Contents & References of Investigating the effect of whole body vibration with different frequency and amplitude on bending strength, calcium ion density and histomorphometry of femur and tibia in urectomy rats.
List:
Chapter One: Research Plan
1-1- Introduction. 2
1-2- Statement of the problem..3
1-3- Necessity of research 7
1-4- Research objectives. 9
1-4-1- general goal. 9
1-4-2- Dedicated goals. 9
1-5 - research assumptions. 10
1-6- Research area. 10
1-7- research limitations. 11
1-8- operational definition of research variables. 11
1-8-1- independent variable. 11
1-8-2- dependent variables. 12
Chapter Two: Research Generalities
Introduction ..14
2-1- The basis of mechanical vibrations. 14
2-2- Whole body vibrations. 16
2-3- Forces on the bone. 18
2-4- Mechanical resistance of bone. 21
2-4-1- bone regeneration. 21
2-4-2- The mechanism of osteoporosis. 21
2-4-3- bone response to loading. 23
2-4-4- Mechanism of bone mechanical adaptation. 25
2-4-5- muscle response to loading. 30
2-4-6- Bone mechanical test. 31
2-5- Microscopic structure of bone. 34
2-5-1- bone covering cells. 36
2-5-2- bone composition. 37
2-6- Macroscopic structure of bone. 39
2-6-1- dense and spongy bone. 39
2-6-2- bone in terms of evolution. 40
2-7- Calcium. 41
2-8- Research background. 42
2-8 - Summary. . 49
Chapter three: Explanation of the research
Introduction. 52
3-1- Preparation and maintenance of ret. 52
3-1-1- Study sample. 52
3-1-2 - rat cage 53
3-1-3 - rat feed 53
3-1-4 - lighting and ventilation system. 54
3-1-5- Ambient humidity and temperature. 54
3-2-1- Rat anesthesia. 54
3-2-2- Performing surgery. 55
3-3- Mechanical stimulation. 56
3-3-1 - mechanical bone stimulation device. 56
3-3-2- Implementation method 58
3-3-3- Sampling. 61
3-4- bone assessment. 62
3-4-1- Evaluation of bone bending. 62
3-4-2- Assessment of calcium ion concentration. 65
3-4-3- bone histomorphometric evaluation. 67
3-5- The method of statistical data analysis 69
Chapter four: Research analysis
Introduction. 71
4-1- Descriptive statistics. 72
4-2- Inferential statistics. 73
3-4- Body weight. 74
4-4- Bending resistance. 76
4-4-1 - Stress. 76
4-4-2 - Stiffness. 79
4-5-3- absorbed energy. 84
4-5-4- Moving. 88
4-5-5- Summary. 91
4-6- Calcium ion concentration. 91
4-7- Dense and spongy bone histomorphometry. 93
4-7-1 - Summary. 96
Chapter Five: Inference and Conclusion
Introduction. 103
5-1- Research Summary 103
5-2- Discussion. 104
5-3- Conclusion. 116
5-4- Research suggestions. 116
5-4-1- Practical suggestion. 116
5-4-2- Research proposal. 116
Resources. 118
Source:
1. Lash RW, Nicholson JM, Velez L, Van Harrison R, McCort J. Diagnosis and management of osteoporosis. Primary Care: Clinics in Office Practice. 2009;36(1):181-98.
2. Melton JL. Perspectives: how many women have osteoporosis now? Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. 1995;10(2):175-7.
3. Siris E, Adler R, Bilezikian J, Bolognese M, Dawson-Hughes B, Favus M, et al. The clinical diagnosis of osteoporosis: a position statement from the National Bone Health Alliance Working Group. Osteoporosis International. 2014
4. Huang T.H. LSC, Chang F.L., Hsieh S.S., Liu S.H., Yang R.S. Effects of different exercise modes on mineralization, structure, and biomechanical properties of growing bone. J Appl Physiol Bone. 2003(95):7-300.
5. Comelekoglu U, Bagis S, Yalin S, Ogenler O, Yildiz A, Sahin NO, et al. Biomechanical evaluation in osteoporosis: ovariectomized rat model. Clinical rheumatology. 2007;26(3):380-4.
