Contents & References of Factors affecting the selection of academic research commercialization strategy in the faculties of Islamic Azad University, Rasht branch
List:
Title
Abstract 1
Chapter One: Overview and Introduction
1-1- Introduction. 3
1-2 - statement of the problem. 3
1-3 - The necessity and importance of research. 4
1-4- research objectives. 6
1-4-1- the main goal. 6
1-4-2- sub-goals. 6
1-5- Research questions. 7
1-5-1- The main question. 7
1-5-2- Research sub-questions. 7
1-6- conceptual and operational definitions. 8
1-6-1- commercialization of academic research. 8
1-6-2- Factors affecting the choice of commercialization strategy: 8
1-7- Organization of research. 8
1-8- Scope of the research (time, place, topic): 8
Chapter two: Review of the conducted studies
2-1- Introduction. 11
2-2 Definition of academic research commercialization. 14
2-3- The history of academic research commercialization. 18
2-4 beneficiaries of the commercialization process of academic research. 21
2-5- Mechanisms and strategies of academic research commercialization. 23
6-2- Factors affecting the commercialization of academic research. 39
Chapter Three: Research Method
3-1 Introduction. 42
3-2 Research method. 42
3-2-1 qualitative stage. 42
3-2-2 quantitative step. 43
3-3 Definition of community and statistical sample. 43
3-3-1 Qualitative stage of research. 43
3-3-2 quantitative research stage. 43
3-4 sampling method. 43
3-4-1 Qualitative stage of research. 43
3-4-2 quantitative research stage. 44
3-5 information gathering methods. 45
3-5-1 Data sources 45
3-5-1-1 Qualitative stage of research. 45
3-5-1-2 quantitative research stage. 45
3-5-2 Data collection method 45
3-5-2-1 Qualitative stage of research. 45
3-5-2-2 quantitative research stage. 46
3-6 method of measuring system reliability. 46
3-6-1 Qualitative stage of research. 46
3-6-2 quantitative research stage. 46
7-3 method of measuring system reliability. 47
3-7-1 Qualitative stage of research. 47
3-7-2 quantitative research stage. 47
3-8 research scope (time, place, topic) 47
3-9 data analysis methods 47
3-9-1 qualitative stage of research. 47
3-9-1-1 coding method. 48
3-9-1-2 Classification. 48
3-9-2 quantitative research stage. 48
Chapter Four: Data Analysis
4-1- Introduction. 50
4-2- Analysis of qualitative data from the interview. 50
4-3-1- theme analysis. 50
4-3-2- How to code interviews with experts. 51
4-4- Collection and coding of qualitative data. 51
4-4- Quantitative data analysis. 54
Chapter Five: Conclusions and Suggestions
5-1- Introduction. 73
5-2- Presenting the results of the qualitative section. 73
5-3- Answering the research questions. 76
5-3-1- The main research question. 76
5-3-2- Research sub-questions. 77
5-4- Conclusion. 78
5-5- Suggestions. 79
5-5-1- Suggestions for policy makers. 80
5-5-2- Research limitations. 80
5-5-3- Suggestions for future research. 80
Sources and sources. 81
Appendices: 83
Source:
Sources and sources
Bazargan Abbas (1387). An introduction to qualitative and mixed research methods. Common approaches in behavioral sciences. Tehran, Didar Publishing House, first edition.
Bazargan, Abbas (2010). Educational evaluation: concepts, patterns and operational process. Tehran: Publications of Organization for the Study and Compilation of Humanities Books of Universities (SAT).
Bazargan, Abbas; Hijazi, goddess; Sarmad, Zahra (1386). Research methods in behavioral sciences. Tehran: Nash Agh. 10th edition.
Homan, H. ع. (1387). A practical guide for meta-analysis in scientific research. Tehran: Sammet.
Arora, A., A. Fosfuri and A. Gambardella (2001), Markets for Technology: The Economics of Innovation and corporate strategy. MIT Press, Cambridge MA, forthcoming.
Bercovitz, J. & Feldman, M (2004). Academic Entrepreneurs: Social Learning and business school.
Cohen, W., R. Florida, L. Randazzese and J. Walsh (1998) “Industry and the Academy: Uneasy Partners in the Cause of Technological Advance,” In R. Noll. Ed., Challenges to the Research University. Washington D.C.:: Brookings Institution.
Di Gregorio, D. and S. Shane (2003), 'Why Do Some Universities Generate More Start-ups than Others?'. Research Policy 32, 209–227.
Etzkowitz, H., 2002, MIT and the Rise of Entrepreneurial Science., Routledge.
G?ktepe-Hultén (2008). "University Inventors and University Patenting Patterns at Lund University: Conceptual- Methodological & Empirical Insights" in Krishna, C. Sri Academic. Amicus Books, ICFAI, India ISBN 81-314-1349-7
Henderson R., A. Jaffe and M. Trajtenberg (1998). "Universities as a Source of Commercial Technology: A Detailed Analysis of University Patenting, 1965-1988". Review of Economics, Vol. 1, pp. 119-127.
Mowery, R. R., and Ziedonis, A. A. (2004).
Mowery, D.C., R.R. Sampat, and A.A. Ziedonis, 2001, 'The Growth of Patenting and Licensing by US Universities: An Assessment of the Effects of the Bayh-Dole Act of 1980.' (2007). Determinants and consequences of university spinoff activity: a conceptual framework, J Technol development of university high-tech spinout companies.
OECD, 2003, Turning science into business. Patenting and licensing at public research organizations http://213.253.134.43/oecd/pdfs/browseit/9203021e.pdf.
Rasmussen et al. (2006). Initiatives to promote commercialization of university knowledge. Technovation 26, 518-533.
Rosenberg, N., and R.R. Nelson, 1994. "American Universities and Technical Advance in Industry," Research Policy 23, 323-348.
Roberts, E. (1991), Entrepreneurs in High Technology, Lessons from MIT and Beyond. Oxford University Press.
Roberts, E. B. (2007). 'Managing Invention and Innovation'. Research-Technology Management, VOL:50, Number 1, pp. 35-54(20).
Roberts, E. and D. E. Malone (1996), 'Policies and Structures for Spinning Off New Companies from Research and Development Organizations'. R&D Management 26, 17–48.
Shane, S., 2004, “Encouraging university entrepreneurship? The effect of the Bayh-Dole Act on university patenting in the United States”, Journal of Business Venturing Vol.19 : 127–51.
Siegel, D. S., Waldman, D., Atwater, L. & Link, A.N (2004). Toward a model of the effective transfer of scientific knowledge from academicians to practitioners: qualitative evidence from the commercialization of university technologies Journal of Engineering and Technology Management Transfer 33:653–666.
Stuart, T.E. (2000). "Interorganizational Alliances and the Performance of Firms: A Study of Growth and Innovation Rates in a High-Technology Industry," Strategic Management Journal, 21: 791-811.
Thursby, J., R. Jensen and M. Thursby (2001). 'Objectives, characteristics and outcomes of university licensing: A survey of major U.S. universities', Journal of Technology Transfer, 26, 59-72.
Vohora, Ajay; Mike Wright and Andy Lockett (2004). Critical junctures in development of university high-tech spinout companies, Nottingham university business school.