Contents & References of Investigating the random forest method to improve urban land cover classification using satellite images
List:
Chapter 1 Introduction. 2
1-1 Preface. 2
1-2 Necessities, motivations and characteristics of research. 4
1-3 Objectives and research questions. 5
1-4 Research method. 6
1-5 Brief introduction of other chapters. 7
Chapter 2 review of previous research. 10
2-1 Introduction. 10
2-2 An overview of land cover classification methods. 10
2-2-1 Object-oriented classification techniques 11
2-2-2 Unsupervised pixel-based classification techniques 12
2-2-3 Supervised pixel-based classification techniques 12
2-3 Overview of new classification methods in remote sensing. 13
2-3-1 Classification with artificial neural networks. 14
2-3-2 Classification with decision trees. 15
2-3-3 Classification with support vector machine based methods. 15
2-3-4 knowledge-based classification techniques. 17
2-3-5 Classification with combined algorithms. 18
2-4 Methods of selecting and reducing feature space. 21
2-5 Summary of the chapter. 22
Chapter 3 concepts and methods. 25
3-1 Introduction. 25
3-2 Basic concepts. 25
3-3 Common learning algorithms. 27
3-3-1 Linear separation analysis. 27
3-3-2 Decision trees. 28
3-3-3 Neural networks. 31
3-3-4 Simple Bayes classifier 33
3-3-5 Methods based on support vector machines and kernel. 34
3-4 Collective methods. 39
3-5 Reinforcement. 41
3-6 Bagging method. 42
3-6-1 Two group patterns. 42
3-6-2 Bagging algorithm. 43
3-6-3 Random forest. 47
3-6-4 Feature selection with the help of RF feature importance index. 51
3-7 Image segmentation. 53
3-7-1 Segmentation by multi-resolution method. 54
3-7-2 Method of estimating the appropriate scale for image segmentation. 58
3-8 Estimation of classification accuracy. 59
3-8-1 Ambiguity matrix. 60
3-9 Summary. 62
Chapter 4 research method and results. 64
4-1 Introduction. 64
4-2 Data and study area. 64
4-3 Proposed research method. 66
4-3-1 Band selection with the help of RF feature importance index. 69
4-3-2 Hyperspectral image segmentation. 70
4-3-3 Feature groups. 71
4-3-4 Classification. 72
4-4 Evaluation. 74
4-4-1 Evaluation results of overall accuracy and Kappa coefficient 74
4-4-2 Time evaluation of classification methods. 79
4-4-3 Classification results by classes 80
4-4-4 Visual evaluation. 84
4-5 Summary of the contents of the chapter. 88
Chapter 5 conclusions and suggestions. 91
5-1 Introduction. 91
5-2 Summary of the research. 91
5-3 Research achievements. 92
5-4 Suggestions 95
Resources 97
Source:
Alexander C, Tansey K, Kaduk J, Holland D, and Tate NJ (2011) An approach to classification of airborne laser scanning point cloud data in an urban environment. International Journal of Remote Sensing 32, 9151-69.
Baatz M and Sch?pe A (2000) Multiresolution segmentation: an optimization approach for high quality multi-scale image segmentation. Angewandte geographische informationsverarbeitung 12, 12-23.
Ball GH and Hall DJ (1965) ISODATA, a novel method of data analysis and pattern classification. In (ed.), Vol. pp. DTIC Document, Bartels M and Wei H (2006) Maximum Likelihood Classification of LIDAR Data incorporating multiple co-registered Bands. In Proceedings of 4th International Workshop on Pattern Recognition in Remote Sensing/18th International Conference on Pattern Recognition. (ed.), Vol. 20, pp. 17-20, Citeseer,
Bekkari A, Idbraim S, Elhassouny A, Danielle Ducrot DM, Yassa ME, and Ducrot D (2012) Spectral and17-20, Citeseer,
Bekkari A, Idbraim S, Elhassouny A, Danielle Ducrot DM, Yassa ME, and Ducrot D (2012) Spectral and Spatial Classification of High Resolution Urban Satellites Images using Haralick features and SVM with SAM and EMD distance metrics. International Journal of Computer Applications 46,
Benz UC, Hofmann P, Willhauck G, Lingenfelder I, and Heynen M (2004) Multi-resolution, object-oriented fuzzy analysis of remote sensing data for GIS-ready information. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 58, 239-58.
Bilgin G, Erturk S, and Yildirim T (2011) Segmentation of hyperspectral images via subtractive clustering and cluster validation using one-class support vector machines. Geoscience and Remote Sensing, IEEE Transactions on 49, 2936-44.
Blaschke T (2010) Object based image analysis for remote sensing. ISPRS journal of photogrammetry and remote sensing 65, 2-16.
Bonissone P, Cadenas J, Garrido M, and D?az-Valladares R (2008a) A fuzzy random forest: Fundamental for design and construction. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-Based Systems (IPMU'08). (ed.), Vol. pp. 1231-8,
Bonissone PP, Cadenas JM, Garrido M, and Diaz-Valladares RA (2008b) Combination methods in a fuzzy random forest. In Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 2008. SMC 2008. IEEE International Conference on. (ed.), Vol. pp. 1794-9, IEEE,
Bosch A, Zisserman A, and Muoz X (2007) Image classification using random forests and ferns. In Computer Vision, 2007. ICCV 2007. IEEE 11th International Conference on. (ed.), Vol. pp. 1-8, IEEE,
Boulesteix AL, Janitza S, Kruppa J, and K?nig IR (2012) Overview of random forest methodology and practical guidance with emphasis on computational biology and bioinformatics. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery 2, 493-507.
Breiman L (1996) Bagging predictors. Machine learning 24, 123-40.
Breiman L (2003) Manual for Setting Up, Using, and Understanding Random Forest V4.0. In (ed.), Vol. pp.
Breiman L (2001) Random forests. Machine learning 45, 5-32.
Bruzzone L, Marconcini M, Wegmuller U, and Wiesmann A (2004) An advanced system for the automatic classification of multitemporal SAR images. Geoscience and Remote Sensing, IEEE Transactions on 42, 1321-34.
Burges CJ (1998) A tutorial on support vector machines for pattern recognition. Data mining and knowledge discovery 2, 121-67.
Camps-Valls G and Bruzzone L (2005) Kernel-based methods for hyperspectral image classification. Geoscience and Remote Sensing, IEEE Transactions on 43, 1351-62.
Chan JC-W and Canters F (2007) Ensemble classifiers for hyperspectral classification. In Proceedings 5th EARSeL Workshop on Imaging Spectroscopy. Bruges. (ed.), Vol. 1, pp.
Chapelle O and Keerthi SS (2008) Multi-class feature selection with support vector machines. In Proceedings of the American statistical association. (ed.), Vol. pp.
Chehata N, Guo L, and Mallet C (2009) Airborne lidar feature selection for urban classification using random forests. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences 39, 207-12.
Chen Y-W and Lin C-J (2006) Combining SVMs with various feature selection strategies. In Feature Extraction. Vol. pp. 24-315. Springer, Cohen J (1960) A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and psychological measurement 20, 37-46.
Cortes C and Vapnik V (1995) Support-vector networks. Machine learning 20, 273-97.
Crawford MM, Ham J, Chen Y, and Ghosh J (2004) Random forests of binary hierarchical classifiers for analysis of hyperspectral data. In Advances in Techniques for Analysis of Remotely Sensed Data, 2003 IEEE Workshop on. (ed.), Vol. pp.