Investigating the creep behavior of soil reinforced with geosynthetic fibers in laboratory conditions

Number of pages: 109 File Format: word File Code: 31404
Year: 2014 University Degree: Master's degree Category: Civil Engineering
  • Part of the Content
  • Contents & Resources
  • Summary of Investigating the creep behavior of soil reinforced with geosynthetic fibers in laboratory conditions

    Dissertation for receiving a master degree

    in the field of civil engineering with soil and foundation orientation

    Abstract:

    The compressibility behavior of soils has become an important concern in geotechnical engineering. As buildings, embankments and roads are implemented, significant settlements often occur. Since long-term settlements occur due to creep, therefore, the calculation and prediction of creep settlements is very important. When the soil is subjected to constant loading, with the complete loss of pore water pressure, deformations occur over time, known as secondary compaction or creep. The mechanisms and factors influencing the creep behavior of sandy soils are not yet fully understood. In this study, single-stage, multi-stage, and loading-unloading one-dimensional consolidation tests were performed on unreinforced and reinforced clayey sandy soil samples with geotextile fibers, and the effect of soil reinforcement with geotextile fibers, the effect of stress levels, stress history, and pore water on creep deformations were studied, and the creep mechanism was stated by considering slippage, impact, and particle deformation. The obtained results are described based on the relationship between porosity and secondary density coefficient. The results of the experiments show that at low stresses, creep deformations in saturated samples are larger than dry samples, but with increasing stress, creep deformations decrease in saturated samples and increase in dry samples. In addition, in the loading-unloading test, the creep speed is higher than the single-step test, and this test is effective in accelerating the creep. In reinforced samples, with an increase in the percentage of geotextile under the same stresses, creep deformations decrease in saturated samples and creep deformations increase in dry samples.

    Key words: creep, clayey sand soil, one-dimensional consolidation, geotextile, secondary compaction coefficient.

    Chapter one:

    Research overview

    -1- Introduction

    The compressibility behavior of soils has become an important concern in geotechnical engineering. By implementing buildings, embankments, roads, etc. Often significant meetings are created. These meetings can be considered very important especially when the foundation of the structure consists of deep layers of clay. Predicting soil behavior after months or years using today's knowledge is an important challenge in geotechnical engineering. When soil is subjected to constant loading, it experiences deformations over time called creep. Time-dependent deformations, especially when long-term deformations are considered, are of great importance in geotechnical engineering. These deformations include the settlement of the structure on compressible ground, movements of natural or excavated slopes, compression of soft ground around the tunnel and so on.

    The use of geosynthetic materials has peaked in the world since the mid-seventies. Among these materials, geotextiles and then geomembranes have found the most use among various uses. Geosynthetics are composed of polymer materials that are used together with natural materials such as soil and stone in engineering structures. Geotextiles have a very good performance in terms of distributing and evening out stresses or forces on a larger level and effectively prevent point and local ruptures. Building materials and embankments can withstand compressive stresses in a good way, while they are weak in tensile strength. In fact, the performance of fibers in a certain depth of the soil can be considered similar to the behavior of steel bars in concrete. Another characteristic of geotextiles is their elasticity, and this causes the soil that has been reinforced with fibers and has settled under the effect of an external load to return to its original state after removing the load. Theoretical studies show that the use of geotextile fibers in soils increases the resistance and elasticity coefficient of the soil (Mohammed Balochi, Zeinab Qanad. 2019). Considering the use of geosynthetics, it seems necessary to study their effects on creep behavior.

    Research background

    Soil is used as a building material in civil engineering in important projects. Man lives on land and different types of structures such as houses, roads, bridges, etc. builds Therefore, civil engineers should study the properties of the soil such as origin, granularity, water drainage, settlement, shear resistance, bearing capacity, etc., and the behavior of the soil.Therefore, civil engineers should study the properties of soil such as origin, granularity, water drainage, settlement, shear strength, bearing capacity, etc. and predict soil behavior as a result of human activity. The history of understanding the creep behavior of clay soils dates back to the 19th century. Among the classic examples, we can mention the settlement of the Tower of Pisa in Italy, so that due to creep, the tower has settled about 1.5 meters and tilted to one side, and even now the tower is prone to settlement. The deviation of the tower is about 5.5 degrees. The geological conditions of the structure and the time-varying settlement are given in Figure 1-1. 

