Investigating the relationship of organizational learning with job involvement and organizational innovation among public secondary school teachers in Kermanshah province in the academic year of 2013-2014

Number of pages: 184 File Format: word File Code: 29894
Year: 2014 University Degree: Master's degree Category: Educational Sciences
  • Part of the Content
  • Contents & Resources
  • Summary of Investigating the relationship of organizational learning with job involvement and organizational innovation among public secondary school teachers in Kermanshah province in the academic year of 2013-2014

    Dissertation for Master's Degree in Educational Management

    Abstract:

    The present study aims to identify the relationship between organizational learning, job involvement and organizational innovation of public secondary school teachers in Kermanshah province. The research method is descriptive correlation type. The statistical population of this research is all the teachers of public secondary schools in Kermanshah province, whose number is 5600, and 361 people were selected as a sample based on cluster and stratified random sampling methods and based on Karjesi and Morgan's table. The tools for collecting information were three questionnaires of organizational learning by Nifa, occupational engagement by Kanungo, and organizational innovation by Etlai and Akif. To determine the validity of the questionnaires, the content validity method was used and it was approved by educational management experts, and the reliability of the questionnaires was calculated through preliminary implementation on a sample of 50 subjects (male and female teachers) and using the Cronbach's alpha method, which was obtained for the organizational learning questionnaire at 0.87, job involvement at 0.76 and organizational innovation at 0.86. To analyze data using SPSS software version 16, descriptive statistics indicators such as table, frequency, percentage, mean, standard deviation and inferential statistics methods such as one-group t-test, t-test for independent groups, one-way analysis of variance, Pearson correlation coefficient and step-by-step regression analysis were used. The results of the research showed that: the level of organizational learning (and its components) and organizational innovation of teachers of public secondary schools in Kermanshah province is above average and the level of job involvement is average. The level of job involvement of female teachers is higher than that of male teachers, and the level of organizational innovation and organizational learning is the same for male and female teachers. The amount of organizational learning, organizational innovation and job engagement of teachers in terms of variables of academic records and years of service and the amount of organizational learning and job engagement of teachers are the same in terms of age, but there is a difference between the amount of organizational innovation of teachers in terms of age. There is a relationship between organizational learning and its components (individual skills, mental models, shared vision, team learning, systems thinking) with job involvement and organizational innovation. The components of mental models of individual organizational learning skills can predict organizational innovation. Also, the components of common vision and mental models of organizational learning have the ability to predict job conflict.

    Key words: organizational learning, job conflict, organizational innovation, public secondary school teachers.

    Introduction:

    The world of the organization is noisy and turbulent. Organizations expand, contract, separate and disappear. Activity levels in the organization sometimes rise and sometimes fall (Behrangi, 2010: 237). This environment full of explosive changes in communication and information technology creates unprecedented tasks for the heads of organizations who have the task and responsibility of determining the performance and future of their organizations, and in order to respond effectively to these expectations, managers of organizations must review their priorities and behavior, and competitive advantage is not only a function of increasing performance and profitability, but also a function of the organization's ability to innovate, learn, respond quickly, plan, and provide a suitable basis for responding. to demands and having maximum control over one's destiny (Irannejad Parisi, 2017: 23). In order for educational organizations to be dynamic and effective, they must move towards a learning organization. This requires fundamental changes in organizations and the attitude of their managers. The requirement for an organization to be able to improve itself is to learn faster what to do and how to do it according to changes in the environment. Thus, the basic way for an organization to be on the path of improvement and excellence is that organizations play a role in the leadership of the contemporary world by taking learning out of its way and providing learning facilities for it (Mashaikhi and Asgari Nejad Amiri, 1389). In fact, their presence now affects many aspects of life. In the words of Peter Drucker, "Today's youth, like the people whose ancestors learned farming, must learn about organizations" and in this regard, human resources and it is better to say that the youth are the building blocks of organizations, and what needs to be learned in organizations are the attitudes related to organizations. The heterogeneity of organizations appears in various forms.In the same way that organizations are different, those who manage and review them are different and have different job attitudes. All organizations are motivated to provide stability, determination and sufficient confidence with which they can operate effectively and efficiently in environments that contain unknowns and uncertainties (Behrangi, 2018). Education is one of the important and key organizations of every society, and teachers, as human resources, are essential elements of education in achieving its goals. 1-2) Statement of the problem: Undoubtedly, education is the most basic social institution in shaping, guiding and controlling the thoughts of people in every human society. The most important strategic resource of any organization or any society, in order to achieve its goals, is human resources, and among the elements of human resources, teachers are the starting point of any educational transformation, and in this regard, organizational learning is one of the fundamental variables to achieve organizational goals. 2015: 50). Shokri and Khairgou (2008) consider the intellectual forms of today's organizations to be full of deepening information and paying attention to the participation of creative and scientific human resources instead of functional human resources, and they consider organizational learning to be the basis of organizations' involvement in the process of knowledge management. In this space, improving performance and maintaining and improving competitive advantage form the main concerns of managers. Organizational innovation and learning are considered to be the most important bases for improving performance and gaining competitive advantage, and in many organizations, the speed of changes is far more than the speed of response and the ability to adapt organizations (Shokri and Khairgou, 2018). Environmental changes and developments in various fields such as technology, competitive environment and economic policies of governments create the necessity of changing and adapting organizations for survival and excellence, and in this, human efforts, the most important component of which is management, are important (Ramsli 2007, quoted by Mashayikhi and Asgari Nejad, 2019). The rapid changes and transformations of environmental factors have increased the level of ambiguity and complexity and have faced serious challenges to the management of organizations, and organizations will not be able to effectively face such conditions without learning from their own experiences and those of others. Organizations do not become learners by chance, but moving towards becoming learners requires planning and targeted efforts (Qorbanizadeh, 2017: 12). In today's era, organizations are successful if all their employees strive to improve their capabilities, and the manager's duty is to provide suitable conditions for this educational process (Dasgardi, Guderzi, Asadi, Dasgardi and Dasgardi, 2019). Today, organizations must be involved in a set of knowledge management processes, organizational learning is the foundation of this transformation and is an inherent feature of only some organizations. As a result, organizational learning emphasizes the improvement of performance and guides the organization in the direction of creating useful knowledge, in order to achieve the goals of productivity and innovation by sharing experiences (Tabarsa, Abdali and Hatami, 2019). Knowledge reduces uncertainty and unpredictability. Learning is the heart of organizational change and transformation (Sebahani Nejad, Shahabi and Yuzbashi, 2015: 51). Organizational learning is considered one of the tools for gaining a competitive advantage for current organizations in strategic management, all organizations learn and in this sense cope with the changing world around them. But some organizations learn faster and more effectively than their peers (Allameh and Moghadami, 2019). The learning process is the basis on which the concept of knowledge management emerges and is understood. In the long run, learning is not a separate activity that happens before a person enters the work environment or is left out in classroom environments, nor is learning an activity that is reserved for the management group, the behaviors that define learning and the behaviors that determine productivity are the same. Learning is the heart of productivity activity, in other words, learning is a new form of work, learning requires considering the distinction between ideas and skills (Marquad, translated by Zali, 2015). Tabarsa, Abdali and Hatami (2013) believe that organizational learning guides the organization in the direction of creating useful knowledge, in order to achieve productivity and innovation goals by sharing experiences.

