Contents & References of Selecting the appropriate earthquake record to perform dynamic analysis of the structure using genetic algorithm
List:
The first chapter. 1
(Overview and research background) 1
1-1 Introduction. 2
1-2 research literature. 8
1-2-1 Basics of seismology. 8
1-2-2 Time history of earthquake. 14
1-2-3 Smoothing the response spectrum caused by different records. 17
1-2-4 Scaled design range 18
1-2-5 Regulations. 18
1-3 optimization. 20
1-3-1 types of optimization methods. 21
1-3-2 Innovative search. 21
1-4 inheritance. 24
1-4-1 An overview of the history of genetic science. 25
1-4-2 genetic algorithm. 27
1-4-3 History of Genetic Algorithm. 28
1-4-4 characteristics of genetic algorithm. 30
1-4-5 The general structure of genetic algorithms. 31
1-4-6 genetic algorithm parameters. 32
1-5 general process of optimization and solving problems in genetic algorithm. 33
1-6 research background. 34
1-6-1 Introduction. 34
1-6-2 Research done in connection with the subject. 36
1-6-3 Summary of the theoretical and practical foundations for building an authentic support. 43
The second chapter. 45
(Research method, data analysis) 45
2-1 Introduction. 46
2-2 definitions and basic concepts of genetics. 48
2-2-1 gene. 48
2-2-2 double helix. 49
2-2-3 chromosome. 50
2-2-4 allele. 51
2-2-5 population. 51
2-2-6 The principle of survival and fitness. 52
2-2-6 Reproduction. 54
2-2-7 Selection. 54
2-2-8 intersection. 56
2-2-9 jump. 58
2-2-10 Removal. 59
2-2-11 Exchange or replacement. 60
2-3 Alternative to the elitist selection method 61
2-4 Convergence. 62
2-5 The general trend of genetic algorithms. 63
2-6 genetic algorithm operators. 67
2-7 Advantages of Genetic Algorithm. 70
2-8 Disadvantages of Genetic Algorithm. 71
2-9 applications of genetic algorithm. 72
2-10 Time history analyses. 73
2-11 Different types of accelerometer scaling methods 75
2-12 Scaling records 77
2-13 Using genetic algorithm to scale records 79
2-14 Basic elements of genetic algorithm applied in these problems. 81
2-15 Selection of accelerograms for seismic design. 83
2-16 How to collect and analyze data 84
2-17 Problem formulation. 86
2-18 Selection, implementation and comparison of examples and evidence. 88
2-19 Programs implemented in different stages and presenting the developed program. 89
2-20 genetic operators. 91
2-20-1 Selection. 91
2-20-2 Hembray. 91
2-20-3 Mutation. 91
2-21 Speciation. 92
2-22 The selection of accelerometers and the effect of the size of the community of maps 93
Chapter three. 94
Results and discussion. 94
3-1 genetic algorithm control parameters. 95
3-2 Program execution results. 97
3-3 comparative study of the presented program 99
3-4 study of the effect of optimization control parameters in binary genetic algorithm. 110
3-5 Presentation of hybrid genetic algorithm (selecting control parameters for optimization by genetic algorithm) 146
3-6 Research findings. 151
3-7 general summary. 153
3-8 suggestions and areas for further research 156
Source:
[1] Bab al-Hawaji, M., 1378, An introduction to optimal design, Mashhad: Ferdowsi University Press, first edition.
[2] Bavi, A., 1389, Genetics and optimization algorithms of composite structures. Tehran: Abid Publications. [3] Perna, M., 2018, Earthquake Code 2800, a description of the design of buildings against earthquakes, Tehran: Soha Danesh Publications, 9th edition. [5] Tehranzadeh, M., 1387, Dynamics of structures and its application in earthquake engineering, Tehran: Amirkabir University Publications, first edition. [6] Hosseini Moghadam, M., 1391, Optimization of slabs against buckling using genetic algorithm, master's thesis in structural civil engineering, East Azerbaijan Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Unit. [7] Rezaei, AD, 2018, applied education, 2018, applied genetic and fuzzy algorithm training in MATLAB software, Tehran: Padideh Kitab Publications, print.
