Comparison of the self-efficacy of exercise of 9- to 12-year-old male athletes in different sports fields in Shahin Shahr

Number of pages: 70 File Format: word File Code: 31484
Year: 2014 University Degree: Master's degree Category: Physical Education - Sports
  • Part of the Content
  • Contents & Resources
  • Summary of Comparison of the self-efficacy of exercise of 9- to 12-year-old male athletes in different sports fields in Shahin Shahr

    Master's degree in physical education and sports science (movement behavior orientation)

    Abstract

    Aim and background of the research: Self-efficacy of training is a factor that plays a significant role in sports success and as a deterrent factor, it is important in eliminating the adverse consequences resulting from sports competition. Therefore, the aim of this study is to compare the structure of efficiency in individual and team fields.

    Materials and methods: The research method is post-event type with causal-comparative design. The statistical population included 1500 students who practiced in sports centers related to education in Shahin Shahr. The sample of the study was 77 boys aged 9 to 12 who were selectively included in the study. Self-efficacy and group efficiency questionnaires were used to check the level of efficiency beliefs in table tennis, swimming, football and basketball athletes. The validity of the questionnaire was confirmed by the professors of physical education and its reliability was reported as 0.7. Data analysis was done using descriptive statistics (mean, standard deviation) and inferential statistics (one-way analysis of variance) with a significance level of 0.05. All analyzes were done in the SPSS software package version 16.

    Findings: The results showed that there is a difference between the beliefs of the effectiveness of training in different fields and swimmers and soccer players had higher self-efficacy and group efficiency.

    Conclusion: Efficacy beliefs in different sports fields according to the intra-individual (such as the level of ability to perform skills) and interpersonal (such as The perception of team members about the ability of their teammates is different, and the beliefs of efficiency are more influenced by the experience and ability of the individual to perform the skill than by the age of the people.

    Key words: comparison, automaticity of practice, group efficiency, male students, different sports fields

    Introduction

    Exercise and activity A regular body in all periods of life, especially during childhood and adolescence, plays an important role in determining people's health and future lifestyle. Since the recognition of physical talents and abilities is formed in this period and is completed during the future life of a person, education as one of the basic organs plays an important role in the health of society and its growth and development. By expanding physical education and sports activities in schools, the level of physical, mental and intellectual abilities of students can be increased and their mental and physical tensions can be reduced (Abdali et al., 2009). Participating in sports exercises and competitions, in addition to health consequences, helps students to better understand their mental-motor abilities and to believe that they can maintain physical activity and sports throughout their future lives by achieving sports success. Zee Wal Toski[1] and his colleagues (2009) showed that children who had a higher perception of opportunities for physical activities after school, had higher confidence to do physical activities and were more confident that they could influence their parents and school staff to provide opportunities for physical activities.

    The concept of self-efficacy is one of the important psychological concepts in the effective implementation of sports activities (Ryan[2], 2008). Bandura (1986, 1997) proposed the theory of self-efficacy in the form of social-cognitive model. This theory suggests that mediators that ultimately increase physical activity behaviors (such as self-efficacy intervention strategies) operate within a complex set of individual, environmental, and behavioral variables that are moderated by an individual-level human base. Bandura [3] (1977) defined self-efficacy as a feeling of confidence in an individual's ability to perform a certain behavior in various situations. Regardless of the interaction between different factors in the occurrence of a special behavior, probably the most important factor is the individual's belief about the ability to perform that behavior (Weinberg and Gould [4], 2003). A person's attitude about being able to perform a behavior successfully increases the possibility of engaging in that behavior.

