Presenting an improved transport layer protocol for wireless surveillance systems

Number of pages: 112 File Format: word File Code: 31014
Year: 2014 University Degree: Master's degree Category: Computer Engineering
  • Part of the Content
  • Contents & Resources
  • Summary of Presenting an improved transport layer protocol for wireless surveillance systems

    Dissertation

    For Master Degree

    Information Technology Engineering - Computer Networks Major

    Abstract

    Wireless surveillance networks are an important branch of wireless multimedia sensor networks with some unique features. The quality of service in wireless surveillance networks is closely related to the packet loss rate. Occurrence of congestion is one of the main and most important reasons for packet loss in the network. Packet loss in wireless surveillance networks, depending on the type of lost packet, can have significant effects in reducing the quality of the received video. One of the important factors that can play a significant role in improving the quality of video transmission is the queuing policy used in the router and including multimedia content and packet priority. In recent years, extensive studies have been conducted on obtaining transport layer protocols for effective congestion control in wireless multimedia sensor networks. However, most of these algorithms work regardless of multimedia content. In this thesis, the congestion control mechanism for wireless sensor networks is first presented, which is done by using feedback from intermediate routers to control the sending rate by sensors as effectively as possible. Then the priority queuing policy is used to improve the quality of the received video. Finally, the possibility of retransmission for packets with higher priority has been checked and the improvement rate has been obtained for different network states. The simulation was done using the ns-2 simulator and the simulation results indicate that the proposed mechanisms have better performance in the received video quality compared to other existing mechanisms.

    Key words: wireless surveillance networks, multimedia sensor networks, congestion control, transmission layer, quality of service.

    1 Chapter 1:

    Introduction

    Research questions

    In order to review and improve the protocols of the transmission layer of wireless surveillance networks, one must first gain a deep understanding of the conditions of the problem and the relevant challenges, then using this information, appropriate solutions were provided. If some of the needs of the problem are not satisfied by the existing solutions, a new solution should be provided. Therefore, the questions that are raised and enlighten the path of this research are:

    What kind of traffic is there in surveillance networks and what are their characteristics?

    What components are surveillance networks made of and what facilities do they provide?

    What are the requirements of wireless surveillance networks?

    What is multimedia and real-time traffic? Do they have an effect on the design of transport layer protocols?

    How do the characteristics of wireless surveillance networks (including: high data rate and high packet loss rate) affect the design of transport layer protocols?

    For wireless surveillance networks, stateless protocols [1] or stateful protocols [2] are more suitable?

    How can the transport layer be used in surveillance networks? Optimized wireless?

    1-1 Thesis structure

    The overall structure of the thesis is as follows:

    In the second chapter, a background of the main topics including explanations of wireless sensor networks and wireless multimedia sensor networks and discussions in multimedia are presented, and then it describes the classification of wireless multimedia sensor networks and an overview of wireless monitoring systems. which is an important group of wireless multimedia sensor networks with unique features.

    In the third chapter, we will describe the environmental conditions and characteristics of wireless surveillance networks, examine the upcoming challenges and introduce the important parameters required for evaluation.

    The fourth chapter includes the introduction, evaluation and comparison of proposed protocols for networks with features such as wireless communication line, high packet loss rate. In the network, there are high data rates, multimedia traffic, real-time traffic, service quality requirements [3], etc.

    In the fifth chapter, we present our work and state the results and improvements and compare it with some of the proposed protocols.

    And finally, in the sixth chapter, we draw a conclusion from this research and mention some examples of work that can be done in the future.

    1 Chapter 2:

    Background

    Wireless surveillance networks are an important category of wireless multimedia sensor networks, the dominant traffic of which is multimedia (videos, images and sounds obtained from sensors). In order to better understand these networks, it is first necessary to have a preliminary understanding of multimedia and then to study wireless multimedia sensor networks and the generation before it, i.e. wireless sensor networks. 1-1 Multimedia What is multimedia? People who use the word multimedia are divided into different categories with different views. they become For example, the seller of a multimedia computer as a computer that includes a sound system, DVD optical drive, etc. knows An entertainment vendor may consider multimedia as an interactive cable television system with access to hundreds of digital channels over the Internet or network. In computer science, the concept of multimedia is a set of modules such as text[1], images[2], graphics[3], animation[4], video[5] and sound[6] that can be interactive. These concepts that consider different aspects of video are:

    Types of video signals

    Analog video

    Digital video

    Since video is made from many different sources, we will start with the signal itself. Analog video is represented as a continuous signal. Digital video is also represented as a series of digital images. At the end of this section, we will describe digital video compression methods. 1-1-1 Types of video signals Video signals can be classified into 3 separate categories: 1) Component video [7] 2) Composite video [8] and 3) S-video [9].

    Component video

    When from 3 separate video signals are used for red, green and blue planes, known as component video. These types of wires include 3 wires (connectors) that are used to connect the camera or other devices to the TV or monitor.

