Contents & References of Stabilization and modification of geotechnical characteristics of windy sand using polymer slurry
List:
The first chapter of the introduction. 1
1-1-Work perspective. 2
2-1- Definition of the problem. 2
3-1-Review of the materials presented in this research. 3
The second chapter of research history. 5
1-2- Introductions to soil improvement, materials and methods used. 6
2-2- Using waste additives to improve the properties of sandy soils. 6
1-2-2- Improving the properties of sand stabilized with cement and waste glass shards. 6
2-2-2- Using waste rubber and rubber flooring to improve the properties of sandy soil. 10
3-2- Reinforcement of sandy soil using natural fibers. 16
1-3-2-amendment of sand using barley straw and hemp fibers. 16
2-2-3- Increasing the carrying capacity of sandy soil reinforced with palm leaves 18
4-2- Reinforcement of sandy soil using synthetic fibers. 20
1-4-2 Using waste plastic fibers of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) 21
2-4-2- Using rubber factory fibers. 26
5-2- Use of polymer and petroleum materials to improve sandy soil. 27
1-5-2- Modifying the geotechnical properties of sandy soils by using petroleum waste from refineries: 28
2-5-2- Investigating the effect of polymer adhesives on the mechanical properties of sandy soils: 31
1-2-5-2-Research conducted by Park et al. 31
2-2-5-2-Research done by Kastaz et al. 35
3-2-5-2- The research done by Anagnastopoulos et al. 38
2-5-3- Summary and conclusions from past research. 40
The third chapter of research method. 43
1-3- Introduction. 44
2-3- Materials used. 44
1-2-3- used soil. 44
2-2-3- Polymer used in research. 45
3-2-3- Fibers used. 46
4-2-3- Cement. 47
3-3- Sample preparation and processing 47
4-3- Laboratory program. 48
1-4-3- Granulation test. 49
1-1-4-3- Necessary tools. 49
2-1-4-3- Performing the test. 49
2-4-3- Compaction test. 49
1-2-4-3- Introduction. 49
2-2-4-3- The basis of the test. 50
3-2-4-3- Necessary tools. 50
4-2-4-3- Test method. 51
3-4-3- CBR test. 52
1-3-4-3- Experiment theory. 52
2-3-4-3- Test equipment. 53
3-3-4-3- Test method. 54
4-3-4-3 CBR numbers. 55
5-3-4-3- Correcting test results. 55
3-4-4- Direct cutting test. 56
-1-4-4-3 theory of testing. 56
-2-4-4-3 conditions for conducting the test. 57
-3-4-4-3 test equipment. 57
-4-4-4-3 method of testing. 58
-5-4-3 Uniaxial compression test. 59
1-5-4-3 test theory. 59
2-5-4-3- Test equipment. 59
3-5-4-3-test method. 60
Chapter Four, the results of the experiments and their interpretation 61
1-4- Introduction. 62
2-4- Granulation test results. 62
3-4- Results of compression tests. 62
1-3-4- Compaction test without additives. 63
2-3-4- Compaction test with 0.1% polyvinyl alcohol polymer. 64
3-3-4- Compaction test with 0.2% polyvinyl alcohol polymer. 65
4-3-4- Compaction test with 0.3% polyvinyl alcohol polymer. 66
5-3-4- Interpretation of compression test results. 67
4-4- Results of CBR tests. 68
1-4-4- CBR test without additives. 68
2-4-4- CBR test with 0.1% polyvinyl alcohol polymer. 69
3-4-4- CBR test with 0.2% polyvinyl alcohol polymer. 71
4-4-4- CBR test with 0.3% polyvinyl alcohol polymer. 73
5-4-4- CBR test with 0.4% polyvinyl alcohol polymer. 74
6-4-4- CBR test with 0.5% polyvinyl alcohol polymer. 76
7-4-4- CBR test with 0.6% polyvinyl alcohol polymer. 77
8-4-4- Interpretation of CBR test results. 79
9-4-4- CBR test with polyvinyl alcohol polymer and cement. 81
5-4- Results of direct cutting tests. 82
1-5-4- Direct cutting test on soil without additives. 82
2-5-4- direct cutting test on soil with 0.2% polyvinyl alcohol polymer. 83
3-5-4- Direct cutting test with 0.2% polymer and 0.4% tire fibers. 84
4-5-4- direct cutting test with 0.2% polymer and 0.6% fibers84