    "Perceived efficacy" plays a key role in human actions, because it not only directly affects behavior, but also affects other determinants of behavior such as goals and hopes, consequences experiences, affective tendencies and perceived obstacles and opportunities in the social environment (Bandura, 1995, 1997). Perceived self-efficacy should be distinguished from other components such as self-concept, locus of control, and outcome experiences. In fact, perceived efficiency is a judgment of a person's ability. Therefore, self-efficacy is considered a special form of self-confidence (Felts [5], 1988). Bandura (1997) theorized self-efficacy through the approach of influence on individual chosen activities, the effort they spend in such activities and the amount of preparation they show in the face of failure or annoying feeling.

    Bandura (1986) proposed the concept of group efficacy for the theory of self-efficacy and in order to describe the options, effort and persistence in the group. He (1997.p.447) defined perceived group efficacy as the group's shared belief in their ability to organize and implement desired actions in order to achieve certain levels of progress (success). From his point of view, group efficiency is a certain event at the group level that is evaluated at the individual level. Also, Zaccaro [6] and his colleagues (1995) set another definition of group efficiency; Under the heading that group efficiency is the shared sense of competence among group members, whose response is coordinated and completed under the title of a coherent source according to the requirements of a specific situation. Therefore, to accomplish group tasks, group efficiency requires a high level of interaction, solidarity and cooperation, and in a sports complex, it is considered as "team efficiency or team confidence" (Sherrett, Sullivan and Feltz [7], 2005). A basketball player may have little confidence in the successful execution of an individual task of shooting a shot, but believe that his team will perform successfully in an interrelated group task (Martinez[8] et al., 2011). In addition to the four basic sources mentioned by Bandura, Valli[9] and his colleagues (1998) identified other sources of confidence such as mental and physical preparation consisting of social support and guidance from the instructor, which can mean; There are other sources of information at the group level. In the current research, we decided to examine the factor of self-efficacy and group efficiency in individual and team disciplines. Statement of the problem Research has shown that there is a significant relationship between higher levels of practice self-efficacy and better individual and team performance (Meritz [10], 2000, Bashart 2011). It is also possible to raise the level of athletes' performance by identifying mediators that affect this relationship, so that the effects of disruptive factors that destroy athletes' performance (such as anxiety and stress) can be prevented. Among the types of self-efficacy measurements, task-specific measurements have the highest correlation with performance, however, few studies in the country have investigated the relationship between self-efficacy and the performance of athletes.

    Dr. Abdoli and his colleagues (2009) showed that by expanding physical education and sports activities in schools, the level of physical, mental and intellectual abilities of students can be increased and their mental and physical tensions can be reduced. Examining children's sports history and their successes in competitions plays an important role in understanding the level of self-efficacy of people's training. Despite its high importance, the research on the issue of efficacy beliefs in sports education has been limited to elementary school students, and we tried to understand more about the role of effective variables in people's efficacy beliefs by comparing children's exercise self-efficacy. Considering the important role of exercise self-efficacy in knowing the physical abilities of children and adolescents, it is important to know the mediators that may affect the relationship between self-efficacy and performance and affect the level of self-efficacy and performance. Factors such as age, gender, sports experience, and the number of sports successes are influential mediators in people's efficacy beliefs.

    According to Bandura (1986), the concepts of self-efficacy and group efficacy are different in terms of mediation, which means that in group efficacy, in addition to the four basic sources, there are other sources at the group level.

  • Contents & References of Comparison of the self-efficacy of exercise of 9- to 12-year-old male athletes in different sports fields in Shahin Shahr

    List:

    Chapter One: Research Design

    Introduction .. 2

    Statement of the problem .. 4

    Necessity and importance of research .. 5

    Research objectives .. 6

    1-4-1. Overall goal .. 6

       1-4-2. Specific objectives .. 6

    Research hypotheses .. 7

    Research field .. 7

    Research limitations .. 7

    Definition of words and terms .. 8

    Chapter two: theoretical foundations and research background

    2-1. Introduction .. 10

    2-2. Theoretical foundations .. 10

    2-2-1. Self-efficacy and its information sources. 10

    2-2-2. Measuring exercise self-efficacy. 11

    2-2-3. Performance measurements.. 12

       2-2-4. Mediators of the relationship between self-efficacy and performance. 13

    A) The type of self-efficacy assessment and implementation. Group efficiency.. 15