    (images are available in the main file)

    When the saturated soil is subjected to constant loading, effective stresses increase with time as the pore water pressure decreases, in other words, primary consolidation occurs. A significant amount of settlement occurs during initial consolidation and the ratio of initial consolidation can be expressed using the consolidation coefficient Cv. After the pore water pressure is completely dissipated, if the loading on the soil is maintained, a series of deformations will occur with time, which is called secondary compaction or creep. Secondary compression ratio can be expressed by C? coefficient. Therefore, the calculation and prediction of these long-term settlements is very important.

    A series of researches in the field of secondary compaction coefficient was carried out about a decade after Terzaghi's theory[1] (1925), which expressed the compaction of clay soils due to the loss of pore water pressure. Laboratory studies conducted by Taylor [2] (1942) and Beusman [3] (1936) clearly stated the effect of time on the compressibility of clay. Beausman (1936) expressed the relationship of settlement-logarithm of time under constant stress for clay soils in a linear form. Taylor (1942) for the first time presented the time-dependent model to describe the creep behavior of clay soils in which primary consolidation and secondary compaction are considered as two separate processes. In order to describe creep behavior and overconsolidation pressure caused by creep effects, Bejerum [4] (1967) presented a model in which primary consolidation and secondary compaction act as a couple. Although primary consolidation and secondary consolidation act as a couple from the beginning of loading, secondary consolidation occurs at the end of primary consolidation. Because the creep speed is lower than the initial consolidation, therefore the creep deformations during the initial consolidation cannot be considered. When initial consolidation takes a long time (for example, for thick layers of clay), the simultaneous effect of creep and initial consolidation can be considered. Laboratory studies conducted on thin layers of clay show that primary consolidation occurs in a short period of time, so creep in the initial consolidation stage can be ignored. Zhang et al.[5] (2006), Mejia et al.[6] (1988) conducted one-dimensional consolidation creep tests on sand samples at low stresses and concluded that the amounts of creep deformations in sand increase with increasing stress levels. Studies conducted in the field of creep deformations show that mineral compounds (minerals in soil), stress levels, stress history, liquid Porosity, drainage conditions and soil structure are important parameters affecting creep behavior (Savajan Varadarjan[7]. 2011). Although the effect of these parameters has not been fully determined, in this study, using laboratory results, the effect of soil reinforcement with geotextile fibers on creep deformations, the effect of stress levels, stress history, and pore water pressure has been studied, and the creep mechanism has been described by considering slippage, impact, and deformation of particles. Long-term deformations of sandy clay soil in unreinforced and reinforced with geotextile fibers. The specific objectives of the study are:

    1) Investigating the effect of stress levels and pore fluid on the creep behavior of clayey sandy soil.

    2) Investigating the effect of reinforcing soil with geotextile fibers on the creep behavior of clayey sandy soil.

    3) Investigating the effect of stress history in order to create suitable conditions to speed up the creep test.

    Soil granularity used in this research includes sand. It is Ottawa and clay, which is Ottawa sand, passed through a 30 sieve and remaining on a 50 sieve. The clay used is Hamadan potter's clay.

