Investigating the quality of life in urban areas (case study of five cities of Karaj)

Number of pages: 133 File Format: word File Code: 30423
Year: 2014 University Degree: Master's degree Category: Geography - Urban Planning
  • Part of the Content
  • Contents & Resources
  • Summary of Investigating the quality of life in urban areas (case study of five cities of Karaj)

    Dissertation

    To obtain Master's degree

    Department of Geography and Urban Planning

    Abstract:

    The quality of urban life is one of the most important areas of urban studies in different countries. This is important because of the growing importance of quality of life studies in monitoring public policies and its role as an efficient tool in urban management and planning. Urban areas are the main centers of economic, social and political growth in any country and have proven themselves as the most attractive points for creating wealth, work, creativity and innovation. But at the same time, these areas also face important challenges in terms of physical and environmental destruction, social exclusion, insecurity, unemployment, lack of housing, traffic and marginalization, which greatly reduce the quality of urban life. The main purpose of the current research is to evaluate the quality of life in urban areas in five cities of Karaj. In this research, using a field survey study and a descriptive-analytical research method, it first collected field data from citizens using a questionnaire tool (N=383), and its reliability was confirmed with Cronbach's alpha of 0.80. Then for the analysis, appropriate statistical tests were used in the form of spss software, Pearson correlation tests, one-sample t-test, and Friedman's test were used to rank the indicators. The results show that the highest averages in the objective dimension are related to the index of the residential environment with an average of 2.70 and in the subjective dimension are related to the index of interaction and social solidarity with an average of 4.47. Also, the findings obtained from Friedman's test show that Friedman's ranking has an almost adequate status, such that the mentioned indicators of interactions and social solidarity with an average rating of 8.22, feeling of security or 6.61, leisure time with 5.78 have the highest rating averages, and the other two indicators of employment and income with 3.85 and education with 2.80 have scored lower. It was accepted that the most important factors affecting the quality of life in the region are five indicators related to the quality of interaction and social solidarity. In other words, in the discussion of the quality of urban life in the Panj region, a total of 9 indicators were investigated, and it was found that the indicators with a high average rank are often indicators related to the quality of interaction and social solidarity of life. Key words: quality of life, objective dimension, subjective dimension, urban areas, Panj Karaj region 1-1- Introduction (problem statement) For centuries, people have been naturally looking for a good life and in this In order to improve their living conditions, they tried to make maximum use of their talents and capabilities. Therefore, the main issue was always how to live a desirable and high-quality life. (Ong, 2014, 23). One of the most important phenomena today is urbanization and its transformation process, so that in the last three decades it has reached a level that has not been experienced in years. In other words, during the last thirty years, the urban population has more than doubled in the world. According to the predictions of the United Nations, in the next thirty years, this phenomenon will be repeated in urban areas and in developing countries, so that the urban population in these areas of the world will reach the threshold of 4 billion people in 2030, from 1.9 billion people in 2000. While in the rest of the world, i.e. advanced industrial countries, the figure of 900 million will reach one billion people in the same period of time (hardi, 2006:18). Urban areas are the main centers of economic, social and political growth in any country and have proven themselves to be the most attractive places for creating wealth, work, creativity and innovation. But at the same time, these areas also face important challenges in terms of physical and environmental destruction, social exclusion, insecurity, unemployment, lack of housing, traffic and marginalization, which greatly reduce the quality of urban life. Nevertheless, policymakers and planners at the international and national levels emphasize the ability of cities to improve the quality of human life (Donald, 2001:13). The study of the quality of life in urban areas has received wide attention in recent years. Researchers from various fields such as urban planning, geography, sociology, economics, psychology, political science, marketing and management have participated in this field. But these studies are different in many aspects such as the scale of the study, the territories used and the methods of measuring the quality of life.In this way, various methods have been used to study the quality of life in urban areas. However, until now, a comprehensive framework for studying the quality of life in an integrated and holistic manner and relying on physical, spatial and social indicators has not been provided (Kamp et al, 2003:5). Quality of life is often measured using objective indicators or subjective indicators and rarely using both types of indicators (Rizvani et al., 2017: 37). Subjective indicators are obtained from surveys of institutions, evaluations and residents' satisfaction with urban life, while objective indicators are related to observable facts and are often obtained from secondary data. According to the mentioned contents, the quality of urban life is one of the most important areas of urban studies in different countries. This is important because of the increasing importance of quality of life studies in monitoring public policies and its role as an efficient tool in urban management and planning. Karaj city is one of the most important cities in the country. Due to the new establishment of Alborz province, the cities of this province, especially Karaj city, have undergone many civil and urban development changes. The city of Karaj with a population of more than one million shows the capabilities of this city to settle and attract people. In the meantime, one of the most important topics for city officials to plan and provide better services to citizens is measuring the quality of life of citizens in their place of residence. Considering that the city of Karaj has twelve regions and the reason for choosing the fifth region is that this region is one of the most immigrant-friendly regions of Karaj city, where many Iranian ethnic groups are present, which shows the importance of this region compared to other regions. Therefore, it is very important and necessary to measure and examine the quality of life of the citizens of Panj region in two subjective and objective dimensions for the city officials and also to use these results to plan for the future of the Panj region. According to the said content, the following questions are raised for us: How is it?

