Ranking of entrepreneur insurance branches based on balanced performance evaluation model (BSC) using TOPSIS technique

Number of pages: 313 File Format: word File Code: 31142
Year: 2013 University Degree: Master's degree Category: Management
  • Part of the Content
  • Contents & Resources
  • Summary of Ranking of entrepreneur insurance branches based on balanced performance evaluation model (BSC) using TOPSIS technique

    Business Management

    Financial Orientation

    Dissertation for receiving the master's degree "M.A"

    Abstract:

    Given the very high impact of the insurance industry on the economic growth and development of countries, performance evaluation in insurance companies is very important and since insurance companies are very broad in terms of structure and type of activity, the need to control and evaluate performance in them is doubled. Therefore, evaluating the performance of insurance company branches by checking the quality and performance and comparing them is a step to continuously improve the performance of the branches. Today, the basic issue for evaluating the performance of insurance companies or institutions that have multiple departments and branches is that until now, a comprehensive, reliable and flexible performance evaluation method has not been provided in this regard; Therefore, this research aims to design a model to evaluate the performance of insurance company branches, inspired by the balanced scorecard model, and then to rank insurance company branches. For this purpose, through document study and interviews with experts, experts and managers of the insurance industry, the most effective performance indicators have been identified and generally classified in the form of eleven criteria and 48 indicators in four areas of finance, customer, internal processes and growth and learning. Then, through a questionnaire and a survey of experts, as well as the use of statistical tests with the help of SPSS software, the research hypotheses were tested. The results indicated that the balanced scorecard model and each of the four dimensions of the model have significant importance in the evaluation of entrepreneur insurance branches, and by using the Friedman test, it was determined that the dimensions of the balanced scorecard model have the same importance in the insurance industry. Finally, using the TOPSIS technique, the ranking of entrepreneur insurance branches in the cities of Kashan, Hamedan and Isfahan in 2009 and 2010 was discussed.

    Key words:

    Performance evaluation, balanced scorecard, ranking, TOPSIS technique, branches of insurance companies

    Chapter one

    General research

    1-1- Introduction [1]:

    Today's organizations with increasing competition due to globalization of business, explosion of technology and organizational knowledge, creation of knowledge and ability to innovate with many challenges including; They face limited and running out financial resources, increased customer expectations and pressure for greater transparency and accountability, increased tasks and activities, and an influx of different management solutions to improve the organization's situation. In such an environment, performance evaluation [2] is very complicated and difficult. Therefore, one of the basic concerns of today's organizations is to achieve a comprehensive, reliable and flexible performance evaluation method (Tabari, 1387, p. 12).

    With the emergence of the information age, it is not possible to evaluate the performance of organizations only by applying past financial criteria, and organizations need evaluation in all their financial and non-financial dimensions. Therefore, creating a transformation in the evaluation system and using new performance evaluation methods is inevitable (Safari and Madah, 2012, p. 25).

    Until now, various tools have been presented to cover this gap, the most famous of which is a tool called Balanced Scorecard (BSC)[3]. The balanced performance evaluation method as a performance evaluation system, in addition to the financial evaluation that relies on traditional accounting scales, evaluates the organization's performance from all dimensions, both financial and non-financial.

    Insurance industry[4] is one of the industries that has high prestige and importance in the new economy and domestic and foreign trade and the essential role it plays in the gross domestic product. Performance evaluation of insurance companies, in addition to determining the general position of the company in the industry and market and informing the stakeholders, increases the competition and dynamism of the industry and the development of the society (Hajiani, 2019, p. 77). Insurance companies by examining their quality and how they perform and measuring them is a step to continuously improve the performance of these branches, so the present research aims to evaluate the performance and ranking of insurance company branches based on their performance.Therefore, in order to evaluate the performance of insurance company branches after reviewing various performance evaluation models, the balanced performance evaluation model was considered as the research framework. At the beginning of the research work, the key performance indicators were identified and approved by the managers, experts and experts of the insurance industry, and then the information related to each of the indicators was collected. In the following, using the opinions of experts [5] and experts through weighting the indicators, the degree of importance and priority of each of them was determined, and a proposed and practical model was presented in order to reach the appropriate indicators for ranking the branches of insurance companies [6]. In the end, the TOPSIS technique was used to rank the branches of insurance companies.

    Therefore, the overall process of this research consists of 3 stages of literature review, data collection and data analysis, which includes; Defining the problem, examining performance evaluation models and choosing a balanced performance evaluation model, extracting performance indicators, final verification of indicators and gathering information, determining the degree of importance of criteria and performance indicators (prioritization of indicators), designing a suitable model for performance evaluation, and finally ranking insurance company branches (implementation of the model). It should be noted that the proposed model is inspired by the balanced performance evaluation model, 48 indicators [7] in the form of 11 criteria [8] are presented separately for each aspect. Many stakeholders are placed; It is appropriate to address this issue with great importance (Yari, 2019, p. 47). The lack of centralized databases, the absence of a strong and efficient information exchange network, the absence of a codified system and methodology, the absence of sufficient rules and regulations, the absence of a codified strategy and plan, as well as the absence of specialized and independent rating institutions, has not found a suitable place (Mirzaei and Safari, 2018, p. 16). (Hajiani, 1389, p. 77). Considering the very high importance of the insurance industry in the growth and development of countries, evaluating the performance and ranking of insurance companies is of great importance, and since insurance companies provide public services and are considered the driving force of society, if their performance is not evaluated, they will face economic and social challenges to the society. What are their uses? In general, the basic purpose of rating is to evaluate the reliability of insurance companies (Mirzaei and Safari, 2018, p. 16).

