Stabilization and modification of geotechnical characteristics of windy sand using polymer slurry

Number of pages: 130 File Format: word File Code: 31460
Year: 2012 University Degree: Master's degree Category: Civil Engineering
  • Part of the Content
  • Contents & Resources
  • Summary of Stabilization and modification of geotechnical characteristics of windy sand using polymer slurry

    Dissertation

    To receive a Master's degree

    Civil Engineering - Soil and Foundation Mechanics

    Abstract

    The purpose of this research is to improve the mechanical and geotechnical properties of windy sand soils. Because one of the major problems of windblown sand is its low resistance under natural and saturated moisture conditions, a laboratory study was conducted to investigate the effect of adding polyvinyl alcohol polymer in improving the geotechnical properties of windblown sand. The results of compaction tests showed that the addition of this polymer up to 0.2% by weight increases the maximum dry weight and there is no significant change in the optimal moisture content. The results of the tests also showed that with the increase in the polymer percentage, the CBR resistance of the samples increases to a significant amount, so that in the samples made with 0.5% by weight of the polymer, the CBR value reached 185; This value is more than 5.7 times CBR for soil without additives. Considering the solubility of the above polymer in water, cement was used to protect the mixture of soil and polymer against scouring. Experiments showed that by adding 2% of cement to the above mixture, both the strength of the samples increased and their stability against scouring increased. The results of the direct shear test showed that the addition of polymer also causes a significant increase in the shear strength of the samples. Of course, soil failure in this case was observed as brittle and sudden failure. To prevent this situation and to make the samples more malleable, tire fibers were used. The optimal amount of fibers needed in this case was equal to 0.6% by weight. The results of uniaxial tests also showed that the addition of polyvinyl alcohol increases the compressive and shear strength of the soil to a very significant extent. It was also found that the simultaneous combination of polymer, cement and fibers to the soil has the greatest effect in modifying the characteristics of windy sand. For example, in the combination of 0.4% polyvinyl alcohol, 2% cement and 0.6% tire fibers with air sand, the compressive strength of the sample reached 15 kg/cm2; While the compressive strength for windblown sand with 2% cement was only 0.3 kg/cm2.

    Chapter One Introduction

    Work Prospects

    Undoubtedly, one of the most preliminary and important principles in the implementation of construction projects is to have a resistant land for construction, which due to the increasing growth of the world's population in recent years, the area of ??suitable land for construction is gradually decreasing. is In such a situation, finding new and fundamental methods to improve and correct unsuitable land has created a fierce competition among civil engineers in developed countries, and in fact, it must be accepted that the development of specific techniques and methods as much as possible will be necessary for humans to achieve this goal. What makes one method superior to another method is economic parameters, implementation conditions and problems, available facilities, and time and place limitations. Basically, obtaining high-quality materials that are economical and can easily withstand the loads applied by the structure is the main motivation of soil modification[1]. Problematic soils, such as loose soils with low bearing capacity and high settlement, have two ways in front of geotechnical engineers: a) Using load-bearing elements in the soil. b) Improving and correcting the physical properties of the soil. Improvement (or modification) refers to a set of operations that lead to the removal of some inappropriate behavior of the soil or the imposition of appropriate behavior on it. Basically, the main goals of improvement are: increasing the soil resistance, reducing the general characteristics of deformation and removing some inappropriate behaviors or adding some appropriate behaviors to the soil. There are wide soil stabilization methods that are used in each case according to their specific conditions, but in general they can be divided into two categories: chemical stabilization and physical-mechanical stabilization. The purpose of chemical stabilization is to modify the desired properties of the soil with the help of additives, which are obtained in terms of chemical interactions resulting from these materials in the vicinity of the soil. The meaning of physical stabilization of soil is stabilization and modification of soil properties without changing the chemical properties of soil.. This type of stabilization can be implemented in different ways, soil reinforcement is one of these methods.