    Composite video

    In composite video, the color ("chrominance") and intensity ("luminance") of the signals are mounted in a carrier wave. Chrominance is the combination of two colors (I and Q or U and V). This system is used in the general TV segment because it is also compatible with black-and-white TVs.

    S-Video

    S-Video uses two wires: one for luminance and one for the combined chrominance signal.

    1-1-2 Analog Video

    An analog signal f(t) samples a time-varying image. does In the progressive scanning method [10], an image (frame) is scanned completely from the beginning. In another method called scanning one in between [11], image lines are scanned in one in between (even and odd lines). The main broadcast television standards are:

    NTSC

    It is a standard widely used in North America and Japan. In this standard, the 4:3 ratio and the one-in-one scanning method are used. Also, in this standard, 30 frames per second and 525 lines are scanned per frame.

    PAL

    is a television standard invented by German scientists. This standard uses scanning at 625 lines per frame and 25 frames per second with a 4:3 aspect ratio and interlaced scanning. This important standard is widely used in Western Europe, China, India and many other parts of the world.

    SECAM

    Invented by the French, this standard is the third major standard in public television broadcasting. SECAM also uses 625 line-per-frame scans, 25 frames per second, with a 4:3 aspect ratio and scanning once in between. SECAM and PAL are similar except that they use a different color coding scheme. In Table 2-1, the standards of public television broadcasting are briefly compared.

  • Contents & References of Presenting an improved transport layer protocol for wireless surveillance systems

    List:

    Chapter One: Introduction 1

    1-1 Thesis Structure 2

    Chapter Two: Background. 5

    2-1 multimedia 6

    2-1-1 types of video signals. 7

    2-1-2 analog video. 8

    2-1-3 digital video. 9

    2-1-4 video compression. 12

    2-1-5 H.261. 15

    2-1-6 H.263. 20

    2-1-7 H.264. 22

    2-2 wireless sensor networks. 23

    2-2-1 Introduction. 23

    2-2-2 An overview of wireless sensor networks. 24

    2-2-3 History of sensor networks. 27

    2-2-4 Features 28

    2-2-5 Application of wireless sensor networks. 28

    Title Page

    2-2-6 General features of a wireless sensor network. 29

    2-2-7 communication structure of wireless sensor networks. 31

    2-2-8 Factors affecting the design of wireless sensor network. 31

    2-2-9 hardware features. 32

    2-3 Wireless Multimedia Sensor Networks and Wireless Monitoring Systems. 34

    Chapter three: environmental conditions, issue 40

    3-1 Factors influencing the design of multimedia sensor networks. 42

    3-2 network architecture. 45

    3-2-1 Reference architecture. 45

    3-2-2 Implementation of single-row sensors compared to multi-row. 46

    3-2-3 important parameters in evaluating multimedia transmission protocols. 47

    Chapter Four: Related Protocols 50

    4-1 RTP 51

    4-2 RTCP 54

    4-3 RTSP 55

    4-4 SCTP 57

    4-4-1 Multicast. 58

    4-4-2 SCTP specifications. 58

     

    Title Page

    4-5 SCTP derivatives. 59

    4-6 DCCP 62

    4-6-1 CCID 2: TCP pseudo-congestion control. 63

    4-6-2 CCID 3: TFRC Congestion Control. 64

    Chapter Five: Proposed Mechanism 66

    5-1 Congestion Control. 67

    5-2 Proposed Congestion Control Mechanism 71

    Chapter Six: Conclusion and Future Work 94

    Chapter Seven: References 98

    Abstract 102

     

     

    Source:

    [1] Cucchiara, Rita. "Multimedia surveillance systems." In Proceedings of the third ACM international workshop on Video surveillance & sensor networks, pp. 3-10. ACM, 2005.

    [2] Girod, Bernd, Mark Kalman, Yi J. Liang, and Rui Zhang. "Advances in channel adaptive video streaming." Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing 2, no. 6 (2002): 573-584.

    [3]Girod, Bernd, Anne Margot Aaron, Shantanu Rane, and David Rebollo-Monedero. "Distributed video coding." Proceedings of the IEEE 93, no. 1 (2005): 71-83.

     

    [4] Stockdon, Hilary F., and Rob A. Holman. "Estimation of wave phase speed and nearshore bathymetry from video imagery." Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans (1978–2012) 105, no. C9 (2000): 22015-22033.

    [5] Z?niga, Marco, and Bhaskar Krishnamachari. "Integrating future large-scale wireless sensor networks with the internet." USC Computer Science, Tech. Rep(2003).

     

    [6] Kulkarni, Purushottam, Deepak Ganesan, and Prashant Shenoy. "The case for multi-tier camera sensor networks." In Proceedings of the international workshop on Network and operating systems support for digital audio and video, pp. 141-146. ACM, 2005.

     

    [7]Stewart, Randall, M. Ramalho, Q. Xie, M. Tuexen, and P. Conrad. "SCTP partial reliability extension." In Work in progress, draft-ietf-tsvwg-prsctp-01. txt. 2003.