    The rating of insurance companies has been for more than a century, which is one of the most essential information provided to the economic operators of developed countries, so that society and stakeholders, including customers, managers and employees, shareholders, brokers, reinsurers, banks and investment institutions, economic advisors and especially supervisors, can make the right choice. guide economic decisions (Hajiani, 2019, p. 78).

    It should be noted that the rating should be done by reliable and independent private institutions in order to be more reliable. due to the lack of independent private rating institutions in Iran and the lack of access of Iranian insurance companies to international rating institutions; For example, AM Best, Standard & Poor's, Moody's International, S&P in order to get a rating due to the conditions of sanctions, the insurance industry is basically faced with a gap in the rating evaluation of insurance companies.

    In Iran, the rating of insurance companies is often viewed as a financial evaluation, and unfortunately, the Central Insurance of the Islamic Republic, as the custodian, ranks insurance companies using a series of indicators that mostly examine the financial aspects of insurance companies, and this institution has no supervisor. Paying attention to the correct methodology is used to assess and rank insurance companies, which unfortunately not only does not help in making correct economic decisions, but its results can cause confusion and confusion.

  • Contents & References of Ranking of entrepreneur insurance branches based on balanced performance evaluation model (BSC) using TOPSIS technique

    List:

    Abstract..1

    Chapter One: Research Overview

    Introduction..3

    Problem Definition..6

    Research Necessity..8

    Research Questions..9

    Research Hypotheses..10

    Research Objectives..10

    Users of the Results Research. 11

    Research method..12

    Research domain..12

    1-9-1- Subject domain..12

    1-9-2- Spatial domain..13

    1-9-3- Time domain..13

    Data analysis method. 13

    Limitations of research.14

    Subject records..14

    Description of keywords..16

    Title

    Chapter Two: Research Literature

    2-1- Overview of the insurance industry..19

    2-1-1- Introduction..19

    2-1-2- Definition 20

    2-1-2-1- Definition of insurance in terms of vocabulary. 20

    2-1-2-2- Definition of insurance in terms of insurance law. 21

    2-1-2-3- Definition of insurance in technical terms. 21

    2-1-2-4- Definition of insurance in financial terms. 21

    2-1-2-5- Definition of insurance in the academy. Iran.21

    2-1-3- History of insurance..22

    2-1-3-1- History of insurance in the world.22

    2-1-3-2- History of insurance in Iran.25

    2-1-3-3- Position of insurance after the Islamic revolution.27

    2-1-3-4- Insurance in the world today.28

    2-1-4- Types of insurance..29

    2-1-4-1- Social insurances..29

    2-1-4-2- Commercial insurances..30

    2-1-4-3- Comparison of commercial and social insurances.31

    2-1-5- Some definitions and terms of insurance.31

    2-2- Overview Performance evaluation.33

    Title

    2-2-1- Introduction..33

    2-2-2- History of performance evaluation.34

    2-2-2-1- History of performance evaluation in the world.34

    2-2-2-2- History of performance evaluation in Iran.35

    2-2-3- Definition of measurement..36

    2-2-4- Reasons for measurement..36

    2-2-5- Definition and concept of performance. 37

    2-2-7- Evaluation stages..38

    2-2-8- Definition and concept of performance evaluation. 39

    2-2-9- Functions of performance evaluation. 40

    2-2-10- Reasons for performance evaluation. 41

    2-2-11- Objectives of performance evaluation. 42

    2-2-12- Necessity and The importance of performance evaluation. 42

    2-2-13- Performance evaluation dimensions..43

    2-2-14- Performance evaluation process. 45

    2-2-15- Performance evaluation indicators and standards. 48

    2-2-15-1- Standard definition.