6. Bagi C, Wilkie D, Georgelos K, Williams D, Bertolini D. Morphological and structural characteristics of the proximal femur in human and rat. Bone. 1997;21(3):261-7.
7. Albright J, Skinner H. Bone:Bone: remodeling dynamics. The scientific basis of orthopedics Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York. 1979:185-229.
8. Frost H. Skeletal structural adaptations to mechanical usage (SATMU): 1. Redefining Wolff's law: the bone modeling problem. The Anatomical Record. 1990;226(4):403-13.
9. Wolff J, Maquet P, Furlong R. The law of bone remodeling: Springer-Verlag Berlin; 1986.
10. Warner S, Shea J, Miller S, Shaw J. Adaptations in cortical and trabecular bone in response to mechanical loading with and without weight bearing. Calcified tissue international. 2006;79(6):395-403.
11. Lehtonen?Veromaa M, M?tt?nen T, Svedstr?m E, Hakola P, Heinonen O, Viikari J. Physical activity and bone mineral acquisition in peripubertal girls. Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports. 2000;10(4):236-43.
12. Vuori I. Health benefits of physical activity with special reference to interaction with diet. Public health nutrition. 2001;4(2b):517-28.
13. Daley MJ, Spinks WL. Exercise, mobility and aging. Sports Medicine. 2000;29(1):1-12.
14. Carter ND, Kannus P, Khan K. Exercise in the prevention of falls in older people. Sports Medicine. 2001;31(6):427-38.
15. Heinonen A, Kannus P, Siev?nen H, Oja P, Pasanen M, Rinne M, et al. Randomized controlled trial of effect of high-impact exercise on selected risk factors for osteoporotic fractures. The Lancet. 1996;348(9038):1343-7.
16. Cardinale M, Rittweger J. Vibration exercise makes your muscles and bones stronger: fact or fiction? British Menopause Society Journal. 2006;12(1):12-8.
17. Cardinale M, Bosco C. The use of vibration as an exercise intervention. Exercise and sport sciences reviews. 2003;31(1):3-7.
18. Cardinale M, Wakeling J. Whole body vibration exercise: are vibrations good for you? British journal of sports medicine. 2005;39(9):585-9.
19. Rubin C, Judex S, Qin Y-X. Low-level mechanical signals and their potential as a non-pharmacological intervention for osteoporosis. Age and aging. 2006;35(suppl 2):ii32-ii6.
20. Cardinale M, Pope M. The effects of whole body vibration on humans: dangerous or advantageous? Acta Physiologica Hungarica. 2003;90(3):195-206.
21. Judex S, Zernicke R. Does the mechanical milieu associated with high-speed running lead to adaptive changes in diaphyseal growing bone? Bone. 2000;26(2):153-9.
22. Robling A, Duijvelaar K, Geevers J, Ohashi N, Turner C. Modulation of appositional and longitudinal bone growth in the rat ulna by applied static and dynamic force. Bone. 2001;29(2):105-13.
23. Fritton SP, J McLeod K, Rubin CT. Quantifying the strain history of bone: spatial uniformity and self-similarity of low-magnitude strains. Journal of biomechanics. 2000;33(3):317-25.
24. Judex S, Boyd S, Qin Y-X, Turner S, Ye K, Müller R, et al. Adaptations of trabecular bone to low magnitude vibrations result in more uniform stress and strain under load. Annals of biomedical engineering. 2003;31(1):12-20.
25. Tezval M, Biblis M, Sehmisch S, Schmelz U, Kolios L, Rack T, et al. Improvement of femoral bone quality after low-magnitude, high-frequency mechanical stimulation in the ovariectomized rat as an osteopenia model. Calcified tissue international. 2011;88(1):33-40.
26. Rubin C, Turner AS, Bain S, Mallinckrodt C, McLeod K. Anabolism: Low mechanical signals strengthen long bones. Nature. 2001;412(6847):603-4.
27. Rittweger J. Vibration as an exercise modality: how it may work, and what its potential might be. European journal of applied physiology. 2010;108(5):877-904.
28. Judex S, Lei X, Han D, Rubin C. Low-magnitude mechanical signals that stimulate bone formation in the ovariectomized rat are dependent on the applied frequency but not on the strain magnitude. Journal of biomechanics.