Investigating the relationship between organizational structure and administrative system health of government offices in Ardestan city, Isfahan province

Number of pages: 133 File Format: word File Code: 31103
Year: 2013 University Degree: Master's degree Category: Management
  • Part of the Content
  • Contents & Resources
  • Summary of Investigating the relationship between organizational structure and administrative system health of government offices in Ardestan city, Isfahan province

    Dissertation for Master degree (M.A)

    Treatment:

    Management Information Systems

    Abstract

    Most experts believe that the success or failure of governments depends on how public affairs are implemented. The health of the administrative system is one of the most important topics in the science of public administration. Therefore, all governments try to have a completely transparent administrative system without corruption. The health of the administrative system is influenced by various factors. The purpose of this research is to investigate the relationship between the organizational structure and the health of the administrative system. The statistical population of the research is all employees of government offices in Ardestan city. The statistical sample includes 279 employees who were selected randomly. The required data was collected through a questionnaire. Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to test the hypotheses. The findings of the research showed that there is a negative relationship between complexity and concentration with the health of the administrative system and there is a positive relationship between formality and the health of the administrative system. Keywords: health of the administrative system, administrative corruption, organizational structure, complexity, formality, concentration A vehicle without wheels cannot move, and a human being without hands and feet is unable to meet his needs and achieve his goals and desires, and a society without a healthy administration cannot take a step towards meeting its needs and achieving its goals (Qodsi, 1378, 153).

    Most experts believe that the success or failure of governments depends on how public affairs are carried out, to the extent that Brooks Adams connects the survival of civilization and the administration of public affairs. And Vincent Sturm considers the health of any society to be related to how public affairs are managed in that society (Namagh, 2016, 59).

    There is a lot of evidence that the more societies move forward, the issue of corruption becomes more important as one of the pervasive social issues (Heyoud, 2011, 50). And the approach of greasing the gears of development to solve the problem of corruption loses its importance and the view that corruption acts more than anything as a problem that leads to disruption in the process of the gears of development is flourishing (Rabiei, 1381, 15).

    According to the majority of thinkers, corruption in general and administrative corruption in government offices is an undeniable disease in all governments and is specific to a continent, region or ethnic group. It is not specific, and corruption is found in democratic and dictatorial political regimes, socialist, capitalist and feudal economies, and corrupt practices are not related to the present, but their history is as old as the world. Therefore, corruption is as old as the concept of government. In fact, wherever power and wealth are concentrated and wherever there is a government, corruption also exists (Rabiei, 1381, 17). As a result, fighting against administrative corruption is a vital necessity - for the survival of the system and government and the movement of society towards prosperity and prosperity. In order to correct and eliminate them, we can deal with the problem and complications of that disease, including corruption. Therefore, in this research, it is intended to examine the relationship between the health of the administrative system and the organizational structure. 1-1 Statement of the problem The goals and ideals can be achieved within the framework of a healthy administrative system, and if the administrative system is not healthy and efficient, despite the good intentions of the policy makers, what is realized in practice may be in conflict with those goals and policies. Therefore, without a healthy administrative system, achieving development in a third world country such as Iran seems very unlikely (Haji). Zadeh, 1381, 3).

    Despite its modern appearance, the administrative system in Iran was not able to fulfill the functions of a modern institution in the society and is not (Hajizadeh, 1381, 3). Procedures for doing administrative work have always been objected to by clients (Mirjalali, 2011, 251). Unfortunately, due to internal and external issues, the administrative system in Iran has not only helped the development of the country, but also helped to stabilize the country's backwardness, and despite the programs of administrative revolution, administrative reform, cleaning up offices, and expansion of administrative management, the country still suffers from structural and managerial issues (Hajizadeh, 1381, 1).

    In 2011, Transparency International1 investigated the corruption of government officials in 183 countries of the world, and in these surveys, Iran was ranked 120th in terms of administrative corruption, and it was ranked 10th in the Middle East, which indicates the existence of administrative corruption in Iran. It wastes these countries. The bed and shelter of administrative corruption is the administrative system of the country and the administration of government affairs. The Islamic Republic of Iran has inherited an inefficient administrative system coupled with corruption in the government and its sub-systems. Naturally, part of this corruption is left over from the previous regime, and part of it is a consequence of the inevitable performance and conditions of the years after the Islamic Revolution. After the victory of the Islamic Revolution and due to many reasons, the system of the Islamic Republic and its various governments were not able to carry out the reforms and positive changes necessary to identify and fight against the corrupt factors, and the conditions of war and its imposition on the country have also been another important factor in its aggravation.

