Investigating the relationship between social intelligence, organizational citizenship behavior and organizational creativity of Boali Sina University, Hamedan, in the academic year of 2012-2013

Number of pages: 156 File Format: word File Code: 29886
Year: 2014 University Degree: Master's degree Category: Educational Sciences
  • Part of the Content
  • Contents & Resources
  • Summary of Investigating the relationship between social intelligence, organizational citizenship behavior and organizational creativity of Boali Sina University, Hamedan, in the academic year of 2012-2013

    Dissertation for Master's Degree in Educational Management

    Abstract:

           The purpose of this research was to investigate the relationship between social intelligence, organizational citizenship behavior and organizational creativity of the employees of Bu Ali Sina University in Hamedan in the academic year of 2012-1393. The statistical population included all employees in the number of 777 people (587 men and 190 women) based on the Karjesi and Morgan table, 348 people (211 men and 137 women) were selected from among the employees using the stratified random sampling method. The research method was descriptive and correlational. The data collection tools included three questionnaires: Silvera et al.'s social intelligence (2001), organizational citizenship behavior (Ergan and Kanoski, 1991) and Randsip's organizational creativity (1979). The content validity of the questionnaires was confirmed by several educational management experts, and the reliability of the questionnaires was obtained using Cronbach's alpha method, 0.87, 0.84, and 0.92, respectively. The data were analyzed through SPSS software and at two levels of descriptive statistics such as table, graph, mean, standard deviation, frequency percentage and inferential statistics (Kalmogrov-Smironov test, t-test for independent groups, Pearson correlation coefficient and one-way analysis of variance test and step-by-step multivariate regression analysis, LSD test). The results of the research indicate that the social intelligence status is average (statistical average 3), but the organizational citizenship behavior and organizational creativity of Bu Ali Sina University employees is above the average level (higher than the statistical average 3). Also, the research results show a positive and significant relationship between social intelligence and organizational citizenship behavior and organizational creativity. Using step-by-step regression, the findings show that among the components of social intelligence, only the components of information processing and social awareness have the ability to predict organizational citizenship behavior. In addition, among the components of social intelligence, only the dimensions of social skills have the power to predict the organizational creativity variable.

    Key words: social intelligence, organizational citizenship behavior, organizational creativity, employees of Bo Ali Sina University

    1-1. Introduction:

    Today's society is an organizational society. Today, a major part of our life is spent in organizations or in connection with organizations. By performing multiple or specialized tasks, any organization achieves general or specific goals for society and people (Alegh Band, 2017: 4). An organization requires certain characteristics in order to adapt to changes and to grow and survive in new environments. One of the most important characteristics that can help in responding to these changes is social intelligence (Mirza Qadri, 2016: 60).

    Social intelligence [1] is a comprehensive term that includes a wide set of individual skills and characteristics and usually refers to those intra-personal and interpersonal skills that go beyond the field of It is a characteristic of previous knowledge, such as technical or professional skills. Thorndike [2] is one of the pioneers of the theory of social intelligence, who defined it as the ability to understand others and behave wisely in human communication. Thorndike used the term collective or social intelligence for the first time to explain human behavior and actions (Bozan, 2004). Investigating individual behavior in the work environment has attracted the attention of researchers to a great extent. The common goal of the studies is to define the type of behavior that contributes to the long-term success of the organization. The social intelligence of the organization's employees will have a great impact on their behavior, job satisfaction, organizational commitment (Tahami Monfared, Aliai Zand and Yousefi, 2012) and especially their organizational citizenship behavior [3] and organizational creativity [4]. According to Oregon and his colleagues[5], citizenship behavior is individual and voluntary behavior that improves the effectiveness and efficiency of the organization's performance, but is not directly rewarded by the organization's official systems. Organizational creativity is any kind of thinking process that solves a problem in a useful and original way (cited by Martinez and Treblanc [6], 2003: 65).

