Contents & References of Investigating the relationship between cognitive styles (novice or receptive-novice or exploratory) with delayed gratification and academic procrastination of male high school students in Abdanan city
List:
List of Content
Page Title
Chapter One: Research General
1-1 Introduction. 12
1-2 statement of the problem. 14
1-3 research objectives: 17
1-4 research questions. 18
1-5 Research hypotheses: 19
1-6 Importance and necessity of research: 20
1-7 Theoretical and practical definition of concepts: 21
Chapter two: Literature and research background
2-1 Definition of learning. 24
2-1-1 Definition of style. 26
2-1-2 Definition of cognitive style. 27
2-1-3 learning styles according to Kolb: 27
2-1-3-1 divergent learning style 28
2-1-3-2 absorbing learning style 28
2-1-3-3 convergent learning style 29
2-1-3-4 adaptive learning style 29
2-1-4-types of cognitive styles. 30
2-1-4-1 resistance to flexibility. 30
2-1-4-2 Being conventional against individuality. 30
2-1-4-3 conceptualization styles. 30
2-1-4-4 Sectional styles. 30
2-1-4-5 divergence versus convergence. 31
2-1-4-6 Absorber vs. Adaptor 31
2-1-4-7 Verbal vs. visual processor. 31
2-1-4-8 Impulsive vs. reflective cognitive style. 31
2-1-4-9 styles of cognitive complexity against cognitive simplicity. 32
2-1-4-10 context-dependent and context-independent cognitive styles. 32
2-2 Definition of procrastination. 34
2-2-1 Types of procrastinators and their ranks. 36
2-2-2 Features of work procrastination: 37
2-2-3 Effects of work procrastination: 37
2-2-4 Consequences of work procrastination: 38
2-2-5 Examining the basic causes of work procrastination. 38
2-2-6 Damages related to environmental negligence. 39
2-2-7 Treatment of procrastination. 43
2-3 Definition of consent. 45
2-4 internal and external background of the research. 47
Chapter three: research method
3-2. Research method. 53
3-3. Research area: 54
3-3-1. Time area: 54
3-3-2. Location area: 54
3-3. Thematic area: 54
3-4. Statistical population and statistical sample and sampling method: 54
3-5. Data collection methods: 55
3-6. Data analysis method: 57
3-7. Validity and reliability of academic procrastination questionnaire. 57
3-8. Validity and reliability of cognitive style questionnaire. 59
Chapter Four: Data Analysis
4-2. Examining the individual characteristics of students: 63
4-2-1. Examining the father's education of the 63 sample people
Table 1-4: Examining the people of the sample group based on the education of the 63 father
Chart 4-1: Pie chart of the survey of the sample people based on the education of the father: 63
4-2-2. Examination of the mother's education of the sample 64
Table 4-2: Examination of the sample group according to the mother's education: 64
Chart 4-2: Pie chart of the examination of the sample according to the mother's education: 64
4-2-3. Examining the economic status of the family of sample people: 65
Table 4-3: Examining the people of the sample group based on the family economy: 65
Chart 4-3: Pie chart of the study of sample people based on the family economy: 65
Table 4-4: Descriptive statistics of the research variables. 66
Table 4-5: Checking the status of normality. 66
b) Examining the research hypotheses: 67
The main research hypothesis: 67
Table 6-4: A comparison table between the cognitive style of innovative or receptive and innovative or researcher with delayed gratification and academic procrastination of students. 67
First partial hypothesis: 68
Table 7-4: Comparison table between avoidant or accepting cognitive style with delayed academic satisfaction in students 68
Second partial hypothesis: 69
Table 4-8: Comparison table between avoidant or accepting cognitive style with academic procrastination of students 69
Partial hypothesis Third: 70
Table 9-4: Comparative table between modernist or researcher cognitive style with delayed academic satisfaction of students. 70
Fourth Partial Hypothesis: 71
