Ethanol and acetate production from synthesis gas using Clostridium Langali bacteria

Number of pages: 225 File Format: word File Code: 31795
Year: 2011 University Degree: Master's degree Category: Chemical - Petrochemical Engineering
  • Part of the Content
  • Contents & Resources
  • Summary of Ethanol and acetate production from synthesis gas using Clostridium Langali bacteria

    Dissertation of the Ph.D. course in the field of chemical engineering, biotechnology orientation

    Abstract

    Clostridium langalli is a highly anaerobic aestogenic bacterium that can grow on the components of synthesis gas, i.e. CO and H2/CO2, and convert them into ethanol and acetate at ambient temperature and pressure. During this process, the bacterium shows a complex metabolic pathway that includes both estogenic (acid production) and salontogenic (solvent production) phases. In the process of heterotrophic growth of this bacterium, the effect of different organic substrates (fructose, glucose, ethanol and acetate) on the beginning of the metabolic shift towards the alcohol production phase was investigated. The results of the discontinuous fermentation process showed that the use of fructose as an organic substrate led to the production of the same molar ratio of ethanol (27.1 mmol/L) and acetate (26.3 mmol/L). In the process of autotrophic growth of bacteria with synthesis gas, in order to reduce the reducing potential of the culture medium and change the direction of the flow of electrons towards the alcohol production phase, different reducing solutions (sodium sulfide and/or acidic cysteine ??with different concentrations) were used at different initial pH (6.8 or 5.9) of the culture medium in discontinuous bioreactors. The highest molar ratio of ethanol to acetate production (0.65) was obtained in the culture medium containing 5.07 mmol/l acidic cysteine ??and at the initial pH of 5.9, which was probably related to the presence of more electrons in this medium. To determine the biokinetic parameters related to the growth rate, substrate consumption and product production, synthesis gas fermentation process was carried out in discontinuous bioreactors with different synthesis gas pressures. To describe the kinetics of bacterial growth rate on synthesis gas components (CO and H2), a kinetic growth model was developed based on a binary substrate using Long's model for CO and Monod's model for H2. This model could also predict the inhibitory effects of CO at high pressures on cell growth. Modified Veltra, Andrew, and Gomperts kinetic models were also used to describe cell growth, substrate consumption, and product production. The continuous process of synthesis gas fermentation was carried out in a two-liter stirred bioreactor. The effect of various operational parameters such as liquid dilution rate, synthesis gas flow intensity into the bioreactor and stirrer speed on the performance of the culture medium was investigated. The highest specific production rate (0.0048 mol per gram of cells per hour), product yield (0.178 mol of product per mole of substrate) and the molar ratio of ethanol to acetate production of 0.73 (with 30 and 41 mmol per liter of ethanol and acetate) were obtained at the liquid dilution rate of 0.018 (per hour), gas flow intensity of 12 (ml/min) and stirring speed of 500 (rpm). 

    Key words

     Ethanol, acetate, Clostridium Langali, synthesis gas fermentation

     

    1         Chapter 1: Introduction

    rtl;">1-1      Introduction

    Since the beginning of the 20th century, the production of fuel and chemical compounds from syngas as a method for producing renewable fuels has attracted the attention of scientific and industrial communities. However, most of the advances and discoveries that have been made in this field are related to the use of catalytic processes and metal-based catalysts. Recently, the attention of researchers has been directed to the production of biological fuels and chemical compounds from synthesis gas through biological methods, because the use of microbes as biocatalysts has advantages over metal-based catalysts.

    Today, many efforts are made to produce biological fuels, but this issue has become one of the controversial issues in the scientific and human societies. The production of first generation biofuels from food sources is considered unethical and has always been criticized due to the urgent need of many countries for food. Synthesis gas fermentation for the production of second-generation biofuels [2] can answer most of the criticisms regarding the production of fuel from food products. The production of second-generation biofuels from non-food sources, generally agricultural waste and organic waste, includes two basic technologies, in which biomass is first converted into gas, and then the synthesis gas produced as a substrate in a microbial or catalytic process is converted into biological fuel.

