Fabrication and evaluation of polysulfone nanocomposite membrane of mineral nanoparticles

Number of pages: 92 File Format: word File Code: 31857
Year: 2014 University Degree: Master's degree Category: Industrial Engineering
  • Part of the Content
  • Contents & Resources
  • Summary of Fabrication and evaluation of polysulfone nanocomposite membrane of mineral nanoparticles

    Master thesis (M.Sc.)

    Treatment: process design

    Abstract

    Currently, membranes have found a special place in different separation industries and have wide applications in various fields of separation, including solutions They have different liquids and gases. Membrane technology is one of the most widely used technologies in today's industry, whose field of application is wide ranging from water and sewage industry to food and pharmaceutical industries. Most of the membranes that are recently used in membrane gas separation processes are polymer and non-porous membranes, and the basis of their performance is the solubility-permeation mechanism. This is the mechanism at the molecular scale of the diffusion of molecules from the polymer membrane. In this mechanism, it is assumed that the molecule is absorbed on one side of the membrane and penetrates through the empty spaces of the polymer chains and is rejected on the other surface. Due to its good mechanical properties, high chemical resistance and high glass transition temperature, the polysulfone polymer is widely used in the preparation of asymmetric membranes (usually in the range of ultrafiltration and microfiltration). Polysulfone ultrafiltration membranes have very low surface wettability. Due to interactions Hydrophobicity between the membrane and hydrophobic solvents, this property will cause many blocking problems in polysulfone membranes. Also, polymer membranes cannot overcome the problem of contradiction between selectivity and permeability. In order to increase the hydrophilicity of polysulfone membranes and improve the structural properties of the membrane, there are several methods, but a few methods that have been more developed since the beginning of work are: in situ polymerization, induction solution composition, melting process and mixed bed method. In this research, clay nanoparticles have been used in the preparation of this nanocomposite membrane using the mixed bed method. With mixed bed membranes, high selectivity can be achieved with the same permeability or greater permeability compared to existing polymer membranes. By adding inorganic nanoparticles, the separation properties can be improved.

    Key words: nanocomposite membrane, ultrafiltration, nanoclay, mixed bed membranes

    Introduction

    Current advances in chemical and similar industries are aimed at increasing the speed of processes and reducing energy consumption during the process. One of the most important and widely used processes in such industries is the separation of different materials. To carry out industrial processes, the components of the primary raw material must be separated and the product obtained from these processes must also be separated and purified. On the other hand, in most industries, considering environmental laws, the need to carry out separation processes is seen more than ever.