    In Iran, taking into account the climate and geographical conditions, as well as the existence of vast areas of deserts, where most of the soils in these areas are fine-grained sands (windy sand), because one of the major problems of windy sand soils is their low resistance under natural moisture and saturation conditions, perhaps one of the major obstacles in the field of developing the country's road network and construction projects is the existence of this type of sand. in a wide area of ??the country. It is natural that if the loan sources are far away from the axis of the road or construction projects, as is the case in the Central Desert, Lut Desert or the southern deserts of the country, the cost of road construction and soil improvement in the region will be several times higher than usual. For this purpose, it is very important to study new methods that are able to improve the soil of the land covered with windy sand, and this research is in this direction.

    3-1-Overview of the materials presented in this research

    In the second chapter, the generalities and history of research related to improving the properties of sandy soils are reviewed.

    The third chapter describes the research method and laboratory programs.

    In the fourth chapter, the results of the experiments and their interpretation are discussed.

    The fifth chapter includes conclusions and proposals, and at the end, the sources are introduced.

    The second chapter, research background

    Introduction to soil improvement, materials and methods used

    In this section, various materials that have been used so far to improve sandy soils are briefly discussed. The materials used in general include the following:

    Using waste materials

    Using natural fibers

    Using synthetic fibers

    Using abandoned polymer and petroleum materials

    2-2- Using waste additives in order to improve the properties of sandy soils

    Producing a huge amount of worn materials with a long lifespan and not providing a principled and correct solution for Burial, recycling or optimal use is one of the issues and problems that have arisen in recent years. In addition to improving soil properties, adding waste materials can also be considered from the two perspectives of disposal of waste materials and reduction of operational costs. In this research, several things are briefly mentioned. 1-2-2- Improving the properties of sand stabilized with cement and waste glass shards. For the first time in 1917, Amis [2] registered the soil-cement mixture as an invention in Philadelphia, America, and after him in 1922, the State Highway Organization of South Dakota and Iowa and subsequently in the year In 1932, the South Carolina Road Department used this mixture to stabilize the roads and build highways [1]. During the years 1940-1950, research was conducted on the effective factors of compacted improved soil in the road bed [2]. Cementation [3] in its general meaning is cementing and sticking, and in geotechnical engineering, it refers to the sticking of soil particles to each other and creating a sticky mass with greater resistance. Artificial cementation has generally been investigated in relation to sands. Because coarser materials such as coarse-grained sands generally do not need to be improved and often have favorable geotechnical characteristics, for this purpose, in order to improve the soil by using its artificial cementation, researchers have focused more attention on sands and fine-grained materials[3].

    After cement is added to the soil, various reactions take place between soil and cement. The most important of these reactions in the short term is the substitution reaction of positive ions and the accumulation-condensation reaction. In these two reactions, the soil texture changes with the accumulation of particles next to each other in a kind of granulation and its resistance increases. The finer the cement particles, the more hydration [4] is done and for a longer period of time, even for many years, and this goes back to the increase in the strength of the cement composition with time [4].

    Dupas and Packer [5] in 1979, studying the static and mechanical properties of sand-cement in order to improve the sand and avoid the risk of liquefaction, showed that by increasing the amount of cementing agent, the adhesion of the soil increases and adding 5% of Portland cement 200-300 kPa creates adhesion in sandy soil [5].

  • Contents & References of Stabilization and modification of geotechnical characteristics of windy sand using polymer slurry

    List:

    The first chapter of the introduction. 1

    1-1-Work perspective. 2

    2-1- Definition of the problem. 2

    3-1-Review of the materials presented in this research. 3

    The second chapter of research history. 5

    1-2- Introductions to soil improvement, materials and methods used. 6

    2-2- Using waste additives to improve the properties of sandy soils. 6

    1-2-2- Improving the properties of sand stabilized with cement and waste glass shards. 6

    2-2-2- Using waste rubber and rubber flooring to improve the properties of sandy soil. 10

    3-2- Reinforcement of sandy soil using natural fibers. 16

    1-3-2-amendment of sand using barley straw and hemp fibers. 16

    2-2-3- Increasing the carrying capacity of sandy soil reinforced with palm leaves 18

    4-2- Reinforcement of sandy soil using synthetic fibers. 20

    1-4-2 Using waste plastic fibers of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) 21

    2-4-2- Using rubber factory fibers. 26

    5-2- Use of polymer and petroleum materials to improve sandy soil. 27

    1-5-2- Modifying the geotechnical properties of sandy soils by using petroleum waste from refineries: 28

