2) Movement learning approach. 19
(4-11-2) Treatment by restricting movement. 19
(5-11-2) Robotic assisted treatments. 20
(6-11-2) Cognitive approach after stroke. 20
(7-11-2) adaptive-compensatory approach in rehabilitation after stroke. 21
(8-11-2) alternative and complementary approach. 21
(9-11-2) massage therapy. 22
(10-11-2) Acupuncture. 22
(11-2-11) Riki. 22
(12-11-2) Neurofeedback. 22
(13-11-2) Biofeedback. 23
(12-2) Definition of biofeedback. 26
(13-2) History of biofeedback. 27
(14-2) Application of biofeedback. 27
(15-2) Biofeedback mechanism of action. 28
(2-16) The effect of biofeedback on the function of the upper limb. 28
(17-2) Review of texts. 29
Chapter Three
(1-3) Introduction. 38
(2-3) Type of study. 38
(3-3) The investigated society. 38
(4-3) Entry criteria. 38
(3-5) Exit criteria. 39
(6-3) variable. 39
(1-6-3) stroke. 39
(2-6-3) Biofeedback device. 40
(3-6-3) range of motion of the wrist. 40
(4-6-3) spasticity. 41
(3-7) Data collection tools. 41
(1-7-3) Personal information questionnaire. 41
(2-7-3) Cognitive status questionnaire. 41
(3-7-3) Bartel questionnaire. 42
(4-7-3) Modified Ashworth test. 43
(5-7-3) goniometric assessment of joints. 43
(1-5-7-3) Evaluation of elbow extension range of motion. 43
(2-5-7-3) Evaluation of wrist extension range of motion. 43
(3-5-7-3) evaluation of the range of motion of finger extension. 44
(8-3) Data collection method. 44
(9-3) Implementation method. 44
(10-3) Data analysis method. 46
(11-3) Ethical considerations. 46
Chapter Four:
(1-4) Introduction. 48
(2-4) Descriptive data section. 49
(3-4) Data analysis. 56
The fifth chapter:
(1-5) Introduction. 61
(2-5) discussion and interpretation of findings. 61
(3-5) Research results. 61
(4-5) general conclusion. 66
(5-5) research limitations. 67
(6-5) Suggestions. 67
Source:
1. Steultjens, E.M., et al., Occupational therapy for stroke patients: a systematic review. Stroke, 2003. 34(3): p. 676-87.
2. Corr, S.J. and B. Antony, Occupational therapy for stroke patients after hospital discharge — a randomized controlled trial. Clinical Rehabilitation 1995. 9(4): p. 291-296.
3. Walker, M.F., et al., Individual patient data meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of community occupational therapy for stroke patients. Stroke, 2004. 35(9): p. 2226-32.
4. Giulianne, K. and Guy McCormack, Occupational Therapy: Evidence-Based Interventions for Stroke. 2009.
5. Maffetone, P., Introduction to annual Biofeedback
2009: p. Part 1 of a 3 Part Series.
6. Armagan, O., F. Tascioglu, and C. Oner, Electromyographic biofeedback in the treatment of the hemiplegic hand: a placebo-controlled study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil, 2003. 82(11): p. 856-61.
7. Glanz, M., S. Klawansky, and T. Chalmers, Biofeedback therapy in stroke rehabilitation: a review. J R Soc Med, 1997. 90(1): p. 33-9.
8. Nacht, M.B., S.L. Wolf, and C.E. Coogler, Use of electromyographic biofeedback during the acute phase of spinal cord injury: a case report. Phys Ther, 1982. 62(3): p. 290-4.
9. Mark, S.S. and F. Anfrasik, Biofeedback a practitioner's guide. , 2003, M. S. Schwartz and F. Andrasik: New York.
10. Wolf, S.L., Electromyographic biofeedback applications to stroke patients. A critical review. Phys Ther, 1983. 63(9): p. 1448-59.
11. Ramaprasad, A., On the definition of feedback. Behavioral Science, 1983. 28(1): p. 4-13.
12. Woodford, H., Price, E, EMG biofeedback for the recovery of motor function after stroke. 2007.
13. Nelson, L.A., The role of biofeedback in stroke rehabilitation: past and future directions. Top Stroke Rehabil, 2007. 14(4): p. 59-66.
14. Dursun, E., et al., Angular biofeedback device for sitting balance of stroke patients. Stroke, 1996. 27(8): p. 1354-7.
15. Wolf, S.L. and S.A. Binder-MacLeod, Electromyographic biofeedback applications to the hemiplegic patient. Changes in lower extremity neuromuscular and functional status. Phys Ther, 1983. 63(9): p. 13-1404.
16. Kelly J. Hunt, et al., National Cholesterol Education Program Versus WorldHealth Organization Metabolic Syndrome in Relation to All Cause and Cardiovascular Mortality in the San Antonio Heart Study Circulation, 2004. 110: p. 1251-1257.
17. Cockrell, J.R. and M.F. Folstein, Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Psychopharmacol Bull, 1988. 24(4): p. 689-92.
18. Mayer, N.H., Clinicophysiologic concepts of spasticity and motor dysfunction in adults with an upper motoneuron lesion. Special Features, 1998. 20(muscle nerve): p. 1-14.
19. Ashworth, B., Preliminary Trial of Carisoprodol in Multiple Sclerosis. Practitioner, 1964. 192: p. 540-2.
20. Bohannon, R.W. and M.B. Smith, Interrater Reliability of a Modified Ashworth Scale of Muscle Spasticity. American physical therapy, 1987. 67(2): p. 206-7.
21. Nuyens G, et al., Interrater reliability of the Ashworth scale in multiple sclerosis. 1994. 8: p. 286-292.
22. Brashear, A., et al., Inter- and intrarater reliability of the Ashworth Scale and the Disability Assessment Scale in patients with upper-limb poststroke spasticity. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2002. 83(10): p. 1349-54.
23. Amouzadeh Khalili, M. and A.A. Pahlevanian, Evaluation of spasticity using the Ashworth Scale with Intermediate Scores. Iranian Rehabilitation Journal 2010. 8(12): p. 21-25.
24. Eric J. Nestler, Steven E. Hyman, and Robert C.