Contents & References of Separation of prosthesis projections and tissue implants in spiral CT scan sinogram images using active contour methods
List:
Table of Contents
Title Page Back Projection (FBP) and artifacts in CT 4
1-2-1- Beam hardening 6
1-2-2- Photon deficiency 7
1-2-3- Scattering 7
1-2-4- Relative volume effect 7
1-3- General Objectives of this thesis 8
2- Chapter Two: Theoretical Basics of Research 9
2-1- CT History 10
2-2- Cornecting Components of CT Scan 11
2-3- Different CTS 14
2-3-1- First generation 15
2-3-2- Second generation 16
2-3-3- Third generation 17
2-3-4- Fourth generation 17
2-3-5- Fifth generation, EBCT CT scans 18
2-3-6- Sixth generation, spiral CT scans (spiral or helical) 19
2-3-7- Seventh generation, multislice CT scans 20
2-4- Image reconstruction algorithms 21
2-4-1- Sinogram 23
2-4-2- ART algorithm 27
2-4-3- Back Projection Fourier Slice algorithm 28
2-4-4- Filtered Back Projection Fourier Slice algorithm 32
2-5 Image reconstruction in fan beam mode Fig. 34 2-5-1- Image reconstruction in fan beam mode with equal angles 35 2-5-2 Image reconstruction in fan beam mode with equal coverage spaces 38 2-6 Image reconstruction in spiral generation cities 38 2-7- Contours active 40 2-7-1- Parametric active contour models 41 2-7-2 Geometric active contour models 53 2-8 Hough transform 62 3-Chapter 3: Review of the research done 68
4- Chapter 4: Research method 75
4-1- Introduction 76
4-2-Spiral imaging method and its comparison with a normal scanner 77
4-3- Formation of sinogram 78
4-4- Proposed algorithm
4-4-1- Active contour model 80
4-4-2- Hough transform based algorithm 84
4-4-3- Post-processing algorithm 86
4-5- Conclusion 86
5- Chapter five: Results 88 5-1 - Applying the proposed algorithm to real data and comparing intuitively 89 5-2 Applying the proposed algorithm to mulage and comparing quantitatively 90 5-2-1 - Gray level mean and variance 92 5-2-2 - Mean square Errors 93 5-2-3 - Maximum signal-to-noise ratio 93 5-2-4 - Q parameter 94 5-3 Comparison of proposed algorithm with threshold separation method and Hough transform 119 5-4 - Conclusion 122
References 123
Source:
[1] Hsieh, J. (2009), Computed Tomography Principles, Design, Artifacts, and Recent Advances, 2nd ed. Washington: Bellingham.
[2] Yazdi, M., and Beaulieul, L. (2007). "Artifacts in Spiral X-ray CT Scanners: Problems and Solutions," Proceeding of World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology 26: 376-380.
[3] DeMan, B. "Iterative Reconstruction for Reduction of Metal Artifacts in Computed Tomography," PhD. Dissertation, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium, 2001.
[4] Xu, C., Pham, D.L., and Prince, J.L. (2000). "Medical Image Segmentation Using Deformable Models," Handbook of Medical Imaging, Volume 2: Medical Image Processing and Analysis, PP.129-174, edited by Fitzpatrick, J.M., and Sonka, M., SPIE Press.
[5] Xu, C., and Prince, J.L. "Gradient Vector Flow: A New External Force for Snakes," Proc. IEEE Conf. on CVPR, Los Alamitos Comp. Soc. Press, PP.66-71, June 1997.
[6] Azizi, Amir, Haf conversion, Electronics Research Institute of Iran University of Science and Technology: Department of Machine Vision and Image Processing, Azar 1389, [Online], .
[7] Zamyatin, A. "Method, Apparatus, and Computer Program Product for Sinogram" Completions". Patent Number: 7515676, Patent Date: Apr. 7, 2009.
[8] Zamyatin, A.A., and Nakanishi, S. (2006). "Sinogram Correction Methods using Sinogram Decomposition," IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, vol.6, pp.3438-3440.
[9] Changchun, Z., and Ge, S. "A Hough Transform-Based Method for Fast Detection of Fixed Period Sinusoidal Curves in Images," in Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Signal Processing, vol. 1, 2002, pp. 909-912, Aug. 26-30.
[10] Ballard, D.H. (1987). "Generalizing the Hough Transform to Detect Arbitrary Shapes," Readings in Computer Vision: issues, problems, principles, and paradigms, pp. 714-725.
[11] Ebraheim, N.A., Coombs, R., and Rusin, J.J. (1990). "Reduction of Postoperative CT Artifacts of Pelvis Fractures by Use of Titanium Implants," Orthopedics, vol. 13, pp. 1357-1358.
[12] Kalender, W., Hebel, R., and Ebersberger, J. (1987). "Reduction of CT Artifacts Caused by Metallic Implants," Radiology, vol. 164, No. 2, pp. 576-577.
[13] Klotz, E., and Kalender, W. (1990). "Algorithms for the Reduction of CT Artifacts Caused by Metallic Implants," Medical Imaging, vol. 1234, pp. 642-650.
[14] Liu, J., Watt-Smith, S., and Smith, S. (2003).