    Despite the studies and researches that have recently been conducted on the synthesis gas fermentation process as a sustainable and renewable method for the production of biological fuels, this process is still considered an undeveloped technology and it is necessary to overcome various technical and economic challenges before the commercialization of this process. 

    1-2     Biofuels

    The global production of biofuels has increased rapidly in the last decade, but this growing industry has brought with it important concerns. First generation biofuels are produced from primary food sources such as starch, sugar, vegetable oils and animal fats. Although the production of first-generation biofuels, such as the production of ethanol from corn in the United States, ethanol from sugarcane in Brazil, and biodiesel from rapeseed and sunflower in Europe, continues as commercialized processes, despite many criticisms regarding the sustainability of these fuels and their competition with food production, second-generation biofuels have received much attention [1]. Second generation biofuels are produced from lignocellulosic biomass [3] that are not a food source. An overview of the primary sources used to produce second-generation biofuels is presented in Figure 1-1 [1, 2]. In general, these raw materials are divided into agricultural waste, organic waste, and biomasses that grow rapidly and are cultivated for energy production [4]. Therefore, the second generation biofuels have advantages such as the use of waste and residues and the use of barren lands, especially in rural areas. However, if the production of these fuels competes with food products on the available land, the suitability of these fuels will be doubted in terms of production sustainability. There is another concern in this field that the indiscriminate harvesting of agricultural waste to produce fuel and biological energy will have a negative impact on soil fertility and its quality [3]. In this process, the bacterium presents a complex metabolic pathway including both the acetogenic and solventogenic phases. During the heterotrophic batch cultivation of the bacterium, the effect of various carbon sources (fructose, glucose, ethanol and acetate) on triggering the metabolic shift towards solventogenesis was considered. The fermentation results demonstrated the equimolar production of ethanol (27.1 mM) and acetate (26.3 mM) in the presence of fructose. During the autotrophic growth of the bacterium with synthesis gas for lowering the redox potential of the growth medium and alteration of the electron flow towards solventogenesis, various reducing solutions (sodium sulfide and/or cysteine-HCl with various concentrations) at different initial medium pH (6.8 or 5.9) were used in the batch bioreactors. The results suggested the plausible provision of more electrons into the culture in the presence of 5.07 mM cysteine-HCl at the medium pH 5.9, as a promoted ethanol to acetate molar ratio of 0.65 was achieved in this culture. In order to determine the intrinsic growth, substrate uptake and product formation biokinetic parameters in synthesis gas fermentation process, the bacterium was grown in various pressurized batch bioreactors. A dual-substrate growth kinetic model using Loung for CO and Monod for H2 was developed to describe the growth rate kinetics of the bacteria on these substrates. This model also accommodated CO inhibitory effects on cell growth at high CO partial pressures. The Volterra model, Andrews and modified Gompertz were respectively adopted to describe the cell growth, substrate uptake rate and product formation. Continuous synthesis gas fermentation experiments were carried out in a 2.0 L CSTR bioreactor.

  • Contents & References of Ethanol and acetate production from synthesis gas using Clostridium Langali bacteria

    List:

    Abstract. B

    Key words. B

    List of contents. T

    List of tables Z

    List of figures Z

    List of images Z

    List of symbols and abbreviations. Chapter 1: Introduction 1 1-1 Introduction 1 1-2 Biological fuels. 2

