Contents & References of Investigating the relationship between anthropometric dimensions and structural profile with sports injuries of elite runners
List:
1-1. Introduction. 2
1-2. State the problem. 3
1-3. The necessity and importance of research. 4
1-4. Objectives of the research. 5
1-4-1. general purpose 5
1-4-2. Specific goals. 5
1-5. Presuppositions of research. 5
1-6. Research assumptions. 6
1-7. Research variables. 6
1-7-1. criterion variable (independent).. 6
1-7-2. Dependent variable (predictor) 7
1-8. Research limitations. 7
1-8-1. Controllable limitations. 7
1-8-2. Uncontrollable limitations. 7
1-9. Definition of research words and terms. 8
Chapter Two: Background of the research. 10
2-1. Introduction. 11
2-2. The first part of theoretical foundations of research. 11
2-2-1. Anatomical alignment of the lower limb. 11
2-2-2 Postural abnormalities 12
2-2-3. Causes and causes of abnormalities 12
2-2-4. Lower limb syndromes. 12
2-2-4-1. Cross syndrome of the lower limbs. 13
2-2-4-2. Pronation deviation syndrome. 13
2-2-4-3. Syndrome of motor impairment of the lower limbs. 13
2-2-5. Cross knee. 14
2-2-6. Bracket knee. 16
2-2-7. Navi drop test. 16
2-2-8. Angle Q. 17
2-2-9. Common injuries of runners in the lower limbs. 17
2-2-9-1. Shin splint (pressure syndrome on the inner tibia) 18
-2.2-9-2. stress fracture. 18
2-2-9-3. Runner's knee (ilio tibial band syndrome) 18
2-2-9-4. Anterior knee pain (patellofemoral pain syndrome) 19
2-2-9-5. Plantarfascia (inflammation of the sole of the foot) 19
2-2-9-6. Achilles tendonitis. 20
2-2-10. Anthropometry. 20
2-2-10-1. The concept of anthropometry. 20
2-2-10-2. Anthropometric methods and tools. 21
2-2-10-3. Applications of anthropometry. 21
2-2-10-4. Human differences in terms of skeletal-muscular structure. 22
2-3. Research background. 23
2-3-1. Introduction. 23
2-3-2. Studies conducted in the field of abnormality and damage. 24
2-3-3. Studies conducted on the relationship between anthropometric characteristics and sports injuries. 32
2-3-4. Studies conducted on the relationship between anthropometric characteristics and abnormality. 33
2-3-5. Summary: 34
The third chapter: research methodology. 35
3-1. Introduction. 36
3-2. Research design. 36
3-3. Society and the statistical sample of the research. 36
3-4. Protocol. 37
3-5. Measurement tools and information collection. 37
3-6. Measurement methods. 37
3-6-1. Questionnaire. 38
3-6-2. Height measurement method. 38
3-6-3. Weight measurement method. 38
3-6-4. The method of measuring the bracketed knee. 38
3-6-5. The method of measuring the deformity of the crossed knee. 39
3-6-6. Angle measurement method 40
3-6-7. Navigation loss measurement method. 41
3-6-8. The method of measuring the length of the lower limb. 42
3-6-9. Thigh length measurement method. 43
3-6-10. Leg length measurement method. 44
3-6-11. How to measure knee width. 45
3-6-12. Ankle width measurement method 46
3-6-13. Foot sole length measurement method 47
3-7. Statistical methods and methods of research data analysis. 48
Chapter Four: Data Analysis 49
4-1. Introduction. 50
4-2. Test results of repeatability and standard error of measurements 51
4-3. Descriptive analysis of research findings. 51
4-3-1. Characteristics of subjects 51
4-3-2. Quantitative description of structural and anthropometric profile variables. 52
4-4. Inferential analysis of research findings. 55
4-4-1. The first null hypothesis: there is no significant relationship between any of the variables (crossed knee, braced knee, flat sole, hollow sole, Q angle) and common injuries of runners. 55
4-4-1-1. Sub-hypothesis 1: There is no significant relationship between crossed knees and runners' injuries. 55
4-4-1-2. The second hypothesis: There is no significant relationship between knee braces and runners' injuries. 55
4-4-1-3. The third sub-hypothesis: There is no significant relationship between flat feet and runners' injuries. 55
4-4-1-4. Sub-hypothesis 4: There is no significant relationship between the soles of God's feet and the injuries of runners. 55
4-4-1-5. Under the fifth assumption: Between Sub-hypothesis 5: There is no significant relationship between Q angle and injuries of runners. 55
4-4-2. The second null hypothesis: There is no significant relationship between anthropometric characteristics in any of the variables (lower limb length, foot length, thigh length, leg length, knee width, ankle width) with common injuries of runners. 57