  • Contents & References of Investigating the relationship of organizational learning with job involvement and organizational innovation among public secondary school teachers in Kermanshah province in the academic year of 2013-2014

    List:

     

     

    Table of Contents

    Title

    Chapter One: General Research

    1-1) Introduction. 3

    1-2) statement of the problem. 4

    1-3) The importance and necessity of research. 8

    1-4) research objectives. 10

    1-5) research questions. 10

    1-6) research hypotheses. 11

    1-7) conceptual and operational definitions. 11

    1-7-1) conceptual definitions. 11

    1-7-2) operational definitions. 12

    Chapter Two: Theoretical foundations and research records of the research subject

    2-1) Introduction. 17

    2-2) Definition of organizational learning. 17

    2-2-1) History of organizational learning. 20

    2-2-2) Difference between organizational learning and learning organization. 22

    2-2-3) characteristics of organizational learning. 23

    2-2-4) four main dimensions of organizational learning. 24

    2-2-5) Organizational learning as a dynamic process. 24

    2-2-6) three-stage process of organizational learning. 25

    2-2-7) Organizational learning process from the perspective of Argeris and Schon (1978). 26

    2-2-8) intra-organizational and inter-organizational learning. 27

    2-2-9) internal and external learning. 28

    2-2-10) Low-level and high-level learning. 29

    2-2-11) hereditary, experimental and vicarious learning. 30

    2-2-12) adaptive and productive learning. 30

    2-2-13) types of learning according to Chein (1993). 31

    Table of Contents

    Title

    Page

    14-2-2) Organizational learning methods and solutions. 32

    2-2-15) organizational learning levels. 35

    2-2-16) transfer mechanisms from individual learning to collective learning. 37

    2-2-17) Barriers to organizational learning. 38

    2-2-18) Ways to overcome obstacles to organizational learning. 39

    2-2-19) Obstacles to institutionalize organizational learning. 40

    2-2-20) The benefits of using organizational learning. 40

    2-2-21) Consequences of ignoring organizational learning. 41

    2-2-22) Nifa's view on organizational learning. 41

    2-3) Job conflict. 45

    2-3-1) Definition of job conflict. 45

    2-3-2) Casmir's three-stage model. 47

    2-3-3) Determinants of job involvement. 48

    2-3-4) Measurement of job involvement. 50

    2-3-5) Job involvement and organizational citizenship behavior and work performance. 51

    2-3-6) Job involvement and innovation in the organization and factors of the work environment. 52

    2-3-7) Job involvement and personality traits. 53

    2-3-8) Factors affecting job conflict. 54

    2-3-9) Consequences of job conflict. 56

    2-3-10) Kanongo's view on job conflict. 57

    2-3-11) Latent interest model (deprivation theory) Jahodes. 58

    2-3-12) theory of occupational conflict and comprehensive quality management and human resource management. 59