    2-5-2- Investigating the effect of polymer adhesives on the mechanical properties of sandy soils: 31

    1-2-5-2-Research conducted by Park et al. 31

    2-2-5-2-Research done by Kastaz et al. 35

    3-2-5-2- The research done by Anagnastopoulos et al. 38

    2-5-3- Summary and conclusions from past research. 40

    The third chapter of research method. 43

    1-3- Introduction. 44

    2-3- Materials used. 44

    1-2-3- used soil. 44

    2-2-3- Polymer used in research. 45

    3-2-3- Fibers used. 46

    4-2-3- Cement. 47

    3-3- Sample preparation and processing 47

    4-3- Laboratory program. 48

    1-4-3- Granulation test. 49

    1-1-4-3- Necessary tools. 49

    2-1-4-3- Performing the test. 49

    2-4-3- Compaction test. 49

    1-2-4-3- Introduction. 49

    2-2-4-3- The basis of the test. 50

    3-2-4-3- Necessary tools. 50

    4-2-4-3- Test method. 51

    3-4-3- CBR test. 52

    1-3-4-3- Experiment theory. 52

    2-3-4-3- Test equipment. 53

    3-3-4-3- Test method. 54

    4-3-4-3 CBR numbers. 55

    5-3-4-3- Correcting test results. 55

    3-4-4- Direct cutting test. 56

    -1-4-4-3 theory of testing. 56

    -2-4-4-3 conditions for conducting the test. 57

    -3-4-4-3 test equipment. 57

    -4-4-4-3 method of testing. 58

    -5-4-3 Uniaxial compression test. 59

    1-5-4-3 test theory. 59

    2-5-4-3- Test equipment. 59

    3-5-4-3-test method. 60

    Chapter Four, the results of the experiments and their interpretation 61

    1-4- Introduction. 62

    2-4- Granulation test results. 62

    3-4- Results of compression tests. 62

    1-3-4- Compaction test without additives. 63

    2-3-4- Compaction test with 0.1% polyvinyl alcohol polymer. 64

    3-3-4- Compaction test with 0.2% polyvinyl alcohol polymer. 65

    4-3-4- Compaction test with 0.3% polyvinyl alcohol polymer. 66

    5-3-4- Interpretation of compression test results. 67

    4-4- Results of CBR tests. 68

    1-4-4- CBR test without additives. 68

    2-4-4- CBR test with 0.1% polyvinyl alcohol polymer. 69

    3-4-4- CBR test with 0.2% polyvinyl alcohol polymer. 71

    4-4-4- CBR test with 0.3% polyvinyl alcohol polymer. 73

    5-4-4- CBR test with 0.4% polyvinyl alcohol polymer. 74

    6-4-4- CBR test with 0.5% polyvinyl alcohol polymer. 76

    7-4-4- CBR test with 0.6% polyvinyl alcohol polymer. 77

    8-4-4- Interpretation of CBR test results. 79

    9-4-4- CBR test with polyvinyl alcohol polymer and cement. 81

    5-4- Results of direct cutting tests. 82

    1-5-4- Direct cutting test on soil without additives. 82

    2-5-4- direct cutting test on soil with 0.2% polyvinyl alcohol polymer. 83

    3-5-4- Direct cutting test with 0.2% polymer and 0.4% tire fibers. 84

    4-5-4- direct cutting test with 0.2% polymer and 0.6% fibers84

    4-5-4- direct cutting test with 0.2% polymer and 0.6% tire fibers. 85

    5-5-4- Direct cutting test with 0.2% polymer and 0.8% tire fibers. 86

    6-5-4- Interpretation of direct cutting test results. 86

    4-6- The results of uniaxial tests. 88

    4-6-1- Uniaxial test for windblown sand with 2% cement. 88

    4-6-2- Uniaxial test for wind sand with 0.2% polyvinyl alcohol. 89

    3-6-4- Uniaxial test for wind sand with 0.4% polyvinyl alcohol. 89

    4-6-4- Uniaxial test for wind sand with 0.6% polyvinyl alcohol. 90

    5-6-4- Uniaxial test with 0.2% polyvinyl alcohol and 2% cement. 91

    6-6-4- Uniaxial test with 0.4% polyvinyl alcohol and 2% cement. 91

    7-6-4- Uniaxial test with 0.2% polyvinyl alcohol and 0.6% tire fibers. 92

    8-6-4- Uniaxial test with 0.4% polyvinyl alcohol and 0.6% tire fibers. 93-9-6-4- Uniaxial test with 0.2% polyvinyl alcohol, 0.6% tire fibers and 2% cement 93