    [8] Miyazaki, Akihiro, Thomas Wiebke, Rolf Hakenberg, and Carsten Burmeister. "RTP payload format to enable multiple selective retransmissions." (2000).

    [9] Feamster, Nicholas G. "Adaptive delivery of real-time streaming video." PhD diss., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2001. [10] Raman, Suchitra, Hari Balakrishnan, and Murari Srinivasan. "ITP: An image transport protocol for the internet." Networking, IEEE/ACM Transactions on 10, no. 3 (2002):

     

    [11] Argyriou, Antonios, and Vijay Madisetti. "Streaming H. 264/AVC video over the internet." In Consumer Communications and Networking Conference, 2004. CCNC 2004. First IEEE, pp. 169-174. IEEE, 2004.

    [12] Lifen, Zhao, Shang Yanlei, and Liu Ju. "The performance study of transmitting MPEG4 over SCTP." In Neural Networks and Signal Processing, 2003. Proceedings of the 2003 International Conference on, vol. 2, pp. 1639-1642. 2003.

    [13] Argyriou, Antonios. "A novel end-to-end architecture for H. 264 video streaming over the Internet." Telecommunication Systems 28, no. 2 (2005): 133-150.

    [14] Abd, Ahmed, Chitra Venkatramani, Tarek Saadawi, and Myung Lee. "Improving interactive video in wireless networks using path diversity." In Management of Multimedia Networks and Services, pp. 1-12. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2004.

    [15] Abd El Al, Ahmed, Tarek Saadawi, and Myung Lee. "Unequal error protection for real-time video in mobile ad hoc networks via multi-path transport." Computer Communications 30, no. 17 (2007): 3293-3306.

     

    [16] Kim, Kyung-Hoe, Kwang-Min Jeong, Chul-Hee Kang, and Seung-Joon Seok. "A SCTP transmission control for real-time multimedia streaming." Computer Networks 54, no. 9 (2010): 1418-1425.

    [17] Blanton, Ethan, Kevin Fall, and Mark Allman. "A conservative selective acknowledgment (SACK)-based loss recovery algorithm for TCP." (2003).

    [18] Chandran, Kartik, Sudarshan Raghunathan, Subbarayan Venkatesan, and Ravi Prakash. "A feedback-based scheme for improving TCP performance in ad hoc wireless networks." Personal Communications, IEEE 8, no. 1 (2001): 34-39.

    [19]Fu, Zhenghua, Haiyun Luo, Petros Zerfos, Songwu Lu, Lixia Zhang, and Mario Gerla. "The impact of multihop wireless channel on TCP performance." Mobile Computing, IEEE transactions on 4, no. 2 (2005): 209-221.

    [20] Holland, Gavin, and Nitin Vaidya. "Analysis of TCP performance over mobile ad hoc networks." Wireless Networks 8, no. 2/3 (2002): 275-288.

    [21] Kim, Dongkyun, C-K. Toh, and Yanghee Choi. "TCP-BuS: Improving TCP performance in wireless ad hoc networks." Communications and Networks, Journal of 3, no. 2 (2001): 1-12.

    [22] Liu, Jian, and Suresh Singh. "ATCP: TCP for mobile ad hoc networks." Selected Areas in Communications, IEEE Journal on 19, no. 7 (2001): 1315-1300.

    [23] Sundaresan, Karthikeyan, Vaidyanathan Anantharaman, Hung-Yun Hsieh, and Raghupathy Sivakumar. "ATP: A reliable transport protocol for ad hoc networks." Mobile Computing, IEEE Transactions on 4, no. 6 (2005): 588-603.

    [24]Xu, Kaixin, Mario Gerla, Lantao Qi, and Yantai Shu. "Enhancing TCP fairness in ad hoc wireless networks using neighborhood RED." In Proceedings of the 9th annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking, pp. 16-28. ACM, 2003.

    [25]Yu, Xin. "Improving TCP performance over mobile ad hoc networks by exploiting cross-layer information awareness." In Proceedings of the 10th annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking, pp. 231-244. ACM, 2004.

    [26] Lochert, Christian, Bj?rn Scheuermann, and Martin Mauve. "A survey on congestion control for mobile ad hoc networks." Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing 7, no. 5 (2007): 655-676. [27] Bakre, Ajay, and B. R. Badrinath. "I-TCP: Indirect TCP for mobile hosts." In Distributed Computing Systems, 1995., Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on, pp. 136-143. IEEE, 1995.

    [28] Balakrishnan, Hari, Srinivasan Seshan, and Randy H. Katz. "Improving reliable transport and handoff performance in cellular wireless networks." Wireless Networks 1, no. 4 (1995): 469-481.

    [29] Sinha, Prasun, Thyagarajan Nandagopal, Narayanan Venkitaraman, Raghupathy Sivakumar, and Vaduvur Bharghavan. "WTCP: A reliable transport protocol for wireless wide-area networks." Wireless Networks 8, no. 2/3 (2002): 301-316.

Presenting an improved transport layer protocol for wireless surveillance systems