The effect of school smartness on the learning styles of the fifth grade students of the elementary school of Tehran

Number of pages: 157 File Format: word File Code: 29923
Year: 2014 University Degree: Master's degree Category: Educational Sciences
  • Part of the Content
  • Contents & Resources
  • Summary of The effect of school smartness on the learning styles of the fifth grade students of the elementary school of Tehran

    Dissertation for Master's degree (M.A) orientation: educational management

    Dissertation abstract (including summary, objectives, implementation methods and results obtained):

    The aim of the current research was to investigate the impact of school smartness on the learning styles (Kolb model) of the fifth grade students of the elementary school in Tehran. The current research is semi-experimental with pre-test and post-test. The statistical population of this research includes all the fifth grade students of the 19 districts of Tehran in the academic year of 2019-2019 in the number of 32,250 people, of which 400 people were selected based on the HS-Bola table and by heterogeneous cluster random method. The subjects first answered the Kolb (2005) learning style questionnaire, after 2 months of using information and communication technology in smart schools, the subjects answered the mentioned questionnaire again. To analyze the data, descriptive statistics and inferential t-correlated statistics were used. The learning methods of abstract conceptualization and reflective observation have also been effective and have reduced them.

    Key words: smart schools, ICT information and communication technology, educational technology, club learning styles, style (convergent, divergent, absorbing and adaptive)

    1 Introduction

    At the beginning of the third millennium, after the industrial age of the fourth wave of human life, Peter Drucker coined the term "knowledge society" for this wave. uses, has been formed, and the schools of advanced countries in this era have achieved characteristics that are different from what is traditionally understood about schools. Also, education has always played a very important role in human life and has undergone changes and transformations along with the change of human life and the development of technology. In this way, it can be claimed that the development of the educational system in the age of information and communication technology is one of the main challenges of policy makers. In many countries of the world, the expansion of information technology in education has been considered, and both developed and developing countries have designed comprehensive programs to equip schools with various facilities.

    Unlike the conditions in traditional schools, information and communication technology has become an essential part of the teaching-learning process in many schools and has created a huge transformation in all educational stages. In general, it can be said that in today's fast-paced world, traditional methods of education are slow and ineffective and cannot meet the new scientific and educational concepts with sufficient power and excitement that are needed by today's generations of students. Also, the teacher will be able to better review the student's performance and change appropriate techniques for teaching. Today, the traditional methods of teaching and learning do not meet the needs of learners, because by using traditional methods, it is not possible to achieve problem solving skills, use information, participation, cooperation and understanding with each other, so learners do not understand the joy of science and school is boring for them, and one of the solutions to deal with such problems is to implement new methods in education. (Niyaz Azari and Hosseini, 2013)

    Therefore, it is better to use the tools that are the result of the efforts and progress of scientists in the field of modern information and communication technologies, while increasing the speed of learning, and provide learning conditions for different talents and tastes so that learners can be trained according to their characteristics in an educational environment equipped with computers and other facilities. More centered on the element of information is expanding. This started from military environments and has been transferred to academic and civil environments. For more than two decades, the information technology system has included the educational system and educational environment. In advanced and even developing countries, in order to increase the level of awareness of students in relation to information technology and prepare them to enter the information society and increase the spirit of research and research and optimal use of this infinite sea and increase the production of knowledge, smart schools have been exploited instead of traditional schools.(Mehrabi, 1390)

    Since technology is the center of all economic, medical, social and educational activities, it is necessary to apply and teach information and communication technology from an early age. Therefore, in order to implement this and prevent the backwardness of the country's knowledge and technology caravan, especially teachers and students, this technology (intelligence of schools) should be used for better education at a faster rate and to avoid wasting time, and as much as possible to cover different learning styles (Kolb model) of different students and help teachers in education. It is continuous. Organizations, as a part of these societies, have undergone these extensive changes and transformations. The changing unstable environment, the category of globalization, privatization and the emergence of advanced communication and information technology are serious challenges that educational institutions and schools have faced as the basic and operational pillars of these institutions. If the educational system and schools do not seek to reengineer their structure and function and do not change their position in the society, they will have an uncertain future.

    A society whose goal is progress based on knowledge and technology must first transform its education. For this, he should use educational technology, that is, the design, implementation and evaluation of basic and applied researches. (Rastegarpour and Abdulahi, 1384)

    The emergence of smart schools as a part of formal education support systems has provided new learning opportunities for students deprived of education in advanced countries such as England and America since the early 1960s. (Zamani et al., 2008)

    In developing countries, in-person smart schools to compensate for some of the shortcomings such as inefficient traditional teacher-centered teaching methods, the lack of rich and up-to-date textbooks, the lack of information and computer literacy of teachers and students, the increasing needs of the labor market for human resources equipped with technological literacy are being formed and developed.

