Contents & References of Investigating the performance of listed companies before and after the implementation of the first phase of targeting subsidies
List:
List
Chapter One: General research. 1
1-1, introduction. 2
1-2, statement and proposal of problem 4
1-3, research objectives. 6
1-4, the necessity and importance of research. 7
1-5, research questions or hypotheses. 7
1-6, theoretical models (theories) available in the subject of research. 8
1-6-1: traditional standard. 9
1-6-1, a) Return on assets 9
1-6-1, b) Return on equity. 10
1-6-1, c) Income per share: 10
1-6-1, d) Price index on income per share: 11
1-6-2, modern standards. 12
1-6-2, a) Economic added value. 12
1-6-2, b) added market value. 13
1-6-3, c) return on invested cash flow. 15
1-6-2, d) cash added value: 17
1-7, scientific background and past studies. 18, 1-8, research method: 22, 1-9, statistical analysis unit. 23
1-10, data collection tools and methods 25
1-11, data analysis methods 25
Chapter two: theoretical foundations and research background. 27
2-1, introduction. 28
2-2, subsidy. 29
2-2-1) Types of subsidies 30
2-2-2) Subsidy payment methods. 30
2-2-3) Major subsidy payment methods in different countries. 31
Cash system. 31
2-2-4) The history of subsidies in the world. 32
Iran. 32
Poland. 35
Bulgaria. 35
Indonesia. 36
China. 38
Türkiye. 39
2-2-5, targeting of subsidies 42
2-3, evaluation of company performance. 45
2-5-1, History of performance evaluation in the country. 48
2-5-2, the importance of performance evaluation. 48
2-5-3, performance evaluation objectives. 50
2-5-4, types of performance evaluation. 51
2-5-6, performance evaluation process. 52
2-5-7, subjective measures of performance. 53
2-5-8, objective measures of performance. 53
2-6, performance evaluation criteria. 53
2-6-1, financial performance. 54
2-7, financial performance evaluation models. 56
2-7-1, accounting models. 57
2-7-1, a) profit. 58
2-7-2, b) Earnings per share (EPS) 58
2-7-2, c) Profit growth. 59
2-7-2, d) dividend. 60
2-7-2, e) free cash flows. 61
2-7-2, g) rate of return on equity. 62
2-7-2,h) return rate of assets 63
Advantages of accounting profit and performance evaluation criteria based on it. 63
2-7-3, criteria based on accounting information and market information. 64
2-7-3, a) price-to-earnings ratio (P/E. 65
2-7-3, b) ratio of market value to book value of shares. 65
2-7-3, c) Tobin's Q ratio. 65
Deficiencies of performance evaluation models based on accounting profit. 67
2-7-4, economic models. 69
2-7-4, a) Economic value added (EVA). 69
Economic value added benefits (EVA). 71
Disadvantages of economic added value (EVA). 72
2-7-4, b) Market Value Added (MVA). 73
2-7-4, c) Refined economic added value. 75
Refined economic added value benefits. 76
2-8, research background. 78
2-8-1, foreign researches. 78
2-8-2, internal research. 83
The third chapter: research methodology. 90
3-1, introduction. 91
3-2, research method. 91
3-3, statistical population. 92
3-4, research sample. 92
3-5, research variables. 94
3-5-3, income per share. 94
3-5-4, price-to-earnings index per share. 95
3-5-5, economic added value. 95
3-5-6, added market value. 96
3-5-7, return on invested cash flow. 96
3-5-8, cash added value. 97
3-6, the method of collecting information. 98
3-7, method and data analysis. 98
Chapter 4: Research findings. 99
Introduction. 100
4-1, data description 101
4-1-1, description of performance evaluation indicators before and after targeting subsidies 101
4-2, research hypotheses. 104
Chapter Five: Findings, conclusions and suggestions. 119
1-5, summary. 120
3-5, discussion. 125
4-5, research limitations. 126
6-5, suggestion. 127
Appendixes 129
Appendix 1. 129
Appendix 2. 151
Resources.156
Source:
Sources
Persian sources
1)
2)
3)
Jehankhani, Ali and Ahmad Zarif Fard (1374), "Do managers and shareholders use the right criteria to measure company value?", Financial Research Quarterly, numbers 7 and 8, pp. 48-70. 5) 6) Rai, Reza and Ali Saeedi (2007), Fundamentals of Financial Engineering and Risk Management, Publications of Organization for the Study and Compilation of Humanities Books of Universities (Samt). 8) 9) 10) 11) 12)
13)
14)
15)
16)
17)
18)
19)
20)
21). Bacidore, J. M., Boquist, J. A., Milbourn, T. T., and A. V. Thakor (1997). "The Search for the Best Financial Performance Measure", Financial Analysts Journal, May./June., pp. 10-20.
Bausch A. E., Barbara, W. and M. Blome (2003). "Is Market Value-Based Residual Income a Superior Performance Measure Compared to Book Value-Based Residual Income?", Working Paper 2003, No. 1. Justus-liebig-Universitat.
Booth G., Kallunki, J., Martikainen, T., (1996), "Post Announcement Drift and Income Smoothing: Finnish Evidence", Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 23: PP 197-211.
Charles, L. B., Sarver, L. and T. Strickland (2004). "EVA, MVA and CEO Compensation: Further Evidence", American Business Review, June, Issue 3, pp. 82-87.
Chen, M.-H., Kim, W. G., & Chen, C.Y. ((An investigation The Mean reversion of Hospitality stock prices towards their fundamental values: The case of Taiwan)) . Hospitality management , 26(2) , (2007) , p.453-467
Chen, S. and J. L. Dodd (2001). "Operating Income, Residual Income and EVA(TM): Which Metric Is More Value Relevant?" Journal of Managerial Issues, Spring, Vol. 13, Issue 1, pp 65-87.
Devinney Timothy M., Pierre J. Richard, George S. Yip, Gerry Johnson, (2004), "Measuring Organizational Performance in Management Research: A Synthesis of Measurement Challenges and Approaches", Australian Graduate School of Management, Presented in AOM Conference.
Dodd, J. L. and J. Johns (1999). "EVA Reconsidered", Business and Economic Review, April/June, Vol. 45, Issue 3, pp. 13-18.
Fatemi, A., Desai, A. S. & Katz, J. P., ((wealth creation & managerial pay: MVA & EVA as a determinants of executive compensation.)), Global Finance Journal, 14(2), (2003), p.159-179
Ferguson, R. and D. Leistikow (1998). "Search for the Best Financial Performance Measure", Financial Analysts Journal, Jan./Feb.,Vol.54, No.1, pp. 80-86.
J.M.Bacidore, J.A.Boquist, T.T.Mil Bourand, A.V.Thakor ((The Search For The Best Financial Performance Measure)), Financial Analysis Journal, (May / June 1997), p.15.
Kallunki, J. , Silvola, H. (2008). "The effect of organizational life cycle stage on the use of activity-based costing", Management Accounting Research Vol.19, pp.62-79.
Kim, J. J., Ahn, J. H., & Yun, J. K., ((Economic Value Added (EVA) as a proxy for market value added (MVA) and accounting earnings : Empirical evidence from the business cycle)) , Journal of Accounting & Finance Research ,12(1) , (2004) ,p.40-48
Kramer, J. K., & Pashner, G. ((An empirical analysis of economic Value Added as a proxy for market value added)) Financial Practice & Education, 7(1),(1997) ,p.41-49
Krolick, Debra L. (2005). "The Relevance of Financial Statement Information for Executive Performance Evaluation", The International Journal of Accounting, Vol. 40, pp. 115-132.
Lehn, K. and A. K. Makhija (1996). "EVA, Accounting Profits and CEO Turnover: An Empirical Examination", Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 90-97.
Lovata, L. M. and M. L. Costigan (2002). "Empirical Analysis of Adapter Value Added", Management Accounting Research, Vol. 13, pp. 215-228.