Contents & References of GIS evaluation of the vulnerability of urban housing against earthquakes using AHP (a case study of worn-out fabric of Minab city)
List:
1 first chapter. 8
1-1. Introduction. 9
1-2. State the problem. 9
Main research questions. 10
1-3. The importance and necessity of research. 10
1-4. Research background. 36
1-5. Research hypotheses. 11
1-6. The main objectives of the research. 11
1-7. General summary. 11
2 Chapter Two. 12
2-1. Cities and natural hazards 13
2-2. Earthquake risk in cities 13
2-2-1. Earthquake risk. 13
2-2-2. Vulnerability in earthquakes. 14
2-2-3. Earthquake crisis: 14
2-3. Types of crisis. 15
2-4. Earthquake and the resulting crisis. 15
2-5. Seismic sources. 16
2-6. The intensity and magnitude of the earthquake. 16
2-7. Earthquake damages and losses. 16
2-7-1. Damages on land: 17
2-7-2. Damage to structures 17
2-7-2-1. Damage to buildings 18
2-7-2-2. Damage to non-building structures. 18
2-7-2-3. Damage to vital arteries. 18
2-7-2-4. Damages caused by secondary accidents. 18
2-8. Physical expansion of cities and increased vulnerability. 18
2-8-1. Urban safety. 19
2-8-2. Urban vulnerability. 20
2-8-3. City structure. 20
2-8-4. City fabric. 21
2-9. Erosion and wear and tear. 23
2-10. Effective factors in the seismic vulnerability of cities 23
2-10-1. Physical vulnerability analysis. 25
2-11. Urban planning and the vulnerability of cities 25
2-12. The relationship between land use and earthquake vulnerability. 26
2-13. Crisis management. 27
2-14. The role of GIS in crisis management. 28
2-14-1. GIS and mitigation phase. 29
2-14-2. GIS and preparation phase. 29
2-14-3. GIS and response phase. 29
2-14-4. GIS and reconstruction phase. 30
2-15. The role of urban planning in crisis management (earthquake) 30
2-16. decision making 30
2-16-1. Spatial decision making. 31
2-16-1-1. Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) 31
2-16-1-1-1. Discrete and continuous models. 33
2-16-1-1-2. Compensatory and non-compensatory models. 33
2-16-1-1-3. Individual and group examples. 33
2-17. Weighting methods: 34
2-17-1. Hierarchical analysis process (AHP. 34
2-18. Fuzzy sets and fuzzy complications. 35
3 Chapter 3. 42
3-1. The geographical location of Minab city. 43
3-1-1. Natural and geological features of the region. 44
3-1-2. Climate of Minab city. 3-2. Earthquake-related problems. 3-4. General classification of Minab's worn-out structures. 47. p> 3-5. 3-5. Review of urban infrastructure 49. 3-8. 51
3-8. Data collection
3-9. Selection of vulnerability assessment methods
3-10. Vulnerability caused by the population density of worn-out neighborhoods. 54
3-10-2. Vulnerability due to access to open spaces. 57
3-10-3. Vulnerability caused by the type of materials and the life of structures 58
3-10-4. Vulnerability caused by the smallness of the construction fabric (area of ??parts) 60
3-10-5. Vulnerability caused by the number of floors. 62
3-10-6. Access to the road network and its effect on vulnerability. 63
3-10-7. Vulnerability due to user incompatibility 64
3-11. Weighting criteria and multi-criteria decision rules. 65
3-11-1. Method based on pair by pair comparison. 66
3-11-1-1. Building hierarchies. 66
3-11-1-2. Pairwise comparison and weight calculation. 66
3-11-1-3. Calculate the inconsistency rate. 67
3-11-1-3-1. mean vector of inconsistency. 68
3-11-1-3-2. Calculation of incompatibility index. 68
3-11-1-3-3. Calculation of random matrix inconsistency index. 68
3-11-1-3-4. Rate calculationCalculate the inconsistency rate. 69
3-12. Fuzzification of layers 69
3-13. conclusion 70
4 Chapter Four. 71
4-1. Analysis of vulnerability to earthquakes according to the indicators introduced in the research. 72
4-1-1. Vulnerability due to population density. 72
4-1-2. Vulnerability due to access to open spaces. 73
4-1-3. Vulnerability caused by old buildings 73
4-1-4. Vulnerability due to the type of building materials 74
4-1-5. Vulnerability caused by the fineness of building tissues. 75
4-1-6. Vulnerability caused by the number of floors in the building. 76
4-1-7. Lack of access to urban roads and vulnerability due to earthquakes. 77
4-1-8. Vulnerability caused by the incompatibility of neighboring uses. 78
4-2. Calculation of index weights 80
4-3. Vulnerability zoning of the area. 82
4-4. Fuzzification of information layers. 83
4-4-1. Fuzzy AND operator. 88
5 Chapter Five. 89
5-1. Summary and conclusion. 90
5-2. Testing research hypotheses. 91
5-3. Research limitations. 92
5-4. Suggestions 92
5-5. Resources. 93
Source:
Ahdanjad, Mohsen. 2018. Modeling the vulnerability of Iranian cities against earthquakes, case example: Zanjan city, PhD thesis, Zanjan University, Zanjan. Ahmadi, Hassan. 1376. "The role of urban development in reducing the vulnerability of the city" Housing and Revolution Quarterly, Islamic Revolution Housing Foundation.
