Preparation and standardization of academic compatibility test in students

Number of pages: 184 File Format: word File Code: 30300
Year: 2013 University Degree: Master's degree Category: Psychology
  • Part of the Content
  • Contents & Resources
  • Summary of Preparation and standardization of academic compatibility test in students

    Papannameh for obtaining a master's degree in psychology

    General orientation

    Abstract

    The present research was conducted in order to construct and standardize the academic compatibility test. To create this test, all tests related to compatibility were studied and reviewed, and after conducting interviews with a number of students and removing and changing a number of questions and confirming content validity and face validity by psychology professors, questionnaires were prepared in 6 subscales (compatibility with the university and faculty, compatibility with the course and field of study, social and interpersonal compatibility, emotional compatibility, self-discovery and purposefulness, compatibility with academic and educational skills) with 152 questions. This questionnaire was implemented on the sample group. The population of the present study consists of all the students of Qazvin city. 411 people were selected as samples from the four major Qazvin universities and two non-governmental institutions. The questions were analyzed by exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, and the reliability of the test was obtained using Cronbach's method. And the final version was prepared with 138 questions. The results showed that according to the Cronbach's alpha obtained for the whole test (? = 0.94), the questionnaire has high reliability.

    Keywords: academic adjustment, standardization

    In this chapter, first, an introduction about adjustment and its importance for students is given. A comprehensive and up-to-date tool to measure academic adjustment so that it includes most of the components shows the necessity of the current research. This research pursues two main goals, which are 1. Examining the current conditions and the tools used to measure academic adjustment. 2. Preparing a questionnaire that can measure academic adjustment and has high reliability and validity. Finally, the method that is suitable for analyzing the research data is introduced.

    1-1- Introduction

    Studying at university for a large number of students, both boys and girls, is accompanied by anxiety and pressure. The educational environment and new rules, different expectations from the previous era, the beginning of an independent life and entering the world of adulthood and the formation of human and intimate relationships are new conditions that require the adoption of new strategies. Adaptation [1] is a dynamic process in which a person tries to balance what he does or wants to do, as well as with what that the environment and society demand to establish a balance. In psychology, adaptation is assumed to be a more or less conscious process on the basis of which a person adapts to the social, natural or cultural environment [2]. This adaptation requires that the person changes himself or actively makes changes in the environment, and as a result, the necessary harmony between the person and the environment is created. Student life is new conditions for those who enter the university, and at the same time, it has its own tensions. Many students enter there without knowing the culture of the university and do not know what the professors want from them, what is the purpose of doing the homework and what is the grading method. Some students feel that they cannot adapt to the professors and the new conditions, as a result of incompatibility. and sometimes adapt to new geographical conditions as well as more responsibility than in the past. On the other hand, students who study in cities other than their family's place are faced with issues such as separation from family and new life conditions. Studies have shown that such tensions affect people's performance and productivity. Entering university requires learning skills that increase students' ability and adaptability in dealing with specific issues. Adapting to the new environment and conditions, especially for non-native students and dormitory residents, issues such as living with roommates, living independently from parents, managing personal affairs, managing finances, etc. follows Meanwhile, communication issues, academic and motivational issues are among the other common issues among new students.                                  

       Academic adjustment[3] includes components such as: staying in university, enjoying education, having psychological well-being, two-way social relations and good academic performance. Academic adjustment and its various dimensions are considered fundamental and very broad topics in psychology. For this reason, identifying factors related to it, while increasing the scope of knowledge, can have many applications in reducing individual and interpersonal problems.

    The great importance of this issue is that there is no suitable tool for measuring academic adjustment, which includes all components and is in accordance with Iranian culture. The present study was designed and implemented with the aim of preparing a questionnaire of academic adjustment and its standardization[4]. The scores of psychological tests are usually interpreted based on the norms that represent the functioning of the normative samples in the test. Therefore, for norming in an experimental way, the functioning of the group that represents the desired society should be evaluated. practically determined in the test, then the raw score of each person is checked in connection with the distribution of the scores obtained from the norming sample to determine his place [5] in this distribution.

    1-2- Statement of the problem

    Man is always faced with diverse and unknown issues and problems in relation to his surrounding environment, and in order to meet his demands, he needs balance and adaptability to the environment. Adaptation is the flow of a person to adapt himself to internal pressures and requirements. Outside, it takes effort (Reid-Victor [6], 2004; McLeod and McElliser[7], 1999).

    Chaplin[8] defines adaptation as a change in activities in order to overcome obstacles and satisfy one's needs. He considers adaptation as a type of problem solving in which an organism or a person has a need that cannot be met by previous methods. In such situations, the behavior is changed until the response leads to the satisfaction of the need. In the adaptation mode, the person plays a more active role in the situation. For this reason, compatibility is different from the concepts of compromise, adaptation and conformity [9] (Chaplin, 1985).