        2-2-6. Group efficiency resources .. 15

        2-2-7. Measuring group efficiency.. 16

    2-3. Background of the research.. 17

        2-3-1. Research done inside the country. 17

        2-3-1. Research done abroad. 19

    2-4. Summary.. 24

    Chapter Three: Research Methodology

    3-1. Introduction .. 27

    3-2. Research method.. 27

    3-3. Statistical community.. 28

    3-4. Sample size .. 28

    3-5. Research variables .. 28

    3-6. Information collection tool .. 28

    3-6-1. Table tennis practice self-efficacy questionnaire. 28

    3-6-2. Exercise self-efficacy questionnaire in swimming. 30

    3-6-3. Questionnaire of group efficiency in football field. 30

    3-6-4. Questionnaire of group efficiency in the field of basketball. 31

    3-7. How to conduct research.. 32

    4-7. Statistical method .. 33

    Chapter four: data analysis and research results

    4-1. Introduction .. 35

    4-2. Descriptive data analysis.. 35

    4-3. Testing of statistical hypotheses.. 38

    Chapter five: summary, discussion, conclusions and suggestions

    5-1. Introduction .. 42

    5-2. Summary of the research.. 42

    3-5. Research results.. 43

    5-4. Discussion and conclusion.. 44

    5-4-1. Discussion of the first hypothesis.. 44

    5-4-2. Discussion of the second hypothesis.. 45

    5-4-3. Discussion of the third hypothesis.. 46

    5-5. Conclusion .. 46

    5-6. Suggestions for future research .. 47

    5-7. Practical suggestions .. 48

    Source:

    Amirtash, Ali Mohammad. Sobhaninejad, Mehdi. Abedi, Ahmed (2015). Comparison of the social development of athletic and non-athletic male students in middle school. Olympics. Number 2.

    Shivelson; Statistical reasoning in behavioral sciences; the second c; Translated by Kyamanesh; Tehran; Academic Jihad; 1383 [2]

    [3] Dr. Abdoli, Shamsipour Dehkordi, Shams, Faqihi; (1389); The effect of sports participation on personality traits of perfectionism and self-efficacy of adolescent students and the relationship of these traits with social development; Education Quarterly No. 102; 1389

    [4] Vaez Mousavi, Seyyed Mohammad Kazem; Moseibi, Fathullah. (1386). Sports psychology. First edition, Tehran: Samit

    [5] Jafar Abdul Alizadeh, Jafar Mohammadi, Seyyed Reza Attarzadeh Hosseini, Mehdi Sohrabi (2008). Determining the sources of sports self-confidence of young volleyball players participating in national championships in 2018 and its relationship with sports history. Published in the second motor behavior conference in Arak. [6] Mohammad Ali Besharat, Samane Pourbohlool (2011). Moderating Effects of Self-Confidence and Sport Self-Efficacy on the Relationship between Competitive Anxiety and Sport Performance Psychology. University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran. Vol.2, No.7, 760-765 Copyright © 2011 SciRes.

    [7] Rahim Ramzaninezhad, Misagh Hoseini Keshtan, Minoo Dadban Shahamat & Shahram

    Shafiee Kordshooli (2009). THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN COLLECTIVE EFFICACY, GROUP COHESION AND TEAM PERFORMANCE IN PROFESSIONAL VOLLEYBALL TEAMS. Brazilian Journal of Biomotricity, v. 3, n. 1, p. 31-39, 2009 (ISSN 1981-6324).

     

    [8] Julio Rom?n Mart?nez1, Félix Guillén1 and Deborah Feltz2 (2011). Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Collective Efficacy Questionnaire for Sports. Psychothema 2011. Vol. 23, n? 3, pp.