    2-2-15-2- Definition of indicators..48

    2-2-15-3- Types of performance indicators.49

    2-2-15-4- Characteristics of ideal performance indicators. 50

    2-2-15-4-1- Ideal performance indicators according to Peter Drucker. Globerson's opinion. 50

    2-2-15-4-3- The principles of performance indicators according to Maskel. 51

    2-2-15-4-4- Performance indicators in the Sink and Tuttle model. 52

    2-2-15-4-5- Performance indicators in the results and determinants model. 52

    2-2-15-4-6- Performance indicators in the model Performance pyramid. 53

    2-2-16- Performance management..54

    2-2-16-1- Definition of performance management. 54

    2-2-16-2- Advantages of performance management. 55

    2-2-16-3- Prerequisites of performance management. Performance. 56 2-2-16-5- The conditions for effective movement from performance evaluation to performance management. 56 2-2-16-6- The difference between performance management and performance evaluation. 57 2-2-17- Traditional and modern perspectives on performance evaluation. 59 2-2-17-1- Comparison of traditional and modern performance evaluation criteria. 60

    2-2-17-2- Defects of traditional evaluation systems. 61

    2-3- Performance evaluation models. 61

    Title

    2-3-1-Appropriate model for performance evaluation. 62

    2-3-2- Characteristics of an evaluation system.62

    2-3-2- Characteristics of a suitable performance evaluation system. 62

    2-3-3- Types of performance evaluation models. 64

    2-3-3-1- Financial performance evaluation models. 66

    2-3-3-1-1- History of financial evaluation systems. 66

    2-3-3-1-2- Statement analysis Financial. 67

    2-3-3-1-3- Types of financial ratios. 70

    2-3-3-1-3-1- Liquidity ratios. 70

    2-3-3-1-3-2- Activity (efficiency) ratios. 72

    2-3-3-1-3-3- Capital structure ratios (ability to pay debt) 76

    2-3-3-1-3-4- profitability ratios. 78

    2-3-3-1-5- financial ratios related to shareholders' investment

    capital turnover

    (market value). 81

    2-3-3-1-4- strengths and weaknesses of financial ratios. 84

    2-3-3-2- Productivity assessment models.85

    2-3-3-2-1- History of productivity.85

    2-3-3-2-2- Definition of productivity.86

    2-3-3-2-3- Types of productivity.86

    2-3-3-2-4- Levels of productivity.88

    2-3-3-2-5- The steps of creating productivity measures. 88

    2-3-3-2-6- The concept of added value in productivity. 90

    Title

    2-3-3-2-7- Value-added productivity indicators. 90

    2-3-3-2-8- Quick evaluation method Productivity. 93

    2-3-3-2-9- The limitations of evaluating the productivity of companies. 95

    2-3-3-3- Organizational effectiveness models. 97

    2-3-3-3-1- Approach to achieving the goal. 97

    2-3-3-3-2- Systemic approach. 97

    2-3-3-3-3- Approach Strategic factors.98

    2-3-3-3-4- competitive values ??approach.98

    2-3-3-3-5- limitations of organizational effectiveness evaluation models.98

    2-3-3-4- organizational excellence evaluation models.99

    2-3-3-4-1- European Quality Award (EQA) model.99

    2-3-3-4-2- Deming National Award Model.102

    2-3-3-4-3- Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award Model.104

    2-3-3-4-5- Limitations of Organizational Excellence Evaluation Models.106

    2-4- Balanced Performance Evaluation Model.107

    2-4-1- Introduction.107

    2-4-2- The dimensions of the balanced performance evaluation model. 108

    2-4-3- The types of indicators in the balanced performance evaluation model. 110

    2-4-4- The reasons for using the balanced performance evaluation model. 111

    2-4-5- The applications of balanced performance evaluation. 113

    Title  

    2-4-6- The steps of implementing and developing the balanced performance evaluation model. 115

    2-4-7- The evolution of the balanced performance evaluation model. 118

    2-4-8- The advantages of the balanced performance evaluation model. 123

    2-4-9- The limitations of the balanced performance evaluation model. 124

    2-5- An overview of the rating in the insurance industry. 124

    2-5-1- Introduction.125

    2-5-2- Definition of rating.125

    2-5-3- The meaning of rating in the insurance industry.125

    2-5-4- The difference between the concept of rating and classification.126

    2-5-5- Reasons and necessity of rating in Iran's insurance industry.126

    2-5-6- Objectives of rating Classification of insurance companies. 128

    2-5-7- Benefits and effects of rating insurance companies. 128

    2-5-8- Challenges and limitations of rating insurance companies in Iran. 129

    2-5-9- Implementation problems of rating insurance companies in Iran. 133

    2-5-10- Methodology (methodology) of rating insurance companies. 133

    2-5-11- Rating methodology classes.134

    2-5-12- The most important factors in determining the type of rating methodology.135

    2-6- Empirical studies of insurance performance evaluation.135

    2-6-1- Summary of research literature.149

    2-7- Proposed research model.152

    Title

    2-7-1- macro model (conceptual).152

    2-7-2- micro model (operational).153

    Chapter three: research method

    3-1- introduction.156

    3-2- research methodology.157

    3-3- Society Statistics. 159

    3-4- Sample and sampling method. 159

    3-5- Research tools. 161

    3-6- Validity and reliability of measurement tools. 162

    3-6-1- Validity of measurement tools. 162

    3-6-2- Reliability (reliability) of measurement tools. 163

    3-7- Data analysis techniques.

Ranking of entrepreneur insurance branches based on balanced performance evaluation model (BSC) using TOPSIS technique