The relationship between knowledge sharing and the job performance of employees of the General Department of Labor Cooperative and Social Welfare of Isfahan province

Number of pages: 84 File Format: word File Code: 30186
Year: Not Specified University Degree: Master's degree Category: Psychology
  • Part of the Content
  • Contents & Resources
  • Summary of The relationship between knowledge sharing and the job performance of employees of the General Department of Labor Cooperative and Social Welfare of Isfahan province

    Dissertation for Master's Degree in Public Administration

    Human Resources Orientation

    Abstract

    The present research was conducted with the purpose of determining the relationship between knowledge sharing and the job performance of the employees of the General Department of Labor Cooperative and Social Welfare of Isfahan Province using a correlational descriptive method. The statistical population of the research was all the employees of the General Department of Cooperative, Labor and Social Welfare of Isfahan province, numbering 700 people, out of which 241 were selected using the Karjesi and Morgan table and using available sampling method. The data collection tool was the Jafari Knowledge Sharing Questionnaire (2013) with 24 items and Patterson's Job Performance Standard Questionnaire (1970) with 20 items based on a 5-point Likert scale, whose face and content validity was confirmed using the opinions of several respondents and experts, and their reliability was calculated using Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.79 and 0.82, respectively. Data analysis of this research was done using spss software at two levels of descriptive and inferential statistics (Pearson correlation coefficient, stepwise regression and analysis of variance). The findings of the research showed that there was a significant relationship between knowledge sharing and job performance (r=0.460, p>0.05). Also, the relationship between the dimension of personal interactions (r=0.295) (p>0.01), interaction with society (r=0.281) (p>0.015) and written collaborations (r=0.661) (p>0.01) was significant with job performance. Among the variables studied in the regression, the best predictor of job performance was written cooperation in the first step, interaction with the community in the second step, and personal interactions in the third step. The results also showed that there was a significant difference between the opinions of the respondents in the variable of knowledge sharing and its dimensions according to age, degree, and experience, and in job performance according to age and experience. Career

    Introduction

    Review of the theory of organization and management in the last two decades is full of concepts that emphasize the change in the environment of organizations, conditions and business practices. The current era is called the age of knowledge, which is based on knowledge. Today's organizations are placed in a competitive environment that is caused by extensive environmental and organizational changes. Environmental changes are so fast and unpredictable that the slightest neglect of them can deprive the organization of a competitive advantage and other organizations face certain opportunities. One of the most important environmental changes that affects the organization is the use of knowledge in the organization and among employees to improve their performance, which is actually an inexhaustible resource for organizations to create superiority in the competitive environment. This chapter has focused on the relationship between the two variables of knowledge sharing and organizational performance to state the problem, the importance and necessity of research, goals, questions, and theoretical and operational definitions of the variables. With the increasing emphasis of the government on creating a knowledge society and the priority of moving towards a knowledge-based economy (in the fourth development plan), the basic issue is understanding how to use knowledge as an important source of competitive advantage. In this regard, many organizations have focused their efforts on how they can manage knowledge in the organization. Knowledge is a systematic category and requires comprehensive attention to various organizational factors (Haddat, 2017).

    Knowledge is considered one of the main assets of an organization, and any organization that has more of this capital can better deal with existing challenges and operate successfully in the field of competition. Today, all researchers and scientific groups admit; In order for organizations to have a continuous and stable presence in the world of competition, they must operate around science and knowledge and equip their employees with knowledge tools, so that they can optimize the use of their employees' knowledge and experiences with proper management and constantly cultivate new thoughts and ideas in the organization, which is only possible with creative and innovative managers and employees. (Shain [1], 2019). during which employees transfer relevant information to others in the organization.Knowledge sharing as a complex but value-creating activity is the foundation of many knowledge management strategies in organizations. Researchers and experts emphasize that knowledge sharing is very important and when it is not transferred, it becomes an obstacle on the way of the organization in the field of improving performance and competitiveness and does not allow the organization to function efficiently and effectively (Roska [2], 2005). Knowledge sharing is not just an issue, but it is a problem for organizations because lack of information sharing in the organization leads to the death of the organization (Rig[3], 2005).

