Morphological comparison of verbs in Beyhaqi's history and Jovini's history

Number of pages: 475 File Format: word File Code: 31579
Year: 2013 University Degree: Master's degree Category: Literature - Persian Language
  • Part of the Content
  • Contents & Resources
  • Summary of Morphological comparison of verbs in Beyhaqi's history and Jovini's history

    Dissertation for Master's degree

    Abstract

    "Verb" is a word that expresses doing something or taking place in one of the past, present or future tenses. The verb is the most important part of the proposition and the center of the sentence, which is associated with the identifier. Tarikh Beyhaqi is one of the most precious works of Persian prose, whose prose has both the stability and simplicity of the Samani and Ghaznavid eras, as well as the coordinates of technical prose. Tarikh Jahangasha is the most important work of Attamalek Jovini, the prose of the book is artificial and complex, and it is among the best surviving historical texts from the Mongol era. The method of collecting materials is library and the research method is descriptive-analytical. The aim of this research is to compare the verbs of Tarikh Bayhaghi and Tarikh Jahangosh and the way each verb is used in these two works. Statistically, the most used verbs were simple past and simple present, and the least verbs were future, command and prohibition. Compound verbs with the combination of "doing" and "becoming" are abundantly found, and simple, compound and prefix verbs are more definite and transitive.  

    Keywords: verb, morphological construction, simple past, simple present participle, unbiased history, universal history.

    .Introduction

    Language is a social phenomenon and cannot have a fixed and unified form and always depends on Transformation and social transformations, it undergoes changes, in each period of history it finds features that distinguish its form from the language of the previous period. Therefore, in the historical investigation of any language, it is possible to follow the path of its transformations from the oldest form and to determine the changes and laws that govern it throughout history.

    Language is never static due to its transformable nature, and for this reason, exploring it does not recognize stability. If we consider dynamism as a permanent feature of the language, the study of its rules should also be permanent.

    Persian language is one of the important and main branches of Indo-European languages, which has been recognized and paid attention to as an original language in the world for centuries. Extensive and mixed with other languages ??(Turkish, Arabic, Mongolian, etc.), there have been changes in it, but its basis and main form have not changed much and have continued to exist, which has been the reason for the pride and survival of the Iranian society. and unknown, structure (simple and compound and prefix), expression, auxiliary verbs and .

    In this thesis, after stating the generalities, by stating the tense description of Beyhaqi and Attamalek Jovini, and presenting generalities around the topic, including the definition of the verb, subject, aspect, structure, transitive and intransitive, and then types of past tense - simple, continuous, improbable, transitive, subjunctive - types of participles - simple participle, indicative and subjunctive participles - future and imperative verbs in two The work has been compared and the differences and similarities of the verbs have been described in the form of tables and diagrams.

    Due to the volume of the thesis, which was about a thousand pages, the work was done selectively and the number of types of verbs was reduced to fifty. In the presentation of statistics and graphs, all extracted verbs are given.

    The history of Beyhaqi as a great missionary prose of the 4th century and the history of Jovini as a technical and artificial prose of the 7th century and the way verbs are used in these two books motivated me to do this, as well as the guidance of the respected professors, Dr. Alireza Kavehi and Dr. Akram Rahmani. It was a good incentive.

    1-2. General

    1-2-1. Statement of the problem

    Tarikh Beyhaqi, known as Tarikh Mas'udi, is one of the most precious works of Persian prose and the art of writing written by Abulfazl Mohammad Bin Hossein Beyhaqi (470-385). In this book, he has depicted the social life of the Ghaznavid era, out of the thirty volumes, the remaining six volumes contain the events.In this book, he has depicted the social life of the Ghaznavid era, out of thirty volumes, the remaining six volumes contain the events of the reign of Amir Masoud, the son of Sultan Mahmud of Ghaznavid. The prose of this book is simple and straightforward. Alaa al-Doulah, Attamalek Juvini (623-681) in Jahangoshah History has discussed the real causes of the defeat of the Khwarezm Shahs and the extinction of Iranian civilization against the Tatar attack and the real reasons for the progress of Genghis Khan's work. Although the author of the book tried to praise the Mughal Khans, he did not refrain from mentioning historical facts. This book has been published in three volumes and has a technical and complicated prose.

    The present research is a valuable comparative study of verbs in Beyhaqi history and Jahangosh history and how each of the verbs is used in these two works.

    In order to achieve this purpose, both books have been carefully studied and the verbs have been extracted and then their current coordinates, including subject, person, time, aspect, transitive and intransitive, known and unknown, simple and compound, and so on. It is described and expressed in the form of tables and diagrams.

    1-2-2. Research questions

    The questions that are intended in this research are:

    1- What are the morphological characteristics of verbs in the history of Bayhaqi?

    2- What are the morphological characteristics of verbs in the history of Jahanghosha? 

