Evaluation of the performance of intelligent neurophasic models and artificial neural networks in predicting and simulating the quality parameter of TDS of rivers (Case study of the Shirin River)

Number of pages: 117 File Format: word File Code: 31317
Year: 2012 University Degree: Master's degree Category: Civil Engineering
  • Part of the Content
  • Contents & Resources
  • Summary of Evaluation of the performance of intelligent neurophasic models and artificial neural networks in predicting and simulating the quality parameter of TDS of rivers (Case study of the Shirin River)

    Master's Thesis in Civil Engineering - Hydraulic Structures

    Abstract:

    Rivers are one of the most important and common sources of drinking, agricultural and industrial water supply. These resources have many qualitative fluctuations due to passing through different platforms and direct connection with the surrounding environment. Therefore, predicting the quality of river flow, which is an uncertain, random and influenced phenomenon of some natural and unnatural factors, plays an important role in the quality management of water resources. According to the defects in the statistical data, the results of the simulation models can be used to discover the defects, correct or complete the data. In order to check the quality status of a water resource, indicators are considered to control the quality of water resources. In order to achieve this, the concentration of dissolved solids (TDS) and electrical conductivity (EC) of Grab hydrometry station located in Ab Shirin river have been evaluated to predict and simulate salinity changes. In forecasting models, monthly delayed inputs of total dissolved solids have been used to estimate salinity by maintaining temporal continuity, and in simulation models, due to the necessity of maintaining temporal continuity and reducing the modeling error, the random combination of total anions and cations has been used as model input. In this study, the intelligent algorithms of artificial neural networks and fuzzy-neural networks have been used to model time series that do not have conditions such as stationarity to apply classical techniques. The results indicate the almost similar performance of the above two methods with acceptable accuracy in modeling the qualitative parameters of the study area. In the end, according to the obtained results, the neurophasic model has less uncertainty in the output values ??compared to the neural network; So that it performs better within the confidence range of most modeling.

    Key words: qualitative parameters, prediction, fresh water river, artificial neural networks, simulation, neuro-fuzzy.

    Chapter one: basic concepts

     

    1-1 Introduction

    One of the most important factors in the development of any region is the availability of quality water sources. Knowing the state of river pollution has made management plans to control river water quality in the future more important. Predicting the quality of river flow in the future, despite being affected by some natural and unnatural factors, plays an important role in managing the quality of water resources.

    By predicting the quality of river flow, in addition to managing the exploitation of water resources to meet the needs, and allowing more agricultural and industrial harvests in the time periods when the river is more polluted, it is possible to use diversion routes from the entry of streams with high pollution loads that affect Unfavorable effect on the water quality of the reservoirs. Also, due to the existence of statistical data defects in the quantitative and qualitative data of hydrometric stations, the results of the simulation model of qualitative parameters can be used in order to correct, discover defects, correct or complete the data. Experimental models that try to establish a relationship between input and output data regardless of the parameters used are known as intelligent models. In fact, fuzzy logic, neural computing and genetic algorithms form the foundations of soft computing science. Unlike hard computing [1], soft computing [2] is compatible with the uncertainty in the real world. It is possible to express the basic principles of soft computing in the form of one sentence as follows: "Using the tolerance of inaccuracy, uncertainty and partial truth [3] in order to reach a flexible, solid and low-cost solution" [63]

    In the prediction of quality parameters, one can use the time delays of the same parameter, due to its abundance and availability compared to other parameters such as flow rate, temperature, color, etc. used as model inputs. In fact, one of the methods of predicting natural and unnatural processes, including pollution, is to use delayed time series of the same parameter as a predictor. 1- The main goal of this research is to use intelligent neural and fuzzy-neural network models to estimate the salinity of a future time step by examining the influence of monthly delayed time series in the study area.

    2- In the following, the problem of simulating TDS using the concentration of different ions in water, pH and flow rate as the input of the models has been investigated and analyzed. The changes of TDS with other qualitative parameters in different rivers have been calculated, among these parameters, total anion and total cation have been selected as inputs to the simulation model, and the results of each model have been discussed and reviewed. is Hydrological forecasts can be divided into short-term and long-term. Short-term forecasts often have a time horizon of several days and are used for warning and real-time operation of water resources systems. In contrast to long-term forecasts, they have a time horizon of more than a week to a year and are used to manage water resources, such as allocating water for irrigation and reducing the effects of drought through water resources management.

    Short-term forecasts are usually more accurate and easier to obtain. Mathematical and physical relationships are more important for these predictions and have better simulation capabilities. On the other hand, long-term forecasts have more errors for various reasons and have more complexities in modeling and simulation. Equally, their importance for a water resource management system is very high, so that a small increase in the accuracy of these predictions will bring many benefits to the exploitation system. The first and most obvious benefit of forecasts with long-term time horizons is to make decisions based on water storage and release more dynamic [14]. Therefore, monthly and seasonal forecasts related to river quality parameters and salinity changes are part of long-term forecasts, and the results of these forecasts are very important in managing the quality of water resources.

