Contents & References of Seismic improvement of reinforced concrete frames filled with building materials using fiber reinforced polymers
List:
Chapter One: General. 1
1-1- Introduction 2
1-2- Properties of the interlayer frame. 4
1-2-1- Interaction between frame and intermediate frame. 4
1-2-2- properties of intermediate frame materials. 6
1-2-3- seams 8
1-2-4- reinforcement. 8
1-2-5- next ratio. 9
1-3- Rupture modes of intermediate frames. 10
1-4- Hardness of the intermediate frame. 14
1-4-1- How to model the effect of intermediate frame on stiffness. 17
1-5- Intermediate frame resistance. 19
1-5-1- Interframe cracking resistance. 21
1-5-2- final resistance of the intermediate frame. 23
1-5-2- Interframe resistance in the direction perpendicular to the plane 25
Chapter Two: Theoretical foundations and background of the research. 31
2-1- Introduction of FRP composites and its application in reinforcing reinforced concrete structures. 32
2-1-1-types of FRP composite sheets. 33
2-1-2- Mechanical properties of FRP composites. 33
2-1-3- Resins 34
2-1-4- Comparison of performance of FRP composites in strengthening structures 35
2-1-5- Safety factor. 35
2-2- Review of the studies conducted in the field of strengthening of reinforced concrete frames with FRP. 36
2-2-1- Review of laboratory studies conducted by Ozkainak et al. 36
2-2-1-1- Checking the results. 38
2-2-2- An overview of the laboratory studies conducted by Tarek Al-Moslem et al. 39
2-2-2-1- Discussion on the results. 40
2-2-2-2- Conclusion. 42
2-2-3- Review of laboratory studies conducted by Akin et al. 43
2-2-3-1- Examining the behavior of the tested samples. 45
2-2-3-2- Discussion on the results. 46
2-2-3-3-Conclusion. 49
Chapter 3: Principles and basics of modeling and analysis of intermediate frames with ABAQUS finite element software. 50
3-1- Introduction 51
3-2- Introducing ABAQUS finite element software. 52
3-2-1- History. 54
3-3- Introduction of laboratory research used for modeling in ABAQUS software. 55
3-3-1- Introduction of samples 56
3-3-1-1- Reinforced concrete frame with brick intermediate frame wall. 56
3-3-1-2- Examining different modes of strengthening samples 60
3-4- Modeling of members 66
3-4-1- Modeling of reinforced concrete frame members. 66
3-4-1-1- Concrete behavior modeling in Abaqus. 67
3-4-1-2- Introduction of C3D8R element for concrete members. 79
3-4-1-3- Modeling of steel bars. 80
3-4-2- Modeling of brick intermediate frame. 83
3-4-2-1- Existing methods for modeling masonry structures. 83
3-4-2-1-1- Accurate modeling. 83
3-4-2-1-2- Micro modeling. 84
3-4-2-1-3- Macro modeling. 84
3-4-3- CFRP modeling. 89
3-5- Analysis. 90
3-5-1- Explicit dynamic analysis method. 91
3-5-2- mass scaling. 92
3-5-3- Assumptions of analysis. 93
Chapter four: modeling and results. 95
4-1- Introduction 96
4-2- Mechanical characteristics of materials. 97
4-2-1- Concrete. 97
4-2-2- Rebars 97
4-2-3- Masonry materials. 97
4-2-4-CFRP. 97
4-3- Modeling. 98
4-2- Results of nonlinear dynamic analysis on samples 99
4-2-1- Sample 1. 99
4-2-2- Sample 2. 103
4-2-3- Sample 3. 107
4-2-4- Sample 4. 111
4-2-5- sample 5. 116
4-2-6- sample 6. 121
4-2-7- sample 7. 126
Chapter five: discussion and conclusion. 131
5-1- Introduction 132
5-2- Discussion on the results of the analysis. 133
5-3- Conclusion. 138
5-4- Suggestions. 139
List of sources and references. 140
ABSTRACT 146
Source:
[1] W.W. El-Dakhakhni, A.A. Hamid, Z.H.R. Hakam & M. Elgaaly. Hazard mitigation and strengthening of unreinforced masonry walls using composites, Composite structures 73 (2006) 458-477.
[2] Mohammadi, Majid. Intermediate frame and its effect on the structure. Tehran: Fadak Isatis, 1st edition. 2013. [3] Natghi Elahi Fariborz, Maleki Shahram. Reinforcement of concrete structures with FRP. Tehran: Noorpardazan, second edition, 1389.
