Evaluation of urban quality of life indicators in Kermanshah (case study of Region 2 of Kermanshah Municipality)

Number of pages: 158 File Format: word File Code: 30416
Year: 2014 University Degree: Master's degree Category: Geography - Urban Planning
  • Part of the Content
  • Contents & Resources
  • Summary of Evaluation of urban quality of life indicators in Kermanshah (case study of Region 2 of Kermanshah Municipality)

    Dissertation for Master Degree in Geography and Urban Planning (M.A)

    Abstract

    Quality of life as a concept to show the level of satisfaction of a person with life and in other words a measure to determine the satisfaction and dissatisfaction of individuals and groups, from different aspects of life. The quality of urban life is one of the most important areas of urban studies in different countries. This is important because of the increasing importance of quality of life studies in monitoring urban planning policies and its role as an efficient tool in urban management and planning. Therefore, the city, as the living environment of urban dwellers, needs to provide standards that can be called quality of life standards at a glance. The term quality of life is more related to the natural environment and external conditions of people's lives, such as pollution, quality of housing, aesthetic aspects, density, prevalence of crime, and the like. The purpose of this research is to investigate and evaluate the quality of urban life in Region 2 of Kermanshah Municipality. The analysis method is descriptive-analytical. To collect information, library and survey methods using questionnaires were used to measure the quality of life in the region. In order to analyze data and test hypotheses, statistical methods of single-sample T-test, factor analysis and SPSS software were used. The quality of urban life is usually measured through subjective indicators obtained from the survey and evaluation of citizens' perceptions and satisfaction with urban life or by using objective indicators. The results of this research show that the level of citizens' satisfaction with the quality of their living environment in physical dimensions is not optimal. At the end, some suggestions have been presented to improve the situation of this area.

    Key words: quality of life, urban environment, T-test, factor analysis, region 2 of Kermanshah

    Chapter 1

    Research overview

    Introduction

    Today, the importance of urban residential environments as the main residences of people is increasing day by day. So that these environments are primarily an important tool for the development of various life indicators such as health, family, work or leisure. provide Second, a large population lives in heavily urbanized areas or will live in the near future, so special attention should be paid to the quality of their living environment (Rafiian, 1391:10). The quality of the environment is not only concerned with the fulfillment of human material needs, but it also considers the provision and promotion of social and developmental capacities of communities based on social behavior patterns. Therefore, improving and improving the quality of the residential environment has become one of the main goals of policy makers and urban planners in monitoring public policies (Khadem al-Hosseini and others, 1389: 1) The quality of the urban residential environment is usually through subjective indicators resulting from the survey and evaluation of citizens' perceptions and satisfaction with urban life and their residential environment; or measured using objective indicators obtained from secondary data; In order to achieve a systematic assessment of the level of satisfaction and benefit of the citizens from the environmental, social, cultural, economic and physical features of the residential environment. Based on this, in this research, we aim to connect urban planning with an interdisciplinary concept and through increasing communication with citizens, we will inquire about their mental image regarding the quality of their living environment. Therefore, first of all, the criteria and components of the quality of the urban living environment have been recognized with an emphasis on the mental image of the citizens of Region 2 of Kermanshah Municipality. 1- 1- Statement of the problem The quality of the urban environment is a measure to evaluate the conditions of the residential environment that bring the least benefit for urban life, and the effective factors can be the amount and manner of social services, the type of hierarchy in major and service uses. He mentioned the city, social security in urban spaces, how to access urban spaces, the location of the main uses and spaces of the city in the context of the city, the urban environment, the performance of different departments in the city, the ongoing activities in the urban environment, attention to the identity and native culture of the residents, etc. The important reason for such attention to (the concept of) quality with regard to urban planning and design simultaneously and interactively is one of the solutions that can improve the functional quality in urban spaces.. The quality parameters of the urban environment to examine the expected results of the planning process, after comparing different theories and analyzing them and taking into account the commonalities and differences between the elements that make up the quality of the urban environment such as the theories of Jane Jacobs, Lynch, Bentley, DETR, Cremona and John Panter, finally six indicators were considered. These indicators include permeability [1], diversity [2], safety and security [3], flexibility [4], inclusiveness [5] and vitality [6]. According to Kanter's model, the qualities of the urban environment consist of the qualities related to the body, activity and imagination. Functional quality emerges from the combination of physical and activity qualities (Golkar, 2010: 56).  However, there is little agreement among urban planners and policymakers about the definition of the quality of life, the individual components that comprise the quality of life (the quality of life is obtained from their sum and interaction) and the way through which special programs improve the quality of life. At the same time, many urban planning reports and projects refer to the concept of quality of urban life, either as a result of the project or as a review of the existing situation (Latfi, 1388: 68).