    Being admitted to university and transferring from high school to university is a big and major change in their lives for many young people. Entering the university is an opportunity for further learning and psychological growth, but at the same time, it is a source of stress for some people and causes maladaptive reactions in them. A person benefits from adaptation when he can establish a healthy relationship between himself and his social environment. It originates from the science of biology. Darwin proposed it for the first time in his theory of evolution, then this concept was used in other sciences such as psychology and sociology. This term in the meanings of biology refers to biological structures that facilitate the survival of species (Friedlander, Reid, Shapak, 2007). In the psychology of Kressini [10], adaptation is defined as follows: creating changes in attitudes and behavior in such a way that one can lived well and effectively. Establishing constructive relationships with others, dealing with problematic or stressful situations, handling responsibilities and satisfying personal needs and goals are examples of adaptation. The degree of adaptation depends on two factors: 1) personal characteristics such as attitudes, skills and physical conditions. 2) The nature of the situations he faces such as family problems, sudden and natural events. Since man and his environment are constantly changing, so the adaptation of man is also constantly changing (Viton [11], 2003). Adaptation has different dimensions: Sin Wesing [12] has divided adaptation into three main types: a) academic adaptation, b) social adaptation [13], c) emotional adaptation [14] (Nick Dell, 2015). Bakro Siriak [15] believes that academic adaptation is a multi-dimensional concept and means the ability of individuals to respond successfully to the diverse demands of the educational environment (Zarei, 2013).

    Theories of learning and academic success identify two types of factors that affect the continuation or discontinuation of studies in the university: 1) Individual factors or tendencies that students have before entering the university. 2) interactive factors that are related to experiences after entering the university (Balter [16], 2002, quoted by Ardakani, 2014).

  • Contents & References of Preparation and standardization of academic compatibility test in students

    List:

    List of Content

    Page Title

    Abstract. C

    Chapter One: Generalities. 1

    1-2- statement of the problem. 4

    1-3- The importance and necessity of research. 7

    1-4- Research objectives. 9

    1-5- research variable. 9

    Chapter Two: Theoretical foundations and research background. 13

    2-1- Compatibility. 15

    2-2- Adjustment and mental health. 18

    2-3- Characteristics of a compatible person. 20

    2-4- Social adaptation. 21

    2-5- Academic compatibility. 23

    2-5-1- Effective factors in academic adjustment. 25

    2-5-2- transfer to university. 29

    2-5-3- Fundamental changes in the life of newly arrived students. 31

    2-5-4- adaptation to dormitory life. 33

    2-6- Definition of test. 34

    2-6-1- The main characteristics of a good test. 36

    2-6-2- Secondary characteristics of a good test. 38

    2-6-3- Classical theory of true score. 39

    2-6-4- The theory of the present characteristic. 40

    2-6-5- The desired elements in the preparation and standardization of tests 40

    2-7- The concept of norms. 42

    2-7-1- Normative tests. 44

    2-7-2- Characteristics of a normative group. 45

    2-7-3- types of soft or norm. 45

    2-8- Background of the research. 47

    Table of contents

    Title

    Chapter three: research method. Error! Bookmark not defined.

    3-1- Statistical population. 60

    3-2- Sample and sampling method. 60

    3-3- Research questions. 60

    4-3- Research tools..60

    4-5- Data analysis method 64

    Chapter four: research findings. Error! Bookmark not defined.

    4-1- Preliminary result analysis. 67

    4-2- Analysis of the final result. 120

    Chapter five: discussion and conclusion. 131

    5-1- Discussion and conclusion. 133

    5-2- Limitations and suggestions 139

    List of sources. 141

    Appendix. 147

    Test version of the questionnaire. 156

    The final version of the questionnaire. 162

    Questionnaire key. 167

     

     

     

    List of tables

    Title                                                                                                                                                                                                                 page Distribution of students in different universities by gender. 58

    Table No. 3-2. Distribution of selected samples from different universities by gender. 59

    Table No. 3-3. Distribution of the sample according to the gender of the subjects 59

    Table No. 3-4. Distribution of the selected samples from different universities by section. 59

    Table No. 3-5. Distribution of the sample group according to educational qualification. 60

    Table No. 4-1. Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the factor of adaptation to the university and faculty environment (factor 1). 67

    Table No. 4-2. Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the compatibility factor with the course and field of study (factor 2). 66

    Table No. 4-3. Cronbach's alpha coefficient of social and interpersonal adjustment factor (factor 3). 67

    Table No. 4-4. Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the emotional compatibility factor (4). 68

    Table No. 4-5. Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the self-discovery and purposefulness compatibility factor (factor 6). 69