    3- What are the most important factors affecting the quality of life in the five regions?

    1-2- The necessity and importance of research

    Reviewing the research literature shows that there is a general agreement among researchers, policymakers and planners regarding the need to study the quality of life in urban areas. These studies often have key functions such as informing citizens, social groups, and policy makers about quality of life trends. The results of quality of life studies can help to evaluate policies, place rankings, develop management strategies and urban planning, and facilitate the understanding and prioritization of social issues for urban planners and managers in order to improve the quality of life of citizens. Also, the quality of life findings can be used to re-examine previous political strategies and design future planning policies (Lee, 2008:1207). In addition, quality of life studies can help identify problematic areas, causes of people's dissatisfaction, citizens' priorities in life, the impact of socio-demographic factors on quality of life, and monitoring and evaluating the effectiveness of policies and strategies in the field of quality of life. In this regard, Santos and Martins point out that the participation of the local community in quality of life studies can be an important support for determining policies and long-term goals (Rafiian and Askari: 1386, 1389).

    Urbanization is growing rapidly in our country, and based on the results of the population census in 1385, more than 68% of it is urban (Iranian Statistics Center, 1385: 1). This is despite the fact that about a century ago, only 10% of the country's population lived in cities. However, the opportunities, resources and facilities required for the development and provision of human needs are not properly provided in the cities and with problems such as high density, poverty, lack of health, unemployment and fake jobs, disorder, instability, lack of identity and so on. They live in very unfavorable conditions. In addition, not many studies have been conducted on the quality of urban life in Iran, which is one of the important motives for conducting this study. This research can provide useful information in the field of improving the methodology of studying the quality of life in the urban areas of Iran in order to improve the quality of life of the citizens.

  • Contents & References of Investigating the quality of life in urban areas (case study of five cities of Karaj)

    List:

    Chapter One

    1-1- Introduction (problem statement). 2

    1-2- Necessity and importance of research. 4

    1-3- research objectives. 5

    1-4- research assumptions. 5

    1-5- indicators and variables of quality of life. 6

    1-6- Research background. 10

    1-7- Research method. 12

    1-7-1- navigation method. 12

    1-7-2- descriptive-analytical method. 13

    1-8- Statistical population, sampling method and determination of sample size. 14

