Presenting a new structure of the active and reactive power market at the same time, taking into account the network voltage restrictions

Number of pages: 151 File Format: word File Code: 30895
Year: Not Specified University Degree: Master's degree Category: Electronic Engineering
  • Part of the Content
  • Contents & Resources
  • Summary of Presenting a new structure of the active and reactive power market at the same time, taking into account the network voltage restrictions

    Dissertation for Master's Degree in Power Electrical Engineering

    Trend of Power Systems

    Abstract:

    During the last two decades, the electricity industry has undergone fundamental changes in the way of production, transmission and distribution, which is referred to as restructuring. With the restructuring in the electricity industry, reactive power has been introduced as one of the most important ancillary services for the safe and reliable operation of the power grid. In recent years, reactive power markets have been defined in order to increase the reliability of the network, create a correct competitive structure and encourage producers to produce reactive power. Meanwhile, active and reactive power are related in various ways, such as load spreading equations, synchronous generator capability curve, and maximum power capacity passing through the lines, and as a result, separate implementation of active and reactive power markets will not bring the optimal solution. Thus, in this thesis, the reactive power market is implemented simultaneously with the energy market, and its results are compared with the results obtained from the separate implementation of active and reactive power markets. In order to make the competition in reactive power production more fair, the price proposals for reactive power production will be modified and a new structure will be presented to reactive power producers to pay the lost cost. Also, considering the local nature of reactive power, the possibility of creating local reactive power markets is investigated and the results of the implementation of local reactive power markets are compared with non-local markets. On the other hand, the presence of scattered production sources, especially wind farms, in the power grid is increasing day by day, and with the advancement of technology in recent years, these sources are eager to participate in reactive power markets. Thus, in this thesis, in order to consider the participation of wind farms in the reactive power market, the possibility of providing reactive power by wind farms with variable speed turbine technology is studied first, and then the active and reactive power markets are implemented with the participation of wind farms. In this study, in order to consider the wind power forecasting error, active and reactive power markets are implemented with two error modes in wind power forecasting, and the effect of this forecasting error on the amount of participation of wind farms in the active and reactive power markets and also on the cost of operating these markets is examined.

    Key words: reactive power market, active and reactive power simultaneous market, expected payment function, lost opportunity cost, farms Wind

    Introduction

    Over the past few decades, many electric power systems around the world have been restructured. During this period, in order to increase the operating efficiency and encourage investors, the electricity industry has undergone fundamental changes in terms of management and ownership, so that in order to create a suitable competitive environment, its various parts, including production, transmission and distribution, have become independent from each other. This process has led to the decentralization of various services that were previously produced by the monopoly structure. Although energy trading is the main issue in the competitive electricity market, in order to have a secure and reliable grid, ancillary services are critical and must be provided in an appropriate manner. In restructured power systems, the independent system operator (ISO[1]) is responsible for maintaining and operating the fair, safe and reliable power system. Accordingly, ISO is responsible for real-time load balancing, congestion management, and ancillary service provisioning. These ancillary services are provided by the system operator through commercial contracts with market participants [1].

    Among these, six different types of ancillary services are defined in the FERC-888 Directive[2], which reactive power provision is one of these important services and should be considered in many aspects of market planning and operation. Another thing that should be considered is that a generator can sell its production power when there is enough reactive power to maintain the voltage levels in the acceptable range in the system. Otherwise, the generator will not be able to sell its produced energy due to the limitation of voltage stability [3]. As a result, while the main issue in electricity markets is financial issues, due to the important role of reactive power in security systems, technical issues should also be taken into consideration in market settlement along with economic issues.So far, various objectives such as reactive power pricing [4, 5], minimizing the cost of reactive power [6, 7], simultaneously minimizing the cost of reactive power and transmission losses [8, 9], minimizing the deviation from transactions [3], etc. have been presented to resolve the reactive power market and improve this market.

    On the other hand, reactive power plays an important role in power system voltage security [10]. The lack of reactive power in the system may cause an undesirable voltage drop in some system buses, which if the system does not overcome this voltage deficiency, may lead to voltage instability in the entire network. Inadequate reactive power leading to voltage collapse is known to be the main cause of major power outages around the world. For example, the main cause of blackouts on July 2, 1996 and August 10, 1996, which occurred on the west coast of the United States, was declared to be voltage collapse [11]. Therefore, system voltage security is an important issue that should be considered in reactive power planning.