    Table No. 6-4. Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the compatibility factor with academic and educational skills. 70

    Table No. 4 - 7. Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the whole test. 71

    Table No. 4-8. Average and standard deviation. 80

    Table No. 9-4. Division of questionnaire scores based on average into weak, medium, strong compatibility. 81

    Table No. 4-10. Correlation matrix between questions and factors and the classification of each factor. 81

    Table No. 4-11. KMO and Bartlett test to check the ability of the test to reduce to 6 factors. 88

    Table No. 4-12. Correlation matrix between questions and factors after rotation. 88

    Table No. 4-13. Commonalities of factors or recognition of the contribution of a set of factors in explaining the variance of each factor. 98

    Table No. 14-4. Transformation matrix of factors 106

    Table No. 15-4. Correlation matrix between items 108

    Table No. 16-4. Cronbach's alpha coefficient of compatibility factor with university and facultyCronbach's alpha coefficient of the compatibility factor with the university and faculty (1). 118

    Table No. 4-17. Cronbach's alpha coefficient of compatibility with the course and field of study of the agent (2). 119

    Table No. 4-18. Cronbach's alpha of social and interpersonal adjustment (factor 3). 120

    Table No. 4-19. Cronbach's alpha coefficient of emotional compatibility (4). 121

    Table No. 4-20. Cronbach's alpha coefficient of self-discovery and purposefulness (factor 5). 122

    Table No. 4-21. Cronbach's alpha coefficient of compatibility with academic and educational skills (6). 123

    Table No. 4-22. Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the whole test. 124

    Table No. 4-23. Average and standard deviation. 127

    Table No. 24-4. Cut points of the academic adjustment questionnaire. 127

     

     

    List of tables

    Title

    Table No. P- 1. Total explained variance. 148

    Table No. P-2. The covariance of the correlation matrix. 155

    Table No. P-3. Questions related to each subscale. 172. List of charts. rotated factor matrix. 109

    Source:

    List of References

    Allen, M.Yin, and (1979). "Introductions to Measurement Theories (Psychometrics)", translated by Ali Delavar (1374). Tehran Organization for the Study and Compilation of Humanities Books. Pages, 373-86.

    Amali, H. (1390). Psychology, page, 4.

    Anastazi, A(1975). "Psychological testing", Mohammad Taghi Brahni(1371). Tehran University Publications. page, 150-149.

    Islaminsab, A. (1373) "Psychology of adaptation (how to adapt to ourselves, nature and society)." Tehran Foundation Publications. Page 19-25

    Elahi, Asad (1391). "Psychological tests" Psychological Services Center. Retrieved from the site

    http://jm.um.ac.ir (April, 12, 2013).

    Pashashreifi, H. (1372). "Principles of psychometrics and psychoanalysis". Fajr Publications. Page, 38.

    Pour Mogdades, A. (1367). "Adjustment Psychology." Isfahan Mashal Publications. Page, 130. Arshad. University of Tehran. Page 158-150

    Zarei, H. Mirhashmi, M. Pasha Sharifi, H. (2013) "Relationship of thinking styles with academic adjustment in nursing students". Iranian Journal of Education in Medical Sciences. Number 4. Page, 2.

    Zaki, M. (2014) "Adjustment of young people to the university and its relationship with social support; a case study of female and male university students" Isfahan." Specialized Quarterly Journal of Youth, Culture, Society Research, Number 4. Pages, 4-5

    Abdini, Y. (1381). "Investigating the relationship between social problem solving skills and peer acceptance in second and fifth grade female students in Tehran". Master's thesis in the field of educational psychology, University of Tehran. Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences. Farahbakhsh, K. (2016). "Preparation of students' adaptability test (ASAD) and determination of its reliability, validity and norm determination." Educational Measurement Quarterly No. 6, page 11-10. Ganji, H. (2015).

    Latafabadi, H(1387)."Measurement in educational sciences and psychology."Tehran, Organization for Studying and Compilation of Humanities Books of Universities (Samet), Center for the Realization and Development of Humanities. Pages, 56-53

    Mosavi, A.M. Kafi Masuleh, M. Amirportalesh, F(1377). Amirkabir.Safha, 25-36

    Nikdel, A.(2016) "Investigation and comparison of self-regulation of learning and adaptation (emotional, social, educational) in students who use the Internet and non-users in Tehran boys' high school in the academic year of 2015-2016" Teacher Education University. Counseling and the Ministry of Sciences and the Counseling Center of Tehran University.

    Hilgard and Baro (1975). "Theories of Learning". Translated by Mohammad Taghi Brahni (1371), Tehran, University Publishing Center. Page 121.

    Anton, W, D. & Reed, J, R (1991); "College adjustment scales".

Preparation and standardization of academic compatibility test in students