Investigation of progressive collapse of truss bridges

Number of pages: 96 File Format: word File Code: 31419
Year: 2014 University Degree: Master's degree Category: Civil Engineering
  • Part of the Content
  • Contents & Resources
  • Summary of Investigation of progressive collapse of truss bridges

    Dissertation

     

    Master's Course

    Field: Civil Engineering

    Abstract

    Bridges are inseparable members of communication facilities and are very influential in economic and social conditions. The passage of time and random loads are among the things that threaten the health of bridges. Abnormal loads caused by natural accidents, execution errors and some other issues can cause progressive collapse in structures, so early detection of bridge damage can prevent disasters. Therefore, it is felt necessary to carefully investigate the behavior of these structures against progressive collapse. In this thesis, a method based on the investigation of the collapse of a multi-span truss bridge against the phenomenon of progressive collapse with scenarios of detection and removal of critical members and a comparison between different situations of removal and also the effect of scenarios of removal of critical members on the stability of the remaining structure is presented. After simulating 3D finite element models, it was subjected to different scenarios in order to evaluate the potential of progressive collapse. By comparing the results of linear static analysis, non-linear static analysis and non-linear dynamic analysis during the times of 0.5 seconds and 1 second, the dynamic load increase factor of the critical members in the average state of force changes for the upper and lower edge members was discussed. By comparing the dynamic load increase coefficient for two groups of key members of the upper and lower ridge and the average value of the key members in each group, it was concluded that the shorter the time of the applied impact due to removal, the greater the load increase coefficient, and it was also concluded that the faster the member removal is done, the load increase coefficient increases. Persian keywords: progressive collapse, critical area, truss bridge, load increase coefficient.

     

    Chapter 1:  

    Introduction and Generalities

     

     

    1-1- Introduction

    After the Second World War, the construction industry developed rapidly all over the world. However, the passage of time and the existence of various internal and external factors cause the structural components to be damaged and the structure to suffer serious problems and even destruction under operational loads. Considering all aspects in the design and early detection and appropriate action to fix the damage can prevent the catastrophic collapse of the structure. Therefore, in recent decades, a lot of research has been done in the field of identifying damage in structures.

    Communication lines and infrastructure structures play an essential role in all countries, and a lot of money is spent on their construction and maintenance every year. Meanwhile, bridges play a key role in the economic, social and political conditions of a country. Therefore, in recent years, the amount of attention paid to monitoring the health of bridges has greatly increased, because there is a fundamental need to assess the condition of many bridges in the world. Studies show that more than 40% of existing bridges in Canada need to be repaired and retrofitted [1]. Among the 57,000 highway bridges in the United States in 1997, 187,000 of them were reported to be defective and it is stated that 5,000 more bridges are added to this number every year [2]. In 2001, it was stated that Japan has 140,000 bridges, most of which were built before 1980. Therefore, many of them are in dire need of maintenance[3].

    Due to the location of Iran in an earthquake-prone region, the occurrence of multiple earthquakes can cause severe damage to various types of structures. In addition, daily traffic and its increase can be a factor for the damage of bridges. Also, the lifespan of many existing bridges in the country reaches more than 30 years. On the other hand, the amount of construction of different types of bridges in Iran is increasing. As a result, the maintenance and control of bridges can provide an effective role in the country [4].

    A rare but very harmful phenomenon in structures is the phenomenon of progressive collapse [1]. This phenomenon is a dynamic effect resulting from the expansion and successive development of the primary rupture in a structure, which indicates a severe mismatch between the causative factor and severe collapse. The factor that causes progressive collapse is a local and concentrated factor such as lack of local resistance that causes a catastrophic phenomenon [5].

    Due to the occurrence of unpredictable events such as earthquakes, explosions, collisions and accidents, as well as the possible reduction of the structure's capacity due to the passage of time and the effect of these factors on the occurrence of progressive collapse in bridges, the investigation of the effects of strengthening structural components on the resistance against progressive collapse has been considered. Past studies show that earthquake strengthening of the structure can make the structure resistant to progressive collapse in the face of unusual factors. On the other hand, increasing ductility can accelerate the mechanism of progressive collapse.