    The urban strategy of the World Bank (1999) for third world cities is focused on the four basic characteristics of livability, competitiveness, good governance and bankruptcies; He considers these four factors to be involved in increasing the welfare of the residents of these cities (Baskha et al., 1389:98).  In the latest ranking according to the quality of life index among the countries of the world in 2014, unfortunately, Iran was ranked 51st in the world, which is also in a very unfavorable position in the Asian continent. (Refer to the ranking table of the countries of the world in terms of quality of life indicators in 2014 on the website www.economic.com) and Kermanshah province among the provinces of Iran in 1991, with a quality of life rating of -1.48, was placed in the low quality of life rank and ranked 22nd among the 25 provinces under investigation (Mozen 1391: 1391). In general, according to the field research and information obtained from the municipality and related authorities and comparing it with the standards introduced by reliable sources, the quality of life in the neighborhoods of Kermanshah Municipality Region 2 is at a low level due to various reasons, and it is necessary to carry out comprehensive research in all specialties in order to serve urban development planning.

    1-2- The importance and necessity of conducting research

    It can help to identify problematic areas, people's dissatisfaction, citizens' priorities in life, the impact of social factors - population on the quality of life and monitoring and evaluating the effectiveness of policies and strategies in the field of quality of life (Sadeeqah Lotfi, 1388: 66). It has been noted that the quality of life is used to determine the satisfaction and dissatisfaction of individuals and groups from different aspects of life. Nowadays, the quality of life is the main goal of all the plans prepared by thinkers and planners (Qalibaf et al., 2013: 31).

    The quality of life of city residents is closely related to the sustainable development of cities. Sustainable development emphasizes all aspects of development (environment, economy and society) in human society. Considering the inherent complexity of cities and their various dimensions of influence, it seems essential to know the main and key factors in order to achieve urban sustainability. In this regard, the satisfaction of city dwellers with the current state of cities, paying attention to their demands and needs can help city managers in achieving greater sustainability of cities, especially social sustainability (Hosseinzadeh Delir et al. 2018: 2). A healthy city means healthy people and both will lead to a healthy and dynamic society. Urbanization is considered as one of the important factors affecting the personal and social health of citizens, in such a way that the health of people is largely influenced by their socio-economic and environmental status and depends on the plans and goals that the city has planned for them, and the improvement of the quality of urban life is also dependent on health. Improving the level of health is accepted as the axis of development of societies and according to the goals of the Ottawa Charter, it is the ultimate goal of all governments. Quality of life findings can be used to re-identify previous political strategies and design future planning policies. Improving the quality of life in any society is one of the most important goals of the public policies of that society (Ghadami and Motamed 2013:50-33).

  • Contents & References of Evaluation of urban quality of life indicators in Kermanshah (case study of Region 2 of Kermanshah Municipality)

    List:

    Chapter One: General Research Design

    Introduction. 3

    1- 1- Statement of the problem. 3

    1-2- The importance and necessity of conducting research. 5

    1-3- review of relevant literature and records. 6

    1-4- Goals (including general and practical goals) 9

    1-4-1- General goal. 9

    1-5- Application of research results. 10

    1-6- Research questions. 10

    1-7- research hypotheses. 10

    1-8- Research problems and limitations. 10

    1-9- Definitions of words and concepts. 11

    1-9-1- neighborhood. 11

    1-9-2- Indicators 11

    1-9-3- Quality. 11

    1-9-4- quality of life. 11

    1-9-5- Kermanshah city 12

    Chapter two: theoretical foundations

    Introduction. 14

    2-1- Origin of the city and urbanization. 15

    2-1-1- The first stage of the transformation and growth of cities from 1300 to 1320. 15

    2-1-2- The second stage of transformation and growth of cities from 1320 to 1341. 16