    1-3 production methods of second generation biological fuels. 4

    1-3-1 process of chemical-thermal conversion of biomass. 6

    1-3-1-1 conversion to biomass gasification. 6

    1-3-1-2 synthesis gas fermentation. 9

    1-4 advantages of biocatalysts 10

    1-5 production of ethanol as a biological fuel. 11

    1-6 Problem design and the necessity of carrying out the project 14

    1-7 General goals of the project 14

    1-8 Project goals and framework 15

    1-9 Division of thesis chapters. 17

    2 The second chapter: review of scientific texts 19

    2-1 Introduction 19

    2-2 Biological reaction of water-gas displacement 20

    2-3 Acetogenic bacteria. 29

    2-3-1 Clostridium Langali. 34

    2-4 Metabolic Path of Acetogens 36

    2-5 Effective Factors in Synthesis Gas Fermentation. 42

    2-5-1 The effect of the composition of the culture medium. 42

    2-5-2 Effect of organic source. 46

    2-5-3 Effect of culture medium pH. 49

    2-5-4 Effect of reducing agent 51

    2-5-5 Effect of minor elements. 54

    2-5-6 inhibitory effects in the fermentation environment. 56

    2-5-7 mass transfer limitations. 58

    2-5-8 Effect of gas substrate pressure. 64

    3 The third chapter: required materials and working methods 68

    3-1 Introduction 68

    3-2 Clostridium Langali bacteria. 69

    3-3 Langali bacteria culture medium. 70

    3-3-1 Compositions of liquid culture medium. 72

    3-3-1-1 solution of minor elements. 72

    3-3-1-2 Wolff vitamin solution. 72

    3-3-1-3 solution of reducing agents 73

    3-4 method of preparation of liquid culture medium. 73

    3-4-1 Method of preparation of solid culture medium. 75

    3-5 How Langali bacteria reproduce. 75

    3-6 discontinuous Langali culture experiments. 79

    3-6-1 Bacteria growth with organic substrate. 79

    3-6-1-1 effect of type of organic substrate. 79

    3-6-1-2 effect of organic substrate concentration. 80

    3-6-2 bacterial growth with synthesis gas. 81

    3-6-2-1 simultaneous effect of reducing agents and initial pH of culture medium. 81

    3-6-2-2 The effect of initial pressure of synthesis gas in discontinuous bioreactors. 83

    3-7 Synthesis gas fermentation continuous experiments. 84

    3-7-1 Effect of dilution rate. 87

    3-7-2 Effect of synthesis gas flow intensity and stirrer speed. 88

    3-8 Analysis of results 88

    3-8-1 Measurement of cell density. 88

    3-8-2 Analysis of fructose and glucose in culture medium. 90

    3-8-3 Analysis of liquid samples for ethanol and acetate. 93

    3-8-4 Analysis of gas samples 94

    3-9 Kinetic models and the method of obtaining them 95

    3-9-1 Kinetics of cell growth. 95

    3-9-2 Mass transfer calculations. 98

    3-9-2-1 Mass transfer in discontinuous system. 98

    3-9-2-2 Mass transfer in continuous system. 100

    3-9-3 reaction rate. 102

    4 Chapter Four: Results of experiments and data analysis 103

    4-1 Introduction 103

    4-2 The effect of organic substrate. 104

    4-2-1 Cell growth and substrate consumption 104

    4-2-2 Proposed metabolic pathway for Langali. 108

    4-2-3 Product production. 111

    4-2-4 effect of fructose concentration 115

    4-2-4-1 cell growth. 115

    4-2-4-2 Product production. 118

    4-3 simultaneous effect of reducing agents and pH. 122

    4-3-1 cell growth. 123

    4-3-2 consumption of gaseous substrate. 125

    4-3-3 production of ethanol and acetate. 129

    4-3-4 product yield. 133

    4-4 kinetic studies. 135

    4-4-1 Cell growth kinetics. 136

    4-4-2 Gas substrate consumption kinetics. 145

    4-4-3 Investigating the kinetics of gaseous substrate consumption rate and mass transfer. 147

    4-4-4 substrate consumption kinetics 152

    4-5 continuous synthesis gas fermentation experiments in bioreactor 154

    4-5-1 effect of dilution rate. 154

    4-5-1-1 cell density and culture medium pH. 155

    4-5-1-2 consumption of gaseous substrate. 157

    4-5-1-3 Product production. 158

    4-5-2 Effect of gas flow intensity and stirrer speed. 159

    4-5-2-1 consumption of gaseous substrate. 160

    4-5-2-2 Product production. 162

    4-5-2-3 mass transfer coefficient in162

    4-5-2-3 mass transfer coefficient in bioreactor 163

    4-5-2-4 product yield. 169

    5 Chapter Five: Conclusions and Suggestions 172

    5-1 Conclusions from the experiments 172

    5-2 Presenting suggestions for future projects. 175

    Appendix A. 177

    Appendix B. 181

    6 references. 187

    Abstract

    Source:

    1- A. Eisentraut, Sustainable Production of Second-Generation Biofuels: Potential and perspectives in major economies and developing countries, IEA Energy Papers 2010.