    1-9- Selecting a sample from among the citizens of Panj Karaj region. 15

    1-10- Information gathering methods. 16

    1-10-1- documentary and library method. 16

    1-10-2- Field studies. 17

    1-10-3- Questionnaire method. 17

    1-11- Application of research achievements. 18

    Chapter Two

    2-1- Introduction. 20

    2-2- Quality of life. 21

    2-2-1- The concept of quality. 21

    2-2-2- The concept of quality of life. 22

    2-3- Approaches to the quality of urban life. 24

    2-3-1- Mental quality of life. 24

    2-3-2- objective quality of life. 26

    2-4- The relationship between subjective and objective quality of life. 26

    2-5- structural models of quality of life. 28

    2-6- Construction (combination) of quality of life. 28

    2-9- Quality of life indicators. 29

    2-9-1- Indicators of economic dimensions of quality of life. 29

    2-9-2- indicators of political dimensions of quality of life. 29

    2-9-3- Indicators of environmental dimensions of quality of life. 30

    2-9-4- Indicators of dimensions of health and quality of life education. 31

    2-9-5- indicators of social dimensions of quality of life. 31

    2-10- Literature and research background. 36

     

    Chapter Three

    Introduction. 40

    3-1- Geographical location of Karaj city: 40

    3-2- Name of Karaj city: 40

    3-3- Introducing the five regions of Karaj city. 41

    3-4- Public use of land in Panj Karaj area. 45

    3-5- Studying geological formations, tectonics, tectonics and determining the exact location of important or possible faults. 47

    3-6- Climatology studies of the region. 48

    3-7- Studying and identifying the potential sources of surface and underground water pollutants in the region. 49

    3-8- Quantitative physical characteristics of the whole city. 50

    3-9- Introducing the facilities of area five. 52

    3-10- Tarbar fruit market. 53

    3-11- Mosques. 53

    3-12- Police station and police station. 54

    3-13- Sports halls. 56

    3-14- Library. 56

    3-15- Clinics and schools 56

    3-16- Pharmacy. 57

    3-17- Schools. 57

    3-18- Banks 58

    3-19- Research indicators. 60

    3-20- validity - reliability of the questionnaire. 63

    Chapter Four

    Introduction. 66

    4-1- Findings from questionnaires (findings related to demographic characteristics). 66

    4-1-1- gender characteristics of respondents. 67

    4-1-2- marital characteristics and celibacy of respondents. 68

    4-1-3- age characteristics of respondents. 69

    4-1-4- Characteristics of respondents' education level. 71

    4-1-5- The characteristics of the occupational groups of the respondents. 73

    4-1-6- Income characteristics of respondents. 74

    4-2- Findings from the analytical questions of research questionnaires. 75

    4-2-1- Findings from the quality of life questionnaire (objective dimension). 76

    4-2-2- Examining the status of health and hygiene index variables in the fifth region. 77

    4-2-3- Investigating the status of environmental quality index variables in the fifth region. 79

    4-2-4- Investigating the status of variables of the residential environment quality index in Panj region. 80

    4-2-5- Investigating the status of infrastructure quality index variables in region five. 82

    4-2-6- Examining the status of employment and income quality variables in region five. 83

    4-3- Findings from the quality of life questionnaire (mental dimension). 85

    4-3-1- Examining the status of education quality index variables in region five. 86

    4-3-2- Examining the status of security quality index variables in region five. 88

    4-3-3- Examining the status of leisure time quality index variables in five regions. 89

    4-3-4- Examining the status of the index variables of the quality of interaction and social solidarity in the fifth region. 90

    4-4- Summary. 92

    Chapter Five

    5-1- Introduction. 94

    5-2- Analysis process. 94

    5-4- Proof of research assumptions. 95

    5-4-1- The first hypothesis. 95

    5-5- The second hypothesis.98

    5-6- The third hypothesis. 101

    5-7- Conclusion. 103

    5-8- Research suggestions. 108

    Sources and sources. 110

    Questionnaire attachment. 116

     

    Source:

    Ahmadi, Fatemeh: 1388, the upgrading of villages to cities and its role in improving the quality of life of local residents (case: village-city of Saheb, Saqqez city), master's thesis in geography and rural planning, University of Tehran.