    One of the famous incidents in the field of collapse is the collapse of the I-35W steel truss bridge over the Mississippi River, located in the state of Minnesota[2], in the United States. As shown in Figure (1-1), this bridge suddenly collapsed on August 1, 2007, killing 13 and injuring more than 100. The investigation report on the causes of the collapse of the I-35W bridge shows that the dead load of the deck was increased several times due to the repair and strengthening of the slab, and the thickness of the gusset plates used in the bridge was only half of the designed thickness. In addition, on the day of the collapse, there were construction materials and heavy machinery on the bridge for maintenance. These factors have caused the collapse of the I-35W bridge[6]. According to Figure (1-2), in 2007, in China, a cargo ship collided with the foundation of the Jiangdong Jingjiang Bridge[3], causing the collapse of four spans adjacent to the foundation. Investigations show that the collision force of the ship was more than the permissible design force and as a result caused damage to the bridge foundation. As a result of this damage, the internal forces changed and the redistributed forces exceeded the capacity of the side foundations, and as a result, progressive collapse occurred[7]. Other examples of progressive collapse occurred in Baihua Bridge[4] in Figure (1-3) as a result of the Wenchuan earthquake[5]. In this bridge, due to the damage of the supports, the bridge deck has collapsed along with twisting deformations [7, 8].

    1-2-

    (Images are available in the main file)

    Ensuring the safety of human lives and vehicles passing over the bridges, as well as maintaining the health of the bridge structure, as well as preventing possible accidents such as settlement due to the weight of the structure, cracks in the structures, or partial collapse of the structure. The cause of decay, wear and tear, corrosion, construction error, collision of passing vehicles on or under the bridge or collision with a bridge foundation, explosion or terrorist attacks and similar cases, has become one of the important issues in the field of bridge construction and maintenance, which includes truss or cable-stayed bridges. Various solutions to solve these problems have been provided by researchers. But one of the important issues in the field of truss bridges is the sudden removal of one or more members of the bridge due to an external factor, which causes the collapse of a part of the bridge, or sometimes appears as a progressive collapse phenomenon and leads to the collapse of the entire bridge. Today, the regulations and especially the regulations for the design of bridges and suspended structures against progressive collapse around the world have covered these weaknesses to some extent by providing special design solutions to reduce the possibility of progressive collapse. However, designing with high reliability coefficients is not always cost-effective. Therefore, in this thesis, an attempt has been made to present a practical method to identify critical members and strengthen them in order to reduce the possibility of progressive collapse of the bridge.

    1-3-

    In this research, after performing a static analysis on the truss bridge in a healthy structural state, by removing the candidate members in four groups, during 48 scenarios with the help of a factor called the change index, a comparison of the force ratio of each member in the state of healthy and damaged structure was made and finally Each group of two members was identified as a critical member, and a total of eight critical members (with a key member) were identified, of which 4 members were removed due to the instability of the structure due to the failure of the key member. Then, by removing the key member in each scenario with the help of linear static analysis and nonlinear static analysis and nonlinear dynamic analysis, the change index was obtained for each key member, and finally, with the help of dynamic load increase coefficient, for the remaining four key members, the dynamic load increase coefficient was compared in three modes of linear static analysis, nonlinear static analysis, nonlinear dynamic analysis in 0.5 second mode and nonlinear dynamic analysis in 1 second mode for each member. was paid Finally, appropriate solutions will be presented to deal with the phenomenon of progressive collapse.

    Therefore, the purpose of this research is:

    <>Introducing the phenomenon of progressive collapse and explaining the cause of its occurrence as well as the process of this phenomenon in structures, especially bridges, and the methods of dealing with this dangerous phenomenon.

