Investigating root canal morphology in maxillary first and second permanent molars by CBCT method in Iranian people

Number of pages: 64 File Format: word File Code: 31992
Year: 2013 University Degree: Master's degree Category: Medical Sciences
  • Part of the Content
  • Contents & Resources
  • Summary of Investigating root canal morphology in maxillary first and second permanent molars by CBCT method in Iranian people

    Dissertation for obtaining a professional doctorate degree in dentistry

    Abstract

    Introduction: One of the common causes of non-surgical root canal treatment failure is the inability to effectively treat all root canals due to the complex anatomy of the root canal system. Due to the fact that so far no comprehensive and extensive study has been conducted on the anatomy of the root canal system in maxillary first and second molar teeth using CBCT in the Iranian race, so the purpose of this study was to investigate the variations and anatomical features of these teeth in a population of Iranian race.

    Materials and methods: In the present study, 250 extracted human maxillary first and second molar teeth were used. After disinfecting the teeth, first the number and condition of the roots were recorded for each case.  The morphology of the dental canals was determined using Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT), in such a way that after preparing stereotypes, the images in all three axial, sagittal, and coronal sections were morphologically evaluated with the help of Romexis software. To determine the total number of canals in each tooth, the number of canals in each root and the morphology of the canals (using Vertucci's classification and Gulabivala's supplementary classification) in one root. All evaluations were done by 2 calibrated endodontists. The data was entered into SPSS software version 11.5 and the frequency percentage of each type of root morphology was described using frequency distribution tables and average, median and standard deviation indices.

    Results: The prevalence of three-rooted first and second molar teeth was 98.4% and 97.6%, respectively, and the prevalence of four-rooted first and second molar teeth was 1.6% in both cases. In 0.8% of the second molar teeth, the teeth had two roots. Root adhesion was observed in 2.4% of first molars and 8.8% of second molars. The prevalence of the fourth canal in the mesiobuccal roots of the first and second molars was 52.8% and 16.84%, respectively. The most common canal morphology in the mesiobuccal root of the first molar was type I, type VI, and type II, respectively, and in the second molar, type I, type III, and type IV. It was also observed in 2.3% of the first molar and 0.8% in the second molar of the fourth canal in the distobuccal root.

    Conclusion: According to the results of this study, the prevalence of the fourth channel in the Iranian race is relatively high. Considering the non-invasiveness and high accuracy of CBCT to identify additional canals and the importance of discovering these canals in the success of a root canal treatment, the use of CBCT during root canal treatment is recommended in cases with anatomical complications.

    Keywords: Root canal morphology, maxillary first molar, maxillary second molar, CBCT

    (1-1) Preface

    The goal of root canal treatment is complete debridement of the root canal and complete removal of microorganisms and their byproducts from the root canal system and effective flooding of the canal system. This goal will not be achieved without complete knowledge of root canal morphology (1).

    One ??of the common causes of non-surgical root canal treatment failure is the inability to effectively treat all root canals. Many studies have been presented on the morphology of the root canal in different populations, which is certainly of great importance to endodontists and general dentists who want to perform root canal treatments (2). rtl;">(2-1) General

    1-2-1 tooth development

    The first signs of macroscopic development of maxillary milk molar teeth begin at 12/5 weeks. The time of the first signs of calcification of the maxillary first deciduous molar is at 15.5 weeks and the maxillary second deciduous molar at 19 weeks. At birth, three quarters of the occlusogingival height of the maxillary first deciduous molar and one quarter of the occlusogingival height of the maxillary second deciduous molar are calcified (3).

    First and second permanent molar teeth They begin to develop in the 20th embryonic period. This is done in a series of steps. Crown development occurs around 2.5 to 3 years old, while the tooth root is completed around 9 to 10 years old.. These events occur during a sequence including the initiation of cell division, cell growth, differentiation and deposition of plaque and enamel (4).

