Seismic damage distribution in steel building components with viscoelastic damper

Number of pages: 137 File Format: word File Code: 31309
Year: 2014 University Degree: Master's degree Category: Civil Engineering
  • Part of the Content
  • Contents & Resources
  • Summary of Seismic damage distribution in steel building components with viscoelastic damper

    Dissertation for obtaining a master degree

    in the field of civil engineering with earthquake tendency

    Abstract

    Introduction of damage generators is very close to the concept of inelastic behavior and as a result hysteresis energy. Therefore, it can be said that the hysteresis energy at these levels can be a significant criterion for the design or control of the structure. The great dependence of hysteresis energy on the damage of devices has caused this concept and new methods of designing devices to be noticed by researchers and engineers.

    In this research, first three steel frames of 4, 8 and 12 floors with a medium bending frame system were designed using the equivalent static method based on the first edition of the 2800 standard and by means of ETABS (Ver. 9.5.0) software, then all the frames were designed under the effect of seven field acceleration maps. Near and seven far field accelerograms have been subjected to nonlinear dynamic analysis by PERFORM3D (Ver.5) software. The purpose of this study is to investigate the distribution of damage, energy, relative displacement, roof displacement and base cutting in the examined frames. Next, the need to use the strengthening method to reduce the relative displacement is described based on the regulations, then viscoelastic dampers are used to strengthen and reduce damage in the investigated frames. The results obtained indicate that despite the uniform distribution of resistance in the height of the floors, the hysteresis and damage energy distribution diagrams do not follow this distribution and the concentration of energy and damage is observed in one or more floors. Therefore, in order to optimally use the maximum capacity of the system, it does not seem reasonable to design structures based on resistance only, and other parameters such as hysteresis energy, which play a major role in the damage of structural members, should be considered in the design process. Also, the effect of using viscoelastic dampers on reducing the damage of high-height frames has been greater, and it shows a good performance in reducing damage under near-field earthquakes.

    Key words: hysteresis energy, damage, dynamic analysis, retrofitting, viscoelastic damper

    Chapter 1

    1-1 Introduction

    annually in the world, on average 10,000 people die as a result of the earthquake (Figure (1-1)). UNESCO's studies show that the financial damage caused by earthquakes from 1926 to 1950 was about 10 billion dollars. In this period of time, two cities and 200 villages were destroyed in Central Asia. Since then, several cities including Ashgabat (1948), Agadir (1960), Esco Pih (1963), Managua (1972), Gomona and Tangshan (1976), Mexico City (1985), Spitaka (1988), Kobe (1995), cities in Turkey and Taiwan (1999) and hundreds of villages were razed to the ground due to earthquakes. Historical writings prove the long-standing concern of mankind about the dangers caused by earthquakes [1]. This is the reason why man is trying to deal with this natural phenomenon and has made significant progress in this way. However, due to the excessive complexity of this phenomenon, it has not yet been able to achieve complete safety and security, both in terms of life and material.

    Nowadays, it is well known that the structures designed according to the existing regulations will suffer heavy damages against severe earthquakes. However, some earthquake design criteria (especially in the initial design of structures) are still based on elastic analysis and the use of a static force equivalent to an earthquake [2,3]. They enter the structure during an earthquake. The forces used by the earthquake depend on the elastic and plastic characteristics of the structure.

    Various researches show that other parameters are also involved in the response of the earthquakes of the structures, and the discussion of force-displacement in elastic or even fully bilinear elastoplastic cannot justify all the behaviors of the earthquakes of the structure. As a result, the researchers are looking to propose a new method in the design of earthquakes of structures. In the same direction and during the last two decades, the energy issue has received a lot of attention.. Because with the progress achieved in this method, many parameters and behaviors mentioned in the seismic design of structures have found the ability to be justified and applied in the design process. Nevertheless, there are still many unknowns and shortcomings in the energy method that prevent it from being presented as a comprehensive method in the form of a reliable regulation. According to the extensive research and researches that are currently being conducted on this issue at the world level, bright futures are predicted for it, and maybe in the near future, the current principles and rules in the regulations will be replaced with the principles and rules of the energy method. which are designed by resistance method and subjected to nonlinear dynamic analysis, it can be seen that in the design based on resistance, despite the uniform distribution of resistance in the floors, this method has weaknesses and cannot be a perfect method for designing buildings, and a concentration of energy and damage is always observed in one or two floors. Studies show that examining structures based on energy concepts can better show the structure's behavior during an earthquake, so in this study, it is tried to examine the structure based on energy concepts.