    In fact, the importance of separation processes and related devices and equipment is so much that in many industries, most of the cost of a product is related to the costs of separating and purifying that product. For this reason, finding a simpler and less expensive separation method can be considered. In choosing an appropriate separation method, the efficiency of those methods, access to equipment, separation costs, construction costs, and energy costs should be fully evaluated, taking into account environmental issues and political issues. Also, the goals of separation in the process should be specified, in a separation process, different goals such as concentration, purification, separation and displacement of the reaction equilibrium can be considered. In this regard, membranes have been developed to separate different types of materials in solid, liquid and gas states. Although the separation method with membranes is newer than other methods such as distillation, surface adsorption, crystallization and liquid-liquid extraction, but due to its efficiency and ease of use in the last two decades, a significant expansion in its use has been observed [1]. This mechanism on a molecular scale is the diffusion of molecules from the polymer membrane. In this mechanism, it is assumed that the molecule is absorbed on one side of the membrane and penetrates through the empty spaces of the polymer chains and is rejected on the other side.In this mechanism, it is assumed that the molecule is absorbed on one side of the membrane and penetrates through the empty spaces of the polymer chains and is rejected on the other side. According to the solubility-permeation model, the penetration of molecules through the membrane is controlled by two main parameters, the diffusion coefficient and the solubility coefficient. The solubility coefficient is defined as the ratio of two absorption potentials such as partial pressure [2]. For good membrane performance, both permeability and selectivity must be high. The higher the permeability, the lower the required area of ??the membrane for gas purification, and high selectivity gives high gas purity in the same permeability conditions. In glassy polymers (polymers that are below their glass transition temperature), small molecules such as H2 and He pass quickly and large molecules such as hydrocarbons pass through the membrane slowly. Permeable polymers have low selectivity [2]. Despite all these advantages, polymeric membranes cannot overcome the problem of contradiction between selectivity and permeability. In fact, inorganic membranes such as carbon membranes have high selectivity and permeability, but it is difficult to manufacture them on a large scale, due to the need for high efficiency of membranes in polymer and inorganic membranes, a new type of membranes has recently been developed called mixed bed membranes. Mixed bed membranes are composite membranes in which solid or liquid or both are embedded as fillers in a polymer substrate [3]. Research on mixed bed membranes has been continuously increasing since 1980 with a remarkable speed. Now experimental and laboratory findings have shown the relative superiority of mixed bed membrane separation compared to pure polymer membranes. Considering the novelty of this type of membranes, there is a lot of work space for future studies [3]. In this research, the focus is on the fabrication of polysulfone nanocomposite membranes by the mixed bed method and investigating the performance of these membranes. In order to check the performance of the membrane in different conditions, permeation tests and structural analyzes have been carried out. In this research, the effect of different parameters on membrane performance and the effect of pressure on membrane permeability and selectivity have been investigated. It should be mentioned that the production of polysulfone nanocomposite membranes by mixed bed method is new and for the first time.

     Abstract

    Today membranes have special place in detachment industry. They also have great use in various detachment grounds, like: liquid lotion and various gases. Today membranes technology is one of the most all-purpose technology in industries, which usage is from water and sewage industry to food and drug industry. Most of membranes which is recently used in gas and detachment are polymeric and non-spongy membranes. The basis of their application is solvation-osmosis mechanism. This mechanism in molecule criterion is polymer criterion. In this mechanism it is assumed that molecule absorb in one side of membrane and osmosis in vacuo polymeric continuum and ejection from other side of membrane.

        Since polysulfon polymeric have good mechanical property, high resistivity and high glass alternate thermal, it is largely used in bottom of asymmetric membrane (usually in olterafesiun and microfiltration) ultrafiltration poly-sulfon membranes have low saturate. Because of hydrophobic interaction between membrane and water closet soluble, this property in polysulfon membrane have great plosive problems. Polymeric membranes cannot overcome the problem of antithesis between permeability and electability.

    There are so many various ways for the purpose of improving polysulfon membrane and improving organizational property of membranes but some ways which are used from the beginning of function are: polymerization, composition of faradic lotion, melt process and mixed ground way.

            In this Nano disquisition the sparks of argil are used for the purpose of preparation of Nano composite membrane. We can reach the high selectivity with the same permeability of more permeability in contrast with available polymer membrane. By adding Nano atomic mineral we can improve detachment property.

  • Contents & References of Fabrication and evaluation of polysulfone nanocomposite membrane of mineral nanoparticles

    List:

    Page

    Abstract.  1

    Introduction. 2

    The first part of library studies. 3

    1-1-Research objectives. 4

    1-2-Hypotheses. 4

    1-3-Membrane. 4

    1-4-Division of membrane. 5

    1-4-1-Division based on the mechanism governing separation. 5

    1-4-2-Division based on membrane type.5

    1-4-2-1-Polymer membranes.6

    1-4-2-2-Liquid membranes.6

    1-4-2-3-Ceramic membranes.6

    1-4-2-4-Metal membranes.7

    1-4-3-Division based on The basis of the geometric shape of the membrane. 9

    1-4-4-Division based on the structure of the membrane. 9

    1-5-Membrane properties. 10

    1-6-Membrane applications. 10

    1-7-Membrane processes. 11

    1-7-1-Reverse osmosis. 11

    1-7-2-Nanofiltration.11

    1-7-3-Ultrafiltration.12

    1-7-4-Microfiltration.14

    1-8-Composite.14

    1-8-1-What is composite? 14

    1-8-2-From straw to composites 15

    1-6-3-other applications of composites. 16

    1-8-4-composite manufacturing. 17

    1-8-5-methods of nanocomposite manufacturing. 18

    1-9-use of membrane technology. 19

    1-10-main axes of membrane application. 19

    1-10-1 water industry and Sewage. 19

    1-10-2-Food industries. 20

    1-10-3-Pharmaceutical and medical industries. 20

    1-10-4-Air purification and gas purification. 20

    1-10-5-Other applications. 21

    1-11-Mixed bed membranes. 21

    1-12-Types of membranes.22

    1-13-Permeation solubility model.22

    1-14-Necessary equipment to check the structure of membrane performance.25

    1-15-History of membrane development.25

    1-16-History of mixed bed membranes.26

    Part two: materials, equipment and works Experimental. 28

    2-1-Appropriate selection of polymer phase. 29

    2-1-1-Polysulfone polymer membrane. 29

    2-1-2-Reasons for choosing nanoclay, nanosilica and polymer. 31

    2-2-Experimental works. 33

    2-2-1-Materials and equipment. 33

    2-2-2-Construction Membrane.33

    2-2-2-1-Making PSf ultrafiltration polymer membrane film.33

    2-2-2-2-Making nanocomposite membranes.34

    2-2-3-Pure water flow.35

    2-2-3-1-Membrane module.35

    2-2-3-2-Test Percolation.35

    2-2-3-3-How to conduct experiments.

    2-2-3-4-Calculating the amount of pure water passing through the membrane.36

    2-3-Structural evaluation methods.36

    Part three: Results and discussion.37

    3-1-Structural evaluation.38

    3-1-1-Spectrum Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) measurement. 38

    3-1-2-Scanning electron microscope (FESEM) analysis. 39

    3-1-3-Atomic force microscope (AFM). 42

    3-2-Results of liquid separation tests. 45

    3-2-1-Permeability test. 45

    Section Fourth: conclusions and suggestions. 51

    4-1-conclusion.52

    4-2-suggestions.54

    References. 55

    Source:

     

     ] 1] G. Srikanth, (2008) “Membrane separation processes” technology and Business opportunities, water conditioning & purification, pp 1-4.

    ] 2] Baker R W. (2004). Membrane technology and applications, znd ed. Chichester. wiley,.

    [3] A. Bakhtiari, (1389 Shahrivar) "Making membranes mixed with polymer base for natural gas sweetening". PhD thesis in Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Chemical Engineering, University of Science and Technology, Tehran. 4] R. Sharma, pp1-95, (2008) “Membrane Filtration”, available from: http://www.ozscientific.com

    ] 5] “Synthesis and catalytic membranes”), 2008), Institute of polymer research, center for Membranes and structured materials, Available from: http://www.gkss.de

    ]6] “Synthetic polymeric membranes that are used with the four filtration technologies” (2008), pp1 – 2.

    ]7] T. dev Naylor, (1996) “Polymer Membranes”, Rapra technology limited, volume 8, No. 5,.

    ]8] “Ceramic membranes” (2008), lenntech water treatment & air purification, Available from: http://www.lenntech.com

    [9] Sarmad Heydari. (2008), "Metallic Membranes", Iranian Engineers Club, Chemical Engineering Articles.

    ] 10] J. Baggote, E. Dennis, (1995) "Membranes", pp1-10,.

    ]11] J. Bomben,) 2008( "Membrane separation", SRI consulting business intelligence,.

    ]12] E. T. Thostenson, C. Li, T. w. Chou,Chou, composite sci. tech. (2005) 491.

    ]13] “Areas of application of membrane technology” (2008), Available from: http:// www.itan.ir

    ]14] S. Kulprathipanja, R.W. Neuzil, N.N. Li, separation of fluids by means of mixed matrix membranes, us. (1988). Patent u, 740,219.