    1-2. Statement of the research problem

    People in social situations do not act the same because of individual differences. These individual differences refer to social intelligence in psychology literature. Social intelligence was seriously discussed for the first time when Thorndike defined intelligence in 1920 as social, mechanical and abstract intelligence between human behavior and action. He defined social intelligence as the ability to understand others and behave wisely in communication.Social intelligence was seriously discussed for the first time in 1920 when Thorndike defined intelligence as social, mechanical and abstract intelligence between human behavior and actions. He defined social intelligence as the ability to understand others and wise behavior in human communication (Doughan and Chetin[7], 2009). Social intelligence is the ability to establish interpersonal relationships in a group and cooperate with others, use the power of the mind and body to communicate with others and understand them better, the growth and development of interpersonal relationships and friendly behavior with others. In fact, creating healthy relationships or, in other words, "relationship policy" is a special and valuable ability called social intelligence (Bozan [8], 2002). Also, social intelligence is the ability to use communication skills, friendly relations with others, social behaviors and empathy with others (Mohammadian Hosseinabadi, 2016), which includes these components: social information processing; It means the ability to understand and predict the behavior and feelings of others. social awareness; Proper understanding of the concerns and feelings of others is one of the pillars of success in social activities and social skills; Sensitivity to others, to obtain superior job performance and the ability to recognize the needs of others (Golman [9], 2000). On the other hand, the civil behaviors that have arisen when humans entered civil societies have long been the focus of attention of experts and researchers in various fields of sociology and psychology. In particular, the attention of researchers in the fields of educational psychology has been directed to this variable in the last years of the 20th century (C. Chicha and Kim [10], 2009: 58). Katz and Kahn [11] (1968) believe that such behaviors increase the effectiveness of the organization and in environments where there is interaction and group relations, it can be defined as "behavioral patterns that support the social and psychological context of doing tasks and tasks" (Gol Parvar, Vakili and Atashpour, 2010). These behaviors were also defined as voluntary behaviors that are strongly required by official organizations (Ibrogoz [12], 2010). Mackenzie, Podsakoff and Payne[13] (2000) believe that this type of behavior is not primarily among the tasks and responsibilities defined in the job descriptions of people, but their performance in many ways affects the effective performance of individuals and groups. These types of behaviors include a wide range, such as helping others, non-compulsory cooperation and participation based on internal motivation, and offering suggestions and solutions to improve existing processes in the environment. Undoubtedly, it must be said that organizational creativity is one of the main goals and the main axis of management discussions and educational research that should be seriously considered. In today's world, where the speed of changes has increased and competition in organizations has expanded, creativity is considered the key way of survival and sustainability of organizations in this turbulent field. Creativity means the ability to generate new ideas that are useful for a certain time (Wolfoles [14], 2008: 221). Organizational creativity means providing new ideas and plans to improve and improve the quantity or quality of the organization's activities; For example, increasing productivity, increasing products or services, reducing costs, products or services from a better method, new products or services, etc. (Korkmaz, Arpeki[15], 2009). In a research, Mijes et al.[16] (2008) compared the effects of social intelligence and cognitive intelligence on the popularity of school teenagers by measuring academic achievement. It was observed that popularity is significantly related to social intelligence. Rezaei and Khalilzadeh (2008) in a research titled the relationship between managers' social intelligence and school teachers' job satisfaction concluded that (1) there is a positive and meaningful relationship between managers' social intelligence and teachers' job satisfaction. (2) Among the three components of social intelligence, the component of social skill and information processing are the best predictors for job satisfaction.

    Kuldeep and his colleagues [17] (2009) in a research titled the relationship between five dimensions of personality and organizational citizenship behavior concluded that the four personality dimensions of extroversion, conscientiousness, conscientiousness, and openness to experience are positively related to organizational citizenship behavior. The relationship between social intelligence and various variables has been studied by various researchers. but it seems that less research has been done in relation to the correlation of social intelligence with organizational citizenship behavior and organizational creativity. Therefore, this research aims to study the relationship between these variables. Therefore, the current research aims to answer the following basic question.