    3-3) organizational innovation. 61

    3-3-1) Definition of innovation. 62

    3-3-2) Innovation. 64

    3-3-3) organizational innovation. 65

    3-3-4) History of organizational innovation. 67

    3-3-5) Epidemiology of organizational innovation. 68

    Table of Contents

    Title

    3-3-6) Innovation and Organizational Learning. 69

    3-3-7) The main components of organizational innovation leadership. 71

    3-3-8) Factors affecting the formation of organizational innovation. 72

    3-3-9) stages of organizational innovation process. 74

    3-3-10) organizational innovation models. 76

    3-3-11) integrated learning model in the creation of innovation Chaharbaghi ??and Newman (1996). 77

    3-3-12) views of organizational innovation. 79

    3-3-13) obstacles to creativity and innovation. 82

    3-3-14) Obstacles and problems of change and innovation in organizations. 84

    15-3-3) The role and responsibility of education managers in the process of change and innovation. 84

    3-4) An overview of the research done inside and outside the country. 86

    3-4-1) The background of the subject research in the country. 86

    3-4-2) Research background abroad. 92

    4-4) Summary. 98

    Chapter three: research method

    3-1) Introduction. 101

    3-2) research method. 101

    3-3) statistical population.102

    3-4) sample size and sampling method. 103

    3-5) Information collection methods. 104

    3-6) Validity and reliability of measurement tools. 105

    1-6-3) Validity of questionnaires. 105

    2-6-3) Questionnaire reliability. 105

    3-7) statistical methods of data analysis. 106

    Chapter four: (Analysis of research findings)

    4-1) Introduction. 111

    Table of Contents

    Title

    4-2) Descriptive findings. 111

    4-2-1) Demographic information of the studied sample. 111

    4-3) Presumptions of using parametric statistical tests. 115

    4-4) Analysis of research questions. 117

    4-5) Analysis of research hypotheses. 123

     

    Chapter Five: Conclusion and Proposals

    5-1) Introduction. 131

    5-3) Summary of the research. 131

    5-4) research findings. 132

    5-5) general conclusion. 140

    5-6) suggestions. 141

    5-6-1) Practical suggestions. 141

    5-6-2) Suggestions for future research. 143

    5-7) research limitations. 144

    7-5-1) Limitations available to the researcher. 144

    7-5-2) Limitations beyond the researcher's control. 144

    Sources and sources. 147

    Appendices

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    List of tables

    Title

    Page

    Table No. 1-1) Historical course of organization concepts Learner and organizational learning. 21

    Table No. 2-2) The main obstacles to organizational learning. 39

    Table No. 2-3) Different degrees of innovation. 64

    Table No. 2-4) Organizational innovation typology. 68

    Table No. 1-3) distribution of society and sample according to the selected cities. 103

    Table No. 2-3) Number of questions and components of each questionnaire. 105

    Table No. 3-3) Reliability of research collection tools (questionnaires). 106

    Table No. 1-4) frequency and frequency percentage of the studied sample by gender. 111

    Table No. 2-4) frequency and frequency percentage of the studied sample in terms of age. 112

    Table No. 3-4) frequency and frequency percentage of the studied statistical sample in terms of educational qualification. 113

    Table No. 4-4) frequency and frequency percentage of the sample of teachers in terms of service experience. 114

    Table No. 5-4- Result of Kalmogorov Smironov test for normality of data distribution. 115

    Table No. 4-6) Examining the level of organizational learning of teachers. 117

    Table No. 4-7) Examining the level of job involvement. 119

    Table No. 8-4) Examining the level of organizational innovation. 119

    Table No. 4-9) Average organizational learning, job involvement and organizational innovation. 120

    Table No. 10-4) Average learning, job engagement and innovation in terms of age, gender and years. 121

    Table No. 11-4) Comparing the amount of organizational innovation in terms of age. 122

    Table No. 12-4) Examining the relationship between organizational learning and teachers' job involvement. 123

    Table No. 13-4- Examining the relationship between organizational learning and organizational innovation. 124

    Table No. 14-4) Multivariate regression analysis of the impact of learning components on job involvement. 125

    Table No. 15-4-) Multivariate regression analysis of the impact of learning components on innovation. 126

    Sources:

     

    Sources and sources:

    A) Persian sources

    - Ashtiani, P. and Pirmohammadi, F. (1387), organizational innovation in small and medium-sized companies, Tadbir, number 199.

    - Aghaei Fishani, T. (1377), creativity and innovation in people and organizations, Tehran: Development. Ahmadi, P. and Nasiri Vahad, N. (2016). "Strategic communication effective on organizational innovation". Tadbir Monthly 38, No. 186.

    - Scott, R; Translated by Behrangi, M. (1388), organizations, legal systems, real and open, Tehran, Kamal Tarbiat publishing house, second edition, autumn 1380. 524.

    - Arabi, S. M. and Fakharian, M. (1387). "Measuring the level of organizational learning", management research, first year, number 1, 109-129

Investigating the relationship of organizational learning with job involvement and organizational innovation among public secondary school teachers in Kermanshah province in the academic year of 2013-2014