    1-2-1 Modeling for forecasting

    The process of modeling for forecasting includes the following steps:

    Determining a suitable predictor

    Determining a suitable forecasting model

    Model calibration

    Model validation

    1-2-1-1 Determining a suitable predictor

    The first step in modeling for Forecasting is the use of a suitable forecaster. The use of appropriate predictors depends on the physical conditions governing the area and the study area.

    Indicative variables that are used to predict the stream quality include:

    The flow rate of the stream in the past periods of time, the electrical conductivity of EC and the total dissolved solids TDS, and it also includes the rest of the measured quality parameters of the stream.

    The general form of the equations obtained based on these variables is It is as follows:

    Q = f (X1 , X2 , X3 , … , Xn )

    where Xi is the i-th index variable among n variables and Q is the stream quality or stream salinity parameter in the desired time period of the forecast.

    Three methods of modeling hydrological phenomena[19]

    Inspection and analysis of various phenomena in the field of water and environmental engineering, such as quality management of water resources, according to the requirements of the plan (importance, desired accuracy, facilities and time) can be done in the form of the following three general methods:

    Numerical methods

    Experimental methods (Laboratory and field)

    Example-based learning methods (artificial intelligence or data mining)

    In recent decades, soft computing tools and intelligent systems have been introduced as new methods of modeling complex engineering systems. The basis of this method is summarized in the two categories of statistics and artificial intelligence, which artificial intelligence methods are considered as machine learning methods. These methods actually determine the relationship between dependent and independent parameters and somehow fit the most suitable function on them and are able to approximate any non-linear function [11], [47].

  • Contents & References of Evaluation of the performance of intelligent neurophasic models and artificial neural networks in predicting and simulating the quality parameter of TDS of rivers (Case study of the Shirin River)

    List:

    The first chapter: Basic concepts. 8

    1-1 Introduction 8

    1-2 Hydrological forecasting. 9

    1-2-1       Modeling for forecasting. 10

    1-2-1-1 Determining the appropriate predictor. 10

    1-2-1-2 Determining the right model. 11

    1-2-1-3 Validation 11

    1-2-1-4 Validation of the model. 11

    1-3         Time series analysis. 12

    1-3-1 Review of non-deterministic processes. 13

    1-3-2 Conceptual forecasting models. 13

    1-4         Water quality. 14

    1-4-1 Total dissolved solids (TDS) 14

    1-4-2 Electrical conductivity (EC) 15

    1-5 General research. 15

    1-5-1 The purpose of the project 15

    1-5-2 General framework of the thesis 16

    The second chapter: An overview of research and studies conducted 18

    1-2 Introduction 18

    2-2 An overview of the subject literature. 19

    2-2-1 Artificial neural networks in hydrology. 19

    2-2-2       Research conducted in the field of modeling qualitative parameters of rivers 20

    2-2-3       Research conducted in the field of neuro-fuzzy inference system. 25

    2-2-4 Research conducted in the field of hybrid models. 27

    The third chapter: Intelligent model of artificial neural networks. 31

    3-1         Introduction 31

    3-1-1       History of neural networks. 32

    3-1-2 Reasons for using artificial neural networks. 33

    3-1-2-1 Learning ability: 33 3-1-2-2 Dispersion of information "textual information processing" 34 3-1-2-3 Generalization capability 34 3-1-2-4 Parallel processing. 34

    3-1-2-5 Resilience 35

    3-2 Transfer functions. 35

    3-2-1       Properties of sigmoidal functions. 35

    3-2-2       Hyperbolic tangent function tansig. 35

    3-3         Neural network architecture. 37

    3-3-1 Neuron with a vector as input. 37

    3-3-2 One layer network 38

    3-4 Learning rules. 38

    3-4-1       Post release networks. 39

    3-4-2 Feedforward networks. 40

    3-4-3       Network training 40

    3-4-3-1    Post-propagation algorithm. 41

    3-4-3-2 Levenberg-Marquardt Algorithm 41

    3-4-3-3 Early stop. 42

    3-4-3-4    Limitations of post-release networks. 42

    Chapter 4: Fuzzy logic and hybrid neuro-fuzzy model (ANFIS) 43

    4-1 Introduction 43

    4-1-1 Fuzzy systems. 43

    4-1-2 History 44

    4-2 What is fuzzy logic? 45

    4-2-1 Description of fuzzy logic. 45

    4-2-2 Reasons for using fuzzy logic. 46

    4-2-3 Objective of fuzzy logic. 47

    4-3         Principles in fuzzy logic. 48

    4-3-1       Fuzzy sets. 48

    4-3-2 Membership functions in fuzzy logic. 49

    4-3-3 Logical operations. 50

    4-3-4 if-then rules. 51

    4-4         Fuzzy inference systems. 53

    4-4-1 Definition of fuzzy inference systems. 53

    4-4-2 Fuzzy inference by Sogno method. 54

    4-4-3 Comparison of Mamdani and Sogno methods. 54

    4-5         ANFIS  55

    4-5-1        What is ANFIS?. 55

    4-5-2 Model learning and inference through ANFIS. 55

    4-5-3 FIS structure and parameter setting. 55

    4-5-4 ANFIS fuzzy neural adaptive learning networks. 56

    4-5-5 Validation of the model using test data sets and verification data. 58

    4-5-6 Limitations of ANFIS. 59

    4-5-7       Structure and how to create neurophasia model. 59

    4-5-7-1 Network separation 60

    4-5-7-2 Differential clustering. 60

    4-5-7-3 C – Fuzzy Means. 61

    The fifth chapter: Development of intelligent simulation models and prediction of quality parameters. 63