    2-         S. Naik, V.V. Goud, P.K. Rout, A.K. Dalai, Production of first and second generation biofuels: A comprehensive review, Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev 14 2010 578-597. 3- J. Ruane, A. Sonnino, A. Agostini, Bioenergy and the potential contribution of agricultural biotechnologies in developing countries, Biomass Bioenergy 34 2010 1427-1439. 4- T.D. Foust, A. Aden, A. Dutta, S. Phillips, An economic and environmental comparison of a biochemical and a thermochemical lignocellulosic ethanol conversion processes, Cellulose 16 2009 547-565.

    5-         R.E.H. Sims, W. Mabee, J.N. Saddler, M. Taylor, An overview of second generation biofuel technologies, Bioresour Technol 101 2010 1570-1580.

    6- T. Damartzis, A. Zabaniotou, Thermochemical conversion of biomass to second generation biofuels through integrated process design-A review, Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev 15 2011 366-378.

    7-         A. Demirbas, Biofuels securing the planet's future energy needs, Energy Convers Manage 50 2009 2239-2249.

    8-        F. Demirbas, Biorefineries for biofuel upgrading: a critical review, Appl Energy 86 2009 S151-S161.

    9-         C. Piccolo, F. Bezzo, Ethanol from lignocellulosic biomass: a comparison between conversion technologies, Computer Aided Chemical Engineering 24 2007 1277-1282.

    10-       R.P. Datar, R.M. Shenkman, B.G. Cateni, R.L. Huhnke, R.S. Lewis, Fermentation of biomass-generated producer gas to ethanol, Biotechnol Bioeng 86 2004 587-594.

    11-       A. Ahmed, A.M. White, P. Hu, R.S. Lewis, R.L. Huhnke, Biofuels from Syngas. 12- M.J. Burk, C.H. Schilling, A.P. Burgard, J.D. Trawick, Methods and organisms for utilizing synthesis gas or other gaseous carbon sources and methanol, US Patent No. 7,803,589 2010.

    13-       Z.A.B.Z. Alauddin, P. Lahijani, M. Mohammadi, A.R. Mohamed, Gasification of lignocellulosic biomass in fluidized beds for renewable energy development: A review, Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev 14 2010 2852-2862.

    14-       H.N. Abubakar, M.C. Veiga, C. Kennes, Biological conversion of carbon monoxide: rich syngas or waste gases to bioethanol, Biofuels, Bioprod Biorefin 5 2011 93-114. 15- C. Piccolo, F. Bezzo, A techno-economic comparison between two technologies for bioethanol production from lignocellulose, Biomass Bioenergy 33 2009 478-491. 16- J. Mackaluso, The use of syngas derived from biomass and waste products to produce ethanol and hydrogen, MMG 445 Basic Biotechnology eJournal 3 2007 98-103.

    17-       D.W. Choi, D.C. Chipman, S.C. Bents, R.C. Brown, A Techno-economic Analysis of Polyhydroxyalkanoate and Hydrogen Production from Syngas Fermentation of Gasified Biomass, Appl Biochem Biotechnol 160 2010 1032-1046.

    18-       L. Mississippi Ethanol. Final report from Mississippi Ethanol LLC to the National Renewable Energy Laboratory. Report NREL/SR-510-31720, NREL, Golden, CO (USA); 2002.

    19-       J. Abrini, H. Naveau, E.J. Nyns, Clostridium autoethanogenum, sp. nov., an anaerobic bacterium that produces ethanol from carbon monoxide, Arch Microbiol 161 1994 345-351.

    20-       J.L. Gaddy, Biological production of ethanol from waste gases with Clostridium ljungdahlii, Us Patent No. 6,136,577 2000.

    21-       J.H. Sim, A.H. Kamaruddin, W.S.

Ethanol and acetate production from synthesis gas using Clostridium Langali bacteria