    2-1-3- The third stage of the rapid growth of urbanization until the Islamic Revolution. 17

    2-1-4- The fourth stage is the continuation of the rapid urbanization after the Islamic revolution. 17

    2-2- urban space and its dimensions. 18

    2-2-1- The influence of urban spaces on different aspects of a city. 19

    2-2-2- The impact of urban spaces on the appearance and body of a city. 19

    2-2-3- The impact of urban spaces on the cultural and social aspects of a city. 20

    2-3- The process of reconstruction and formation of metropolitan areas. 20

    2-3-1- The tradition of visual aesthetics in urban design. 22

    2-3-2- The tradition of creating an urban place. 22

    2-4- Definition of metropolis. 23

    2-4-1- The history of the emergence of the metropolis. 24

    2-4-2- Characteristics of big cities 24

    2-4-2-1- Dominance of rationality and calculation in cities 24

    2-4-2-2- Complexity of big cities 25

    2-4-2-3- Boredom and monotony. 25

    2-4-2-4- Caution, conservatism in the metropolis. 25

    2-4-2-5- Metropolis, center of modern culture evolution. 25

    2-4-2-6- Inhomogeneity and heterogeneity of cities 26

    2-4-2-7- Density and environmental pollution. 26

    2-4-2-8- Cultural delay and lack of coordination between man and machine. 26

    2-5- The history of the origin of the concept of quality of life. 26

    2-5-1-quality of urban life. 28

    2-5-2- The concept of quality of life. 30

    2-6- Theories of quality of life. 33

    2-6-1- Quality of life due to wealth. 33

    2-6-2- Quality of life caused by communication. 34

    2-6-3- The quality of life is caused by the quality of being. 34

    2-6-4- Quality of urban life and planning. 34

    2-7- Perspectives on the quality of life. 36

    2-7-1- School of structuralism. 36

    2-7-2- school of reformism. 37

    2-7-3- Opinions of contemporary urban designers about environmental qualities. 37

    2-7-4- Urban environment quality classification models. 38

    2-7-4- 1- Lang model: human needs. 38

    2-7-4-2- Appleyard model: modes of human perception. 39

    2-7-4- 3- "Counter" model: components of "place" 39

    2-8- Basic dimensions in models for measuring the quality of urban life. 39

    2-8-1- Quality of life and its three dimensions. 41

    2-8-2- Indicators for measuring the quality of urban life. 43

    2-9- Planning. 46

    2-10- Perspectives of sustainable urban development with respect to the environment. 46

    2-10-1- Definition of the World Food Organization (FAO) 47

    2-10-2- Theories of regional development. 47

    2-10-3- Regionalization method. 48

    2-10-4- Homogeneous areas. 48

    2-10-5- functional areas. 49

    2-10-6- Planning areas. 49

    2-10-7- Systems theory 51

    2-11- Definition and concept of environmental performance evaluation. 51

    2-11-1- The concept of environmental assessment. 53

    2-11-2- Objectives, performance and evaluation criteria. 53

    2-11-3- Evaluation of the environment. 54

    2-11-4- The concept of evaluation. 55

    2-12- Urban management and public participation. 57

    2-12-1- Participation and urban development. 58

    2-12-1-1- The concept of participation. 58

    2-12-1-2- Participation levels. 59

    2-12-1-3- Necessity and importance of participation in development. 60

    2-13- Communication planning theory. 62

    2-13-1- Spatial planning. 63

    2-13-2- Spatial structure. 64

    2-13-3- Spatial organization. 64

    Chapter Three: Materials and Methods

    Introduction. 66

    3-1- Geographical features of Kermanshah 66

    3-1-1- General geological and tectonic features of Zagros. 68

    3-1-2-68

    3-1-2- Topographical and geomorphological features of Kermanshah city 70

    3-2- Status of water resources in Kermanshah province 71

    3-2-1- Hydrological status of Kermanshah city 72

    3-2-1-1- Qarasu river. 72

    3-2-2- Climatic and atmospheric characteristics. 73

    3-2-3- Temperature and its changes. 74

    3-2-4- Rainfall and its amount. 75

    3-2-5- wind. 77

    3-2-6- Evaporation. 78

    3-2-7- The number of frost days. 79

    3-3- Geological issues. 79

    3-3-1- Geology of Kermanshah city and its surroundings. 79

    3-3-2- Air pollution 81

    3-3-3- Investigating the tectonic characteristics of the earth (seismic status of the region) 81