    3- What is the difference between Bayhaqi history and Jahangasha history? 

    4- What are the benefits of sharing in Bayhaghi history and Jahangasha history? 

    1-2-3.  Research hypotheses

    a) Differences in Beyhaqi history and Jahangasha history:

    1- In Beyhaqi history, bringing the past participle in place of the present participle for emphasis

    2- Indicative tense instead of imperative tense

    3- Use of past tense verbs in the form Descriptive

    4- Instead of a simple verb, a compound verb is necessary.

    5- Sometimes in the past tense, instead of auxiliary verbs (am, e, ist, am, id, and) it uses the definite verb "to be".

    6- The transitive past comes to the descriptive form.

    7- In sympathetic sentences, the verb has been omitted. style="direction: rtl;">9- In the history of Jahangasha, the continuous past tense replaces the transitive past, the simple past tense.

    10- In the history of Jahangasha, the transitive past tense becomes the absolute past or the improbable past or vice versa.

    11- In the history of Jahangasha, old verbs such as "boud" and "boand" and others It does not use the present participle of the verb "to be" and uses the participle "to be" instead.

    12- In the history of Bayhaqi, a transitive verb with an old structure, which is formed from the past participle of the main verb + six forms of the auxiliary verb "to be".

    b) Aspects of commonality:

    1- In the history of Beyhaqi and Jahangasha, there is an omission of verbs.

    2- The use of past tense verbs is in the descriptive form.

    3- The past tense comes in the place of the past continuous, simple participle and news.

    4- The past continuous comes in place of the present participle.

    5- The use of relative verbs "is, was, was, became, became, became and."

    6- Eliminating verbs by comparison

    7- Modifying verbs by "anden and eniden"

    8- Using prefixed and compound verbs

    9- Simple verbs are more than other verbs.

    10- Most verbs are "news"

  • Contents & References of Morphological comparison of verbs in Beyhaqi's history and Jovini's history

    List:

    Chapter One: Introduction and Generalities

    1-1. Introduction. 2

    1-2. generalities 3

    1-2-1. State the problem. 3

    1-2-2. Research questions. 4

    1-2-3.  Research hypotheses. 4

    1-2-4. Research method and the steps of the dissertation. 5

    1-2-5. Necessity and purpose of research. 6

    1-2-6. Research background. 6

    Chapter Two: Theoretical Foundation

    2-1. Verb definition. 8

    2-2. The definition of verb - past tense and present tense. 9

    2-3. Regular verbs and irregular verbs. 9

    2-4. Prefix verbs. 11

    2-4-1. Meanings of prefixes 11

    2-4-2. The position of prefixes 13

    2-4-3. Dispositional prefixes. 13

    2-4-4. Signs of prohibition and negation. 14

    2-5. compound verb 14

    2-6. Transitive and intransitive verbs 16

    2-7. Types of verbs based on time. 17

    2-7-1. simple past 17

    2-7-1-1. past continuous 18

    2-7-1-2. past tense 18

    2-7-1-3. unlikely past 18

    2-7-1-4 Past Future. 19

    2-7-1-5. past participle 19

    2-7-1-6. past continuous 19

    2-7-2. participle verb 20

    2-7-2-1. Adverbial participle. 20

    2-7-2-2. Obligatory participle. 20

    2-7-2-3. Participle continuous. 20

    2-7-3. Future verb (future) 21

    2-7-3-1. Future verbs in the past (future past) 21

    2-8. command verb 22

    2-9. Verb of prayer 22

    2-10. relative verbs 22

    2-10-1. Subordinate verbs. 22

    2-11. Definite verbs (auxiliary) 23

    2-12. Semi-definite verbs. 23

    2-13. Impersonal verbs (quasi definite) 24

    2-14. The expression or limit of the verb. 24

    2-14-1. news aspect 26

    2-14-2. Obligation 26

    2-14-3. Imperative 26

    2-15. verb direction 26

    2-15-1. Use of indefinite verb. 27

    Chapter 3: Description of the life and works of Abul Fazl Beyhaqi and Jahangasha Jovini

    3. Description of the life and works of Abulfazl Beyhaqi and Jahangashai Jovini. 29

    Chapter 4: Examining verbs in the two books Tarikh Bayhaghi and Tarikh Jahangasha

    4-1. the past 1

    4-2. participle 449

    4-3. Comparison of the construction of verbs in the two books of Tarikh Bayhaghi and Tarikh Jahangasha 582

    4-3-1. Simple past tense verbs in the past tense. 582

    4-3-2. Past simple verbs in Jahangosh history 582

    4-3-3. Past continuous verbs in Beyhaqi history. 585

    4-3-4. Past continuous verbs in Jahangosh history 586

    Chapter five: Conclusion

    5. conclusion 603

    Sources and sources. 620

    Abstract 623

    Source:

    - Abul Qasimi, Mohsen (1375). Historical grammar of the Persian language. Tehran: Samt.