[4] FEMA 356, Prestandard for the Seismic Rehabilitation of buildings, Federal Emergency Management agency, Second Draft, March 22, 2000
[5]
[4] FEMA 356, Prestandard for the Seismic Rehabilitation of buildings, Federal Emergency Management agency, Second Draft, March 22, 2000
[5] Instructions for the rehabilitation of existing buildings, publication 360, Office of Technical Affairs and Criteria and Risk Reduction, National Management and Planning Organization, 1385
[6].Smith, B. S. & Coull, A., Tall Building Structures: Analysis and Design, John Wiley & Sons, Inc (1991)
[7] Paulay, T. & Priestley, M.J.N. Seismic Design of Reinforced Concrete and Masonry Buildings, John Wiley & Sons, New York, United States (1992)
[8] Bell, D.K. & Davidson, B.J., Evaluation of Earthquake Risk Buildings with Masonry Infill Panels, NZSEE Conference, 2001
[9] Mohyeddin-Kermani, A. et al. (n.d). The Behavior of RC Frames with Masonry Infill in Wenchuan Earthquake
[10] Baran, M. & Sevil, T., Analytical and experimental studies on infilled RC Frames, International Journal of the Physical Sciences Vol. 5(13), pp. 1981-1998, 18 October
[11] Moghadam Hasan. Earthquake engineering, basics and application. Tehran: Hassan Moghadam, 7th edition. 1387.
[12] P. Gavrilovic, V. Sendova, Experimental and analysis studies of infill walls in reinforced concrete structures, Earthquake engineering, 10th world conference, 1992 Balken, Rotterdam
[13] ASTM, American Standard for Testing Material, Standard test methods for compressive strength of masonry prisms, E 447-92b, 2000.
[14] K.M Mosalam, R.N White & P. ??Gergely, Static response of infilled frames using quasi-static experimentation, Journal of Str. Eng. Vol. 123, No. 11, P-1462-1469
[15] Tasnimi Abbasali, The behavior of walls included in Iran standard 2800, publication number G-404 of the Center for Construction and Housing Research, 1383
[16] D. Combescure, P. Regon, Application of local to global approach to the study of infilled frame structures under seismic loading, 12WCEE, 2000
[17] J.R. Riddington, P. Jukes, Determination of material properties for use in masonry FE analyses, Masonry International, Vol. 12, No. 2, 1988
[18] Riddington, J.R. The influence of initial gaps on infilled frame behavior. Proc. Instn. Civ. Engrs. Part 2, Step. 1984, 29-310.
[19] A. Saneinejad & B. Hobbs, Inelastic design of infilled frames, Journal of earthquake engineering, Vol. 121, No. 4, April 1995, P 634-650
[20] P.G. Carydis, H.P. Mouzakis, J.M Taflambas & E.A Vougioukas, Response of infilled frames with brickwalls to earthquake motions, Earthquake Eng. 10th World Conf., balkema, Rotterdam, 1992, P-2829-2834
[21] W. Jung, Polymer matrix composite (PMC) infill walls for seismic retrofit, MCEER, student research accomplishment, No. 21
[22] RC frames under earthquake loading, State of the art report, Comite Eurointernational du beton.
[23] F. Pires, E.C. Carvalho, The behavior of infilled reinforced concrete frames under horizontal cyclic loading, 10th world conference, Balken, Rotterdam, 1992
[24] L. Decanini, A.D. Sortis, L. Liberatore, F. Mollaioli, Damage characterization of the 1999 Athens earthquake, 12th European conference on earthquake engineering
[25] A.E. Schultz, R.S. Hutchinson, G.C. Cheok, Seismic performance of masonry walls with bed joint reinforcement, Published by Elsevier Science Ltd, Paper Refrence: T119-4, 1998
[26] M. Mohammadi Ghazimahalleh, Stiffness and Damping of infilled steel frames, Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, ICE, Structures & Buildings, No.160, April 2007, Pages 105-118
[27] S. Altin, U. Ersoy & T. Tankut, Hysteretic response of reinforced concrete infilled frames, Journal of Str. Eng. Vol. 118, No. 8, Aug, 1992, P-2133-2150
[28] M. Lafuente, A. Molina, C. Gentatios, Seismic resistant behavior of minor reinforced concrete frames with masonry infill walls, 12WCEE, 2000
[29] A.B Mehrabi, P.B Shing, M.p schuller & J.L Noland, Experimental evaluation of masonry infilled RC frames, Journal of Structural engineering, Vol.122, No.