    In this regard, the Islamic Republic is also an exception to this It has not been, and since 2003, it has been establishing smart schools, and in this regard, the strategic document of smart schools has been prepared by Sharif University and Technology Jihad at the request of the Education Organization of Tehran Province. In this document, it is stated in the definition of smart schools that a smart school is an educational organization, with a physical and real existence (not virtual) where students will be educated in a new way. In such schools, students learn according to their talents and interests. Attention to believing in all the potential talents of students is seen in all educational and extracurricular activities in these schools, and there will be no restrictions on the continuation of the learning process and academic progress of students. (Draft strategic document of smart schools, 2014)

    The purpose of smart schools is to help implement the country's national education goals and to strengthen and nurture the workforce to face the events of the 21st century. In these schools, learning is based on individual speed, collaborative efforts, self-direction, continuity between subjects, and the course content is not limited to printed books, but also includes electronic books, multimedia software, courseware, and databases. In smart schools, technology as a bridge makes communication between teachers, students, and parents easier and more effective.

    In a report from UNESCO [1], it is stated that information technology has caused fundamental changes in the learning process. Today, due to the diversity of societies, people, their creativity and interests, there is a need for diversity of learning methods and this requires a new form of education that has sufficient flexibility in this field. (Eric[2], 2006)

    Gates[3] in a speech in 1999 quoted Howard Gardner[4] in the field of education and says: "Because people's understanding of the world is different, children should be taught in different ways." Adapt the mentioned education system. (Nowrozi et al., 2017)

    Bakr [5] 1997 stated that the introduction of information technology to schools leads to better learning. Most researchers believe that this development leads to the change of teacher-centered learning to a student-centered approach.

  • Contents & References of The effect of school smartness on the learning styles of the fifth grade students of the elementary school of Tehran

    List:

     

    Table of contents

    Title

    Abstract 1

    Chapter 1: Generalities of the research

    1-1 Introduction 3

    1-2-Statement of the problem 5

    1-3-Importance of the research. 7

    1-4-Research objectives. 8

    1-4-1-main goal. 8

    1-4-2-sub-goals. 8

    1-5-Research hypotheses. 9

    1-5-1-main hypothesis. 9

    1-5-1 Sub-hypotheses. 9

    1-6- Definition of concepts. 9

    1-7 operational definition of concepts. 12

    1-8 research variables. 13

    Chapter Two: Study Background

    2-1- Background 15

    2-2- Development process and history of teaching and learning of smart schools in Iran. 18

    2-3- History of teaching and learning of smart schools in the world. 19

    2-4- Concepts and differences of smart school from others. 21

    2-4-1- The concept of smart school. 21

    2-4-2- The concept of smart school from the point of view of David Perkins. 21

    2-4-3- The difference between a smart school and a virtual school. 22

    2-4-4- The difference between traditional and smart schools. 23

    2-5- Application of information technology in education. 23

    2-5-1- Application of information and communication technology in individual teaching. 24

    2-5-2- Application of information and communication technology in exploratory learning. 25

    2-5-3- Application of information and communication technology in communication exchange. 25

    2-5-4- The use of information and communication technology in the evaluation of educational goals. 25

    2-5-5- Application of information and communication technology as a management tool. 26

    2-6- Education, learning and information and communication technology. 26

    2-7- The roles of information technology in schools. 27

    8-2- Theoretical foundations of educational technology. 28

    2-8-1- Socrates (469-399 BC) 28

    2-8-2- Wendt (1832-1920) 29

    2-8-3- Ebbinghaus (1850-1909) 29

    2-8-4- Levin (1947- 1890) 29

    2-8-5-Vygotsky (1896-1934) 30

    2-8-6-Ganieh (1916-2002) 30

    2-8-7-Merrill (1937) 30

    2-9-Necessity of using educational technology tools in the classroom. 31

    10-2- The general goals of education in Iran. 31

    2-10-1- Relating general goals to the role of smart schools. 32

    2-11- The pillars of smart schools. 33

    2-12- The principles of smart schools. 33

    2-13- Objectives of smart schools. 34

    2-14- Introducing the Tiger Network project. 35

    2-14-1- Execution and implementation. 35

    2-15- The basic model of smart schools in Iran. 37

    2-15-1- Conceptual model of smart school. 37

    2-15-2- Elements of the conceptual model of the smart school. 38

    2-15-2-1- Teaching and learning environment based on multimedia content. 38

    2-15-2-2- The developed infrastructure of information technology. 39

    2-15-2-3- School management by integrated computer systems. 40

    2-15-2-4- Having trained teachers in the field of information technology. 41

    2-15-2-5- Integrated computer communication with other schools. 41

    2-15-3- Implementation model of smart school. 42

    2-15-3-1- Business processes layer 43

    2-15-3-1-1- Education, compilation and management of educational resources. 43

    2-15-3-1-2- Management of student affairs 44

    2-15-3-1-3- School management 45

    2-15-3-1-4- Technology management. 46

    2-15-3-2- Service layer and application systems. 46

    2-15-3-2-1- Education, compilation and management of educational resources. 47

    2-15-3-2-2- Management of student affairs. 48

    2-15-3-2-3- school management 49

    2-15-3-2-4-technology management. 50

    2-15-3-3- technical layer. 50

    2-16- Different models of learning spaces. 51

    2-16-1- Network learning models. 51

    2-16-2- Learning in future classes 51

    2-16-3- Learning the structure of knowledge and the ability to solve problems. 52