    Smith, David. 1381) Quality of life: human well-being and social justice, translated by: Hossein Hataminejad and Hikmat Shah Ardabili, Journal of Political and Economic Information, year 17, numbers 185 and 186

    Behfroz, Fatemeh, 1385, philosophy and methodology of scientific research in geography, 4th edition, Tehran University of Publishing and Printing Institute.

    Pour Taheri, Mehdi and Iftikhari, Abdul Reza Ruknuddin and Fatahi, Ahad A. , 1389, evaluation of the quality of life in rural areas (case study: North Khaveh village, Lorestan province) Journal of human geography research, number 75, winter 1390, pp. 13-31.

    Hajinejad, Ali and Rafiyan, Mojtabi and Zamani, Hossein (1389) investigation of individual variables affecting citizens' satisfaction with the quality of life (case study: comparison of the old and new context of Shiraz), Geography and Development, No. 17

    Khwarizmi, Shahin Dokht, quality of life and the requirements of the digital age in Iran, Duniya Ekhtaz newspaper, dated 9, 10, 11 and 12/11/1383

    J.R. Kelly (1382) "Leisure, work and leisure theories in social systems". Javad Mahdizadeh translation.  Shahr Sazi Quarterly Journal, No. 6.

    Ong, Nazmohammed (2004). Examining the relationship between social capital and quality of life, master's thesis, Tehran Faculty of Social Sciences. Hafiz Nia, Mohammad Reza, 1381, an introduction to research methods in human sciences, Tehran, Samt Publications. Urban and regional research. First year, number two, pp. 110-87. Rafiyan, Mojtabi and Ahmadi, Hassan and Orang, Melahat (2008) An introduction to post-disaster reconstruction and the requirements for improving the quality of the residential environment, presented at the third international conference on comprehensive crisis management in unexpected events. Indicators of the quality of urban life, a case study of Noorabad city, Lorestan province, Journal of urban studies and research, first year, second issue.

    Rizvani, Mohammad Reza and Hossein Mansoorian; Measuring the quality of life: examining concepts, indicators and models and presenting a proposed model for rural areas; Village and Development Quarterly; year 11; number 3; Fall 2017.

    Rizvani, Mohammad Reza, Ali Akbar Matkan, Hossein Mansourian and Mohammad Hossein Sattari, (2008), development and measurement of urban life quality indicators, a case study of Noorabad city, Lorestan province, Journal of Urban Studies and Research, first year, number 2.

    Rizvani, Mohammad Reza, Alireza Shakiba, Hossein Mansourian (2008); Assessing the quality of life in rural areas; Social Welfare Quarterly; eighth year; No. 30 and 31; Autumn and winter 2017.

    Rizvani, Mohammad Reza, 2017, evaluation of the policy of developing settlements in Iran, first edition, Tehran, Shervin Publications.

    Rizvani, Mohammad Reza, determination and analysis of the levels of prosperity in rural areas of Zanjan province, Geographical Researches, volume 36, number 1.

    Rafiyan, Mojtabi and Askari, Ali (2016) the concept and method of measuring quality Urban environment, presented at Islamic Azad University, Research Sciences Unit, Tehran

    Rizvani, Ali Asghar, 1374, interrelationships between the city and the countryside with an emphasis on Iran, second edition, Tehran, Payam Noor University

    Kukbi, Afshin (1384), planning to improve the quality of urban life in the city center (case study of the central area of ??Khorramabad), Master's thesis, Department of Urban Planning, Faculty of Art, Tarbiat Modares University.

    Kokbi, Afshin and Pour Jafar, Mohammad Reza and Taqvai Ali Akbar (1384) Planning the quality of urban life in urban centers, definitions and indicators, Urban Planning Essays, number 12.

    Golkar, Korosh, (1380) The concept of quality of life in urban design, Shahid Beheshti University's Sefe Journal, number forty-four.

    Golkar, Korosh (1378) Exploration in Definition of urban design, Publications of the Center for Urban Planning and Architecture Studies and Research.

Investigating the quality of life in urban areas (case study of five cities of Karaj)