    When an earthquake occurs, a lot of energy enters the structure, the structure must absorb or dissipate this energy in different ways. The members of the structure enter the inelastic range against the earthquake energy, which is a significant amount, so that they can absorb this energy with their deformations. When the members of the structures enter the non-elastic range, permanent deformations occur in the structure, and in order to continue using the structure, those members that have changed their shape too much or are no longer usable should be replaced with new members or strengthened, which is difficult to implement and the cost is high. Therefore, by placing shock absorbers in the structure, these shock absorbers prevent other components of the structure from entering the inelastic range by absorbing the earthquake energy, and as a result, after the earthquake, the various components of the structure still maintain their operability, and they can be replaced or repaired only by visiting the shock absorbers if necessary.

    According to the stated information, in this research, the structures to which shock absorbers have been added as a method of strengthening is paid For this purpose, by selecting a number of steel frames with a medium bending frame system that are designed based on the first edition of the 2800 standard [4], we will examine the vulnerability of these frames to earthquakes under different earthquakes in the far and near areas and based on energy concepts, and we will examine parameters such as damage to floors and frames, relative displacement of floors, shearing of the foundation and displacement of the roof, then by controlling the relative displacement values ??based on the regulations, we will explain the necessity of using the retrofitting method to reduce these values. to be For this purpose, viscoelastic dampers are used to reduce relative displacement and damage to the structure. One of the advantages of using viscoelastic dampers is that no external stimulation is needed to activate these dampers, and unlike friction dampers that cannot be activated for less than the sliding force, viscoelastic dampers work in any earthquake and waste energy, thus reducing damage to the structure.

    The first chapter contains the introduction, the necessity and objectives of the research and the structure of the thesis.

    In the second chapter, the concepts of energy are examined first, and then the damage indicators are introduced, and with regard to the use of dampers in order to strengthen the frames investigated in this research, the vibration controls, especially the types of passive dampers, are reviewed. Due to the use of viscoelastic damper in this research, the dynamic characteristics of this type of damper and its design method are described in detail. The third chapter introduces steel frames as well as different accelerometers of the far and near fields which are scaled according to the 2800 standard method for nonlinear dynamic analysis. Next, Perform-3D software will be introduced and at the end of the chapter, the accuracy of viscoelastic damper modeling in the above software will be examined.

  • Contents & References of Seismic damage distribution in steel building components with viscoelastic damper

    List:

    Chapter 1 Introduction 1

    1-1 Introduction. 2

    1-2 Necessity and objectives of research. 3

    1-3 thesis structure. 4

    Chapter 2 overview of sources 5

    2-1 Introduction. 6

    2-2 Basic concepts of energy. 6

    2-2-1 Energy equations in one degree of freedom system 7

    2-2-2 Absolute energy equation 8

    2-2-3 Relative energy equation. 9

    2-2-4 Energy equations in multi-degree of freedom system with non-linear behavior. 9

