Contents & References of Investigating the seismic behavior of semi-rigid beam-to-column joints in steel structures
List:
Chapter 1 Research overview_1
1-1 Introduction_2
1-1-1 History of steel structures and connections 2
1-2 Statement of the problem_2
1-2-1 Classification of steel structures_3
Steel structures are classified into three basic groups_3
1-2-2 Disadvantages and advantages of steel structures_6
1-3 Importance and necessity of research_9
1-4 Research objectives_9
1-5 Research variables_10
1-6 Research hypotheses_13
1-7 Definition of words and terms_13
1-8 Research Limits_13
Chapter Two, an overview of the conducted research 15
2-1 Introduction_15
2-2 Theoretical bases of research_15
2-2-1 Connections_15
2-2-2 Classification of steel connections_17
2-2-2-1 classification of joints in terms of hardness_17
2-2-2-2 classification of joints in terms of resistance_17
2-2-2-3 classification of joints in terms of plasticity_17
2-2-3 diagram of anchor-rotation in joints_17
2-2-4 classification of joints based on M-? diagram_ 18
2-2-5 Semi-rigid beam-to-column connections_19
2-2-5-1 Semi-rigid connection details_20
2-2-5-2 Seismic behavior of semi-rigid connections_21
2-2-5-3 Seismic design of semi-rigid connections_23
2-2-5-4 Types of semi-rigid connections_ 25 2-2-5-6 Disadvantages and advantages of hollow joints 27 2-2-5-7 Investigation of behavior and forces involved in hollow joints 28 2-2-5-8 Studies of semi-rigid joints 29 2-2-6 Regulatory issues 29 1-2-2-6 Classification of connections from the point of view of regulations 29
2-2-6-2 Standards and regulations- 31
2-3 Research background_ 34
2-3-1 Introduction_ 34
2-3-2 An overview of the researchers' previous researches: 34
2-3-2-1 Reviewing the design and seismic performance of the structure steel structures with a combined system of rigid and semi-rigid frames_34
2-3-2-2 Investigation of the seismic behavior of column-resistant bending frames with semi-rigid connections 36
2-3-2-3 Parametric analysis and analysis of composite gate frames with semi-rigid connections_38
2-3-2-4 First and second degree stiffness matrices and axial load of a beam-to-beam system Columns with semi-rigid connections_40
2-3-2-5 Development of practical design methods for steel structures with semi-rigid connections 41
2-3-2-6 Approximate parameters for checking the torsional behavior of steel structures with semi-rigid Khorjini connections_44
2-3-2-7 Review and analysis of steel frames with semi-rigid elbow joints beam to beam and beam to column under bending and axial force 46
2-3-2-8 evaluation of semi-rigid joints in steel structures using modal test_ 48
2-3-2-9 stability analysis of flat three-dimensional shelf structures with semi-rigid joints 50
2-3-2-10 stability design of structures with semi-rigid joints 50
2-3-2-11 checking load distribution on flexible foundations Acceptance in structures with semi-rigid connections 50
2-3-2-12 Examining the dynamic characteristics and time response of frame-shaped structures with semi-rigid and eccentric connections 50
2-3-2-13 Assessing the seismic behavior of steel frames with semi-rigid connections and knee bracing using method 50
2-3-2-14 Experimental investigation of systems with semi-rigid connections Under bending with and without axial force 57
2-3-2-15 Seismic performance of semi-rigid bending frames under recorded records of far and near __ 79
The third chapter of modeling basics and matching analytical and laboratory results_ 62
3-1 Introduction_ 63
3-2 Estimation of damping and reduction coefficients of the demand response spectrum 63
3-3 Finite Element Analysis 67
3-4 Stages of Finite Element Analysis 69
3-5 How to Analyze Finite Element 70
3-6 Finite Element Analysis Methods 70
3-6-1 Implicit Finite Element Method_71
3-6-2 Explicit Finite Element Method_71
3-7 Validation of laboratory work_ 75
Chapter 4 Modeling and analysis of models 84
4-1 Introduction_ 87
4-2 Selection of yield criterion_ 87
4-2-1 Van Mises criterion 87
4-3 Studied models_ 88
4-3-1 Acceleration mapping of Tabas earthquake_ 89
4-3-2 Bam earthquake acceleration mapping_90
4-3-3 Manjil earthquake acceleration mapping_90
4-3-4 Elentro earthquake acceleration mapping 91
4-4 Seismic loading results_91
4-4-1 earthquake_ 91
4-4-2 other seismic results 102
5-4 second type models 110
Chapter five conclusions and suggestions_123
5-1 introduction_124
5-2 conclusion 124
5-3 suggestions 126
Sources_ 127
Source:
ATC. Report No. 40, ssc96-01, Applied Technology Council, CA. .