4-5-4- direct cutting test with 0.2% polymer and 0.6% tire fibers. 85
5-5-4- Direct cutting test with 0.2% polymer and 0.8% tire fibers. 86
6-5-4- Interpretation of direct cutting test results. 86
4-6- The results of uniaxial tests. 88
4-6-1- Uniaxial test for windblown sand with 2% cement. 88
4-6-2- Uniaxial test for wind sand with 0.2% polyvinyl alcohol. 89
3-6-4- Uniaxial test for wind sand with 0.4% polyvinyl alcohol. 89
4-6-4- Uniaxial test for wind sand with 0.6% polyvinyl alcohol. 90
5-6-4- Uniaxial test with 0.2% polyvinyl alcohol and 2% cement. 91
6-6-4- Uniaxial test with 0.4% polyvinyl alcohol and 2% cement. 91
7-6-4- Uniaxial test with 0.2% polyvinyl alcohol and 0.6% tire fibers. 92
8-6-4- Uniaxial test with 0.4% polyvinyl alcohol and 0.6% tire fibers. 93-9-6-4- Uniaxial test with 0.2% polyvinyl alcohol, 0.6% tire fibers and 2% cement 93
10-6-4- Uniaxial test with 0.4% polyvinyl alcohol, 0.6% tire fibers and 2% cement 94
11-6-4- Interpretation of the results of uniaxial tests. 95
Chapter Five Conclusions and Suggestions 101
1-5- Conclusion. 102
5-2- Suggestions 103
Resources. 100
Source:
[1] Baxter, C. D. P., King, J. W., Silva, A. J., Page, M., and Calabretta, V. V._(2005)_. "Site characterization of dredged sediments and evaluation of beneficial uses." Recycled materials in geotechnics, A. H. Aydilek and J. Wartman, eds., ASCE, New York, 150–161.
[2] Ingles, O. G. and Metcalf, J. B. (1972). "Soil Stabilization Principle and Practice". Butterworths. Melbourne, Australia.
[3] Clough, G. W., Sitar, N., Bachus, R. C. and Rad, N. S. (1981) "Cemented sands under static loading", Journal of Geotech. Engrg. Div., ASCE, 107(6), 799–817.
[4] Coduto, P.D., (2003), "Geotechnical Engineering" - Principles and practices, Prentice Hall Inc. of India, 759 p. [5] Dupas, J.; Pecker, A. (1979) "Static and dynamic properties of sand-cement". Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 105(3), 419-436.
[6] Wartman, J., D. G. Grubb, and A. S. M. Nasim. (2004). "Select engineering characteristics of crushed glass". Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering 16(6), 526 - 539, American Society of Civil Engineers.
[7] Grubb, D. G., Davis, A., Sands, S. C., Carnivale, M., III, Wartman, J., and Gallagher, P. M. (2006). "Field evaluation of crushed glass and redged material blends." J. Geotech. Geoenvironment. Eng., 132_5_, 577-590.
[8] Grubb, D. G., Davis, A., Sands, S. C., Carnivale, M., III, Wartman, J., and Gallagher, Yigang Liu, P. M. (2006). "Laboratory Evaluation of Crushed Glass-Dredged Material Blends." J. Geotech. Geoenviron.Eng., 132:5_562_576.
[9] Ehsan Haqshan, Arabani Mahyar, Ghorbani Ali, (2010), "Laboratory study of improving the properties of sand stabilized with cement and waste glass chips", 4th Geotechnical Conference, Tehran, Iran.
[10] Foose, G. J., Benson, C. H. and Bosscher P. J., (1996), "Sand Reinforced with Shredded Waste Tires", Journal of Geotechnical Engineering (ASCE), Vol. 122, No. 9, September, pp. 760-767. [11] Hataf, N. and Rahimi, M. M., (2005), "Experimental Investigation of Bearing Capacity of Sand Reinforced with Randomly Distributed Tire Shreds", Construction and Building Materials, (Elsevier, Ltd.), 20, 910-916.
[12] Attom, M. F., (2005), "The Use of Shredded Waste Tires to Improve the Geotechnical Engineering Properties of Sands”, Journal of Environmental Geology, Springer Berlin/Heidelberg, Vol. 49, No. 4, February, pp. 497-503.
[13] Pamukcu S. and Akbullut S., (2006), "Thermoelastic Enhancement of Damping of Sand Using Synthetic Ground Rubber", J. Geotech. and Geoenvir. Engrg., Vol. 132, Issue 4, pp. 501-510.
[14] Nakhai Ali, Marandi Seyed Morteza, Sani Kermani Siamak, (2010), "Laboratory study of soil and rubber crumb", 4th Geotechnical Conference, Tehran, Iran.