[8] Saif, S., 2018, optimal selection of accelerometers for dynamic analysis of structures, Master's thesis in civil engineering, structural orientation, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Khwarazmi University (Karaj teacher training). Targeting subsidies on electricity consumption of household customers in Tehran city using genetic algorithm, master's thesis of management, Kermanshah Islamic Azad University of Science and Research.
[10] Shahrouzi, M., Kivani, J., Saif, S. and Mohammadi, A., 1389, optimization of meta-exploration for scaling strong ground motions, 14th Iranian Geophysics Conference, Tehran, April 21-23, 1228-1236.
[12] Kia, M., 2018, Genetic Algorithms in MATLAB, Tehran: Kian Sabz Computer Publishing, 2nd edition.
[13] Moghadam, Hassan, 2018, Earthquake Engineering,
[14] Mehrabian, R., and Safari, H., 2018, Comparison of Different Accelerometer Scaling Methods, Fourth National Congress of Civil Engineering, University of Tehran.
[15] Nizamabadipour, H., 1389, Inheritance algorithm, basic concepts and advanced topics, Kerman: Bahnar University Press, first edition.
[16] Alimoradi, A., 2001, Performance study of a GA-based active/hybrid control system under near source strong ground motion, A Structural Engineering Odyssey, Proceedings of the 2001 Structures Congress and Exposition, Washington, D.C. ASCE.
[17] Beyer, K., Bommer, JJ.,2007, Selection and scaling of real accelerograms for bidirectional loading: a review of current practice and code provisions, Journal of Earthquake Engineering 2007;11(1):13–45.
[18] Bommer, JJ., Acevedo, AB., 2004, The use of real earthquake accelerograms as input to dynamic analysis. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 2004, Special Issue 8(1):43–91. [19] Camp, C.V., Pezeshk, S., and Cao, G., 1998, Optimized design of two-dimensional structures using a genetic algorithm, J. Struct. Eng. 124 (5), 551–559.
[20] Carballo, J.E., and Cornell, C.A., 2000, Probabilistic Seismic Demand Analysis: Spectrum Matching and Design, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, Report No. RMS-41.
[21] Fahjan, YM., 2008, Selection and scaling of real earthquake accelerograms to fit the Turkish Design Spectra, Teknik Dergi 19(3):4423–44.
[22] Foley, C.M., and Schinler D., 2001. Optimized design of partially and fully-restrained steel frames using distributed plasticity, A Structural Engineering Odyssey: Proceedings of the 2001 Structures Congress and Exposition, Washington, D.C., ASCE.
[23] Goldberg, D. E., 1989. Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization, and Machine Learning
[24] Haydar Kayhan, A., Armagan Korkmaz, K., Irfanoghlu, A., 2011, Selecting and scaling real ground motion records using harmony search algorithm,
[25] Iervolino, I., Maddaloni, G., Cosenza, E., 2008, Eurocode 8 compliant real record sets for seismic analysis of structures, Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 12(1):54-90.
[26] Iervolino, I., Maddaloni, G., Cosenza, E., 2009, A note on selection of time-histories for seismic analysis of bridges in Eurocode 8, Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 13(8):1125–52
[27] Katsanos, EI., Sextos, AG., Manolis GD., 2010, Selection of earthquake ground motion records: a state-of-the-art review from a structural engineering perspective, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering ,30:157–69.
[28] Lee, KS., Geem, ZW., Lee, SH., Bae, KW., 2005, The harmony search heuristic algorithm for discrete structural optimization, Engineering Optimization, 37(7):663–84.
[29] Naeim, F., and Kelly, J. M., 1999, Design of Seismic Isolated Structures From Theory to Practice, John Wiley and Sons, New York.
[30] Naeim, F.