    The tooth first consists of a layer of epithelial cells called the dental lamina. The stages of tooth formation from the dental lamina are divided into three stages according to the shape of the tooth. First, a mass similar to a flower bud appears[1]. The characteristic of this stage is the proliferation of epithelial cells into the ectomesenchyme. Then, this mass is invaginated and it is called cap-shaped [2]. This cell mass is also called the enamel organ. Finally, with the growth of the tooth bud and the deepening of this intussusception, the bell-shaped stage occurs [3]. During the development of the tooth crown, the tissue that is trapped inside this intussusception or the same enamel organ produces dental pulp and in the initial stages it is called dental papilla (5). 

    The cells of the outer layer of the enamel organ become ameloblasts as a result of differentiation, which produce enamel. On the other hand, the internal cells of the enamel organ participate in the formation of dentin by differentiating into odontoblasts (5).

    Also, the ectomesenchyme surrounding the enamel organ turns into a dental sac and participates in the formation of the periodontal ligament (5).

    The deposition of non-mineralized dentin matrix occurs from the tips of the cusps. The first mineral layer of dentin that is formed is called dentin mantle, which is about 20 microns thick (5).

    After the deposition of the first dentin, ameloblasts begin to form enamel, and with the completion of deposition and formation of enamel, the root also begins to form. In the place where the internal and external cells of the enamel organ connect to each other, it is called the cervical loop. As this cervical loop begins to grow, a structure called Hertwig's epithelial sheath is formed. This sheath determines the size, shape and length of the tooth roots. In the case of a single-rooted tooth, these pods grow from different sides until only a small hole remains. This proliferation is called an epithelial diaphragm. In two teeth, diaphragm roots grow in two areas and meet on both sides, resulting in two holes. In teeth with three roots, this multiplication occurs in three directions and three holes are created (4). 

    When the first layer of dentin is formed in the root, dental sac cells begin to form cementum by migrating near the root and differentiating into cementoblasts (5).

    Root formation begins shortly before the tooth erupts into the mouth, and when the tooth has reached its final position, about two-thirds of the root has been formed. The completion of the root is completed about two to three years after the completion of growth (5). 

     

    2-2-1 How to form lateral canals

    When the integrity of Hertwig's sheath is lost or a part of the root odontoblasts are not able to make dentin, a defect occurs in the dentin wall of the root, which eventually causes the formation of a secondary canal between the dental sac and It is pulped. These sub-channels may be formed in any region of the root, but they are more prevalent in the last third of the root (6). But the most accepted theory about the formation of secondary channels is the trapping of a blood vessel in Hertwig's epithelial sheath. If the surrounding parts of this vessel do not undergo dentin formation, eventually a sub-channel will be formed (7). 

    3-2-1 Identification of lateral canals

    Although these lateral canals may exist in most teeth, due to their thinness and small diameter, it is often difficult to identify and diagnose them through perical radiographs. These channels are revealed when the channels are filled with filling materials and the sealer penetrates into these channels (8).

    In various studies, it has been observed that the ability of conventional radiographs to identify sub-channels is significantly lower than other methods. To discover these channels, CBCT, micro CT, ultrasonic, or the use of a microscope are auxiliary methods with high accuracy (9).

  • Contents & References of Investigating root canal morphology in maxillary first and second permanent molars by CBCT method in Iranian people

    List:

    (1) First Chapter: 5

    (1-1) Preface 6

    (2-1) General. 7

    1-2-1 tooth development. 7

    2-2-1 How to form lateral channels. 10

    3-2-1 Identification of lateral channels. 11

    4-2-1 Location and spread of lateral channels. 12

    5-2-1 Different shapes of root canals. 12

    6-2-1 Morphology of maxillary first and second molar teeth. 15

    7-2-1 Various methods of identifying the morphology of dental canals in a laboratory. 17

    (3-1) An overview of the conducted studies. 19

    (4-1) statement of the problem. 38

    (5-1) Objectives and assumptions of the study. 40

    (2) Chapter Two: Methodology 42

    1-2 Study population. 43

    2-2 sample size. 44

    3-2 Collecting teeth 45

    4-2 Preparation of CBCT stereotypes 46

    5-2 Determination of tooth morphology. 47

    6-2 Sampling method. 48

    7-2 Data collection 49

    8-2 Data analysis method 49

    9-2 Study variables. 50

    (3) Chapter Three: Results 51

    (4) Chapter Four: Discussion and Conclusion 61

    (5) Sources. 71

     

    Source:

     

    1. Ng YL, Aung TH, Alavi A, Gulabivala K. Root and canal morphology of Burmese maxillary molars. Int Endod J 2001; 34: 620–30.