    2-2-5 Breakdown of input energy into different energy terms 10

    2-2-5-1 input energy). 11

    2-2-5-2 hysteretic energy ( ). 11

    2-2-5-3 viscous damping energy ( ). 12

    2-2-5-4 kinetic energy ( ). 12

    2-2-5-5 elastic energy ( ). 13

    2-2-6 The effect of instrument parameters on input energy. 13

    2-2-6-1 Effect of periodicity of the structure. 13

    2-2-6-2 Effect of plasticity ratio and hysteretic model on input energy. 14

    2-2-6-3 Effect of damping ratio on input energy. 14

    2-3 damage indicators. 14

    2-3-1 Maximum deformation damage indicators. 15

    2-3-1-1 plasticity ratio. 15

    2-3-1-2 relative location change between floors. 16

    2-3-1-3 bending damage ratio. 16

    2-3-2 Cumulative damage indicators. 16

    2-3-2-1 normalized cumulative transformations. 17

    2-3-2-2 normalized cumulative wasted energy. 17

    2-3-2-3 short cycle fatigue. 17

    2-3-3 composite indicators. 18

    2-3-3-1 Maximum displacement and energy loss. 18

    2-3-3-2 anchor curve - curvature 19

    2-3-4 indicators of maximum plasticity damage. 19

    2-3-5 weighted average of damage indicators. 20

    2-3-6 History of damage index. 20

    2-4 vibration controls. 24

    2-4-1 Types of earthquake control systems. 24

    2-4-1-1 Passive controller system. 25

    2-4-1-2 active controller system. 26

    2-4-1-3 link controller system. 27

    2-4-1-4 semi-active controller system. 28

    2-5 Dampers 28

    2-5-1 Adjusted mass dampers. 29

    2-5-2 Adjusted liquid damper. 31

    2-5-3 Viscose damper. 42

    2-5-4 yielding dampers (metal). 35

    2-5-5 metal alloy dampers with memory deformation. 38

    2-5-6 Friction dampers. 40

    2-5-7 Viscoelastic dampers. 42

    2-5-7-1 Viscoelastic material structure. 42

    2-5-7-2 Dynamic characteristics of viscoelastic dampers. 43

    2-5-7-3 Modeling of structures with viscoelastic damper. 46

    2-5-7-4 Modal strain energy method. 48

    2-5-7-5 design method. 49

    2-5-7-6 Application history of viscoelastic dampers. 51

    Chapter 3 Introduction and modeling of the studied structures 54

    3-1 Introduction. 55

    3-2 frames examined in this study. 55

    3-3 loading and designing frames in ETABS software ver9.5.0. 56

    3-4 how to perform nonlinear dynamic analysis. 59

    3-5 Selection of accelerograms 60

    3-6 Correlation of selected accelerograms. 61

    3-7 Features of Perform 3D software. 61

    3-7-1 Elements used in Perform 3D software 61

    3-7-2 Time step in non-linear analysis of Perform 3D software 62

    3-7-3 Perform 3D software solution technique. 62

    3-7-4 Energy in Perform 3D software 62

    3-7-4-1 Calculation of inelastic and strain energies. 63

    3-7-4-2 energy error. 65

    3-7-5 assumptions of dynamic analysis and modeling in Perform3D software. 65

    3-7-6 Viscoelastic damper modeling in Perform 3D software. 65

    3-7-7 Checking the accuracy of viscoelastic damper modeling in Perform 3D software. 68

    Chapter 4 Results and their interpretation 71

    4-1 Introduction. 72

    4-2 Examining the results of changing the relative location of floors. 73

    4-2-1 frame 4 floors. 73

    4-2-2 frame 8 floors. 75

    4-2-3 frame, 12 floors. 77

    4-2-4 Results of the average change of the relative location of the floors in the frames 79

    4-3 Examining the results of the time history of the earthquake input energy. 81

    4-3-1 Results of the time history of input energy of the Landers earthquake. 81

    4-3-1-1 frame, 4 floors. 81

    4-3-1-2 frame 8 floors. 83

    4-3-1-3 12-story frame. 83

    4-3-2 Results83

    4-3-2 Results of the time history of Tabas earthquake input energy. 84

    4-3-2-1 frame, 4 floors. 84

    4-3-2-2 frame, 8 floors. 85

    4-3-2-3 frame, 12 floors. 86

    4-4 Investigation of hysteresis energy in the structure. 87

    4-4-1 frame, 4 floors. 88

    4-4-2 8-story frame. 89

    4-4-3 frame 12 floors. 90

    4-4-4 checking the average hysteresis energy on the frames 91

    4-5 checking the remaining energy in the structure. 91

    4-5-1 frame, 4 floors. 92

    4-5-2 frame of 8 floors. 93

    4-5-3 frame 12 floors. 94

    4-5-4 Checking the average residual energy in the frames 95

    4-6 Checking the ratio of hysteresis energy to the input energy in the frames 95

    4-7 Checking the damage distribution in the height of the checked frames. 96

    4-7- 4-story frame 96

    4-7-2 8-story frame. 98

    4-7-3 12-story frame 100

    4-7-4 Results of the average damage index of floors in the frames 102

    4-8 Examination of the damage index of the whole structure in the examined frames. 104

    4-9 Checking the foundation cut in the structure. 105

    4-9-1 frame, 4 floors. 106

    4-9-2 frame of 8 floors. 107

    4-9-3 frame 12 floors. 108

    4-9-4 average results of the base cut of the examined frames. 109

    4-10 Checking the movement of the roof in the structure. 110

    Chapter 5 Summary and suggestions 111

    5-1 Introduction. 112

    2-5 Conclusion. 112

    5-3 suggestions. 113

    References 115

     

    Source:

    1. Naeem, Farzad. 1380. "Design of anti-earthquake structures", Clair Academic Publications

    2. Hart, G.G. "Earthquake forces for the lateral force code", The Structural Damage of Tall Buildings, Vol.9, PP.49-64, 2000.

    3. Copra, A.K. and Cruz, E.F. "Evaluation of building code formulas for earthquake forces", Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 115, no. 8 pp. 1881-1899, 1986.

    4.  Building design regulations against earthquakes, Iranian standard 2800, first edition, 1368

    5. SEAOC. "Vision 2000 - A Framework for Performance Based Design, "Technical report, Structural Engineers Association of California, Vision 2000 Committee, Sacramento, California, 1995.

    6. BSSC. "NEHRP Guidelines for the Seismic Regulation of new Buildings and Other Structures", Technical Report FEMA 303, FEMA, 1998.

    7. Bungale S. Taranath "Wind and Earthquake Resistant Buildings structural analysis and design", Marcel Dekker, New York, 2005.

    8. Wang C.M. and Bertero, V.V. "Evaluation of Seismic Energy in Structures", Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 19, pp. 77-90, 1990.

    9. Clough, R.W. Penzein, J., "Dynamics of Structures", NC GrawHill. ISBN: 0-07011-7, 1973.

    10. Akyama, H. "Earthquake-resistant Limit-state Design for Buildings", the University of Tokyo Press, Tokyo, Japan, 1985.

    11. Khashaee, P., Mohraz, B., Sadek, F., Lew, H.S. and John L. Gross. "Distribution of Earthquake Input Energy in Structures", Building and Fire Research Laboratory National Institute of Standard and Technology Gaithersburg, MD20899, PP. 1-36, 2003.

    12. Newmark, N.M. and Hall, W.J. "Earthquake Spectra and Design", EERI, Berkeley California, 1982.

    13. Zahrah T.F. and Hall W.J. "Earthquake Energy Absorption in SDOF Structures", J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 110(8), PP. 1772-1757, 1982.

    14. Banon, H. and D. Veneziano. "Seismic Safety of Reinforced Concrete Members and Structures", Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 10, PP. 179-193, 1982.

    15. Culver, C. G. et al. "Natural Hazards Evaluation of Existing Buildings", Technical Report BSS 61, National Bureau of Standards, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1975. 16. Toussi, S. and J. P. T. Yao. "Hysteresis Identification of Existing Structures", Journal of Engineering Mechanics 16, PP. 1177-1188, 1983.

    17. Banon, H., J. M. Biggs, and H. M. Irvine “Seismic Damage of Reinforced Concrete Frames”, Journal of the Structural Division, ASCE 107 (ST9), PP. 1713-1729, 1981.

    18. Roufaiel, M. S. L. and C.

Seismic damage distribution in steel building components with viscoelastic damper