Factors affecting the selection of academic research commercialization strategy in the faculties of Islamic Azad University, Rasht branch

Number of pages: 112 File Format: word File Code: 30728
Year: Not Specified University Degree: Master's degree Category: Management
  • Part of the Content
  • Contents & Resources
  • Summary of Factors affecting the selection of academic research commercialization strategy in the faculties of Islamic Azad University, Rasht branch

    Academic Thesis for Master's Degree

    Field: Business Management Internal Orientation

    Abstract

    Until a while ago, university scientists and researchers refused to commercialize research and considered their main mission to be simply the production of knowledge without considering its application in the field of production. Until knowledge became the unique source of competitive advantage. Today, universities have shown a great desire to commercialize academic research, and it can be seen that the commercialization of intellectual assets has become the institutional goals of many university systems. Therefore, the present study was conducted with the aim of identifying the factors affecting the commercialization of academic research in Rasht Azad University, which is of a mixed type from the perspective of practical purpose and from the perspective of data collection. The research method is descriptive-survey in the quantitative part and exploratory in the qualitative part. The statistical population in this research is all faculty members of Rasht Azad University. In order to collect information in the qualitative stage, a semi-structured interview with experts was used and in the quantitative stage, a questionnaire was used, which is one of the common tools and a direct method for obtaining research data. Based on the findings of this research, 26 components were observed in the four dimensions of environmental factors, institutional, organizational and individual factors, respectively, in the dimension of environmental factors, policies related to intellectual assets, environmental and regional infrastructures, the availability of investors, the university environment, the density of companies in a region and their selection, the presence of capable and expert human resources, factors related to the government, the existence of incubators, and the existence of supporting laws in the dimension of institutional factors, university culture, university and department. Incentives, laws and regulations for the protection of new products and technologies and approvals for the protection of intellectual property, university mission, university goals, past activities and past contracts of the university with industry and university policy have been identified. In the dimension of organizational factors, costs related to knowledge transfer, defective structure of the university, valuing non-applied research, valuing non-applied research and university resources (allocated revenues and budgets for commercialization of research, technical support, physical infrastructure, communications) and also in the dimension of individual factors, indicators of individual motivations of the researcher, demographic characteristics (such as the researcher's age), psychological characteristics, work experiences and the individual's social network were observed.

    Key words: commercialization of research, factors affecting Commercialization of commercialization strategies

    In recent years, as a result of expectations from economic development and internal pressures in order to create new sources of income, universities have turned more and more to using the creation of a company as a tool to take advantage of academic innovations (Feldman et al. [1], 2003). Universities are increasingly faced with increasing commercialization of new research and decreasing old activities such as teaching and research. The expansion of commercialization of academic research has led to the privatization of scientific commons and scientific advances (Chang et al. [2], 2009). Studying the commercialization of research and technology and its dimensions is very important because such analyzes provide important evidence for more efficient decision-making by managers and policy makers. Indeed, the issue of commercialization as a new field has been moving forward and has been the focus of researchers (Rosermel et al. [3], 2007). On the other hand, in most countries, governments are reducing their role in providing funding for universities, so universities should be towards national independence and find ways to provide the funds needed for their activities so that their mission, missions, norms and values ??are not harmed. The transformation of knowledge into a major competitive advantage in today's world prompts countries to pay special attention to centers of knowledge production and its transfer to other areas and to undertake fundamental reforms in their processes, missions and functions (Siegel et al. [4], 2004). Universities have shown a great desire to commercialize academic research.  So that universities, in addition to research and education, play a role in the direction of the new mission of participation in the economic development of the society.Research findings play a significant role in improving the quality of human life and developing the welfare level of society and economic and social developments. But these findings will not have the necessary importance until they find a practical aspect and are not put on the market or available to the applicants, and they will not compensate the research costs (Zare, Yadalhi; 2013).

    Despite the acceptance of the issue of commercialization by researchers, numerous evidences from around the world indicate that although a large number of researches have been technically successful, only a small percentage of them have achieved success in the field of commercialization, which shows It complicates the commercialization process. The commercialization of academic research has become an undeniable necessity, and the entry of Iranian universities into the knowledge trade has turned from an advantage into a necessity, and this is despite the fact that Iranian universities have not yet been able to commercialize their research and establish an effective interaction between the industry and the university (Zare, Yadalhi; 2013). Determining the real cause of this problem requires conducting fundamental studies in relation to the factors influencing the selection of academic research commercialization strategy, which is an emphasis on the necessity of future research. Failure to recognize the factors affecting the selection of academic research commercialization strategy in different sectors causes the country's energy and capital to be wasted, as well as the cost of opportunity and lost time to the country. By identifying the factors affecting the commercialization of academic research, the complexity of this process is reduced and its success rate is increased, and students, faculty members, and other researchers can identify the right paths for research and take full advantage of its successes.