    The presence of wind farms in restructured markets

    In recent decades, due to some global challenges such as environmental issues, energy crisis and economic recession, renewable sources and distributed production have attracted more attention for electricity production [12]. Research conducted by research centers such as the Electric Energy Research Organization (EPRI [2]) indicates that more than 25% of the electrical energy produced by scattered productions will be used until 2010. Also, according to the research of the Natural Gas Organization (NGF [3]), this figure is predicted to be 30% [13]. Among the types of renewable resources, wind energy has become one of the advanced and popular renewable resources worldwide due to its availability and many advantages. With the increasing penetration of wind power generation into the grid, many new issues need to be studied about power system planning and operation.

    Despite the great advantages of wind energy, this energy source has high uncertainty. Therefore, the random nature of wind speed has been the subject of many researches in recent years, and some different aspects of this phenomenon as well as its effects in the operation and control of power systems have been studied [14].

    Providing reactive power by wind farms

    In addition to providing active power to the grid, wind generators with electronic power converters can also provide reactive power to the system by combining minor changes in design or control architecture. These wind turbines ([4] WTs) can also be used to provide temporary primary frequency regulation and oscillation damping as mentioned in reference [15].

    In various works, reactive power has been mainly investigated as an ancillary service in the field of large thermal generators, and not much work has been reported to investigate that wind generators can contribute to the reactive power required by the system [8] and [17]. Reactive power provision from wind farms (WFs[5]) is rarely purchased by independent system operators. However, with the increasing penetration of wind generators into the power grid along with the increased use of power electronics in turbines, wind farms can be useful as reactive power service providers in the future. Due to the progress in wind forecasting techniques in recent years, along with the power smoothing effect in a wind farm, wind farms can now be considered as a distributable power source by system operators. As a result, reactive power support from voltage source converters (VSCs [6]) from wind farms can also be considered distributable by operators [18]. This means that for all scarce services, compensation costs should be received by suppliers and paid by consumers. This is also true for reactive power. Vendors should be paid the market price or rate for the reactive power they supply so that shortages are avoided. Buyers must also pay the market rate or price.

    Generally, currently in the restructured electricity markets, it has been recognized by several power system operators in different countries that the provision of reactive power should be considered as an ancillary service and there is a need for a suitable financial payment solution for these services.

  • Contents & References of Presenting a new structure of the active and reactive power market at the same time, taking into account the network voltage restrictions

    List:

    Title

    Page

    Abstract..1

    Chapter One: Research Overview

    Introduction.. 2

    Presence of wind farms in restructured markets. 3

    Providing reactive power by wind farms. 4

    Power markets Reactive. 4

    Challenges to create reactive power markets. 5

    Interaction between active and reactive power market. 5

    Market power.

    Introduction..8

    The concept of reactive power and the need to pay attention to it. 8

    What is reactive power? 11

    Capacitive and selfie compensators. 11

    FACTS devices. 12

    Airlines and underground cables. 12

    Reactive power generation cost. 12

    Reactive power support cost by synchronous generator. 13

    Reactive power support costs by transmission equipment. 15

    Providing reactive power in restructured markets.16

    New York..16

    Sweden..17

    Market design for reactive power.17

    Cost of reactive power production.19

    Structure of reactive power offers.20

    Market establishment and price formation.22

    Reactive power market Regional.22

    Summary..24

    Wind farms and their participation in energy and reactive power markets.24 Introduction..24

    Advantages of using wind energy.25

    The current and future status of wind farms.25

    Wind turbine structure.28

    Wind turbine technology.29

    Permanent magnet synchronous generator (PMSG). 29

    Squirrel cage induction generator. 29

    Wound rotor synchronous generator. 30

    Dual-feed induction generator (DFIG). 30

    Planning the production of wind power plants in the energy market. 31

    Participation of wind units in the load distribution problem. economic. 32

    The cost function of wind units in the problem of economic load distribution. 34

    Reactive power produced by wind turbines. 37

    The design of wind farms under study. 37

    Limiting factors. 38

    Design of values. 39

    The ability of reactive power of wind turbines according to wind changes. 40

    Components of reactive power generation cost by wind farms. 42

    Fixed cost component. 42

    Loss cost component. 42

    Opportunity cost component. 43

    Reactive power supply cost model for wind farms. 43

    Conclusion.