    5-1         Introduction 63

    5-1-1        Models used 65

    5-1-2        Characteristics of the river basin and the study station 65

    5-1-3        Data consistency check 68

    5-2                  selection. 69

    5-2-1 Selection69

    5-2-1       Choosing input models for simulating qualitative parameters. 69

    5-2-2       Selecting input models for predicting qualitative parameters. 70

    3-5         Neural network design. 72

    5-3-1 Number of hidden layers required. 72

    5-3-2 The number of neurons required for the hidden layer. 73

    5-3-3 The type of transfer functions used 73

    5-3-3-1 Data normalization 74

    5-3-4 Selection of network training functions 74

    5-3-5 The structure of the neural network used 76

    5-3-6 The neural network algorithm designed to simulate and predict changes saltiness 76

    5-4 Evaluation of models 78

    5-4-1 Root mean square error 78

    5-4-2 Average percentage of absolute error. 78

    5-4-3 Network efficiency factor 78

    5-4-4 Average absolute error. 79

    5-4-5 squared correlation coefficient. 79

    5-5         Results of prediction of qualitative parameters of Abshirin river- Garab station. 79

    5-5-1 neurophagy (ANFIS) 79

    5-5-1-1 neurophagy in EC projections with genfis2 structure. 80

    5-5-1-2 Neurophagy in EC projections with genfis3 structure. 82

    5-5-2       Neural networks in predicting EC of the future time step of Grub station. 85

    5-6         Results of simulation of quality parameters of Abshirin river- Garab station. 89

    5-6-1 TDS gradient with genfis1 neurophagy. 89

    5-6-2 TDS gradient with genfis2 neurophagy. 90

    5-6-3       Neural networks in TDS simulation of Grub station. 91

    5-6-4       Comparison of simulation results of neural network and neurophasia models. 94

    5-7         Modeling related to Zard River (car station) 95

    5-7-1 study area 95

    5-7-1       Results of TDS quality parameter prediction of Zard River. 96

    5-7-2-1 Neurophase in predicting the TDS of the future time step of the Yellow River-Machine Station. 96

    5-7-2-2    Neural networks in predicting the TDS of the future time step of the Yellow River-Car station. 97

    5-7-2-3 Comparison of prediction results of neural network and neurophasia models. 98

    5-7-2 simulation results of the TDS quality parameter of Zard River. 98

    5-7-3-1 Neurophase in TDS simulation of Zard River-Car station. 98

    5-7-3-2    Neural networks in the TDS simulation of the future time step of the Yellow River-Car Station. 99

    5-7-3-3 Comparison of simulation results of neural network and neurophase models of Yellow River. 99

    Sixth chapter: results and suggestions. 101

    6-1 Overview 101

    6-2 Advantages of Modeled Qualitative Parameters 102

    6-3 Improving Results in Future Research. 104

    Sources and references: 106

    A: Persian sources. 106 B: Latin sources 107 Appendix A: Genfis1 110 Appendix B: Genfis2 110 Appendix T: Genfis3 111 Source: A: Persian sources 1.         Bakhtiari, M., Kashfipour, M., Aziri Mobasr, J., "The use of neural networks in the qualitative assessment of Karkhe River". The 6th Iran Hydraulic Conference, 2016.

    2.         Taveori, A., "Using the artificial neural network method in predicting TDS values ??in the Talcheh River". Master's thesis in environmental engineering, Tarbiat Moalem University, Tehran. December, 1387.

    3.         Khalki, M.; Ashrafzadeh, Afshin. and Malmir, M., "Monthly water deficit forecasting using a stochastic model and an adaptive network-based fuzzy inference system". Iran water resources research, fifth year, number 2, fall, 2018.

    4.         Dosarani, M. T.; Sharifi Darani, H.; Talebi, A. and Moghadamnia, A., "Efficiency of artificial neural networks and adaptive neural-fuzzy inference system in rainfall-runoff modeling in Zayandeh Rood dam watershed". Water and Sewerage, No. 4, 1390.

    5.         Rajaei, T.; Mirbagheri, A. and Bodaghpour, S., "River pH Model Using Artificial Neural Networks". The first national conference on infrastructure engineering and management, University of Tehran, Tehran, 2018.

    6.         Zarezadeh Mehrizi, M.; Boghor Haddad, A., "Simulation and forecasting of runoff using ANN-GA hybrid algorithm". Water and soil journal, volume 24, number 5, pp. 942-954, 1389.

Evaluation of the performance of intelligent neurophasic models and artificial neural networks in predicting and simulating the quality parameter of TDS of rivers (Case study of the Shirin River)