    10-6-4- Uniaxial test with 0.4% polyvinyl alcohol, 0.6% tire fibers and 2% cement 94

    11-6-4- Interpretation of the results of uniaxial tests. 95

    Chapter Five Conclusions and Suggestions 101

    1-5- Conclusion. 102

    5-2- Suggestions 103

    Resources. 100

     

    Source:

     

    [1] Baxter, C. D. P., King, J. W., Silva, A. J., Page, M., and Calabretta, V. V._(2005)_. "Site characterization of dredged sediments and evaluation of beneficial uses." Recycled materials in geotechnics, A. H. Aydilek and J. Wartman, eds., ASCE, New York, 150–161.

    [2] Ingles, O. G. and Metcalf, J. B. (1972). "Soil Stabilization Principle and Practice". Butterworths. Melbourne, Australia.

    [3] Clough, G. W., Sitar, N., Bachus, R. C. and Rad, N. S. (1981) "Cemented sands under static loading", Journal of Geotech. Engrg. Div., ASCE, 107(6), 799–817.

    [4] Coduto, P.D., (2003), "Geotechnical Engineering" - Principles and practices, Prentice Hall Inc. of India, 759 p. [5] Dupas, J.; Pecker, A. (1979) "Static and dynamic properties of sand-cement". Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 105(3), 419-436.

    [6] Wartman, J., D. G. Grubb, and A. S. M. Nasim. (2004). "Select engineering characteristics of crushed glass". Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering 16(6), 526 - 539, American Society of Civil Engineers.

    [7] Grubb, D. G., Davis, A., Sands, S. C., Carnivale, M., III, Wartman, J., and Gallagher, P. M. (2006). "Field evaluation of crushed glass and redged material blends." J. Geotech. Geoenvironment. Eng., 132_5_, 577-590.

    [8] Grubb, D. G., Davis, A., Sands, S. C., Carnivale, M., III, Wartman, J., and Gallagher, Yigang Liu, P. M. (2006). "Laboratory Evaluation of Crushed Glass-Dredged Material Blends." J. Geotech. Geoenviron.Eng., 132:5_562_576.

    [9] Ehsan Haqshan, Arabani Mahyar, Ghorbani Ali, (2010), "Laboratory study of improving the properties of sand stabilized with cement and waste glass chips", 4th Geotechnical Conference, Tehran, Iran.

    [10] Foose, G. J., Benson, C. H. and Bosscher P. J., (1996), "Sand Reinforced with Shredded Waste Tires", Journal of Geotechnical Engineering (ASCE), Vol. 122, No. 9, September, pp. 760-767. [11] Hataf, N. and Rahimi, M. M., (2005), "Experimental Investigation of Bearing Capacity of Sand Reinforced with Randomly Distributed Tire Shreds", Construction and Building Materials, (Elsevier, Ltd.), 20, 910-916.

    [12] Attom, M. F., (2005), "The Use of Shredded Waste Tires to Improve the Geotechnical Engineering Properties of Sands”, Journal of Environmental Geology, Springer Berlin/Heidelberg, Vol. 49, No. 4, February, pp. 497-503.

    [13] Pamukcu S. and Akbullut S., (2006), "Thermoelastic Enhancement of Damping of Sand Using Synthetic Ground Rubber", J. Geotech. and Geoenvir. Engrg., Vol. 132, Issue 4, pp. 501-510.

    [14] Nakhai Ali, Marandi Seyed Morteza, Sani Kermani Siamak, (2010), "Laboratory study of soil and rubber crumb", 4th Geotechnical Conference, Tehran, Iran.

Stabilization and modification of geotechnical characteristics of windy sand using polymer slurry