  • Contents & References of Investigating the relationship between social intelligence, organizational citizenship behavior and organizational creativity of Boali Sina University, Hamedan, in the academic year of 2012-2013

    List:

    Table of Contents

    Title

    Chapter One: Research Overview

    1-1. Introduction: 2

    1-2. Statement of the research problem. 3

    1-3. The importance and necessity of conducting research. 6

    1-4. Objectives of the research. 7

    1-4-1. general purpose 7

    1-4-2. Special objectives 7

    1-5. Research questions. 7

    1-6. Research hypotheses. 7

    1-7. Conceptual and operational definitions of research terms. 8

    Chapter Two: Theoretical foundations and research background

    2-1. Introduction: 14

    2-2. Theoretical foundations and research literature. 14

    2-3. The components of social intelligence from the perspective of experts. 29

    2-4. Characteristics of social intelligence. 29

    2-5. Factors affecting the development of social intelligence. 31

    2-6. Organizational citizenship behavior. 32

    2-6-1. Introduction: 32

    2-6-2. Emergence of organizational citizenship behavior. 33

    2-6-3. The concept of organizational citizenship behavior. 33

    2-6-4. Two main approaches to organizational citizenship behavior. 36

    2-6-5. Opinions of experts in the concept of organizational citizenship behavior. 37

    2-6-6. Key characteristics of organizational citizenship behavior. 45

    2-6-7. Factors affecting organizational citizenship behavior. 45

    2-6-8. Consequences of organizational citizenship behavior. 46

    2-6-9. Individual outcomes of organizational citizenship behavior. 47

    2-6-10. The effects of organizational citizenship behavior on the organization. 48

    Table of Contents

    Title

    2-6-11. Policies to encourage organizational citizenship behavior. 49

    2-7. Organizational creativity. 51

    2-7-1. The concept of creativity 51

    2-7-2. The role and importance of creativity. 51

    2-7-3. Degree or levels of creativity. 53

    2-7-4. Components of creativity. 53

    2-7-5. The relationship between creativity, innovation and entrepreneurship. 55

    2-7-6. The difference between creativity, innovation and entrepreneurship. 56

    2-7-7. Creative process models. 57

    2-7-8. Characteristics of creative and innovative people. 58

    2-7-9. Characteristics of creative organizations. 61

    2-7-10. Explaining the concept of organizational creativity. 62

    2-7-11. Barriers to creativity and innovation in organizations 63

    2-7-12. Growth factors of creativity and innovation in the organization. 66

    2-8. Research background. 68

    2-8-1. Research done internally. 68

    2-8-2. Research conducted in foreign countries. 71

    2-9. conclusion 73

    Chapter Three: Research Method

    3-1. Introduction. 82

    3-2. Research method. 82

    3-3. Statistical population. 83

    3-4. Sample size and sampling method: 83

    3-5. Method of collecting information. 84

    3-6. Reliability and validity of questionnaires 85

    3-6-1. Validity of questionnaires 85

    3-6-2. Reliability of questionnaires 85

    Table of contents

    Title

    3-7. statistical methods of research data analysis; 86

    Chapter Four: Analysis of Research Findings

    4-1. Introduction. 90

    4-2. Description of research findings. 90

    4-2-1. Description of the demographic characteristics of the studied sample. 90

    4-3. Default of using parametric statistical tests. 95

    4-4. Analysis of research questions. 98

    4-5. Analysis of research hypotheses. 101

    Chapter Five: Inference and Conclusion

    5-1. Introduction. 111

    5-2. Research summary: 111

    5-3. Discussion and conclusion. 112

    5-4. General conclusion. 117

    5-5. Suggestions 117

    5-5-1. Practical suggestions. 117

    5-5-2. Practical suggestions for future research. 119

    5-6. Research limitations. 120

    5-6-1. Limitations in the authority or control of the researcher: 120

    5-6-2. Limitations that are beyond the control of the researcher. 120

    Resources. 124

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    List of Figures and Diagrams

    Title                                                                                                                       124

    List of Figures and Charts

    Page Title

    Figure 1-1. Research conceptual model. 5

    Figure 2-1. Components of social intelligence. .27

    Figure 2-2. Dimensions of organizational citizenship behavior. 44

    Figure 2-3. Components of organizational creativity. 58

    Figure 2-4. Creativity growth factors in the organization. 65

    Figure 2-5. Creativity and innovation factors in the organization. 66

    Chart 4-1. Frequency percentage of the studied sample by sex. 90

    Chart 4-2. Frequency percentage of the studied sample by the faculty of the place of service. 92

