Identifying and ranking the factors influencing the decision-making of managers in the cultural sector of the country using the TOPSIS model (a case study of the Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance)

Number of pages: 138 File Format: word File Code: 31147
Year: 2013 University Degree: Master's degree Category: Management
  • Part of the Content
  • Contents & Resources
  • Summary of Identifying and ranking the factors influencing the decision-making of managers in the cultural sector of the country using the TOPSIS model (a case study of the Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance)

    Dissertation for Master's degree (M.A)

    Field and orientation:

    Government management-organizations and methods

    Abstract

    According to the depth and breadth of the cultural principles and goals of the system, the centers in charge of cultural affairs, in order to realize these goals, should have high decision-making power. Making a decision according to logical and principled bases is an important part of all decisions based on the scientific method, and experts try to present their knowledge to areas where decisions in those areas have a structure. In this regard, the main goal of the current research is to identify and rank the factors affecting the decision-making process among the country's cultural managers. The statistical population of the research consists of the staff managers of the Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance, and the TOPSIS method was used for ranking. The results of the identification phase led to the extraction of 29 final factors affecting the decision-making process in 4 dimensions: rational factors, psychological factors, social factors and cultural factors. These 29 identified factors were ranked. The results showed that in the dimension of rational factors, the degree of alignment of the decision with the cultural policies of the political system, in the dimension of psychological factors, the way managers and colleagues deal with the decision made, in the dimension of social factors, the degree of impact of the decision in the field of social issues and social security, and in the dimension of cultural factors, considering the dominant culture of the society, ranked first.

    Key words: decision-making, TOPSIS, cultural managers, rational factor, social factors, cultural factors, psychological factors

                    Generalities of the research

    - Introduction

    The practical and executive actions of each groups are based on the decisions that are taken before the action. In any organizational complex, whether it is a company, ministry, or the entire government, many decisions are made every day in order to implement and continue the life of the organization. The quality of administration of each complex and how it functions depends on the quality and consequences of the decisions made in that complex. One of the important factors in determining the quality of decisions is the decision-making system. This research identifies and ranks the factors affecting the decision-making of managers in the cultural sector of the country in the Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance, and in this chapter, the generalities of the research are discussed. In determining the policies of the organization, in formulating goals, designing the organization, choosing, evaluating, and in all actions and actions of management, decision-making is the main component and the main pillar. Decision-making is so important as the first task of a manager in managing the affairs of organizations that some experts have defined the organization as a decision network and management as a decision-making act (Alvani, 2005). For example, Herbert Simon [1] (1947) considers decision-making to be the main essence of management. In his opinion, the decision maker is a person who is ready to step on one of the paths at the crossroads, at the moment of choice (Alvani, 2005). Hui and Miskel [2] (2008) also consider decision-making to be the main responsibility of all managers, and in their opinion, management is a process that not only leads to decision-making, but also leads to implementation. All managers deal with the decision-making process because their profession requires it (Parsaian & Arabi, 1996). According to Wagner and Hellenbruck [4] (2005), decision-making means the process of gathering information to evaluate options and choosing the best ones to solve the problem. In general, decision-making means choosing a solution from two or more options in a preventive behavior and in order to achieve a specific goal or achievement with the least risk possible (Korooni, 2005). For this reason, decision-making forms the core of planning. Therefore, there will be no planning without decision-making (Weinz & Koontz, 1993).

    Managers are always faced with situations that require them to make a decision. For this reason, the decision-making task is one of their important and fundamental tasks in organizational processes (Moghadam & Tehrani, 2008). Of course, managers make their decisions in different styles, but these styles are not the same and change during their working life.People's decision-making style refers to the habitual pattern they use when making decisions. In other words, each person's decision-making style is his personality approach in understanding and reacting to his decision-making task (Tanelhom, 2004). In this regard, researchers have presented different decision-making styles.

    Life in all organizations, including cultural organizations, requires the adoption of various and continuous measures and solutions. Managers must perform various tasks and functions in order to guide and lead their organization (Mirkamali, 2007). In general, decision-making is one of the challenges of managers over time; Because during their organizational mission, they face issues and situations that require decision-making (Kaucher, 2010). The decisions that managers make during their organizational mission affect the performance of employees and their lives and also affect the effectiveness of the organization. Therefore, they should be familiar with their duties and their field of work and consider themselves responsible for their actions, deeds, decisions and behavior at any moment and have a reason for each action and a reasonable justification for each decision (Delshad, 2007). But the main question of the current research is that considering the importance of the decision-making process in the organization - as stated, according to some management thinkers, the main task of the manager is decision-making and management is equal to decision-making - what factors influence the managers' decision? Undoubtedly, knowing these factors can be very important because the decision-making process can be significantly improved based on knowing these factors and knowing their priority and rank. Considering that cultural institutions are considered one of the most important social pillars, the quality of decision-making in them is also of increasing importance. This quality can be affected by various factors, including different decision-making styles of managers. It is obvious that any defect in this field can lead to poor decisions that have harmful consequences for the society. In this regard, the main effort of the current research is to identify and rank the factors influencing the decision-making of managers in the cultural sector of the country. Achieving this goal will help the decision-making process in the studied organization to be significantly improved and help to make decisions at the right time, by the right person and in the right way. 1-3- The importance and necessity of research Cultural managers play an important role in the political, social and economic life of a nation Managers can affect their lives and the employees of their organization with the decisions they make (Willson, 2010).  Considering that the success of any organization is influenced by the quality and decision making of its managers. And a wrong decision can cause irreparable losses, therefore, research in the field of decision-making is considered an organizational necessity.