    2-16-4- Community-based learning 52

    2-17- The nine main steps of personalizing learning. 53

    2-18- The concept of learning. 53

    2-19- The basic axes of learning. 55

    20-2- The importance of learning. 55

    2-21- Learning conditions. 56

    2-22- Division of styles 57

    2-22-1- Cognitive styles. 57

    2-22-2- Emotional styles. 57

    2-22-3- Physiological styles. 57

    2-22-1-1- Cognitive styles and their types: 58

    2-22-1-2- Classification57

    2-22-1-1- Cognitive styles and their types: 58

    2-22-1-2- Classification of cognitive styles based on Kolb's opinion. 59

    2-23- The role of information and communication technology in learning. 60

    2-24- Elements of the learning event. 62

    2-25- Defining the concepts of learning styles. 63

    2-26- Theories in learning styles. 64

    2-26-1- Don and Don's learning style. 64

    2-26-2- Vermont learning styles. 65

    2-26-3- Biggs learning approaches. 66

    2-26-4- Felder and Sulman learning styles 67

    2-26-5- Kolb and Fry learning styles. 68

    2-26-5-1- Experiential learning theory 68

    2-27- The effect of students' styles in relation to the teacher. 76

    2-28- Different learning styles in the education process. 76

    2-29- Research done inside the country 77

    2-30- Research done abroad 84

    2-31- Summary. 91

    2-32-Theoretical framework of the research. 94

    Chapter 3: Research implementation method

    Introduction: 97

    3-1 Research method. 97

    3-2- Statistical population. 97

    3-3- Statistical sample of the sample size and its determination method: 97

    3-4 - Data measurement tool 98

    3-5 Determining the validity and reliability of the research tool: 98

    3-6 Data analysis method 99

    Chapter four: Data analysis

    Introduction 101

    4-1-Description of data 101

    4-1-1- Frequency distribution, histogram chart, and indicators for describing research variables. 102

    4-2 Data analysis 120

    4-2-1 Examination of the first hypothesis. 121

    4-2-2 review of the second hypothesis 122

    4-2-3 review of the third hypothesis 123

    4-2-2 review of the fourth hypothesis 124

    Chapter five: conclusion and suggestions

    Introduction 126

    5-1 Conclusion. 126

    5-2-Research hypotheses and their results 127

    5-2-1- Examining the first hypothesis. 127

    5-2-2- Examining the second hypothesis 128

    5-2-3 Examining the third hypothesis 128

    5-2-4- Examining the fourth hypothesis 129

    5-3- Limitations 129

    5-4- Proposals. 131

    5-5-Summary of the research. 132

    Sources and sources. 134

    Appendixes. 142

    Source:

     

    Sources and Sources

    1-Etidhi, Mohammad, (1386) Resalat Newspaper, Smart School

    http://www.irannamaye.ir/articale /view/1844968

    2-Ahadi, Fatemeh et al. Semnan Medical Sciences) Scientific Journal of Semnan University of Medical Sciences - Volume 11, Issue 34

    Winter 88, pp. 146-141

    3-Ahmadi, Karim (1389) Access through:

    http://www.ahmadikarem.persuangig.com

    4- Yazdi, Samad, Mohammadzadeh Admalai Rajab Ali, (1386) (Investigation of the relationship between learning styles, personality traits and academic performance of students)), and Shahid University Behavioral Scientific-Research Monthly, No. 27, pp. 15-28.

    5- Berari, Mohsen. (1386) ((Investigation of the relationship between the styles or four-faceted engagement of Club and the academic progress of Mazandaran University campus students)), Master's Thesis, School of Education Sciences of Mazandaran Campus

    Biyabangard, Ismail.(2014) ((The Impact of Media and Technology on Education)) Research and Assessment Quarterly, Year 12, Number 41, Research Center for Programmatic Studies and Assessment, pp. 51-72.

    6- Pasha Sharifi, Hassan, (2014) "Theoretical Foundations of Psychological Tests", Tehran: Aaghah

    7- Taqvai Nasser, (2008) (Comparison of convergent, divergent, absorbing and adaptive learning styles of teachers and students of pre-university centers for boys in the fields of humanities, experimental sciences and physics, Varamin city) Master's thesis, Teacher Training University. -Students' learning) Scientific Research Journal of Education Technology, Year 4, Volume 4, Number 2, pp. 111-101

    9- Jariani, Abolghasem, (1380). Karo Danesh

    10- Jan Gholi, Fatemeh, ((The impact of information and communication technology on learning styles in smart secondary schools of Qom)) Master's thesis, Faculty of Educational Sciences, Azad University, Tehran Branch, Islamshahr Branch

    11-Haji, Morteza.

The effect of school smartness on the learning styles of the fifth grade students of the elementary school of Tehran