    Chart 4-3. Frequency percentage of the studied sample according to age. 93

    Chart 4-4. Frequency percentage of the studied sample according to degree. 94

    Chart 4-5. Frequency percentage of the studied sample by service history. 95

    Chart 4-6. Frequency of social intelligence of the studied sample along with the normal curve. 97

    Chart 4-7. The frequency of organizational citizenship behavior of the studied sample along with the normal curve. 97

    Chart 4-8. The frequency of organizational creativity of the studied sample along with the normal curve

    Sources:

    Persian sources

    Aghamohammadi, J. (2012). Investigation of the relationship between the leadership style of school principals and the creativity of secondary school teachers in Diwandara city, Islamic Azad University of Garmsar branch, 7th year, 9-21. Ahmedpour Dariani, M., Azizi, M. (1383). Entrepreneurship. Mihrab Qalam Cultural and Publishing Institute. Ahmadi, H., Maher, F. (1385). Understanding mind games. Tehran: Pardis Publishing House.

    Ahmadi, G., Vardi Alai, T. (1388). Familiarity with organizational creativity as a necessity of the educational system, "Efficient School" magazine, 7th issue, pp. 64-67.

    Akhtiari, M. (2009). Examining dimensions of social cognition performance in opioid-dependent patients, social welfare scientific-research quarterly, year 11, number 41-399.

    Arianpour, M., Arianpour, Abbas. (1387). Farhang English to Farsi, Tehran: Amir Kabir.

    Islami, H., Siyar (2016). Organizational citizenship behavior, Tadbir scientific and educational monthly, year 18, number 187, pp. 59-56.

    Slob, S. (1389). Investigating the relationship between social intelligence and the ability to absorb knowledge among school principals in Bukan city, Master's thesis, Isfahan University.

    Afrooz, G. (1385). Discussions in the psychology and education of children and adolescents. Shagaig printing.

    Mr. Fishani, T. (1377). Creativity and innovation in people and organizations. Termeh Publications.

    Bozan, T. (2004). The power of social genius (translated by Horadzad Salehi). Tehran: Pol Publications. (Date of publication in original language 1977).

    Pirkhafi., A. Manavipour, D., Sharifi, H. (1386). Comparison of creativity and intelligence of students of different fields of study, New Thoughts Quarterly in Educational Sciences, 3rd year, 1st issue.

    Pirkhaifi, A. (1380). Creativity, management and entrepreneurship. Creativity and Innovation Quarterly, No. 9.

    Tahami Monfared, S., Aliai Zand, S., Yousefi, M. (1381). Investigating the relationship between emotional intelligence and coping strategies in normal and gifted high school students in Tehran. The first national conference of brilliant talents, Shiraz. A. and Jafari Farsani, c. (1389). The relationship between perceived quality in leadership style and citizenship behavior, Research and Planning Quarterly in Higher Education, No. 56, p. 114.

    Hajizadeh, M. (1387). Validation of social intelligence scale and its relationship with happiness and aggression in students of Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz branch, master's thesis, general psychology. Hosseini, A. (2008). Creativity management and creativity in management. Rehiyaft Quarterly, No. 26.

    Hafez Nia, M. (1387). An introduction to the research method in humanities, Tehran: Samt Publications.

    Khalasi, N., Qadri, A., Khushgam, M., Berhaninejad, H., Tarski, M. (1388). Examining the relationship between organizational citizenship behavior and employee empowerment in health centers of Tehran University of Medical Sciences, pp. 81-75.

    Khani, A. (1382). The effect of cultural intelligence on group effectiveness, master's thesis, Islamic Azad University, Khorasgan Branch.

    Delavar, A. (1389). Research methods in psychology and educational sciences. Tehran, Payam Noor Publications.

    Delavar, A. (1387). Theoretical and practical foundations of research in humanities and social sciences, 8th edition, Tehran: Rushd Publications.

    Deshiri, G. (1382). Normative evaluation of emotional intelligence questionnaire (EQ-I) to evaluate different aspects of intelligence of students of Tehran universities

Investigating the relationship between social intelligence, organizational citizenship behavior and organizational creativity of Boali Sina University, Hamedan, in the academic year of 2012-2013