    ]15] B. Shimekit, H. Mukhtar, and T. Murugesan, (2011) "Prediction of the relative permeability of gases in mixed matrix membranes" Journal of membrane science, vol. 373, pp. 152-159.

    [16] Mahajan and W. J. Koros, (2000) "Factors controlling successful formation of mixed matrix gas separation materials", Ind. Eng. Chem. Res, vol. 2692-2696, (2010) M. A. Aroon, and M.M.

    [18] F. R. Mahajan. (2000) "Characterization and Modeling of Mixed Matrix membrane materials," PhD Thesis, University of Texas, Austin,.

    [19] W. J. K. D. Q. Vu, S.J. Miller, (2003) "Mixed matrix membranes using carbon molecular sieves, ? modeling permeation behavior" J. Membr. Sci, vol. 211 pp. 335-348.

    [20] Blanco, J. F. Sublet, J. Nguyen, Q. T. Schaetzel, P. (2006) "Formation and morphology studies of different polysulfone-based membranes made by wet phase inversion process", J.membr. Sci. 283, P.P.27-37,.

    [21] Liu, Y. Koops, H. 2003( "Characterization of morphology controlled polyethersulfone hollow fiber membranes by the addition of poly ethylene glycol to the dope and bore liquid solution", J. Membr. Sci. 223. 187-199,.

    [22] Kim. J. H. Kang, M. S. Kim, C. K, (2005) "Fabrication of membranes for the liquid separation. Part 1. Ultrafiltration membranes prepared from novel miscible blends of polysulfone and poly (1-vinylpyrrolidone-co-acrylonitrile) copolymers", J. Membr. Sci. 265, P.P.167-175.

    [23] Shen, L. Q, Xu, Z. K, Z. M, Xu, Y. Y., (2003) "ultrafiltration hollow fiber membranes of sulfonated polyetherimide/polyetherimide blends: preparation, morphologies and antifouling properties", J. Membr. Sci. 218, P. P. 279-293,.

    [24] Zhou, C., Wang, Z. Liang, Y. Yao, J., (2008) "Study on the control of pore sizes of membranes using chemical methods part ?. Optimization factors for preparation of membranes", desalination 225, P. P. 123-138,.

    [25] Ulbricht, M. Belfort, G. (1995) "Low temperature surface modification of polyacrylonitrile ultrafiltration membranes. 1. Plasma treatment effects" J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 56, P.P.325-343.

    [26] Taniguchi, M. Belfort, G., (2004) "Low protein fouling synthetic membranes by uv-assisted surface grafting modification: varying monomer type", J. Membr. Sci. 231. P. P. 147-157. [27] Rahimpour, A. Madaeni, S. S., Taheri, A. H. Mansourpanah, Y, 2008( Coupling TiO2 nanoparticles with uv irradiation for modification of polyethersulfone membranes", Membr. Sci. 313, p.p.158-169.

    [28] Akbari, A. Desclaux, S. Rouch, J. C. Aptel, P. Remigy, J. C. (2006) new uv-photografted nanofiltration membranes for the treatment of colored textile dye effluents” J. Membr. Sci. 286. P. P. 342-350.

    [29] Yamagishi, H. Crivello, J. Belfort, G. (1995) "Development of a novel photochemical technique for modifying poly(arylsulfone) ultrafiltration membranes", J. Membr. Sci. 105, P. P.237-247,.

    [30] M. S. Jyothi, Vignesh Nayak, Mahesh Padki, R. Geetha Balakrishna, A. F. Ismail (2014) “The effect of UV irradiation on Psf/TiO2 Mixed matrix membrane for chromium rejection” Desalination 354189-199. of emulsion poly(vinyl chloride)/TiO2 nanocomposite ultrafiltration membrane” Journal of Membrane Science 472, P.P. 185-193.

    [32] Baker, R. W. (2004).

Fabrication and evaluation of polysulfone nanocomposite membrane of mineral nanoparticles