The relationship between role ambiguity and the level of aggression in football players of the Iranian Premier League

Number of pages: 79 File Format: word File Code: 30545
Year: 2014 University Degree: Master's degree Category: Physical Education - Sports
  • Part of the Content
  • Contents & Resources
  • Summary of The relationship between role ambiguity and the level of aggression in football players of the Iranian Premier League

    Master's thesis in the field of general orientation physical education

    Abstract

     

    The present study was conducted with the aim of investigating the relationship between role ambiguity and the level of aggression in football players of the Iranian Premier League. Using descriptive-correlational research, three teams (72 players) were selected as a sample from the teams present in the premier football league, season 92-93, who were willing to cooperate with the researcher. Players' role ambiguity was measured using the role perception scale of Beaucamp et al. In order to record the level of aggressiveness of the players, the video of the games of the selected teams, in the first half of the season, was observed and their aggressiveness was recorded in a researcher-made checklist based on the aggression checklist of Roberts et al. Spearman's correlation coefficient and linear regression tests were used to analyze the data. In general, the findings showed that there is a significant relationship between the ambiguity of the offensive role (perception of the role) and the level of aggression of football players. The results of the regression showed that the dimension of role ambiguity (perception of the offensive role) has a significant predictive power for the aggression of football players. In general, it can be concluded that the more the players understand their role and are well aware of their responsibilities, position and role in the team, the amount of their aggressive behavior will decrease accordingly.

    -1- Introduction

    Sports as a social phenomenon, in today's modern societies, has found a special place in the studies of scholars of various sciences. The various dimensions of this phenomenon have made it beyond a mere competitive matter and its scope has been related to most social issues. Among the various sports fields, the field of football has attracted the attention of the public opinion members of the societies in terms of its attractions and excitement, and the cultural, economic, social and even political aspects related to football have raised it as an industry (Hajbeigi, 2015).

    Today, the use of psychology in sports by teams is considered a necessity. In fact, in order to select a young player, the coach should pay attention to his mental and psychological preparation in the same way as he looks at the physical, experimental, etc. Ensuring the mental preparation of players in training and matches and using their maximum mental strength as well as physical strength and tactical strength is of great importance for coaches and teams (Hojatpour, 2018). Undoubtedly, success and victory in today's championship sport requires higher expectations than what existed before. Therefore, meeting these special expectations and needs has led sports professionals to pay more attention to the existential aspects of athletes and to try to improve and increase their skills (Sehshuri, 2019).

    Football, like other sports, requires a high level of concentration, attention, accuracy, mental preparation, etc. A football match is 90 minutes, but it keeps the minds of the players and coaches busy for several thousand minutes and affects other activities and areas of life. Defeat or victory, refereeing decisions and mistakes, expulsion, team elimination, losing a penalty, relegation, etc. can occupy the players' thoughts, minds and psyches for days and even weeks and even years, and this is where the constructive role of psychology in football is more than It creates pre-effect (Hojatpour, 2013).

    In order for a football team to be able to maintain its efficiency in a relatively long period of time (as long as a football season) and even more, it must pay attention to the psychological factors that affect the mind and psyche of its players. Therefore, paying attention to psychological factors improves the performance and efficiency of players and minimizes the negative effects that some factors may have on the performance of athletes.

    In the present study, among the variables related to the performance of athletes, the variables of role ambiguity and aggression, which can have a negative effect on performance, will be examined. Role ambiguity independently predicts the efficiency and effectiveness of a person's performance (Beauchamp et al., 2002) and negatively affects the athlete's performance (Abolghasmi et al., 2015).

    In the current research, it is an attempt to identify the relationship between the variables of role ambiguity and aggression in the players of Iran's premier football league and examine the unpleasant consequences of these variables on the performance of the players.

    1-2- Statement of the problem

    The goal of all sports teams is to maximize the physical and mental strength of the players and eliminate the disturbing factors that may negatively affect the sports performance. Football, like other human activities, is tied to psychological concepts such as anxiety, excitement, psychological pressure, aggression, etc., and each of these variables can affect the performance of athletes. Among the variables that play a decisive role in team sports, especially football, are role ambiguity and aggression.

    Individual roles are very important in the environment of teams, and it is these roles that, by being together, make teams successful. Therefore, it is important to know whether the players have accepted these roles or not and whether they are satisfied or dissatisfied with their roles (Bahlke et al., 2012). Understanding the responsibilities of the individual role is defined as one of the most important team variables in sports (Eys et al., 2005). Lack of knowledge about these responsibilities and expectations related to a particular situation has been introduced as role ambiguity (Kahn et al., 1964). In fact, role ambiguity occurs when it is not clear what a person's role is, including when it is not clear what the purpose of a certain job or playing position in sports is or what are the limits of its responsibilities (Droudian et al., 2013). Experiencing role ambiguity can lead to contradictory reactions, feelings of tension, reduced self-confidence, stress and dissatisfaction in the individual (Kahn et al., 1964). Also, role ambiguity is associated with increased physical and cognitive anxiety (Beauchamp et al., 2003) and decreased role effectiveness (Beauchamp et al., 2002) and can have a negative effect on performance (Abolghasmi et al., 2015).

    Football as a team game requires coordination of people. Each player in the team has a responsibility and must fulfill his responsibility in the best way in an atmosphere full of spectators, and a small mistake can cause irreparable damage to the team. Therefore, the players not knowing their role in different situations makes them not know their duty. Uncertainty of the task, in its turn, will be the cause of inconsistency and possibly not performing team activities properly. The lack of familiarity with the role of other teammates and the differences between players due to work interference and resulting discomfort will be other consequences of such a situation (Rajbzadeh, 1385). Numerous researches conducted in the organizational literature indicate that role ambiguity as a stressful factor in different environments for people at the behavioral, psychological and physiological level brings noticeable and significant consequences, which in some way creates the basis for weakening It provides the efficiency and effectiveness of people. One of these consequences is deviant and aggressive behavior. According to the organizational literature and based on the stress-imbalance-compensation model, it can be said that stress by creating negative emotional states towards oneself and work tasks, by disrupting the emotional, behavioral and cognitive balance of people, leads them to unethical and deviant behaviors such as aggression (Golparvar, 2019). In addition, researches conducted in work environments have repeatedly shown that role ambiguity as one of the dimensions of stress has a significant predictive power for anger and aggression (Adibi et al., 2013). Aggression refers to behavior that is done with the intention of harming another person, and involves complete disregard for the health of others and possibly oneself. The consequences of aggression may be physical or psychological (Coackly, 1988). In fact, aggression causes the undesirable use of mental energy, prevents the achievement of victory and the experience of joy from sports, and may hinder the player's concentration and reduce performance by causing anger and excitement (Tolaei, 2011). Parallel to the movement and development of football in Iran, in recent years, violence and aggression have spread in matches and turned into bitter and unfortunate incidents both in the national and international arenas. This issue has caused a lot of concerns for those involved and interested in football (Ramzani-nejad et al., 2018).

  • Contents & References of The relationship between role ambiguity and the level of aggression in football players of the Iranian Premier League

    List:

     

     

    Table of Contents

    Title

    Chapter One (Introduction and Generalities).1

    1-1- Introduction..2

    1-2-Statement of the problem.3

    1-3- Importance and necessity of research.5

    1-4- Research objectives.7

    1-4-1- General research objective.7

    1-4-2- Specific research objectives.7

    1-5- Research hypotheses.7

    1-6- Research limitations.8

    1-6-1- Controlled limitations.8

    1-6-2- Limitations outside of Control. 8

    1-7- Definition of words and terms. 8

    Chapter two (theoretical foundations and background review). 11

    2-1- Introduction..11

    2-2- Theoretical foundations of research. 11

    2-2-1- Role ambiguity. 11

    2-2-2- The concept of role ambiguity in the organization and its relationship with Aggression. 14

    2-2-3- The concept of role ambiguity in sports. 17

    2-2-4- Dimensions of role ambiguity. 18

    2-2-5- The relationship of role ambiguity with sports performance. 20

    2-2-6- Aggression. 21

    2-2-7- Aggression theories. 24

    2-2-8- The relationship between aggression and sports performance.27

    2-3- Research background.28

    2-3-1- Research related to role ambiguity.28

    2-3-2- Research related to aggression.35

    2-4- Summary and conclusion of research literature.37

    Chapter three (research methodology) 39

    3-1- Introduction..40

    3-2- Research method.40

    3-3- Statistical population.40

    3-4- Statistical sample and sampling method.40

    3-5- Research variables.41

    3-5-1- Predictor variable.41

    3-5-2- Criterion variable.41

    3-6- Operational definition of research variables.41

    3-7- Information gathering tool.42

    3-7-1- Questionnaire of individual characteristics of players.42

    3-7-2- Role perception scale.42

    3-7-3- Aggression checklist.42

    3-8- Validity of the research tool.43

    3-9- Questionnaire reliability.43

    3-10- How to collect information.44

    3-11- Statistical methods.45

    Chapter four (findings).46

    4-1- Introduction.47

    4-2- Descriptive review of findings. Research. 47

    4-2-1- Age and game experience. 47

    4-2-2- Position of players. 48

    4-2-3- Level of aggressiveness of players in different positions. 48

    4-2-4- Level of aggressiveness of players in home and away games. 49

    4-2-5- Descriptive statistics of perception scale. role. 49

    4-3- Examining the normality of data distribution. 50

    4-4- Test of research hypotheses. 51

    4-4-1- First hypothesis.51

    4-4-2- Second hypothesis.52

    4-4-3- Third hypothesis.53

    4-4-4- Fourth hypothesis.54

    Chapter 5 (discussion and conclusion). Role.58

    5-3-3- The difference between the role ambiguity of experienced and less experienced players.59

    5-3-4- The difference between the aggression of experienced and less experienced players.62

    5-4- The final conclusion.63

    5-5- Suggestions derived from the research.64

    5-6- Suggestions for future research.65

    Resources..66

    Internal resources. 67

    Foreign sources. 69

    Appendices. 73

    Appendix 1.: Questionnaire of information and individual characteristics of players. 74

    Appendix 2: Biocamp et al. role perception scale. 75

    Appendix 3: Checklist for recording aggression of football players. 78

    Appendix 4: Errors and inappropriate behaviors. 79

     

     

    Source:

     

     

    Internal sources and sources

    1. Abolghasemi, Abbas; Kiamarshi, Azar; Aryapouran, Saeed; Dartaj, Fariborz. (1385). Examining the relationship between role ambiguity, role conflict and competitive anxiety with sports performance and academic achievement of student athletes. Research and planning in higher education, 12, 39-54.

    2. Adibi, Zahra; Golparvar, Mohsen; Mosahebi, Mohammadreza. (2011). Examining the relationship between job demands, job resources and job control with employees' deviant behaviors: a case study of South Zagros Oil and Gas Company. Industrial Management Quarterly, Faculty of Human Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Sanandaj Branch, 22, 108-116.

    3. Regulations for the transfer of Premier League football players. (2012). Taken from the official site of the Football Federation.

    4. Hajbeigi, Mohammad Reza; Masoudi, AhmedHajbeigi, Mohammad Reza; Masoudi, Ahmad Reza. (1385). Violence and aggression in football and ways to control it. Security Quarterly, 1(2), 73-116.

     

    5. Hafeznia, Mohammadreza. (1382). An introduction to the research method in humanities, Tehran, organization for the study and editing of university humanities books (SAT), 8th edition, p. 344.

    6. Hojatpour, Seyyed Mohammad Reza. (1390). Mental preparation of football player, http://.moshavereman.persianblog.ir

    7. Khademi, Alireza. (1387). Sociological investigation of violence and aggression of spectators in stadiums. Social security studies, 16, 47-72.

    8. Delaware, Ali. (1384). Theoretical and practical foundations of research in humanities and social sciences, Tehran: Rushd Publications, p. 432.

    9. Rajabzadeh, Ahmed. (1385). Sociology (1), Tehran: Iran Textbook Publishing Company, fifth edition, pp: 16-37.

    10. Rahimi, Qasim; Ahmadian, Mahdi. (1383). Investigating and comparing the level of aggression among student athletes in selected disciplines. Knowledge and research in applied psychology, 21 and 22, 227-237.

    11. Ramzaninejad, Rahim; Rahmaniya, Farhad; Broumanddulaq, Mohammad Reza. (1385). Investigating the incidence of aggressive behavior of Pegah football team players in the competitions of Iran's professional football league. Journal of Sports Management (Movement), 1, 101-107.

    12. Zare, Hossein; Talebi, Saeed; Saif, Mohammad Hassan. (1389). Advanced inferential statistics, Tehran: Payam Noor University Press, first edition, p: 2.

    13. Selahshuri, Farida; Qatnian, Sepideh. (1390). The relationship between aggression, self-efficacy and sports performance. National conference of new scientific achievements in the development of sports and physical education, 334-341.

    14. Talai, Reza; Hosseinpour, Iskandar. (2011). Aggression among student athletes. Growth of physical education education, 4, 52-54.

    15. Golparvar, Mohsen; Niri, sweet; Mehdad, Ali. (1389). The relationship between stress, emotional burnout and organizational deviant behaviors in Zob Ahan Joint Stock Company: evidence for the stress-burnout (imbalance)-compensation model. New findings in psychology, 2(8), 19-34.

    16. Golparvar, Mohsen; Vathaghi, Zahra; Javadian, Zahra. (1390). structural patterns of the relationship between job stress and emotional exhaustion with positive and negative behaviors; New and extensive evidence of the Iranian stress-imbalance-compensation approach. New findings in psychology, 19, 7-18.

     

    17. Mohseni Tabrizi, Alireza; Rahmati, Mohammad Mehdi. (1381). Satisfying the concepts and theories of violence, aggressiveness and aggression in order to build and present a causal-descriptive model of violence in sports. Journal of Social Sciences, 19, 125-154. 18. Maleki, Behnam; Mohammadzadeh, Hassan; Qavami, Akbar. (2011). The effect of emotional intelligence training on aggression, stress and psychological well-being of elite athletes. Motor Behavior, 11, 177-190.

    19. Vaez Mousavi, Mohammad Kazem; Moseibi, Fathullah. (1390). Sports psychology. Tehran: Organization for the study and compilation of humanities books of universities (Samt), third edition, pp: 324-332.

    20. Hemtinjad, Mehr Ali; Rahmaniya, Farhad; Salehi, Cyrus; Kialashki, Rashad. (1379). Investigating factors of aggression in sports fields from the point of view of athletes, spectators and physical education specialists. Olympic Quarterly, 18, 39-46. Argyle, M. (1993). Bodily Communication. Routledge: Published by Methuen Publishing, pp. 107-112.

     

    22. Bahlekeh, T., Tojari, F., Zarei, A., Ashraf Ganjooee, F. (2013). The Relationships Among Role Ambiguity, Team Cohesion, Role Acceptance and Role Satisfaction of Basketball Players. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, 13(10): 1280-1285.

     

    23. Baron, R. and Byren, D. (1994). Social psychology, Allyn and Bacon, pp. 81-86.

     

    24. Bauer, T. N., & Green, S. G. (1994). Effect of newcomer involvement in work-related activities: Longitudinal study of socialization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 211–223. 25. Beauchamp, M. R., & Bray, S. R. (2001). Role ambiguity and role conflict within interdependent teams. Small Group Research, 32, 133-157. 26. Beauchamp, M. R., Bray, S. R., Eys, M. A., & Carron, A. V. (2002).

The relationship between role ambiguity and the level of aggression in football players of the Iranian Premier League