Alfonsas, D. Kestutis, U. (2008). Analysis of the steel frames with the semi-rigid beam-to-beam and beam-to-column knee joints under bending and axial forces Department of Steel and Timber Structures, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Saule? tekio al. 11, LT-10223
Vilnius, Lithuania
Bulent,A. Jay, S. (2003). Seismic Behavior of Steel Building With Combined Rigid And Semi-Rigid Frames. Department of Earthquake and Structural Science Gobez Institute of Technology 41400 Kocacli -Turkey
Cabrero, E. Bayo, R. (2005). Development of practical design methods for steel structures with semi-rigid connections. Department of Structural Analysis and Design, School of Architecture, University of Navarra, 31080 Pamplona, ??Spain
Dragan, Z. Slavko, Z. Marina, M. Biljana, M. Tomislav, I. (2010). Redistribution Of The Influences In Systems With Semi-rigid Joints On Elastic Foundations. The Faculty of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Serbia
Dario, J. (2010). First-And Second-Order Stiffness Matrices And Load Vector Of Beam-Columns With Semirigid Connections. School Of Mines Nat univ Medellin Colombia.
Feng,F. Huihuan, M. Gengbo, C. Shizhao, S. (2012). Experimental study of semi-rigid joint systems subjected to bending with and without axial force School of Civil Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, 202 Haihe Road, Nangang District, Harbin 150090, PR China
HKS, ABAQUS standard user manual, Version 6.9.1, (2009), Hibbitt, Karlsson, and Sorensen, Inc., Providence (RI)
Kamal, M. Bajoria1, K. Rajshekar, S. (2009). Stability Analysis Of 3-D Conventional Pallet Rack Structures With Semi-Rigid Connections.
Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, India
Michael, M. Astaneh-Asl, A. (2003). Steel Semirigid Column–Three Moment Resisting Frame
Seismic Behavior. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California, Berkeley,
CA 94720
Namvari,F. Zarfam, P. (2011). Seismic Behavior Evaluation of Semi-Rigid Steel Frames with Knee Bracing by Modal Pushover Analysis (MPA). World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology 76 2011
Nihan, D. Aksoylar, A. Elnashai, F. Hussam, M. (2003). Seismic Performance of Semirigid Moment-Resisting Frames under Far and Near Field Records. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA 94720
?piro, G. Stanko, B. Ljiljana, ?. (2011). Dynamic Properties And Time Response Of Frame Works With Semi-rigid And Eccentric Connections. 2University of Belgrade, Civil Engineering Faculty, Belgrade, Serbia
Tomislav, I. Slavko, Z. Dragan, Z. Sr?an, ?. Nikola, S. (2010). Stability Design Of Structures With Semi-rigid Connections. The Highway Institute, Belgrade, Serbia
Tehranizadeh, M. (2003). Approximate parameter for semi-rigid 'Khorjinee' connections in
dynamic torsional response of steel structures Amirkabir University of Technology and IIEES, 37 Salmack St. Vali-Aasr Avenue, Tajrish, Tehran, Iran Received 9 February 1998; received in revised form July 1, 1998; accepted 9 July 1998
Temel, T. Murat, E. Alemdar, B. Murat, M. (2009). Assessment of semi-rigid connections in steel structures by modal testing. a Karadeniz Technical University, Department of Civil Engineering, 61080, Trabzon, Turkey
Vellascoa, d,. deandradec, A. Dasilva, b.