Ahmdian, Arasb. 1379. Salem City and Earthquake Crisis Management, Tehran University Architects Association Journal, No. 10. Ahmadi, Hassan; Shirin, Mohammad Khan, Sadat, Faiznia and Jamal, Qudousi. 2014. Building a regional mass movement risk model using qualitative features (case study: Taleghan watershed), Iranian Natural Resources Journal, Volume 58, Number 1.
Asgharpour, Mohammad Javad. 2015. Multi-criteria decision making, Tehran University Press, 418 pages.
Asgharpour, Mohammad Javad. 2017. Multi-criteria decision-making, Tehran University Press, fifth edition.
Asghari Moghadam, Mohammad Reza. 1378. Natural geography of the city (geomorphology), Masai publications. Amini, Jamal. 1389. Vulnerability analysis of urban housing against earthquakes, (Case study of Region 9 of Tehran Municipality) Master's Thesis in Remote Sensing and Geographical Information System under the guidance of Manouchehr Farajzadeh Assal, Tarbiat Modares University of Tehran, Department of Remote Sensing and Geographical Information System.
Olsen, David. 2017. Multi-criteria decision-making methods, translated by: Ali Khatami Firouzabadi, Madirim Emoraz Publications, 274 p.
E. Draback, Thomas and Geraldji. The weatherman 2013. Crisis Management: Principles and Practical Guide for Local Governments, Producer: Tehran City Planning and Studies Center, Publisher of Urban Planning and Processing Company, Tehran.
Al Sheikh, Ali Asghar; Solmaz, Tutunchian. 2015. The use of GIS in crisis management, a case study on the usability of GIS in crisis management in Asaluyeh region. Geomatic Conference 85.
Bargi, Khosrow. Fundamentals of Earthquake Engineering, Ch1, Tehran: International Institute Publications. Seismology and Earthquake Engineering, 1373
Binesh, Behrang. 2016. Risk and Insurance Electronic Magazine. Access via:
International Institute of Seismology and Earthquake Engineering via website:
/
Pourahmad, Ahmad; Siddiqa, Lotfi; Amin, Farji Melai and Azadeh, Azimi. 1388. Investigating the dimensions of earthquake crisis prevention in the case study of Babol city, "Journal of Urban and Regional Studies and Researches", 1st year, 1st issue, Isfahan.
Pourkermani, Mohsen; Mehran, Arin. 1376. Seismotectonics: Earthquake, Dezab Consulting Engineers Publications. Pourmohammadi, Mohammadreza. 2012. Urban land use planning. Semit Publications.
Jovani, Hassan. 1389. Crisis management during an earthquake (case example: Varzeghan city), master's thesis, Marand Islamic Azad University, Marand.
Hataminejad, Hossein; Hamid, Fathi and Farshid, Eshgabadi. 2018. Assessing the level of seismic vulnerability in the city, case example: District 10 of Tehran, publication, Human Geographical Researches, No. 68, pp. 1-20.
Habibi, Kiyomarth et al. 2017. Determining effective structural factors in the vulnerability of the ancient urban context of Zanjan using GIS and Fuzzy Logic, Fine Arts Publication. No. 33. pp. 36-27.
Habibi, Kiyomarth; Mohammad Javad, Kohsari. 1386.