    Choosing a commercialization strategy is the heart of the development of innovation and a determination of the path by which the organization gains income and profit from an innovation and the products obtained from it (Servo [5], 1998). Researchers have suggested several ways in which universities interact with the private sector regarding technology (Cohen et al., 1998). People such as Siegel (2004), Berkowitz and Feldman [7] (2004) have paid attention to the role of patent registration and licensing of findings in the commercialization of academic research, and people such as Shin [8] (2004) and O'Shea [9] (2005) have paid attention to the importance of forming reproductive companies in the commercialization of academic research. Therefore, our goal in this work is a comprehensive review of transfer methods and strategies. Knowledge and commercialization of academic research and identification of factors affecting it, so that a suitable strategy for commercialization of academic research in the Islamic Azad University of Rasht branch can be presented. Factors such as globalization, along with other factors, as a part of the general trend towards the rapid development of the knowledge market, have fundamentally changed the relationship between industry and university. University is an institution that is at the top of the pyramid of scientific institutions in society. The proper functioning of the university, on the one hand, brings development and progress to the society, and on the other hand, the development of the society as a positive feedback, transfers the university to a higher and more responsible place. In the academic sector of the country, the use of research results and their commercialization are considered important priorities, because national interests require the use of important and significant resources in the form of expert forces, credits and time to conduct research in this sector, maximum exploitation is done and the society benefits from the results of this research in various social and economic sectors (Fakour, 2016). On the other hand, currently, in most countries, the focus of policies is directed towards the role of the relationship between industry and academia in strengthening entrepreneurship in new and fast-growing industries (OECD, 2002). Therefore, universities are considered as the most important players in the knowledge-based economy, and the commercialization of academic research and innovations related to research and development are considered as the most important factors of the economic stability of countries (Arora et al.[10], 2001).  Changing the role of universities from producing knowledge to creating capital from knowledge, which is aimed at improving the performance of the national or regional economy as well as the resulting financial advantages for the university and its professors (Etzkowitz et al. [11], 2000). It has led to an increase in commercialization related activities in the last two decades.

  • Contents & References of Factors affecting the selection of academic research commercialization strategy in the faculties of Islamic Azad University, Rasht branch

    List:

    Title

    Abstract 1

    Chapter One: Overview and Introduction

    1-1- Introduction. 3

    1-2 - statement of the problem. 3

    1-3 - The necessity and importance of research. 4

    1-4- research objectives. 6

    1-4-1- the main goal. 6

    1-4-2- sub-goals. 6

    1-5- Research questions. 7

    1-5-1- The main question. 7

    1-5-2- Research sub-questions. 7

    1-6- conceptual and operational definitions. 8

    1-6-1- commercialization of academic research. 8

    1-6-2- Factors affecting the choice of commercialization strategy: 8

    1-7- Organization of research. 8

    1-8- Scope of the research (time, place, topic): 8

    Chapter two: Review of the conducted studies

    2-1- Introduction. 11

    2-2 Definition of academic research commercialization. 14

    2-3- The history of academic research commercialization. 18

    2-4 beneficiaries of the commercialization process of academic research. 21

    2-5- Mechanisms and strategies of academic research commercialization. 23

    6-2- Factors affecting the commercialization of academic research. 39

    Chapter Three: Research Method

    3-1 Introduction. 42

    3-2 Research method. 42

    3-2-1 qualitative stage. 42

    3-2-2 quantitative step. 43

    3-3 Definition of community and statistical sample. 43

    3-3-1 Qualitative stage of research. 43

    3-3-2 quantitative research stage. 43

    3-4 sampling method. 43

    3-4-1 Qualitative stage of research. 43

    3-4-2 quantitative research stage. 44

    3-5 information gathering methods. 45

    3-5-1 Data sources 45

    3-5-1-1 Qualitative stage of research. 45

    3-5-1-2 quantitative research stage. 45

    3-5-2 Data collection method 45

    3-5-2-1 Qualitative stage of research. 45

    3-5-2-2 quantitative research stage. 46

    3-6 method of measuring system reliability. 46

    3-6-1 Qualitative stage of research. 46

    3-6-2 quantitative research stage. 46

    7-3 method of measuring system reliability. 47

    3-7-1 Qualitative stage of research. 47

    3-7-2 quantitative research stage. 47

    3-8 research scope (time, place, topic) 47

    3-9 data analysis methods 47

    3-9-1 qualitative stage of research. 47

    3-9-1-1 coding method. 48

    3-9-1-2 Classification. 48

    3-9-2 quantitative research stage. 48

    Chapter Four: Data Analysis

    4-1- Introduction. 50

    4-2- Analysis of qualitative data from the interview. 50

    4-3-1- theme analysis. 50

    4-3-2- How to code interviews with experts. 51

    4-4- Collection and coding of qualitative data. 51

    4-4- Quantitative data analysis. 54

    Chapter Five: Conclusions and Suggestions

    5-1- Introduction. 73

    5-2- Presenting the results of the qualitative section. 73

    5-3- Answering the research questions. 76

    5-3-1- The main research question. 76

    5-3-2- Research sub-questions. 77

    5-4- Conclusion. 78

    5-5- Suggestions. 79

    5-5-1- Suggestions for policy makers. 80

    5-5-2- Research limitations. 80

    5-5-3- Suggestions for future research. 80

    Sources and sources. 81

    Appendices: 83

    Source:

    Sources and sources

    Bazargan Abbas (1387). An introduction to qualitative and mixed research methods. Common approaches in behavioral sciences. Tehran, Didar Publishing House, first edition.