    Basically, several factors affect the health of the administrative system. Solving system problems and achieving a healthy administrative system is one of the ideals of many countries in the world, and definitely achieving such an ideal requires comprehensive study and investigation. But since it is not possible to examine all the factors due to many limitations, in this research, an attempt has been made to explore a limited area with deep depth. In this research, the focus is on the role and relationship between the organizational structure and the health of the administrative system. The question raised in this research is what kind of relationship exists between the organizational structure and the health of the administrative system? 1-2- Importance and necessity of the research subject Without a healthy government and a healthy and corruption-free administrative system, it is not possible to achieve development. The positive effects of the administrative system on economic development and other dimensions of development depend on the health of the administrative system, and in fact, a healthy administrative system provides a suitable platform for development, and in this way, the corruption of the administrative system imposes heavy additional costs on the society and the government. An unhealthy administrative system can become a huge eater of resources that should be spent on development and not only does not cause development, but is like a swamp that sinks resources into itself (Farjvand, 2012, 56). Corruption in the administrative systems of most countries has caused serious damage to development and progress, and in developing countries its importance, containment and control has been fully realized and revealed to politicians and their people, therefore due to the importance of the consequences of administrative corruption, a part of its harm is addressed. Disappointment and disillusionment towards the future can be predicted.

    Given the conditions of our country, Iran, and the state of the administrative system in it, and the fact that one of the main problems of the government is the inefficiency of the administrative system and the high level of administrative corruption in the various elements of this system - according to the ranking of corruption in different countries by Transparency International, Iran has not been ranked better than 120th in terms of corruption among the countries examined. The experts can cause a decrease in people's trust in the administrative system, which is a tool for exercising the government's sovereignty, and ultimately decrease the legitimacy and sometimes the transformation of the political system, because many of them consider one of the main causes of the Islamic Revolution to be the existence and contamination of the Pahlavi government and the administrative system related to it, in such a way that even the regime itself realized the necessity of the administrative revolution before its collapse and tried to create it.

    Given these conditions, the necessity of pathology of the administrative system and knowledge of corruption Administration, which is one of the serious problems and damages of this system, is felt more than before. Examining and understanding this problem as much as possible and trying to discover its causes can certainly increase the efficiency and health of the administrative system, increase people's satisfaction, help the country develop as quickly as possible, and ultimately increase the legitimacy of the Islamic system ruling the country.

    Because a healthy administrative system has significant effects on economic development, the issue of the health of the administrative system becomes very important.

  • Contents & References of Investigating the relationship between organizational structure and administrative system health of government offices in Ardestan city, Isfahan province

    List:

    Abstract 1

    1- Generalities of the research. 2

    Introduction 3

    1-1- Statement of the problem. 4

    1-2- The importance and necessity of the research topic. 5

    1-3- Research objectives. 6

    1-4- Research questions. 7

    1-5- Research hypotheses. 7

    1-6- The scope of research. 7

    1-6-1- Spatial territory. 7

    1-6-2- Thematic territory. 7

    1-6-3- Time realm. 7

    1-7- The operational definition of variables 7

    2- Theoretical foundations of research. 9

    Introduction 10

    2-1- Definitions of organization, administration system and government agency. 10

    2-1-1- Organization. 10

    2-1-2- System. 11

    2-1-3- Administration 12

    2-2- Administrative corruption. 12

    2-2-1- Definition of corruption. 15

    2-2-2- Levels of corruption. 17

    2-2-3- Types of corruption. 18

    2-2-4- Political corruption. 19

    2-2-5- Financial (economic) corruption 20

    2-2-6- Administrative corruption. 20

    2-2-6-1- The concept and definition of administrative corruption. 20

    2-2-6-2- Types of administrative corruption 22

    2-2-6-3- History of administrative corruption. 26

    2-2-7- Analysis of corruption in third world countries. 27

    2-2-8- Effects and causes of corruption in the third world. 28

    2-2-9- Differences in corruption in two developed and underdeveloped worlds. 29

    2-2-10- The history of corruption in Iran. 30

    2-2-11- Fight against corruption in Iran. 30

    2-2-12- The state of corruption after the victory of the Islamic Revolution. 32

    2-2-13- The relationship between corruption and social affairs and existing social institutions. 34