    Modification of the reactive power market. 45 Conventional reactive power market. 45

    Expected payment function. 45

    Establishment of the market for reactive power pricing. 46

    Modified reactive power market. 47

    Modified expected payment function. 47

    Modification of market establishment and reactive power pricing. 48

    Model of separate active power markets and Reactive. 50

    Separate active power market. 50

    Separate reactive power market. 50

    Settlement of separate active and reactive power markets. 51

    Simultaneous execution of active and reactive power market. 53

    Lost opportunity cost in the simultaneous market. 53

    Simultaneous active and reactive power market. 55

    Regional reactive power market. 57 Identifying voltage control areas in a system. 57

    Electrical distance. 58

    Determining areas according to electrical distance. 59

    Reactive power market in local voltage control areas. 60

    Simultaneous regional energy and reactive power market. 60

    Participation of wind farms and synchronous generators in active power markets and 61

    Participation of wind farms and synchronous generators in the separate active power market. 61

    Participation of wind farms and synchronous generators in the separate reactive power market. 62

    The effect of wind farm forecasting error on the reactive power capability curve. 62

    Reactive power market for wind farms. 64

    Discrete reactive power market model for wind farms and generators64

    Separate reactive power market model for wind farms and synchronous generators. 68

    Participation of wind farms and synchronous generators in the simultaneous market of active and reactive power. 68

    Conclusion. 72

    Chapter four: Simulation and results

    Introduction. 73

    Simulation of active and reactive power markets. Reactive. 73

    Separate active power market. 74

    Separate reactive power market. 76

    Simultaneous market of active and reactive power. 78

    Comparison of active and reactive power production graph in separate and simultaneous markets. 83. Network zoning. 83. Regional reactive power market. 85. Simultaneous regional energy and reactive power market. 87. Comparison of active and reactive power production graphs in separate and simultaneous regional markets. 89. Simulation of active and reactive power markets with the participation of wind farms. 90.

    Participation of wind farms in the separate markets of active and reactive power. 93

    Participation of wind farms in the simultaneous market of active and reactive power. 98

    Comparison of the graph of reactive power production in separate and simultaneous markets with the presence of wind farms. 103

    Investigation of the effect of the type of error on the production of active and reactive power of each node in the simultaneous market. 106

    Summary. 108

    Chapter Five: Conclusions and Suggestions

    Conclusion 109

    Suggestions 110

    Appendix 112

    Resources 115

    English Abstract 120

    Source:

    List of References

    [1] Foley A.M, ?Gallach?ir B.P, Hur J, Baldick R, McKeogh E.J. 2010. A strategic review of electricity systems models. Energy, Vol. 35, No. 12, pp: 4522-4530. [2] FERC Order No. 888. Promotion of wholesale competition through open access non-discriminatory transmission services by public utilities and recovery of stranded costs by public utilities and transmitting utilities. Issued April 1996.

    [3] Zhong J, Bhattacharya K. 2002. Toward a competitive market for reactive power. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp: 1206-1215. [4] Baughman M.L, Siddiqi S.N. 1991. Real-time pricing of reactive power: Theory and case study results. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp: 23-29.

    [5] El-Keib A, Ma X. 1997. Calculating short-run marginal cost of active and reactive power production. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp: 559-565.

    [6] Lamont J.W, Fu J. 1999. Cost analysis of reactive power support. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp: 890-898.

    [7] Amjady N, Rabiee A, Shayanfar H.A. 2010. A stochastic framework for clearing reactive power market. Energy, Vol. 35, No. 1, pp: 239-245.

    [8] Saini A, Saraswat A. 2013. Multi-objective reactive power market clearing in competitive electricity market using HFMOEA. Applied Soft Computing, Vol. 13, No. 4, pp: 2087-2103.

    [9] Saini A, Saraswat A. 2013. Multi-objective day-ahead localized reactive power market clearing model using HFMOEA. Electrical Power and Energy Systems,46, pp: 376-391.

    [10] Echavarren F.M, Lobato E, Rouco L. 2009. Steady-state analysis of the effect of reactive generation limits in voltage stability. Electric Power Systems Research, Vol. 79, No. 9, pp: 1292-1299.

    [11] Staff report. 2005. Principles for efficient and reliable reactive power supply and consumption. FERC Publication, Docket No. AD05-1-000.

    [12] Lior N. 2010. Sustainable energy development: the present situation and possible paths to the future. Energy, Vol. 35, No. 10, pp: 3976-3994.

    [13] Ackermann T, Andersson G. Soder L. 2001. Distributed generation: a definition. Electric Power Systems Research, Vol. 57, No. 3, pp: 195–204.

    [14] Alabdi M.H, El-Saadany E.F. 2010. Overview of wind power intermittency impacts on power systems. Electric Power Systems Research, Vol. 80, No. 6, pp: 627-632. [15] Ullah N.R, Thiringer T, Karlsson D. 2008.

Presenting a new structure of the active and reactive power market at the same time, taking into account the network voltage restrictions