4-4-2-1. The first hypothesis: There is no significant relationship between the length of the lower limb and the injuries of runners. 57
4-4-2-2. Second hypothesis: There is no significant relationship between the length of the sole of the foot and the injuries of runners. 57
4-4-2-3. Third sub-hypothesis: There is no significant relationship between thigh length and runners' injuries. 57
4-4-2-4. Sub-hypothesis 4: There is no significant relationship between leg length and runners' injuries. 57
4-4-2-5. Sub-hypothesis 5: There is no significant relationship between knee width and runners' injuries. 57
4-4-2-6. Sub-hypothesis 6: There is no significant relationship between ankle width and runners' injuries. 57
4-4-2-7. The seventh sub-hypothesis: There is no significant relationship between age and injuries of runners. 57
4-4-2-8. Sub-hypothesis 8: There is no significant relationship between weight and injuries of runners. 57
4-4-2-9. Sub-hypothesis 9: There is no significant relationship between height and injuries of runners. 57
4-4-3. Third null hypothesis (HO): There is no significant relationship between anthropometric characteristics (lower limb length, thigh length, leg length, knee width, ankle width, sole length) with lower limb abnormalities (bracketed knee, crossed knee, flat sole, hollow sole and Q angle). 60
4-4-3-1. Sub-hypothesis 1: There is no significant relationship between age and lower limb abnormalities of runners. 60
4-4-3-2. Second sub-hypothesis: There is no significant relationship between weight and lower limb abnormalities of runners. 60
4-4-3-3. Third sub-hypothesis: There is no significant relationship between height and lower limb abnormalities of runners. 60
4-4-3-4. The fourth sub-hypothesis: There is no significant relationship between the length of the lower limb and the abnormalities of the lower limb of runners. 60
4-4-3-5. Fifth sub-hypothesis: There is no significant relationship between thigh length and lower limb abnormalities of runners. 60
4-4-3-6. Sixth sub-hypothesis: There is no significant relationship between leg length and lower limb abnormalities of runners. 60
4-4-3-7. The seventh sub-hypothesis: There is no significant relationship between the width of the knee and the abnormalities of the lower limbs of runners. 60
4-4-3-8. Sub-hypothesis 8: There is no significant relationship between ankle width and lower limb abnormalities of runners. 60
4-4-3-9. Sub-hypothesis 9: There is no significant relationship between the length of the sole of the foot and the abnormalities of the lower limbs of runners. 60
4-4-4. Summary of statistical test results. 64
4-4-4-1. Summary of Chi-square statistical test results in runners. 64
4-4-4-2. Summary of Pearson statistical test results in runners. 66
5. Chapter five: discussion and conclusion. 67
5-1. Introduction. 68
5-2. Summary of the research. 69
5-3. Discussion and analysis of the results related to the first hypothesis: There is no significant relationship between any of the variables (bracketed knee, crossed knee, flat sole, hollow sole, Q angle) and the common injuries of runners. 71
5-4. Discussion and analysis of the results related to the second hypothesis: There is no significant relationship between anthropometric characteristics in any of the variables (age, weight, height, lower limb length, foot length, thigh length, leg length, knee width, ankle width) with common injuries of runners. 73
5-5. Discussion and analysis of the results related to the third hypothesis: There is no significant relationship between anthropometric characteristics (age, weight, height, lower limb length, thigh length, leg length, knee width, ankle width, foot length) and lower limb abnormalities (bracketed knee, crossed knee, flat sole, hollow sole and Q angle). 75
5-6. Summary. 78
5-7. Research suggestions: 79
5-7-1. Practical suggestions. 79
5-7-2. Research proposals. 80
Source:
Emami Meybodi, Mohammad Ali, 1372, Local Anatomy of Organs and Joints, Kerman Cultural Publications and Research Assistant at Kerman University of Medical Sciences, first edition
Amini Aghdam, Soran, (1386), Abnormal alignments of the lower limbs and history of knee injuries, Master's thesis of Razi University of Kermanshah.