    2-2-13-1- The relationship between corruption and government public services. 34

    2-2-13-2- State economy and corruption. 35

    2-2-13-3- The size of the government and corruption. 36

    2-2-14- Privatization and its relationship with corruption. 36

    2-2-15- corruption and poverty. 37

    2-2-16- Corruption and laws and regulations. 38

    2-2-17- Corruption and judicial system. 38

    2-2-18- Political development, democracy and corruption. 39

    2-2-19- Culture and corruption. 39

    2-2-20- Corruption and gender. 40

    2-2-21- Corruption and development plans. 40

    2-2-22- Economic policies and corruption. 41

    2-2-23- Corruption and investment. 41

    2-2-24- Government capture and the resulting corruption in transition economies. 42

    2-2-25- Explaining the causes of corruption. 43

    2-2-26- Approaches to explain corruption. 47

    2-2-27- Environmental factors cause corruption. 49

    2-2-28- Intent and opportunity are the prerequisites for corruption. 50

    2-2-29- Variables that facilitate and encourage or prevent corruption. 50

    2-2-30- How to evaluate and select the anti-corruption strategy. 53

    2-2-31- Key policies in the fight against corruption. 55

    2-2-31-1- Competition in providing government services. 56

    2-2-31-2- Formation of independent anti-corruption institutions. 56

    2-2-31-3- Legal supervisions. 57

    2-2-31-4- Creating communication lines and supporting informants. 57

    2-2-31-5- Healthy judges. 57

    2-2-31-6- Accountability and civil supervision. 57

    2-2-31-7- Change in the way of thinking and mobilization of political demands. 57

    2-2-31-8- Measuring and asking for opinions. 57

    2-2-31-9- Public opinion. 58

    2-2-31-10- Freedom of the press. 58

    2-2-31-11- Civil support organizations. 58

    2-2-31-12- Holding local and indigenous seminars. 58

    2-2-31-13- Economic policies. 58

    2-2-31-14- Police confrontation. 58

    2-3- Organizational structure. 59

    2-3-1- Structure determinants 62

    2-3-2- Organizational structure dimensions. 62

    2-3-2-1- Complication. 62

    2-3-2-2- formality. 63

    2-3-2-3- The relationship between formality and complexity. 65

    2-3-2-4- Focus. 65

    2-3-2-5- Decision making and concentration. 65

    2-3-3- Effective factors of organizational structure 66

    2-3-3-1- Organizational communication. 66

    2-3-3-2- Decision making. 67

    2-3-4- Types of organizational structures. 68

    2-3-4-1- structured 68

    2-3-4-2- machine bureaucracy. 70

    2-3-4-3- professional bureaucracy. 71

    2-3-4-4- structural 72

    2-3-4-5- Adhocracy. 74

    2-3-5- structural change 75

    2-3-6- structural change. 76

    2-4- Research background. 77

    2-4-1- Background of internal investigation. 77

    2-4-2- Foreign research. 87

    2-5- The conceptual model of research.92

    3- The third chapter: research method. 93

    Introduction 94

    3-1- Research method. 94

    3-2- Statistical population, sample size and sampling method. 94

    3-3- Methods and tools of data collection 95

    3-3-1- Organizational structure questionnaire. 95

    3-3-2- Administrative health assessment questionnaire. 95

    3-3-3- Components of administrative corruption. 96

    3-4- Validity and reliability of measurement tools. 97

    3-4-1- Validity of measurement tools. 97

    3-4-2- Reliability of measurement tools. 97

    3-5- Statistical tests used 98

    4-    Chapter 4: Data analysis 100

    Introduction 101

    4-1- Descriptive statistics. 101

    4-2- Test of research hypotheses. 102

    4-2-1- The first hypothesis. 102

    4-2-2- The second hypothesis. 103

    4-2-3- The third hypothesis. 104

    4-3- Friedman variance analysis test. 105

    5- Chapter Five: Conclusion and suggestions. 107

    Introduction 108

    5-1- Discussion about the obtained results 108

    5-2- Suggestions for future researchers 116

    5-3- Research limitations. 116

    6- Sources and references. 118

    Persian sources. 119

    English sources 121

     