    3-3-4- The effect of weather on the natural and human face of the province. 82

    3-5- Human and historical characteristics of the region. 83

    3-5-1- Kermanshah city 84

    3-5-2- Population of the province. 85

    3-6- Physical development of Kermanshah in the new era of urbanization in Iran. 87

    3-6-1- Urban life. 88

    3-6-2- race. 89

    3-6-3- dialect language. 89

    3-6-3-1- Kalhari dialect. 90

    3-6-3-2- Orami Kurdish dialect. 90

    3-6-3-3- Sorani Kurdish dialect. 90

    3-6-3-4- Lekki dialect. 90

    3-7- Traditional arts of Kermanshah 90

    3-7-1- Carpet weaving. 91

    3-7-2- Wave weaving. 91

    3-7-3- Jajim Bafi. 92

    3-7-4- carpet weaving. 92

    3-7-5- Financial felt. 92

    3-8- The economic situation of Kermanshah province 93

    3-8-1- Industry and production. 93

    3-8-1- Religious and cultural. 93

    3-8-1- Health and treatment 94

    3-9- Research methodology. 94

    3-9-1- Full description of the research method according to the purpose, type of data and implementation method 94

    3-9-2- Expression of the studied variables in the form of a conceptual model. 94

    3-9-3- Data collection methods 95

    3-9-4- Sampling method and plan. 95

    3-10- Checking the reliability and validity of the measurement tool. 96

    3-10-1- Questionnaire validity. 96

    3-10-2- Questionnaire reliability. 97

    3-11- Information analysis method. 97

    Chapter Four: Experiment and Data Analysis

    Introduction. 100

    4-1- Information and descriptive statistics of the statistical community. 100

    4-1-2- Distribution of respondents according to age. 100

    4-1-3- Distribution of respondents by gender. 101

    4-1-4- Distribution of respondents by occupation. 101

    4-1-5- Distribution of respondents according to the level of education. 102

    4-1-6- Distribution of respondents according to house ownership (type of building residence) 102

    4-1-7- Distribution of respondents according to marital status. 103

    4-2- Measurement indicators. 104

    4-2-1- Indicators 104

    4-3- Inferential findings. 105

    4-3-1- Objective indicators of quality of urban life. 105

    4-3-2- Subjective indicators of quality of urban life. 108

    4-3-2- 1- mental indicators in the physical dimension. 109

    4-3-2-2- Mental indicators in the economic dimension. 109

    4-3-2-3- Mental indicators in the social dimension. 110

    4-3-3- Comparison of the subjective indicators of the quality of the urban environment in different dimensions. 111

    4-4- Examining effective factors using factor analysis. 111

    4-4-1- Factor analysis method. 111

    4-4-2-Exploratory analysis of factors 113

    4-4-3- Validity of factor analysis. 115

    4-4-4- Preparation of data matrix 116

    4-4-5- Calculation of correlation matrix. 116

    4-4-6- extraction of factors 116

    4-4-7- rotation of factors 118

    4-4-8- naming factors 119

    4-4-8-1- first factor. 120

    4-4-8-2- the second factor. 120

    4-4-8-3- the third factor. 121

    4-4-8-4- the fourth factor. 122

    The fifth chapter: hypothesis test and conclusion

    Introduction. 125

    5-1- Findings obtained from research hypotheses. 125

    5-1-1- The first research hypothesis. 125

    5-1-2- The second research hypothesis. 127

    5-2- Conclusions and suggestions 128

    Source:

    Meteorological Department of Kermanshah Province, (2013), report of annual meteorological and climate data of the province.

    Akbari, Esmail, Amini, Mehdi, (2013), Quality of Urban Life in Iran, Social Welfare Quarterly, Year 10, Number 36. Altman, Ayron, (1382), environment and social behavior (privacy of personal space, territory and crowding), translated by Ali Namazian, Shahid Beheshti University Press, Tehran

Evaluation of urban quality of life indicators in Kermanshah (case study of Region 2 of Kermanshah Municipality)