    2. Neelakantan P, Subbarao C, Ahuja R, Subbarao CV, Gutmann JL. Cone-beam computed tomography study of root and canal morphology of maxillary first and second molars in an Indian population. J Endod 2010; 36: 1622-7.

    3. Lewis AB, Garn SM. The Relationship Between Tooth Formation and Other Maturational Factors. Angle Orthodontics 1960; 30(2): 70-76.

    4.Holland GR, Torabinejad M. The dental pulp and periradicular tissues. In: Endodontics principles and practice. Torabinejad M, Walton RE. 4th ed., Saunders Co., St. Louis: Missouri. 2009; 1-11.

    5. Pashley DH, Liewehr FR. Structure and function of the dentin-pulp complex. In: Cohen S, Hargreaves KM. Pathways of the pulp. 9th ed., Mosby Co., St. Louis: Missouri. 2006; 460-474.

    6. Bhaskar SN. Orban's oral histology and embryology. 10th ed., Mosby Co., St. Louis: Missouri. 1986; 37-138.

    7. Weine FS. The enigma of the lateral canal. Dent Clin North Am, 1984; 28(4): 833-852.

    8. Dedeus QD. Frequency, location, and direction of the lateral, secondary, and accessory canals. J Endod, 1975; 1(11):361-366

    9. Neelakantan P, Subbarao C, Subbarao CV. Comparative evaluation of modified canal staining and clearing technique, cone-beam computed tomography, peripheral quantitative computed tomography, spiral computed tomography, and plain and contrast medium-enhanced digital radiography in studying root canal morphology. J Endod. 2010; 36: 1547-51. 10. Weine FS. Endodontic therapy. 4th ed., Mosby Co., St. Louis: Missouri. 1989; 219-233.

    11. Vertucci FJ, Haddix JE, Britto LR. Tooth morphology and access cavity preparation. In: Cohen S, Hargreaves KM. Pathways of the pulp. 9th ed., Mosby Co., St. Louis: Missouri. 2006; 148-233.

    12.Stuart C. White, Michel J Pharoah; Oral Radiology;6th Ed.St Louis:The CV Mosby 2009;225-243

    13.Abuabara A, Baratto-Filho F, Aguiar Anele J, Leonardi DP, Sousa-Neto MD. Efficacy of clinical and radiological methods to identify second mesiobuccal canals in maxillary first molars. Acta Odontol Scand. 2013 Jan;71(1):205-9.

    14. Domark JD, Hatton JF, Benison RP, Hildebolt CF. An Ex Vivo Comparison of Digital Radiography and Cone-beam and Micro Computed Tomography in the Detection of the Number of Canals in the Mesiobuccal Roots of Maxillary Molars. J Endod. 2013 Jul;39(7):901-5.

    15.Han X, Yang H, Li G, Yang L, Tian C, Wang Y. A study of the distobuccal root canal orifice of the maxillary second molars in Chinese individuals evaluated by cone-beam computed tomography. J Appl Oral Sci. 2012 Sep-Oct;20(5):563-7.

    16. Shenoi RP, Ghule HM. CBVT analysis of canal configuration of the mesio-buccal root of maxillary first permanent molar teeth: An in vitro study.. Contemp Clin Dent. 2012 Jul;3(3):277-81. doi: 10.4103/0976-237X.103618.Bottom of Form

    17.Kim Y, Lee SJ, Woo J. Morphology of maxillary first and second molars analyzed by cone-beam computed tomography in a Korean population: variations in the number of roots and canals and the incidence of fusion. J Endod. 2012 Aug;38(8):1063-8.

