Contents & References of Theoretical study of 5-aminolevulinic acid with carbon nanotubes
List:
Abstract. 1
Introduction. 2
Chapter One: Generalities. 4
1-1. The main purpose of the research. 5
1-2. Statement of the problem. 5
1-3. Research hypothesis. 7
1-4. Research innovation. 7
1-5. Research background. 8
1-6. The need to pay attention to safety studies in the gas pressure boosting station. 11
1-7. Concepts and definitions. 17
1-7-1. Quantitative risk assessment method. 17
1-7-2. Quantitative risk assessment steps. 19
1-7-2-1. First step: Determining the goals of quantitative risk assessment. 20
1-7-2-2. Second step: Description of the process unit under investigation. 20
1-7-2-3. The third stage: Identifying risks. 21
1-7-2-4. The fourth step: determining and analyzing scenarios. 22
1-7-2-5. The fifth step: Modeling the outcome. 24
1-7-2-5-1. Material discharge modeling. 26
1-7-2-5-2. Diffusion modeling. 27
1-7-2-5-2-1. Types of fire. 35
1-7-2-5-2-2. Modeling the effects caused by sudden and explosive fire. 40
1-7-2-5-2-3. Effects of fire radiation. 45
1-7-2-5-2-4. The spark and the possibility of its occurrence. 48
1-7-2-6. Sixth step: estimating the repeatability of the scenario. 51
1-7-2-7. Seventh step: Risk calculation and evaluation. 56
1-8. Introduction of PHAST software. 62
Chapter Two: Work method. 65
2-1. Introduction of gas pressure boosting station in Ramsar city. 66
2-1-1. Description of the operational process of Ramsar gas pressure boosting station. 68
2-1-2. Direct operating mode. 68
2-1-3. Reverse operating mode. 70
2-2. Method of work. 74
Chapter Three: Results. 79
3-1. Explanation and interpretation of Golbad chart and presentation of charts related to weather conditions. 80
3-2. The results related to estimating the repeatability of connections. 84
3-3. The results of modeling by software. 91
Chapter four: conclusions and suggestions. 99
4-1. Conclusion. 100
4-2. Suggestions. 101
4-3. Comparing the work done with the work of others. 104
4-4. Suggestion for other students. 105
Appendix . 106
P-1. 107
Sources and sources. 124
English abstract. 127
Source:
1- Abdul Hamidzadeh, b., Badri, N., 1389 Quantitative and qualitative assessment of risk in process industries and the description of industrial hazard identification methods with a focus on the HAZOP method along with familiarity with PHAST, ALOHA & PHA-Pro software and solving numerous industrial examples, Andishe Sara, Tehran
2- Zarei, A., Dermohammadi, A., 2012 Quantitative and semi-quantitative risk assessment in process industries focusing on DOW Index, LOPA, QRA methods, Fan Avran, Tehran
3- Jahangiri, M., Amin Nowrozi, M., Sarbanzadeh, K. 1392 risk management and assessment (includes the basics and basics of risk assessment, reproducibility) estimation methods, and consequence modeling methods along with a complete guide to ALOHA and PHAST software and solving numerous practical examples) 4- Health, Safety and Environmental Affairs (HSE) Gas Transmission Company, 1390 accident analysis booklet for the ten gas transmission operation areas 1390
[1] Basic Engineering Report, Ramsar Compressor Station, National Iranian Gas Company (NIGC)
[2] Center for Chemical Process Safety (CCPS) (2000), Guidelines for Chemical Process Quantitative Risk Analysis, 2nd Ed, American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE), New York.
[3] Joaquim Casal, Evaluation of the Effects and Consequences of Major Accidents
Industrial Plants, Industrial safety series, volume 8
[4] Khan, F., Abbasi, S., (2001), Risk Analysis of a Typical Chemical, (2001), Risk Analysis of a Typical Chemical Industry Using QRA Procedure, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, vol. 14, pp. 43-59.
[5] Center for Chemical Process Safety (CCPS) (1999), Guidelines for Consequence Analysis of Chemical Releases, American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE), New York.
[6] Online available in http://www.meadowbrooktoday.com/id141.html
[7] Online available in http://www.rxn.com/~ uffda/archive/science/edison.txt
[8] Online available in http://www.pishbin.blogsky.