  • Contents & References of Investigating the creep behavior of soil reinforced with geosynthetic fibers in laboratory conditions

    List:

    Chapter One: Generalities

    1-1- Introduction ..2

    1-2- Maximum and research method..3

    1-3- Objectives ..5

    1-4- Dissertation order ..5

    Chapter Two: Maximum Research

    2-1- Introduction ..8

    2-2- Definition of creep ..9

    2-3- Definition of geosynthetics ..10

    2-3-1- History of geosynthetics ..11

    2-4- The purpose of investigating creep deformations .11

    2-5- Laboratory investigations and theories related to the behavior of Time in soils. 13

    2-6- Creep deformations in clay soils. 19

    2-6-1- One-dimensional creep test..19

    2-6-2- Triaxial creep test..20

    2-7- Creep deformations in sandy soils. 22

    2-7-1- Test One-dimensional creep.. 22

    2-7-2- Triaxial creep test..23

    2-8- Factors affecting the secondary compaction coefficient. 25

    2-8-1- The relation between the compaction index and the secondary compaction coefficient. 25 2-8-2- The relation between secondary compaction and stress levels. 25

    2-8-3- The relation between secondary compaction and pre-consolidation pressure. 25. 2-8-4- secondary compaction coefficient of mineral clays of illite, kaolinite and smectite. 28

    2-8-5- pressure coefficient changes in static state K0 during secondary compaction. 29

    2-8-6- relationship between strain and time.. 30

    2-9- soil creep behavior at the microscopic level. 32

    2-9-1- Clay soils..32

    2-9-2- Sandy soils..33 2-9-3- Non-linear behavior in the deformation of sand.33

    2-9-4- Creep behavior of sand in low stresses. 34

    2-9-5- Creep behavior and fracture of sand particles in high stresses 35

    2-10- Time-dependent changes in soil structure. 37

    2-11- Creep in geosynthetics. ..44

    3-2-1- sand soil (Ottawa sand) ..44

    3-2-2- clay (kaolinite clay) ..44

    3-3- geosynthetics ..45

    3-3-1- geotextiles ..45

    3-3-1-1- Non-woven geotextiles. 46

    3-4- Laboratory investigations..47 3-4-1- Granulation test..47

    3-4-2- Relative density test..48

    3-4-3- Limiting test..49

    3-4-4- Limiting test..50

    3-5- Preparation of samples ..51

    3-6- Consolidation device standard ..52

    3-6-1- One-dimensional consolidation test loading standard 55

    3-6-2- Single-stage, multi-stage and loading-unloading tests on unreinforced clay sand samples. 57

    3-6-2-1- Single-stage creep test. 58

    3-6-2-2- Multi-stage creep test. 58

    3-6-2-3- Loading-unloading creep test. 58

    3-6-2-4- Single-stage creep tests on sand samples reinforced with fibers 59. Geotextile.

    Chapter Four: Research Results and Findings

    4-1- Introduction..61

    4-2- Results of single-stage, multi-stage and loading tests on clayey sand samples. 61

    4-3- Results of single-stage tests on samples Clayey sand reinforced with geotextile fibers. 69

    4-4- Effect of pore water on compaction index (Cc). 75

    4-5- Effect of stress levels on secondary compaction coefficient (C?). 75

    4-6- Effect of reinforcing soil with geotextile fibers on secondary compaction. 76

    4-7- Effect of stress history on compaction. Secondary. 76

     

    Source:

    -Mohammed Balochi, Zainab Qanad, properties and applications of geosynthetic materials, Cason Quarterly. Autumn 2019

    1-

    3- Allen, T.M., Christopher, B.R., and Holtz, R.D. (1992). "Performance of a 12.6 m High Geotextile Wall in Seattle, Washington," Geosynthetic-Reinforced Soil Retaining Walls" (Wu, editor), A.A. Balkema Publisher, 81-100.

    4- Augustesen, A., Liingaard, M. and Lade, P. V. (2004). "Evaluation of time-dependent behavior of soils". International Journal of Geomechanics, Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 137-156.

    5- Barden, L. (1969). "Time dependent deformation of normally consolidated clay". Journal of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Division, ASCE, Vol. 95, No. SM1, Proc. paper 6337, pp. 1-31.

    6- Berry, P. L. and Wilkinson, W. B. (1969). "Radial consolidation of clay soils". Geotechnique, Vol.. 19. No. 2, pp. 253-284.