    Bazargan, Abbas (2010). Educational evaluation: concepts, patterns and operational process. Tehran: Publications of Organization for the Study and Compilation of Humanities Books of Universities (SAT).

    Bazargan, Abbas; Hijazi, goddess; Sarmad, Zahra (1386). Research methods in behavioral sciences. Tehran: Nash Agh. 10th edition.

    Homan, H. ع. (1387). A practical guide for meta-analysis in scientific research. Tehran: Sammet.

    Arora, A., A. Fosfuri and A. Gambardella (2001), Markets for Technology: The Economics of Innovation and corporate strategy. MIT Press, Cambridge MA, forthcoming.

    Bercovitz, J. & Feldman, M (2004). Academic Entrepreneurs: Social Learning and business school.

    Cohen, W., R. Florida, L. Randazzese and J. Walsh (1998) “Industry and the Academy: Uneasy Partners in the Cause of Technological Advance,” In R. Noll. Ed., Challenges to the Research University. Washington D.C.:: Brookings Institution.

    Di Gregorio, D. and S. Shane (2003), 'Why Do Some Universities Generate More Start-ups than Others?'. Research Policy 32, 209–227.

    Etzkowitz, H., 2002, MIT and the Rise of Entrepreneurial Science., Routledge.

    G?ktepe-Hultén (2008). "University Inventors and University Patenting Patterns at Lund University: Conceptual- Methodological & Empirical Insights" in Krishna, C. Sri Academic. Amicus Books, ICFAI, India ISBN 81-314-1349-7

    Henderson R., A. Jaffe and M. Trajtenberg (1998). "Universities as a Source of Commercial Technology: A Detailed Analysis of University Patenting, 1965-1988". Review of Economics, Vol. 1, pp. 119-127.

    Mowery, R. R., and Ziedonis, A. A. (2004).

    Mowery, D.C., R.R. Sampat, and A.A. Ziedonis, 2001, 'The Growth of Patenting and Licensing by US Universities: An Assessment of the Effects of the Bayh-Dole Act of 1980.' (2007). Determinants and consequences of university spinoff activity: a conceptual framework, J Technol development of university high-tech spinout companies.

    OECD, 2003, Turning science into business. Patenting and licensing at public research organizations http://213.253.134.43/oecd/pdfs/browseit/9203021e.pdf.

    Rasmussen et al. (2006). Initiatives to promote commercialization of university knowledge. Technovation 26, 518-533.

    Rosenberg, N., and R.R. Nelson, 1994. "American Universities and Technical Advance in Industry," Research Policy 23, 323-348.

    Roberts, E. (1991), Entrepreneurs in High Technology, Lessons from MIT and Beyond. Oxford University Press.

     

    Roberts, E. B. (2007). 'Managing Invention and Innovation'. Research-Technology Management, VOL:50, Number 1, pp. 35-54(20).

    Roberts, E. and D. E. Malone (1996), 'Policies and Structures for Spinning Off New Companies from Research and Development Organizations'. R&D Management 26, 17–48.

    Shane, S., 2004, “Encouraging university entrepreneurship? The effect of the Bayh-Dole Act on university patenting in the United States”, Journal of Business Venturing Vol.19 : 127–51.

    Siegel, D. S., Waldman, D., Atwater, L. & Link, A.N (2004). Toward a model of the effective transfer of scientific knowledge from academicians to practitioners: qualitative evidence from the commercialization of university technologies Journal of Engineering and Technology Management Transfer 33:653–666.

    Stuart, T.E. (2000). "Interorganizational Alliances and the Performance of Firms: A Study of Growth and Innovation Rates in a High-Technology Industry," Strategic Management Journal, 21: 791-811.

    Thursby, J., R. Jensen and M. Thursby (2001). 'Objectives, characteristics and outcomes of university licensing: A survey of major U.S. universities', Journal of Technology Transfer, 26, 59-72.

    Vohora, Ajay; Mike Wright and Andy Lockett (2004). Critical junctures in development of university high-tech spinout companies, Nottingham university business school.

Factors affecting the selection of academic research commercialization strategy in the faculties of Islamic Azad University, Rasht branch