Contents & References of Investigating the amount of crustal bone loss around cylindrical implants compared to conical implants after 6 months of loading
List:
Introduction
Chapter One: General and review articles
General: Implant definition
Implant structure
Implant constituent materials
Implant design
Implant body shape
Implant surface topography
Key factors to achieve osseointegration
Factors related to failure to achieve osseointegration
A) - Internal factors
B) - Factors related to surgery
C) - Factors related to biomaterials
Introduction of the SPI system
Review of articles:
Chapter Two: Statement of the problem
Statement of the problem
General objective
Objectives Partial
Applicable objectives
Chapter three: Materials and methods
Type of study
Sample size
Working method
"Checking a number of important variables"
1. Analysis Bone
2.Pocket depth
3. Presence of gingivitis
Statistical analysis
Chapter four: Results
Comparison of bone loss around cylindrical and conical implants
Comparison of pocket depth around cylindrical and conical implants
Comparison of bleeding during probing (BOP) around cylindrical and conical implants
Comparison of bone changes in upper and lower jaw
Comparison of pocket depth changes in upper jaw and Bottom
Chapter Five: Discussion
Discussion
Conclusion and suggestions
Conclusion
Suggestions
Resources
Source:
1) Zwemer TJ. Mosby's dental dictionary, 1st edition, St. Louis, Mosby, 1998: 254 - 55.
2) Newman WA. Dorland's medical dictionary, 27th ed, Philadelphia, W.B. 5aunders Co, 1994: 827 - 28.
3) Babbush CA. Endosteal, mucosal, subperiosteal and transosseous implants in Laskin DM (editor), Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, 2nded, Philadelphia, W.B. 5aunders Co, 1995: 438 - 40.
4) Misch CEo Generic Root Form Component Terminology. In:
Misch's Contemporary Implant Dcntistry.Bv' ed, St.Louis, Mosby,
2008: 26 - 37.
5) Klokkevold PR, Cochran DL. Clinical Aspects and Evaluation of the Implant Patient. In: Newman MG, Takei HH, Klokkevold PR, Carranza FA Carranza's Clinical Periodontology, 10th ed, Philadelphia, W.B.5unders Co, 2006; 1087 - 104.
6) Buser D, Nydegger T, Hirt HP, Cochran DL, Nolte LP. Removal
Torque values ??of titanium implants in the maxilla of miniature pigs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998 Sep - Oct; 13(5): 611-9.
7) Ericsson I, Johansson Cli, Bystedt H, Norton MR.
A histomorphometric evaluation of bone-to-implant contact on machine-prepared and roughened titanium dental implants.
A pilot study in dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 1994 Dec; 5 (4): 202-6.
8) Klokkevold PR, Nishimura RD, Adachi M, Caputo A. Osseointegration enhanced by chemical etching of the titanium surface. Torque removal study in the rabbit. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997 Dec; 8 (6): 422 - 7.
9) Misch CE, Strong JT, Bydez MW. Scientific Rationale for Dental Implant Design. In: Misch's Contemporary Implant Dentistry, 3rd edition, St. Louis, Mosby, 2008; 200 - 29.
10) Biesbrock AR, Edgerton M. Evaluation of the clinical predictability of hydroxyapatite-coat endosseous dental implants:
A review of literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995 Nov - Dec; 10: 712 - 20.
11) Ellingsen JE. Surface configurations of dental implants. J Periodontal 2000 1998 Jun; 17: 36 - 46.
12) Esposito M, Hirsch JM, Lekholm V, Thomsen P. Biological factors contributing to failures ofBiological factors contributing to failures of osseointegrated oral implants. (II) Etiopathogenesis. Eur J Oral Sci 1998 June; 106 (3): 721-64.
13) Mailath G, Stoiber B, Watzek G, Matejka M. Bone resorption at the entry of
osseointegrated implants-a biomechanical phenomenon. Finite element study. Z
Stomatol 1989; 86(4): 207-16
14) Siegele D, Solte´sz U. Numerical investigations of the influence of implant
shape on stress distribution in the jaw bone.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1989;4:333–340.
15) Rieger MR, Mayberry M, Brose MO. Finite element analysis of six endosseous implants. J Prosthet Dent. 1990; 63(6): 671-6.
16) Andersson B. Implants for single-tooth replacement. A clinical and
experimental study on the Br?nemark CeraOne System. Swed Dent J Suppl. 1995;108:1-41 17) Friberg B, Sennerby L, Roos J, Johansson P, Strid CG, Lekholm U. Evaluation of bone density using cutting resistance measurements and microradiography: an in vitro
Study in pig ribs. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1995;6:164–171.
18) Jokstad A, Braegger U, Brunski J, Carr A, Naert I et al. Quality of dental
implants. Int J of prosthodont.2004;17(6):607-641
19) O'Sullivan D, Sennerby L, Meredith N. Influence of implant taper on the
primary and secondary stability of osseointegrated titanium implants.
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004;15(4):474-80
20) KaroussisI, Br?ggerU, SalviG, Bürgin W, Lang N. Effect of implant design
on survival and success rates of titanium oral implants: a 10-year prospective
cohort study of the ITI® Dental Implant System. Clin Oral Implants Res
2004;15: 8–17
21) Petrie C, Williams J. Comparative evaluation of implant designs: influence
of diameter, length, and taper on strains in the alveolar crest.
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005;16(4):486-94.
22) O'Sullivan D, Sennerby L, Meredith N. Measurements comparing the initial
stability of five designs of dental implants: a human cadaver study. Clin Implant
Dent Relat Res. 2000;2:85–92. 23) Saadoun AP, Le Gall MG, Touati B. Current trends in implantology: part 1—biological response, implant stability, and implant design. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent. 2004;16:529–535.
24) Ormianer Z, Palti A. Long-term clinical evaluation of tapered multi-threaded
implants: results and influences of potential risk factors. J Oral Implantol.
2006;32(6):300-307
25) CruzM, LourençoA, ToledoE, Barra L, Lemonge A et al. Finite element
stress analysis of cuneiform and cylindrical threaded implant geometries.
Technol Health Care. 2006;14(4-5):421-38
26) Huang HL, Chang CH, Hsu JT, Fallgatter AM, KoCC. Comparison of implant body designs and threaded designs of dental implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofacial Implants 2007; 22(4): 551-62.
27) Khayat P, Milliez S. Prospective Clinical Evaluation of 835 Multithreaded
Tapered Screw-Vent Implants: Results After Two Years of Functional Loading.
J Oral Implantology 2007; 33(4): 225-231.
28) Kim J, Baekb S, Kimc T, Changc Y. Comparison of Stability between
Cylindrical and Conical Type Mini-Implants.
Angle Orthodontist 2008; 78(4):692-698
29) Ormianer Z, Palti A. Retrospective clinical evaluation of tapered screw-vent implants: results after up to eight years of clinical function.