    It should be noted that the managers of the Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance have an influential and decisive role in the fate of the society due to their organizational missions, which are policy-making, planning, support and supervision of cultural and artistic programs and activities and the promotion of human and religious values. Based on this, research in the field of factors influencing the decision-making of cultural managers is very important. In addition, conducting such research can add to the wealth of research in this field. Also, the results of such researches can be very important not only for cultural environments but also for other public and government organizations.

    1-4- Research objectives

    Identifying the factors influencing the decision-making of managers in the Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance

    Ranking the factors influencing the decision-making of managers in the Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance

    1-5- Assumptions

    Rational factors on the decision of managers They influence the cultural sector of the country. Psychological factors influence the decision of managers in the cultural sector of the country. Social factors influence the decision of managers in the cultural sector of the country. Cultural factors influence the decision of managers in the cultural sector of the country. management and decision-making. The present research identifies and ranks the factors influencing the decision-making of managers in the cultural sector of the country.

  • Contents & References of Identifying and ranking the factors influencing the decision-making of managers in the cultural sector of the country using the TOPSIS model (a case study of the Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance)

    List:

    Abstract 1

    Chapter One: General Research

    1-1- Introduction. 3

    1-2- statement of the problem. 3

    1-3- The importance and necessity of research. 6

    1-4- research objectives. 6

    1-5- Assumptions. 7

    1-6- Research area. 7

    1-6-1- Subject area. 7

    1-6-2- spatial territory. 7

    1-6-3- Time domain. 7

    1-7- Description of the words and terms used in the research. 8

    1-7-1- Decision making. 8

    1-7-2- Multiple Criteria Decision Making 8

    1-7-3- TOPSIS technique. 8

    1-7-4- Rational factors. 9

    1-7-5- Psychological factors. 9

    1-7-6 - Social factors. 9

    1-7-7- Cultural factors. 9

    Chapter Two: An overview of the research background

    2-1- Introduction. 11

    E

    2-2 - What is decision making? 11

    2-3- levels of decision making. 12

    2-4- The degree of difficulty of decision making. 13

    2-4-1- Types of decision making based on available information 14

    2-5- Time and decision making. 16

    2-6- Decision steps. 18

    2-7- Individual decision-making versus organizational decision-making. 20

    2-7-1- Individual decisions. 20

    2-7-2-organizational decisions. 20

    2-7-2-1- Scientific management approach. 20

    2-7-2-2- Carnegie model. 21

    2-7-2-3- Garbage container model. 23

    2-8 - Decision-making approaches. 25

    2-8-1- Rational decision making. 26

    2-8-2- behavioral decision making. 28

    2-8-3- Open decision making. 31

    2-9- Modeling for decision. 32

    2-9-1- Expected utility model. 33

    2-9-2- behavioral model of organizational decision making. 35

    2-9-3- gradual decision making model. 37

    2-9-4- Decision making model in crisis. 39

    2-9-5- Decision making model in psychological stress conditions. 42

    2-9-6- conflict model or coping with roles model 43

    2-10- decision support systems. 45

    2-11-decision-making problems. 48

    2-12-Intuitive decision making. 50

    and

     

    2-12-1 - Concept theory. 59

    2-12-2- Available judgment. 61

    2-12-3-Representative judgment. 62

    2-12-4- Commitment theory. 62

    2-13- Decision making process. 63

    2-13-1-Problem identification. 63

    2-13-2-Effects of the framework. 64

    2-13-3- Redefining the problem. 69

    2-13-4- Making choices 70

    2-13-5- Correlated optimization. 70

    2-13-5-1-The role of expectations in decision making. 71

    2-13-6-Perform the solution. 72

    2-14- Decision style model. 73

    2-15- Research background. 75

    2-16- Conceptual model of research. 79

    Chapter Three: Research Methodology

    3-1- Introduction. 82

    3-2- Research method. 82

    3-3- Research process. 83

    3-4- Selecting the decision-making group. 84

    3-5- Society and statistical sample. 84

    3-6- sample size and sampling method. 85

    3-7-Research data collection tool. 87

    3-8- Validity of the questionnaire. 89

    3-9- Questionnaire reliability. 90

    3-10- Research method and tools 91

    Z

     

     

     

    Chapter four: Research data analysis

    4-1- Introduction. 93

    4-2- Descriptive research findings. ..94

    4-3- Inferential analysis of research findings. 99

    4-3-1- Test of research hypotheses. 99

    4-3-2- Ranking the factors affecting managers' decision-making using TOPSIS technique. 104

