Contents & References of Investigating the impact of the use of administrative automation systems on the efficiency of the Yazd regional electricity organization
List:
List of tables. List of bugs. K
Abstract. 1
1 The first chapter of generalities. 2
1-1 Introduction. 3
1-2 statement of the problem. 4
1-3 The importance and necessity of research. 5
1-4 research objectives. 6
1-4-1 Scientific goals. 6
1-4-2 practical goals. 6
1-5 research assumptions. 6
1-6 scope of research. 7
1-6-1 Time domain. 7
1-6-2 spatial territory. 7
1-7 research methods. 7
1-7-1 Information gathering tool. 8
1-7-2 Society and statistical sample. 8
1-7-3 data analysis method. 8
1-8 review of research chapters. 9
2 Chapter Two Theoretical foundations and research background. 10
2-1 Introduction. 11
2-2 Definition of productivity. 12
2-3 different views on productivity. 15
2-3-1 Productivity from a systemic point of view. 15
2-3-2 Productivity from the Japanese point of view. 16
2-3-3 Productivity from a historical perspective. 17
2-4 factors affecting productivity. 17
2-5 elements of productivity. 18
2-5-1 Efficiency. 18
2-5-2 Effectiveness. 19
2-6 productivity improvement models. 20
2-6-1 Goodwin model. 21
2-6-2 Hershauer and Rush model. 21
2-6-3 Quantan and Weton models. 21
2-7 The concept of automation. 22
2-8 Evolution of administrative technology. 23
2-9 administrative automation. 24
2-10 administrative automation subsystems. 25
2-11 The effect of using the office automation system. 26
2-12 Research background. 29
2-12-1 Foreign studies. 29
2-12-2 Internal studies. 29
2-13 conceptual model of research and communication of office automation and productivity. 34
3 Chapter 3 Research methodology. 36
3-1 Introduction. 37
3-2 research methods. 37
3-3 Society and statistical sample. 37
3-4 information gathering tools. 38
3-5 research assumptions. 41
3-6 research model and variables. 42
7-3 data analysis method. 43
3-7-1 Descriptive statistics. 43
3-7-2 structural equation model. 44
4 Chapter 4 research findings. 46
4-1 Introduction. 47
4-2 Descriptive statistics. 47
4-3 assumption test. 49
4-3-1 Testing the main hypotheses. 50
4-3-2 Sub-hypotheses test. 52
5 Chapter Five Discussion and conclusion. 55
5-1 Conclusion. 56
5-1-1 Summary of the main assumptions test. 57
5-1-2 Summary of sub-hypotheses test. 57
5-2 research limitations. 58
5-2-1 Location limitation. 58
5-2-2 time limit. 58
5-3 suggestions. 58
Appendix. 59
Research questionnaire. 60
Software outputs. 62
Descriptive statistics. 62
Hypothesis test. 63
Resources. 67
Abstract. 70
Source:
Ahangarpur, Adel (1387). Investigating the efficiency of implementing administrative automation (a case study of Iran's National Drilling Company), Strategy, No. 1, 101-75.
Abtahi, Hossein and Babak Kazemi (2008). Productivity, Tehran, Business Studies and Research Institute.
Alwani, Seyyed Mehdi and Parviz Ahmadi (2009). Designing a comprehensive model for the management of factors affecting the productivity of human resources, Modares, No. 1, 19-2. The principles of efficiency and productivity measurement, Tehran, Business Studies and Research Institute.
Taghizadeh, Ebrahim (2015). Investigating the direct impact of information technology on the organization's effectiveness, public administration master's thesis, management and accounting faculty.
Habibi, Lili (2004). Administrative Automation Systems, Tadbir, No. 154, 42-38. Khaki, G. (1389). Research method with an approach to thesis writing, Reflection Publications.
Rahimikia, Amin, Ezzatale Kadampour and Fateme Roshanzadeh (2019). Investigating the role of administrative automation in the productivity of Khorramabad Municipality employees in 2009, Urban Management, No. 27, 124-99.
Saatchi, Mahmoud (2004). Work psychology and industrial psychology, Tehran, publishing institute. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
Bain, D. (1982). The productivity prescription: theThe productivity prescription: the manager's guide to improving productivity and profits. McGraw-Hill.
Buckle, R. and Chrisrioancenk, J. (1995). Worker Rights Promote Productivity Growth, Challenge, 39, 8.
Clegg. S. and Dunkerly, D. (1980). Organization, Class and Control, London: Routledge Kegan Pail.
Emde, E. (1997). Why Go for Compliance When You Need Commitment? The Journal for Quality and Participation, 20, 1.
Hershauer, J. C., & Ruch, W. A. ??(1978). A worker productivity model and its use at Lincoln Electric. Interfaces, 8(3), 80-90.
Ourhill, M.J. (1972). The Sociology of Public Administration, London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
Robbins, S.P. (1987). Organization Theory: Structure, Design and Applications, 2nd, Prentice Hall.
Shermerborm, J.K. (1993). Management for Productivity, New York: John Wiley & Sons INC.
Roger, M. (1996). Pulling Through with Productivity, Transportation and Distribution, 36, 9.
Swart, J.C. (1985). Clerical Workers on Flexitime, Personal, 62, 4.
Walters, R. W. (1985). The City Bank Project, San Francisco: Jossy Bass.