    One of the basic goals of knowledge management is to implement or improve the sharing or transfer of knowledge among different units of the organization (Jaafari, 2013). If people can use the knowledge they have individually from their work and share it, both the organization and the individual can grow better, and if it cannot be shared effectively in the organization, it is like it has been lost (Alavi and Leidner [4], 2001). It seems that one of the consequences of knowledge sharing is the role that knowledge sharing leaves in job performance.

    According to the definition of the Oxford dictionary, performance means everything that people and machines do. Some consider performance to be equivalent to effectiveness and efficiency, and some believe that performance is the sum of all processes that help management to take appropriate action with a glimpse of creating a pragmatic organization in the future (for example, an efficient and effective organization). In other words, performance is doing everything today that leads to measurable and valuable results in the future (Neely et al. [5], 2010). Performance can usually be defined simply in the form of output concepts as follows: "Achieving quantitative goals" or "Performance means both behaviors and results" (Armstrong[6], 2006).

    Job performance is defined as personal achievements based on organizational standards and rules and regulations. Job performance is the product and efficiency of people in relation to the actions they perform, in other words, the performance is the actual work of people according to the description of their duties. (Noor Alizadeh, 2013, p. In another definition, performance is the sum of job-related behaviors that people show (Kashwarzi, 2016).

    Performance is a predicted criterion or a key dependent criterion that acts as a means to judge the effectiveness of individuals, groups, and organizations. Steps must be taken in order for that work to be carried out, and the realization of the goals means that the goal is realized by following the work steps. It is a behavioral performance in order to achieve the organizational goals and it is measured or valued (Rezai, 2011, p. 68). Especially in the present era, with the existence of information systems and organizational technologies, and the issue of managing the knowledge assets of the organization, attention has been paid.

    The General Department of Cooperative Labor and Social Welfare of Isfahan Province started operating in 2013 with the approval of the Islamic Council on the merger of the three Ministries of Cooperative, Labor and Social Welfare in a new form. Among the most important tasks and missions of this general office are planning and monitoring the implementation of labor laws, cooperation and developing a comprehensive system of welfare and social security, policy making and planning in order to regulate labor relations, investigating and solving issues and problems of the labor community, regulating labor and employer relations in line with the policy of preserving and protecting the workforce, policy making and planning in order to generalize and expand civil institutions and organizations in the field of cooperation, labor and social welfare, setting rules and regulations, standards and recommendations. safety and labor standards and determining the annual minimum wage of workers in the Supreme Labor Council, policymaking, planning and administration of matters related to assemblies and Supreme Councils in the field of cooperation, work and social welfare and determining employment policies and strategies and related planning in the framework of the government's macro plans and policies.

  • Contents & References of The relationship between knowledge sharing and the job performance of employees of the General Department of Labor Cooperative and Social Welfare of Isfahan province

    List:

    Table of Contents

    Title

    Abstract 1

    Chapter One: Research Overview

    1-2- Statement of the problem. 3

    1-3- Necessity of research. 5

    1-4- The objectives of his study. 7

    1-4-1- the main goal. 7

    1-4-2- Secondary objectives. 7

    1-5- research hypotheses. 8

    1-5-1- The main hypothesis. 8

    1-5-2- Sub-hypotheses. 8

    1-6- Definitions of variables 8

    1-6-1- Theoretical definitions of variables 8

    1-6-2- Operational definitions of variables 10

    Chapter Two: Background of the research

    2-1- Introduction. 11

    2-2- Knowledge management. 12

    2-3- knowledge management cycle. 12

    2-3-1- Definition and nature of knowledge sharing. 13

    2-3-2- The importance of sharing knowledge. 15

    2-4- Human factors affecting knowledge sharing in the organization. 15

    2-5- Theories related to knowledge sharing. 17

    2-6- Potential obstacles to knowledge sharing. 19

    2-6-1- Individual potential barriers to knowledge sharing. 20

    2-7- Factors affecting knowledge sharing according to the model of Wang and his colleagues (2010) 23

    2-8- Job performance. 24

    2-8-1- The importance of human resources in the organization. 24

    2-8-2- Definitions of job performance. 24

    2-8-3- Factors affecting job performance. 25

    2-9- Background of the research. 30

    2-9-1- Internal investigation. 30

    2-9-2- Foreign research. 31

    2-10- Summary and summary. 32

    2-11- Theoretical model of research. 33

    Chapter Three: Research Methodology

    3-1- Introduction. 34

    3-2- Type and method of research. 34

    3-3- The statistical population of the research. 35

    3-4- Sample and estimation of research sample size. 35

    3-4-1- Sampling method. 35

    3-5- Information collection tool. 36

    3-5-1- Knowledge sharing questionnaire. 36

    3-5-2- Occupational performance questionnaire. 37

    6-3- Determining the validity and reliability of research measurement tools. 37

    3-6-1- Questionnaire validity. 37

    3-6-2- Reliability of questionnaires 38

    3-7- Statistical analysis methods. 39

    Chapter Four: Results

    4-1- Introduction. 41

    4-2- Description of the descriptive findings of the study. 41

    4-2-1- Questionnaire demographic data. 42

    4-3- Inferential findings. 48

    Chapter Five: Discussion and Conclusion

    5-1- Introduction. 56

    5-2- Summary. 56

    5-3- Summary of the results of research hypothesis testing. 57

    5-3-1- The main hypothesis. 57

    5-3-1-1- The first sub-hypothesis. 58

    5-3-1-2- The second sub-hypothesis. 59

    5-3-1-3- The third sub-hypothesis. 60

    5-3-1-4- The fourth sub-hypothesis. 61

    5-3-1-5- The fifth sub-hypothesis. 62

    5-3-1-6- The sixth sub-hypothesis. 63

    5-4- Suggestions. 63

    5-4-1- Practical suggestions. 63

    5-4-2-Research proposals. 65

    5-5- Research limitations. 65

    List of sources. 67

    Appendices 74

    English abstract. 76

     

    Source:

    List of sources

    List of Persian sources:

    Abtahi H, Salavati A. 1385. Knowledge management in the organization, New Link Publications, first edition. 301 pages

    Alwani M and Parvizian R. 1385 "The role of knowledge management in the development of industrial management in the country", the first national conference of industrial management

    Azer A, Momeni M. 1381. Statistics and its application in management. Volume 1, 8th edition, Tehran: New Link Publications. Azrin B, Yaqoub S, Ameri M. 2013 "Regression analysis of the relationship between knowledge management components and human resources performance". Sports management _ winter. No. 15, page 35-50.

    Armstrong M. Translated by Khodiyar Abili. 1380. Human resource management strategies, Tehran: Fara Publications, p. 7.

    Bavorsad B, Habibi L, Tawanbakhsh H. 1389. "Investigating the relationship between knowledge management and organizational performance in companies admitted to the Tehran Stock Exchange". The first national management conference. Shiraz University. Jaafaris S., 2013, the relationship between the use of information systems with knowledge sharing behavior and readiness for change in branches of Refah Bank in Isfahan city, master's thesis, faculty of educational sciences, Khorasgan Azad University. Jalali M. 1377. Investigating the impact of job attitudes on the performance of operational staff of hospitals of the Shahrood Health and Medical Sciences network, bachelor's thesisInvestigating the impact of job attitudes on the performance of operational employees of Shahrood Health and Medical Sciences network hospitals, Master's thesis, Faculty of Administrative Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University. 2017 "Effect of emotional intelligence on employees' attitude towards knowledge sharing in Niro Keller Company".  Master thesis, Faculty of Management, University of Isfahan. Khalili Shurini, 1381. Research method and its application in management. Tehran: Arvin Publishing House Khouinejad G. 1380. Educational science research method. Samet Publications, p. 542. Drucker, Peter, F. (2013). Future Management, translated by Abdolreza Rezainejad, Tehran, Rasa Publications. Robbins, Stephen P., 2016, Fundamentals of Organizational Behavior, translated by Ali Parsaiyan and Seyed Mohammad Arabi, twenty-seventh edition, Cultural Research Office Publications. JF Amani M, Varij Kazemi R, 2013, Designing a model for adapting organizational culture to knowledge sharing and creating agility in controlling critical situations with a passive defense approach. Crisis management. 3: 77-59. Rezaian A. 1386. Organizational Behavior Management, Tehran, Semit Publications. Sixth edition. Sarmad. 246 pages

    Guide F. Mohammadi A. 2018. Identifying the key success factors of knowledge management system in colleges and higher education centers of Tehran, Information Technology Management Journal. 37-52

    Rahnvard F, Sadr F 1388. The relationship between employees' knowledge sharing culture perception and organizational factors in government agencies. Beyond Management, 8: 71-54. Zare, M. 1387. "Evaluation of the effect of enablers on knowledge management processes in Isfahan Oil Refining Company", master's thesis, Isfahan University School of Management.

    Zandi M. 1390. "Determining effective factors on knowledge sharing and its effect on the performance of Kurdistan Gas Company employees. Master's thesis, Faculty of Management, Isfahan University.

    Sarlak M., Eslami T., 1390, knowledge sharing in Sharif University of Technology with social capital, public management approach Volume 3, No. 1-18. 1386 Sekaran. Translation of Saibi M., 4th edition, Tehran: Higher Institute of Management and Planning. 1383. Keshavarzi A., knowledge sharing in organizations. 1387. Quantitative and qualitative research methods in educational sciences. Tehran: Publications of humanities books

    Manourian A, Asgari N, Ashna M. 1386. Structural and content dimensions of knowledge-based organizations, the first national knowledge management conference 14, 64-75

    Nuraleh M., 1387, investigation of the inhibiting factors related to the establishment of management information systems in the sports teams of Isfahan province, Master's thesis, Faculty of Physical Education, Khorasgan Azad University

    Niko Maram H and Eshaghi F 1389 "The relationship between the effect of intellectual capital on the performance of value companies and an accepted growth in the Tehran Stock Exchange. Journal of Financial Studies, Summer, No. 6, 133-163.

    Hersey, Paul and Blanchard, Kenneth. 1383, Organizational Behavior Management, translated by Ali Alagband, 23rd edition, Sepehr Publications, Tehran

    List of English sources:

    Alavi, M. and Leidner, D.E. (2001), "Review: Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: conceptual foundations and research issues", MS Quarterly, Vol. 25 no. 1, pp. 107-32

    Ali A (1993). Decision making style, individualism, and attitudes towards risk of Arab executives. International Studies of Management & Organization 23(3): 53-73.

    Andreassen, T.W. (1994). "Satisfaction, loyalty and reputation as indicators of customer orientation in the public sector". International Journal of Public Sector Management, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 16-34.

    Armstrong, M. (1999). "A Handbook of HRM Practice", 7th Edition, London: Kogan Page.

    Armstrong, M. (1999). "A Handbook of HRM Practice", 7th Edition, London: Kogan Page.

    Asllani, A., & Luthans, F. (2003). "What knowledge managers really do: An empirical and comparative analysis". Journal of Knowledge Management.  Vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 53-67. Azarbayjani M.

The relationship between knowledge sharing and the job performance of employees of the General Department of Labor Cooperative and Social Welfare of Isfahan province