  • Contents & References of Investigation of progressive collapse of truss bridges

    List:

    Chapter 1: 1

    Introduction and Generalities 1

    1-1- Introduction. 2

    1-2- Necessity of research. 5

    1-3- The purpose of the research. 6

    1-4- Research method. 7

    1-5- thesis structure. 7

    Chapter 2: 10

    Research background and literature 10

    2-1- Introduction. 11

    2-2- Definition of damaging agents. 11

    2-3- Definition of progressive collapse. 11

    2-4- Abnormal loads. 12

    2-4-1- Gas explosion. 13

    2-4-2- Bomb explosion. 14

    2-4-3- an impact caused by collision. 15

    2-4-4- Fire. 15

    2-4-5- Manufacturing error. 16

    2-5- Basic concepts in progressive collapse. 16

    2-6- The history of the emergence of standards related to progressive collapse. 17

    2-7- Composition of progressive collapse loads in standards 19

    2-7-1- Composition of load including unspecified loadings. 19

    2-7-2- Composition of nominal loads using design allowable stress. 20

    2-7-2-1- Basic load combinations 20

    2-7-3- Load combinations for extraordinary and exceptional events. 20

    2-7-3-1- load bearing capacity. 21

    2-7-3-2- Remaining capacity. 21

    2-7-3-3- Conditions of stability and stability of the structure. 21

    2-8-loading combinations required in progressive collapse analysis. 22

    2-9- Examining types of progressive collapse in structures 23

    2-9-1- Pancake collapse. 23

    2-9-2- domino collapse. 25

    2-9-3- Zipper collapse. 25

    2-9-4- Shear collapse. 27

    2-9-5- collapse due to instability. 27

    2-9-6- Combined collapse. 28

    2-10- Progressive collapse of bridges 29

    2-10-1- Collapse due to support rupture. 29

    2-10-2- collapse due to local rupture. 32

    2-11- Structures analysis methods against progressive collapse. 34

    2-11-1- Linear elastic static analysis. 34

    2-11-2- Nonlinear static analysis. 35

    2-11-3- dynamic analysis of linear elastic time history. 36

    2-11-4- Dynamic analysis of nonlinear time history. 37

    2-12-Methods to deal with progressive collapse in bridges 38

    2-12-1- Accident control. 39

    2-12-2- indirect design. 39

    2-12-3- Characteristic local resistance. 40

    2-12-4- alternative load path. 40

    2-12-5- Separation. 40

    2-13- A history of progressive collapse. 41

    Chapter 3: 44

    Research method 44

    3-1- Introduction. 45

    3-2- Analytical model. 47

    3-2-1- Generalities about a laboratory sample. 47

    3-2-1- validation of the laboratory model. 50

    3-2-2- How to model. 51

    3-3- Loading. 55

    3-4- Determination of key members. 57

    3-5- Conclusion. 62

    Chapter 4: 64

    Calculations and findings 64

    4-1- Introduction. 65

    4-2- Criteria for selecting the scenario of removing key members. 65

    4-3- Determining the appropriate analysis method. 71

    4-3-1- The effect of removing members B10 and B9. 71

    4-3-2- The effect of removing T4 and T5 members. 74

    4-4- dynamic increase factor. 77

    Chapter 5: 80

    Conclusion and suggestions 80

    5-1-Introduction. 81

    5-2- Conclusion. 81

    5-3- Presenting suggestions. 82

    Resources and sources. 83

     

             

    Source:

     

    1-         Amiri, D.G.Q. , M. Talebi, Identification of damage in the concrete deck of bridges using matrix updating methods, in the Faculty of Civil Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, 1391, p. 119. 2- Sahab, D.M.Q. , M.J. Rashidi, "Combating progressive damage in metal truss bridges by computer simulation", Tafarsh University, 2013. [3].       Doebling, S.W., et al., "Damage identification and health monitoring of structural and mechanical systems from changes in their vibration characteristics": 6, Los Alamos National Lab., NM (United States), a literature review, 1996.

    [4].       Sohn, H., et al., "A review of structural health monitoring literature": Los Alamos National Laboratory Los Alamos, NM, 1996-2001/2004.

    [5].       Zhou, Z., "Vibration-Based Damage Detection of Simple Bridge Superstructures", University of Saskatchewan, in Department of Civil and Geological, "Vibration-Based Damage Detection of Simple Bridge Superstructures", University of Saskatchewan, in Department of Civil and Geological Engineering, 2006.