    2- - (1385). Brief history of Persian language. Tehran: Side. Fourth edition.

    3- -(1373). Subjects of Dari Persian verbs. Tehran: Diba Press.

    4- Akhlik, Faryar (2006). "To stand, to become and to be able are three modal verbs in the Persian language today". Academy letter. Order special letter. pp. 132-82.

    5- Ahmadi Givi, Hassan (1384). Persian verb grammar. Tehran: Drop Publishing.

    6- Arjang, Gholamreza (1381). Persian grammar today. Tehran: Drop Publishing.

    7- Anuri, Hassan and Hassan Ahmadi Givi (2019). Persian grammar. Tehran: Fatemi Publishing House.

    8- Batani, Mohammad Reza (1356). A look at grammar. Tehran: Aghat Publications.

    9- - (1348). Description of the grammatical structure of the Persian language. Tehran: Amirkabir Publications Institute.

    10- Bagheri, Mehri (1388). Persian language history. Tehran: Drop Publishing.

    11- Jamshidi, Mazher and others (2013). "Study and analysis of the imperative in Persian grammar". Journal of Isfahan Faculty of Literature and Human Sciences. 12- Hakemi, Ismail (1339). Persian grammar. Tehran: Book Joint Stock Company.

    13- Khoeini, Esmet (2009). "Notes about the compound verb". Gohar Goya magazine. fourth year The second pp. 45-58.

    14- Khayampour, Abdul Rasool (1384). Persian grammar. Tehran: Sotoudeh Publications. 12th edition.

    15- Debir Muqaddam, Muhammad (1367). Causative constructions in Persian language. Journal of Linguistics, University Publishing Center. fifth year The first issue.

    16- Satshani, Kisheh Khale, Moharram and Mehdi Dayan (2007). "Investigation of the structure of simple verbs in Persian prose works from the beginning to the end of the fifth century". Order magazine. Academy special letter. Item 4.

    17- -"Prefixed verbs in Persian prose works from the beginning to the end of the fifth century". Order magazine. Special issue of the academy. 5.

    18- Serhangian, Hamid (1352). "definite verb in Persian language". Tabriz Faculty of Literature and Humanities Journal. No. 25.

    19- Shariat, Mohammad Javad (1367). Persian grammar. Tehran: Asatir Publishing House. Third edition.

    20- Sadeghi, Ali Ashraf and Gholamreza Arjang (1354). Persian grammar of the second and third year of culture and literature. Ministry of Education.

    21- Sadeghi, Ali Ashraf (1380). Historical issues of the Persian language, Tehran: Sokhon publishing house. 22- Taleghani, Seyyed Kamal (1351). Grammatical principles of Persian language. Tehran: Amirkabir Publications and Meshaal Publications of Isfahan. 23- Taheri, Hamid (2006). Analytical and historical study of prefix verbs in Persian language. Journal of Faculty of Literature and Human Sciences of Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman. New period. No. 21.

    24- Fatuhi, Mahmoud (1388). Procedure for writing a scientific-research article. Tehran: Sokhon Publications. Third edition.

    25- Farshidvard, Khosrow (1383). Present verb and group and its transformation in Persian language (research on historical grammar of Persian language). Tehran: Soroush Publications. 26- (1383). Compound verb and its structure. Familiar magazine. third year No. 18. pp. 74-82.

    27- - (1348). Today's detailed order. Tehran: Saif Ali Shah Press Company.

    28- Gharib, Abdulazim and others (1370). Persian grammar (five teachers). Tehran: Jihad Danesh Publishing House.

    29- Kolbasi, Iran (1371). The derivation of the word in Persian today. Tehran: Institute of Cultural Studies and Research (Research Institute).

    30- Lasani, Hossein (2004). Comparison of known and unknown structure (verb direction) in Russian and Persian languages.

    31- Majidi, Maryam (2008). The effects and functions of verb form in Persian language. Scientific Research Quarterly of Persian Language and Literature. Sh 15.

    32- Natal Khanleri, Parviz (1343). Linguistics and Persian language. Tehran: Amir Kabir Publications.

    33- - (1366). Persian language history. The second volume. Tehran: New Publishing.

    34- - (1340). About the Persian language. Tehran: Sokhn Magazine Publications.

    35- Vahidian Kamiyar, Taghi and Gholam Reza Omrani (2004). Persian grammar. Tehran: Side. 7th edition.

    36- Vezinpour, Nader (1369). Educational Persian grammar. Publications of Sepahian University of the Revolution of Iran.

    37- Homayounfar Kh., Abdul Rahim (1339). Comprehensive grammar of Persian language. by the efforts of Ruknuddin Homayounfar Kh. Tehran: Ali Akbar Scientific Press Publications.

Morphological comparison of verbs in Beyhaqi's history and Jovini's history