    18.Lee JH, Kim KD, Lee JK, Park W, Jeong JS, Lee Y, et al. Mesiobuccal root canal anatomy of Korean maxillary first and second molars by cone-beam computed tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011 Jun;111(6):785-91.

    19. Lübbers HT, Matthews F, Damerau G, Kruse AL, Obwegeser JA, Gr?tz KW, Eyrich GK. Anatomy of impacted lower third molars evaluated by computerized tomography: is there an indication for 3-dimensional imaging? Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011 May;111(5):547-50.

    20.Verma P, Love RM. A Micro CT study of the mesiobuccal root canal morphology of the maxillary first molar tooth. Int Endod J. 2011 Mar;44(3):210-7.

    21. Krithikadatta J, Kottoor J, Karumaran CS, Rajan G. Mandibular first molar having an unusual mesial root canal morphology with contradictory cone-beam computed tomography findings: a case report. J Endod. 2010 Oct;36(10):1712-6.

    22. Blattner TC, George N, Lee CC, Kumar V, Yelton CD. Efficacy of cone-beam computed tomography as a modality to accurately identify the presence of second mesiobuccal canals in maxillary first and second molars: a pilot study. J Endod. 2010 May;36(5):867-70.

    23.Song JS, Choi HJ, Jung IY, Jung HS, Kim SO. The prevalence and morphological classification of distolingual roots in the mandibular molars in a Korean population. J Endod 2010; 36: 653-7.

    24.Zheng QH, Wang Y, Zhou XD, Wang Q, Zheng GN, Huang DM. A cone-beam computed tomography study of maxillary first permanent molar root and canal morphology in a Chinese population. J Endod. 2010 Sep;36(9):1480-4.

    25. Suomalainen A, Vent? I, Mattila M, Turtola L, Vehmas T, Peltola JS. Reliability of CBCT and other radiographic methods in preoperative evaluation of lower third molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010 Feb;109(2):276-84.

    26.Baratto Filho F, Zaitter S, Haragushiku GA, de Campos EA, Abuabara A, Correr GM. Analysis of the internal anatomy of maxillary first molars by using different methods. J Endod. 2009 Mar;35(3):337-42.

    27.Chen G, Yao H, Tong C. Investigation of the root canal configuration of mandibular first molars in a Taiwanese Chinese population. Int Endod J 2009; 42: 1044-9.

    28. Rwenyonyi CM, Kutesa A, Muwazi LM, Buwembo W. Root and canal morphology of mandibular first and second permanent molar teeth in a Ugandan population. Odontology 2009; 97: 92-6.

    29. Al-Qudah AA, Awawdeh LA. Root and canal morphology of mandibular first and second molar teeth in a Jordanian population. Int Endod J 2009; 42: 775-84.

    30. Khraisat A, Smadi L. Canal configuration in the mesio-buccal root of maxillary first molar teeth of a Jordanian population. Aust Endod J. 2007 Apr;33(1):13-7.

    31. Ashfete Yazdi K, Hosni N. Examining the internal anatomy of the maxillary first molar. Dental Journal of the Islamic Society of Dentists, 2014; 17(Suppl.1): 68-74

    32. Sadeghi M, Sadr Lahijani M. Laboratory examination of the anatomy of the root canals of maxillary molar teeth.  Dental Journal of the Islamic Society of Dentists, 2013; 16(49): 14-21

    33. Zarrabi MH, Jalilzadeh H, Root treatment of maxillary second molar with two palatal roots: a case report. Journal of Mashhad Dental Faculty, 2013; 28(3): 278-275

    34. Iqbal MJ, Asgari S, Abdullah Vand R. Correcting a terminological mistake about the number of canals of the upper first molar. Journal of Faculty of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, 1381; 20(4): 463-459

    35. Alavi AM, Opasanon A, Ng YL, Gulabivala K. Root and canal morphology of Thai maxillary molars. Int Endod J. 2002 May;35(5):478-85.

    36.

Investigating root canal morphology in maxillary first and second permanent molars by CBCT method in Iranian people