     

    [9] David MacLean & Philip Sullivan (2003). A Season Long Case Study Investigation of Collective Efficacy In Male Intercollegiate Basketball. Department of Physical Education and Kinesiology Brock University Copyright © 2003 Athletic Insight, Inc. ISSN 1536-0431.

    [10] Anshel, M. H., & Mansouri, H. (2005). Influences of perfectionism on motor performance, affect, and causal attributions in response to critical information feedback. Journal of sport behavior, 28, 99-124.

    [11] Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory.

    Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    [12] Bandura, A. (1990). Perceived self-efficacy in the exercise of personal agency. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 2, 128-163. [13] Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning.

    Educational Psychologist, 28(2), 117-148.

    [14] Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.

    [15] Balaguer, I., Escart?, A., & Villamar?n, F. (1995). Autoefi cacia en el deporte

    y en la actividad f?sica: actual estado de la investigation. Revista de

    Psicolog?a General y Aplicada, 48(1), 139-159.

    [16] BRUCEW ATIUNS, ANNE W. GARCIA AND ED TUREK (1994). The Relation Between Self-Efficacy and Sport Performance: Evidence from a Sample of Youth Baseball Players. JOURNAL OF APPLIED SPORT PSYCHOLOGY.6.2 1-3 1 ( 1994).

    [17] David, A.D, Karly, S.G, Richard, R.R, Konstantinos, K;(2009); Children's self-efficacy and proxy efficacy for after-school physical activity; Psychology of Sport and Exercise. [18] Feltz, D. L. (1988). Self-confidence and sports performance. In K. B. Pandolf (Ed.)

    Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews, (pp. 423-457). New York: MacMillan.

    [19] Feltz, D. L. (1988). Self-confidence and sports performance. In K. B. Pandolf (Ed.) Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews, (pp. 423-457). New York: MacMillan.

     

    [20] Feltz, D.L. Path analysis of the causal elements in Bandura's theory of self-efficacy and an anxiety-based model of avoidance behavior. Journal o f Personality and Social Psychology,

    1982, 42, 764-781.

    [21] Feltz, D.L., & Chase, M.A. (1998). The measurement of self-efficacy and confidence in sport. In J.L. Duda (Ed.), Advances in sport and exercise psychology measurement (pp. 65-80). Morgantown, WV: Fitness Information Technology.

    [22] Feltz, D.L., & Lirgg, C.D. (1998). Perceived team and player efficacy in hockey. Journal of

    Applied Psychology, 83, 557-564.

    [23] Feltz, D.L. (1995). Motivation in sport and exercise. In G.C. Roberts (Ed.), Comprensi?n de la motivation en el deporte: una perspectiva de autoefi cacia (pp. 123-137). Bilbao: Desclée de Brouwer.

    [24] Feltz, D. L. (1994). Self-confidence and performance. In D. Druckman, & R. A. Bjork

    (Eds.), Learning remembering, believing. (pp. 173-206). Washington, D. C.: National Academy

    Press.

    [25] Gayton, W. F., Matthews, G. R., & Borchstead, G. N. (1986). An investigation of the

    validity of the physical self-efficacy scale in predicting marathon performance. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 63, 752-754. [26] Julio R.M, Félix G, Deborah F; (2011); Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Collective Efficacy Questionnaire for Sports; Psychothema 2011. Vol. 23, n? 3, pp. 503-509.

    [27] Lee, C. (1982). Self-efficacy as a predictor of performance in competitive gymnastics.

    Journal of Sport Psychology, 4,405-409.

    [28] Moritz, S. E., Feltz, D. L., Fahrbach, K. R., & Mack, D. E. (2000). The relation of

    self-efficacy measures to sport performance: A meta-analytic review. Research

    Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 71, 280-294.

Comparison of the self-efficacy of exercise of 9- to 12-year-old male athletes in different sports fields in Shahin Shahr