    Source:

    Persian sources

    Azer, Adel and Mansour Momeni, statistics and its application in management, vol. 2, Samat, 1380

    Armstrong, Michael, human resource management strategies, translated by Khodiar Abili and Hassan Mawafaki, Fara, Ch. First, 1380

    Abtahi, Seyed Hossein and Arman Mehrojan, (1372), Process Engineering, Qoms.

    Abolhamad, Abdul Hamid, (1376), Administrative Law of Iran, TOS.

    Estoni, James E. F. and Others, (1379), Management, translated by Ali Parsaian and Seyed Mohammad Arabi, the first volume of the Cultural Research Office.

    Aqtdari, Ali Mohammad, (1366), Organization and System Management and Organizational Behavior, Faculty of Administrative Sciences and Business Management.

    Alwani, Seyed Mehdi, (1380), General Management, New Publishing.

    Amin, Seyed Kazem, (1381), Familiarity with Administrative Organizations, Cultural Institute. Nkok Zarin, 1st edition.

    Anthony, Robert and others, (1372), management control systems, translated by Mohammad Taqi Ziaei Begdali, Ch 1, Public Management Education Center.

    Tehrani, Siros, (1368), a new approach in organizational structure design, Journal of Public Administration, number five, fourth period.

    Talimi, Mohammad Saeed, (1376), Organizational Transformation Management, Tehran: Samet, first edition.

    Haji Karimi, Abbas Ali and Hassan Rangriz, (1379), Human Resources Management, Business Publishing.

    Habibi, Nader, (1375), Administrative Corruption, First Edition, Wathghi.

    Khezari, Mohammad, (1381), Research report on the causes of corruption in the country's banking system, Strategic Studies Research Center Publications.

    Desler, Gary (1373), Fundamentals of Management, second volume, translated by Daoud Madani Qoms. Dessler, Gary, (1368) Fundamentals of Management (translated by Daoud Madani), volume one, Tehran: Pishbard, second edition. Daft, Richard L., (1378), Organizational Theory and Design, first volume, translated by Ali Parsaian and Seyed Mohammad Arabi, Department of Cultural Research.

    Daft, Richard Al, (1377) Foundations of Organizational Theory and Design, translated by Ali Parsaian and Seyed Mohammad Arabi, Cultural Research Office.

    Delavar, Ali, (1374) Theoretical and Practical Foundations of Research in the Humanities and Social Sciences, Rushd Publications, Ch. 3.

    Dellaporta, (1375), Corruption and Democracy, Message of UNESCO No. 313.

    Robins, Ashtefan, (1379) Fundamentals of Management, translated by Seyyed Mohammad Arabi and others, Cultural Research Office, first chapter.

    Robins, Stephens, (1376), Organizational Behavior (translators: Ali Parsaian and Mohammad Arabi), first volume, first edition, Tehran: Cultural Research Office Publications.

    Rabiei, Ali, (1383) Long live corruption, Tehran, Ministry of Culture and Guidance Printing and Publishing Organization Islamic.

    Rahimi Boroujerdi, Alireza, (1373) Macroeconomic Policies and Structural Reforms, Business Studies and Research Institute, Ch I.

    Rezaian, Ali, (1370), Principles of Management, Tehran: Smit.

    Rafipour, Faramarz, (1376) Development and Conflict, Shahid Beheshti, Ch I.

    Zarei Matin, Hassan, (1379) Human resources management, Alimah Hozha Publicity Office, Qom.

    Safaroni, Enofino Raoul, (1375), Power Virus, UNESCO message no. 313.

    Syed Javadin, Seyed Reza, (1381) Human resource management and staff affairs, Negah Danesh.

    Syed Javadin, Seyed Reza, (1382) Fundamentals of management and organization, Negah Danesh, Chapter 1.

Investigating the relationship between organizational structure and administrative system health of government offices in Ardestan city, Isfahan province