    4-3-2-1-Ranking of components related to the dimension of rational factors. 104

    4-3-2-2-ranking of the components related to the dimension of psychological factors. 105

    4-3-2-3-ranking of the components related to the dimension of social factors. 105

    4-3-2-4-ranking of the components related to the dimension of cultural factors. 106

    Chapter Five: Conclusions and Research Proposals

    5-1- A brief review of the statement of the problem. 108

    5-2- Hypothesis test results. 110

    5-3- Discussion and conclusion. 110

    4-5-Limitations of the research. 115

    5-4-1- Limitations on researcher control. 115

    5-4-2- Limitations beyond the control of the researcher. 115

    5-5- Providing suggestions 116

    5-5-1- Practical suggestions based on research findings. 116

    5-5-2-Suggestions for future research. 116

    Resources and116

    Sources and sources

    Source:

    Asgharpour, Mohammad Javad (2013). Multi-criteria decision-making, Publishing and Printing Institute of Tehran University.

    Bakhrian, Mohammad, Wise decision-making, a new approach to modeling in management, Tehran: Public Management Education Center, 2010, p. 77. Khalili Shurini, Siavash, Research Methods in Human Sciences, Tehran: Yadavare Kitab, 1375, pp. 16-18. Daft, Richard L., Organization Theory and Design, translated by Ali Parsaian and Mohammad Arabi, Tehran: Cultural Research Office, 1377, Volume I, pp. 228-30. Saadat, Esfandiar. "Criticism on the classic model of decision-making", Danesh Management, numbers 9 and 10, summer and autumn 2019, pp. 29-42. Sharifzadeh, Fattah, "Decision-making and policy-making in the environment of decision-making support systems", Administrative Development, 1378, fifth period, number 21, pp. 26-41. 25.

    Moorhead, J. and R. Griffin, Organizational Behavior, translated by Mehdi Elwani and Gholamreza Memarzadeh, Tehran: Marvarid Publishing House, 2017, p. 380.

    Momini, Mansour and Qayoumi, Ali (1389). Statistical analysis using SPSS. New Book Publications, third edition. Tehran.

     

    Abelson, Robert, & Ariel Levi; "Decision Making and Decision Theory", Gardner Lindsey & Elliot Aronson; The Handbook of social psychology, 3rd edition, New York: Random House, 1985.

    Ahituv, Niv & Seev Neumann; Principles of Information Systems for Management; Dubuque, IA: WCB, 1990.

    Alex Mintz, Integrating Cognitive and Rational Theories of Foreign Policy Decision Making; New York, Palgrave, 2002. Alvani, M. (2005). Decision and the state lines. Tehran: Publication of books, reading and editing of Humanities University (left).

    Archer, Ernest R.; "How to make a business decision: An analysis of theory and practice"; Management Review, No. 69 (Feb. 1980), pp. 54-61.

    Ariely, Dan & Dan Zakay, "A timely account of the role of duration in decision making", Acta Psychologica; Vol. 108, Issue 2, Sep. 2001, pp. 187-207.

    Awad, Elias m.; Systems Analysis and Design; New Delhi: Galgotia, 1994, Pp. 9-27.

    Baker, Edward & Fisher, Michael; "Computational Results for Very Large Air Crew Scheduling Problems", Omega, No. 9, (1981), Pp. 8-613. Bazerman, M.H., & Moore, D. (2008). Judgment in Managerial Decision Making (7th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. pp. 54-55 Beach, L. R. & T. R. Mitchell. "Image Theory: A Behavioral Theory of Decision Making in Organizations"; in B. M. Staw and L. L. Cummings (eds); Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 12, Greenwich, CT: JAI, 1990 Beach, L. R.; "Image Theory; decision making in Individual and Organizational Contexts"; London: Wiley, 1990. Beach, Lee Roy, & Terrence Mitchell; "A Contingency Model for the Selection of Decision Strategies"; Academy of Management Review; No. 3 (April 1978), Pp. 439-40. Behling, O. & N. L. Eckel; "Making sense out of intuition"; The Executive; Feb. 1991, pp. 46-54.

    Bhargava, J. N.; Economics of Information Management; Jampur: Arihant Publishing House, 1993, Pp.62-5.

    Blai, Boris; "Eight steps to successful problem solving"; Supervisory Management, Jan. 1986, pp. 7-9.

    Blustein, L; Phillips, D. (1990). "Relation between ego identity statuses and decision-making styles". Journal of Counseling Psychology, Vol 37(2), 160-168.

     Brumfield, Elizabeth B., & John w. Fox (eds); Factional Competition and Political Development in the New World; New York: Cambridge University Press, 1993. Burns, M. (2008). "The role of ethics in decision making by deans and division chairs of community colleges": University of Gonzaga. Business; October 1986, pp. 209-24. Calvert, Randall; "Political Decision Making with Costly and Imperfect Information"; in P. E. Johnson; Formal Theories of Politics: Mathematical Modeling in Political Science; New York: Pergamon Press, 1989, Pp. 497-509. Cohen, M. D., J.

Identifying and ranking the factors influencing the decision-making of managers in the cultural sector of the country using the TOPSIS model (a case study of the Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance)