Comparison of self-discipline ability, personality traits and family functioning of gifted and normal female students

Number of pages: 139 File Format: word File Code: 29950
Year: 2014 University Degree: Master's degree Category: Psychology
  • Part of the Content
  • Contents & Resources
  • Summary of Comparison of self-discipline ability, personality traits and family functioning of gifted and normal female students

    Dissertation to receive master's degree in psychology department: General psychology trend

    Abstract

    Comparison of self-discipline ability, personality traits and family functioning of gifted and normal female students

    Shakuri flame

    Young people are the future capital of society. Special schools for the cultivation of brilliant talents have a relatively different environment from normal schools. The difference between the two educational environments can strengthen and create different personality traits in the two groups of students of these schools. The present study was designed and implemented to investigate the social differences in self-discipline, personality traits and family functioning of gifted high school and conservatory students. The research method is of comparative causal type and sampling is done in multi-stage clusters. The statistical population of this research included secondary school female students of the first education district of Rasht in the academic year of 1994-1993, who were 6990 people. The statistical sample included 180 gifted and normal female students at the secondary level. In this research, Bouffard et al.'s self-regulation questionnaire (1995), five personality factors (Costa and McCree, 1985) and family functioning questionnaire (Epstein, Baldwin and Bishab, 1983) were used to collect data. In general, the results showed that there is a significant difference between the three groups of gifted, high school, and conservatory students in self-discipline (p<0.05), personality traits (p<0.05), and family functioning (p<0.05). According to the research results, it seems that gifted high school students are different from normal students in terms of some aspects of self-discipline, personality traits, and family functioning. The favorable conditions of the educational environment and the type of family treatment can play a role in these differences. Keywords: self-regulation, personality trait, family functioning, smart, normal. In that order, topics such as introduction, statement of the problem, importance and necessity of research, research objectives and conceptual and operational definitions of research variables are discussed in preference.

    Introduction

    Human knowledge about the different needs of a human being has forced the education workers to fulfill the needs of students in various dimensions. The all-round development of teenagers and meeting their needs in terms of physical, movement, cognitive, language and speech, emotional and social, and finally the development of creativity and self-expression is considered by many education practitioners and should be followed in the higher educational stages (Mafidi, 2018).

    Since humans have differences in different dimensions, these differences are reflected in their abilities, talents, desires and finally in their personality. Knowing the personality characteristics of the students makes it possible to adjust the issues with their interests and qualifications through knowledge and awareness, and psychologically secure the living environment and educational fields, so that the students can use their abilities and skills in that environment. The quality of students' thoughts is very important for learning. Students differ in processing, encoding, recalling and organizing, as well as how they apply learned information. Some of them are thoughtful learners, and others process information in a completely superficial way (Ebrahimoglu[1], 2013).

    Today's era requires people with personality traits that have the ability to self-discipline. In addition to individual differences, people also differ from each other in how to deal with a task. But these differences do not only indicate the difference in the level of intelligence or special ability patterns, but also refer to self-regulation learning strategies (Zombern [2] et al., 2011). While there have been advances in the understanding of self-regulated learning, there are still unanswered questions. One of them deals with the issue that self-regulated learning can be considered a learnable feature, or it should be considered related to individual differences. In other words, to what extent self-regulated learning is consistent in connection with personality tendencies, it has not yet been systematically investigated (Bidjerano and Yoon Dai[3], 2007).

    Recently, education experts have paid more attention to the categories of cognition and motivation.Cognition includes parts of ability and mental actions such as understanding and recognition and thinking, which is considered as a role in learning. Self-regulated learning strategies include self-study skills, self-questioning, self-review, and self-enhancement, which help learners facilitate their learning by using cognitive processes. Various factors have an effect on students' self-regulation orientation in different situations, including the family environment and students' personality traits (Pentrich [4], 2002; quoted by Azseif, 2018).

    The family as the first and most important representative of society plays a fundamental role in teaching people how to live. Many studies show that most children who are successful academically come from families with healthy relationships between family members. Family has always been considered as the most important human system. According to the theorists of the family system, the family is like the human body in which each part affects and is influenced by the other part (Qureishi, 2013).

    Regarding the place and importance of the educational system in determining the educational destiny of the students, the purpose of this study is based on the principle that by recognizing the personality characteristics of the students and giving importance to their self-regulation ability according to their family conditions and conditions, the education workers can become the future builders of the society by involving the parents. equip science with necessary skills.

    Statement of the problem

    The education of students in all courses is done in order to change their behavior, thoughts, attitudes and skills, and finally it is measured in the form of progress and academic performance and more friendly, less tense relationships and the ability to master the behavioral range of students. On the other hand, among the most important concerns of officials, education experts and students' families, academic and social performance is desirable. Therefore, considering the factors that affect the personality, family and self-discipline of students, the study of these factors is of particular importance. Because these concepts have broad dimensions that include both environmental factors and intra-personal factors (Hatami, 2013).

    One of these individual dimensions is personality, personality is defined and specific patterns of thought, emotion and behavior that determine a person's personal style in interaction with the material and social environment (Atkinson and Hilgard, 2006). The development of human personality includes all stages of development and adolescence is considered a stage of this psychosocial development, which is between childhood and adulthood. Adolescence is primarily transformation and change, and at the same time, it is the period of character formation and dealing with life issues, the most important phenomenon of adolescence is the transformation of a person's personality (Mansour, 2010). During this evolution, the character traits and characteristics of the teenager are revealed. One of these characteristics that exists in some teenagers is intelligence.

    In recent years, intelligence has been viewed in a multidimensional way. In this connection, Sternberg has identified three types of analytical, synthetic and practical intelligence. Combinations of genetic and acquired factors play a role in the development of intelligence, and it is difficult to determine the contribution of each factor (Kirimi, 2008). The role of family, school, peer group and society is very important in developing intelligence. Gifted students have high self-awareness, self-confidence, and divergent thinking is evident in them. They are highly motivated and have a high mental capacity (Hasinkhanzadeh, 2013).

    Another individual characteristic that is different in teenagers is the ability to regulate their behavior, in other words, self-discipline. The concept of self-regulation is part of Bandura's social-cognitive theory [5], whose main assumption is that each person is the result of the interaction of three categories of personal variables, environment and behavior. According to this theory, self-regulation is not determined only by personal processes, but is influenced by environmental and behavioral elements in an interactive way. The relative strength of the effects of self, environment and behavior in this triple interaction can be changed through personal efforts to self-regulate the behavioral consequences of performance and changes in the environment. According to Bandura, learning through observing one's own behavior and behavioral consequences is the most effective way of perceiving behavior, and modeling people from the environment is one of the determinants of the learning environment. Therefore, self-regulation strategies can be learned by observing patterns that use this strategy (Pentrich and Shank, 2001; quoted by Hosseini, 2018).

  • Contents & References of Comparison of self-discipline ability, personality traits and family functioning of gifted and normal female students

    List:

     

    Table of Contents

    Title

    Page

    Persian abstract.

    Introduction..2

    1-1 Statement of the problem..3

    1-2 Importance and necessity of the research..5

    1-3 Research goals..7

    1-3-1 Main goals..7

    1-3-2 Secondary goals..7

    1-4 Research hypotheses..7

    1-4-1 main hypotheses..6

    1-4-2 secondary findings..7

    1-5 conceptual definitions..7

    1-5-1 partial self-regulation..7

    1-5-2 personality traits..8

    1-5-3 family functioning..9

    1-5-4 intelligence..9

    1-5-5 normal schools..9

    1-6 operational definitions..9

    1-6-1 partial self-regulation..10

    1-6-2 personality traits..10

    1-6-3 family functioning..10

    1-6-4 Intelligence..10

    Chapter Two: Background of the research..11

    Preface..12

    2-1 Definitions and concepts of partial self-regulation. 13

    2-1-4 Internalized self-regulation. 14

    2-1-5 Self-regulation learner characteristics. 14

    2-1-6 Sources of partial self-regulation..16

    2-1-7 Personal determinants. 16

    2-1-8 Behavioral determinants..17

    2-1-9 environmental determinants..17

    2-1-10 principles of education for partial self-regulation.17

    2-1-11 the necessity of teaching partial self-regulation in schools.17

    2-1-12 models of partial self-regulation learning.18

    2-1-13 Kerno model..18

    2-1-14 Bogaerts model..18

    2-1-15 Carver and Shier model..19

    2-1-16 Butler-Wovin model..21

    2-1-17 Pentrich model..22

    2-1-18 Cognitive learning strategies.25

    2-1-19 self-directed strategies to control cognition.25

    2-1-20 resource management strategies.25

    2-1-21 views and theories of self-directed learning.25

    2-1-22 phenomenologists..25

    2-1-23 activists..25

    2-1-24 Vygotsky..26

    2-1-25 Information processing..28

    2-2 Definitions and concepts of personality traits.29

    2-2-1 The nature of personality..30

    2-2-2 Psychological functions..30

    2-2-3 Existing views about 31

    2-2-4 Structure and measurement of personality. 31

    2-2-5 Personality theories and approaches. 33

    2-2-6 Psychoanalytic approach..33

    2-2-7 My state as a parent..34

    2-2-8 My state as a child..35

    2-2-9 State Adult me..35

    2-2-10 cognitive approach..36

    2-2-11 learning approach..36

    2-2-12 biological approach..37

    2-2-13 trait approach..38

    2-2-14 Jung approach..39

    2-2-15 approach Humanism..39

    2-2-16 Eyseng's theory..40

    2-2-17 Kettle's theory..41

    2-2-18 patterns of five personality factors.42

    2-2-19 Five personality factors.43

    2-3 Definitions and concepts of family work.46

    2-3-1 family strategies.

    2-3-4-2 interwoven family..49

    2-3-5 three-axis plan..49

    2-3-5-1 dysfunctional family development.50

    2-3-5-2 dysfunctional family system.50

    2-3-5-3 dysfunctional family group.50

    2-3-6 Strategic view..51

    2-3-7 Basic functions of the family.51

    2-3-8 Support and care..52

    2-3-9 Sociability..52

    2-3-10 Emotion and guidance..53

    2-3-11 Family functioning process model.54

    2-3-12 Roles..55

    2-3-13 Communication..55

    2-3-14 Emotional interference..56

    2-3-14-1 Lack of involvement or lack of involvement.56

    2-3-14-2 Interest..56

    2-3-14-3 Mixing Selfish. 56

    2-3-14-4 Compassionate intervention..56

    2-3-14-5 Network..56

    2-3-15 Control..57

    2-3-16 Values ??and norms..58

    2-3-17 Research background..58

    2-3-18 Research done in Iran.58

    2-3-19 Research done outside Iran.65

    Chapter65

    Chapter three:

    Research design.70

    3-1 Introduction.71

    3-2 Research design.71

    3-3 Statistical society.71

    3-4 Research tools.73

    3-4-1 Five-factor personality questionnaire.73

    3-4-2 Family Function Questionnaire.74

    3-4-3 Boufard Self-Regulation Questionnaire.77

    3-5 Implementation Method.78

    3-6 Statistical Method.78

    Chapter Four: Research Findings.79

    4-1 Introduction.80

    4-2 Descriptive and Inferential Analysis Hypothesis one.80

    4-3 Descriptive and inferential analysis of hypothesis two.82

    4-4 Descriptive and inferential analysis of hypothesis three.86

    4-5 Side findings.90

    4-6 Side findings one.89

    4-7 Side findings two.90

    4-8 Side findings Three.90

    4-9 side findings four.91

    4-10 side findings five.92

    Chapter five: discussion and conclusion.95

    5-1 introduction.96

    5-2 overview of the research problem and goal.96

    5-3 explanation of the findings in order.96

    5-4 hypothesis one.96

    5-5 hypothesis two.98

    5-6 hypothesis three.99

    5-7 finding one.100

    5-8 finding two.101

    5-9 finding three.101

    5-10 finding four.101

    5-11 finding five.102

    5-12 limitations of research.102

    5-13 research proposals.103

    5-14 practical proposals.103

    List of Persian sources.105

    List of English sources.111

    Appendix.114

    Family functioning questionnaire. 113

    Neo personality questionnaire. 116

    Bofard self-regulation questionnaire. 123

    Source:

    Persian sources

    Ebrahimi Qeiri, A. (2012). Comparison of academic motivation and academic hope of gifted and normal students. Master's thesis of Islamic Azad University, Maroodasht branch. Abbott, P.;  and Wallace, K. (2010). An Introduction to the Sociology of Feminist Attitudes, translated by Maryam Khorasani and Hamid Ahmadi, Tehran: Duniya Madr.

    Atkinson, R; Atkinson, R; Smith, A.; Enough, D; and Hoeksma, S. (2000). Hilgard's field of psychology, translated by Brahani, Mohammad Taghi;  Birshak, Behrouz;  Beyk, Mehrdad; Zamani, Reza;  Shahr Arai, Mehrnaz; Karimi, Youssef; Gahan, Nissan;  Mohiuddin, Mehdi; Hashemian, (1385). Ninth edition. Tehran: Rushd.

    Atkinson, R. Vehilgaard, A. (2006). The field of psychology, translated by Rafii, H. Arjmand, M. Hamidpour, h. (2011) Tehran: Arjmand Ahmadipour, T. (1387). The effectiveness of bilateral training on self-regulated learning of first-year male high school students in Saqez city. Master thesis, Allameh Tabatabai University. Ahmadi, M.; Kerami, M.; Hosseini al-Madani, S.A. (2013). Comparison of self-regulation and emotional intelligence of gifted and normal first year high school male students. Journal of Applied Researches in Educational Psychology, 1, 62-69.

    Astvar, N. (1380). Comparing the effectiveness of teaching cognitive and metacognitive strategies on improving performance in science assignments, Master's thesis, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Allameh Tabatabai University. Hafizi, F; and Seyed Nejad, M. (1389). Comparison of motivational beliefs, self-regulation learning strategies, personality traits of gifted and normal high school students in Ahvaz city. Journal of New Findings in Psychology, 127-140.

    Azazi, S. (2016). Sociology of the family: emphasizing the role, structure and function of the family in the contemporary era.  Tehran: Illuminators and Women's Studies. 

    Amani, F; Amani, A.; and Mohammadpour, H. (2011). Comparison of motivational beliefs, self-regulation strategies and personality factors and their predictive role on the academic performance of gifted and normal students. Women and family studies, 4, 15. 62-43.

    Amini Zarar, M. (1387). The relationship between self-regulated learning strategies and motivational beliefs with the academic progress of public high school students. Master's thesis, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Al-Zahra University.

    Amini, Sh. (1382). Examining the role of self-efficacy, self-regulation and self-esteem in the academic progress of third-year high school students in the field of experimental sciences in Shahrshtan, Kurd, Master's thesis, Tarbiat Moalem University, Tehran.

    Irvani, M.; Yousefi Hamidi, S. (1388). Investigating the relationship between family functioning and the identity crisis of Khomeini Shahr teenagers. Journal of Sociology, 1.4.

    Burke, L. (2007). Psychology of growth from conception to childhood, translated by Mohammadi Seyyed Yahya, (2013). Tehran, Arsbaran.  382-384. Bostan, H. (1385).

Comparison of self-discipline ability, personality traits and family functioning of gifted and normal female students