    [6].       Staroosk, U., "Progressive Collapse of Bridges—Aspects of Analysis and Design in International Symposium on Sea-Crossing Long-Span Bridge": Mokpo, Korea, 2006.

    [7].       Astaneh-Asl, "A. Progressive collapse of steel truss bridges, the case of I-35W collapse". in Proceedings of 7th International Conference on Steel Bridges, Guimar?es, Portugal. 2008.

    [8].       Liu, Y., B. Han, and X. Ma, "Advances in Progressive Collapse of Bridge Structures". Pacific Science Review, 2011-13: p. 173-181.

    [9].       Huang, Y., "The performance of girder bridges in the Wenchuan Earthquake and a new method for seismic protection". Journal of Earthquake Engineering and Vibration Engineering, 2008. [10].     America, D.o.D.-U.S.o., UFC 4-023-03-"Design of Building TO Resist Progressive Collapse", 2013.

    [11].     Construction, A.I.o.S., "Steel Design Guide-26 : Design of Blast Resistant Structures", 2012.

    [12].     Administration, T.U.S.G.S., "Progressive Collapse Analysis and Design Guidelines", 2003.

    [13].     VLASSIS, A.G., "Progressive Collapse Assessment of Tall Buildings, in Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering", Imperial College London, 2007.

    [14].     Al-Thairy, H. and Y.C. Wang, "Simplified Analytical Method for Predicting the Critical Velocity of Vehicle Impact on Steel Columns". Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2014. 92: p. 136-149.

    [15].     Porcari, G.-L.F., E. Zalok, and W. Mekky, "Fire Induced Progressive Collapse of Steel Building Structures": A Review of the Mechanisms. Journal of Engineering Structures, 2014. [16].     Agarwal, A. and A.H. Varma. "Fire induced progressive collapse of steel building structures". in Proceedings of the 2012 Structures Congress. 2012.

    [17].     Gilsanz, R. "Simple Nonlinear Static Analysis Procedure for Progressive Collapse Evaluation". in Steel Building Symposium: "Blast and Progressive Collapse Resistance": McGraw-Hill Auditorium, New York City. American Institute of Steel Construction, December 4-5, 2003. [18].     Administration, G.S., "Alternate Path Analysis & Design Guidelines for Progressive Collapse Resistance"-GSA2013, 2013.

    [19].     Ellingwood, B.R., et al., "Best Practices for Reducing the Potential for Progressive Collapse in Buildings", National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2007.

    [20].     ASCE., "Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures", American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, Virginia, 2006.

    [21].     Standard, B., BS8006-1, 2010. Code of Practice for Strengthened/Reinforced Soils and Other Fills, ISBN. 978(0): p. 580.

    [22].     Dowden, C. and S. Brennan, Police-reported hate crime in Canada, 2010. Juristat, 2012. 3: p. 85-002.

    [23].     Engineers, A.S.o.C., ASCE7, Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures, 2010.

    [24].     DoD, U., UFC 4-023-03. Design of Building to Resist Progressive Collapse,” Unified Facility Criteria, United States Department of Defense, Washington, DC, 2005.

    [25].     Graham Powell, P., "Progressive collapse: Case studies using nonlinear analysis". 2005.

    [26].     Starossek, U., "Typology of Progressive Collapse. Journal of Engineering Structures" 2007. 29: p. 2302-2307.

    [27].     Kozlova, P., "The Phenomenon of Progressive Collapse According to Russian Norms", Saimaa University of Applied Sciences, 2013.

    [28].     Vasilieva, "A. Progressive Collapse Methods of Prevention", , Saimaa University of Applied Sciences., 2013.

    [29].     NIST, Final Report of the National Construction Safety Team on the Collapses of the World Trade Center Towers, NIST Investigation, 2005.

    [30].     Kaewunruen, S. and A.M. Remennikov, "Progressive Failure of Prestressed Concrete Sleepers under Multiple High-Intensity Impact Loads".

Investigation of progressive collapse of truss bridges