    7- Berry, P. L and Poskitt, T. J. (1972). "The consolidation of peat". Geotechnique, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 52-27.

    8- Bjerrum, L. (1967). "Secondary settlement of structures subjected to large variations in live load". International Union of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, Symposium on Rheology and Soil Mechanics, Grenoble, France, 1-8 April 1967, pp. 460-467.

    9- Bowman, E. T. and Soga, K. (2003). "Creep, aging and microstructural change in dense granular materials". Soils and Foundations, Vol. 43, No. 4, pp. 107-117.

     

     

    10- Buisman, A. S. K. (1936). "Results of long duration settlement tests. Proceedings", 1st International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Harvard University, Massachusetts, USA, 22-26 June 1936, Vol. 1, pp. 103-106.

    11- Budhu, M. (2007). "Soil Mechanics and Foundations", 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    12- Charles, R. J. and Hillig, W. B. (1962). "The kinetics of glass failure. On symposium on Mechanical Strength of Glass and Ways of Improving It”, Charleroi, Belgium, pp. 511-527.

    13- Colliat-Dangus, J. L., Desrues, J. and Foray, P. (1988). "Triaxial testing of granular soil under elevated cell pressure". Advanced triaxial testing of soil and rock, ASTM, edited by Donaghe et al., Philadelphia, pp. 290-310.

    14- Coop, M. R. (1990). "The mechanics of uncemented carbonate sands". Geotechnique, Vol. 40, No. 4, pp. 607–626.

    15- de Josselin de Jong, I. (1968). "Consolidation models consisting of an assembly of viscous elements or a cavity channel network". Geotechnique, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 195-228.

    16- di Prisco, C., and Imposimato, S. (1996). "Time dependent mechanical behavior of loose sands". Mechanics of Cohesive-Frictional Materials, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 45-73.

    17- Duvall, D. E. and Egan, P. D., “Evaluation of Creep-Rupture Properties of Geosynthetics,” Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Geotextiles, The Hague, 2, 1990, 678.

    18- Graham, J., Crooks, J. H. A. and Bell, A. L. (1983). "Time effects on the stress-strain behavior of natural soft clays". Geotechnique, Vol. 33, No. 3, pp. 327–340.

    19- Graham, J., Alfaro, M. and Ferris, G. (2004). "Compression and strength of dense sand at high pressures and elevated temperatures". Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 41, No. 6, pp. 1206-1212.

    20- Griffiths, J. F. and Joshi, R. C. (1991). "Change in pore size distribution owing to secondary consolidation of clays". Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp. 20-24.

    21- Harvey, E. W. (1962). "Analysis of primary and secondary consolidation". Journal of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Division, ASCE, Vol. 88, No. SM6, Proc. Paper 3373, pp. 207-231.

    22- Holtz, R. D. and Jamiolkowski, M. B. (1985). Discussion of "Time dependence of lateral earth pressure," by Kavazanjian, E. and Mitchell, J. K. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, Vol. 111, No. 10, pp. 1239-1242.

    23- Indraratna, B., Rujikiatkamjorn, C. and Sathananthan, I. (2005). "Radial Consolidation of clay using compressibility indices and varying horizontal permeability". Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 42, No. 5, pp. 1330-1341.

    24- Jailloux, J. M. and Segrestin, P., "Present State of Knowledge of Long Term Behavior of Materials Used as Soil Reinforcements," International Geotechnical Symposium on Theory and Practice of Earth Reinforcement, Yamanouchi et al. eds., Balkema, Fukuoka, Japan, 1988, 105-110.

    25- Karner, S. L., Chester, F. M., Kronenberg, A. K. and Chester, J. S. (2003). "Subcritical compaction and yielding of granular quartz sand". Tectonophysics, Vol. 377, No. 3-4, pp. 357-381.

    26- Kavazanjian, E. and Mitchell, J. K. (1984). "Time dependence of lateral earth pressure". Journal of Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, Vol. 110, No. 4, pp.

Investigating the creep behavior of soil reinforced with geosynthetic fibers in laboratory conditions