Table 10-4- Comparative table between innovative or researching cognitive style with students' academic procrastination 71
Chapter Five: Discussion and Conclusion
5-2-1- Results of individual characteristics of the sample group: 75
5-2-3- Results of research hypotheses: 75
A) Examining the main research hypothesis: 75
B) Examining partial research hypotheses: 76
5-4- Limitation. 70
Fourth Partial Hypothesis: 71
Table 10-4- Comparative table between innovative or researching cognitive style with students' academic procrastination 71
Chapter Five: Discussion and Conclusion
5-2-1- Results of individual characteristics of the sample group: 75
5-2-3- Results of research hypotheses: 75
A) Examining the main hypothesis of the research: 75
B) Examining the minor hypotheses of the research: 76
4-5-Limitations of the research: 79
5-5- Research proposals: 81
Research-based proposals: 81
Proposals for future research: 82
Resources. 83
Appendices: 88
Academic Consent Questionnaire. 88
Academic procrastination questionnaire. 90
Cognitive style questionnaire. 91
Source:
Sources
Asadzadeh, Hassan (2011). Cognitive style, academic excitement and academic performance in students; Quarterly Journal of Research in Educational Systems. Comparison of learning styles (depending on the context and unrelated to the context) of students and students of the humanities and mathematics departments of schools and universities in Tehran. Education Quarterly, 4, 59-80. Namian, Sara; Hosseinchari, Massoud (1390). Explanation of students' academic procrastination based on religious beliefs and core of control.
Nasrabadi, Hasan Ali Bakhtiar; Mousavi, Setare, Kaveh Farsan, Zabihullah (2011). The role of critical thinking attitude and cognitive learning styles in predicting the academic progress of medical students. Iranian Journal of Education in Medical Sciences/ July 2013.
Solimannejad, Akbar; Hosseini Nasab, Siddavoud (1391). The interactive effect of teaching self-regulation strategies and students' cognitive styles on math problem solving performance. The Journal of Teaching and Learning Studies, Fourth Period, Number Two, Autumn and Winter 2013. Serial 2/63.
Edraki, Mitra; Rambad, Masoume; Abdoli, Rooh Elah (2010). Relationship between satisfaction with education and academic achievement in nursing students. Iranian Journal of Education in Medical Sciences/Spring 2013.
Amdi, Nasehuddin Abolfath Abdulwahid bin Mohammad. Gharral al-Hukm and Darr al-Kalam, translated and researched by Seyyed Hashem Rasouli Mahalati. Qom. Islamic culture publishing office. 1380. Ch3.
Emaduddin Abi Jafar Muhammad Ibn Abi Al-Qasim, Al-Tabari, Bashara Al-Mustafi Lashia Al-Mortaza, Qom: Al-Nashar al-Islami Institute, 1420, p. 342, H. 36.
Alice Albert and William James Nall, The Psychology of Procrastination, translated by Mohammad Ali Farjad, Tehran, Omid Institute, 1385. 19.
Nahj al-Balagheh, Aphorisms, translated by Seyyed Jafar Shahidi, Scientific and Cultural Publications, Tehran, 1380, ch 18, no. 175, p. 392.
Bless, Advance/ a new step-by-step method to reduce delays. Psychology of laziness. Translated by Mahdi Karacheh Daghi. 1374. Yasman Publications.
Ardebili, Morteza. 1376. Factors of success in education for middle school and high school students. Neshar Madrasa.
Jaafari, Ali. 1381. Methods of academic success. Neshra Jamat.
Ganji, Hamzeh. 1374. General psychology. Neshar Dana. And no, m. (1388). Prediction of behavioral procrastination and decision-making according to metacognitive beliefs in students. Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology
Ayduk, O., Mendoza-Denton, R., Mischel, W., Downey, G., Peake, P. K., and Rodriguez, M. (2000). Regulating the interpersonal self: Strategic self-regulation for coping with rejection sensitivity. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 79(5): 776–792.
Ayduk, O., Rodr?´guez, M. L., Mischel, W., Shoda, Y., & Wright, J. (2007). Verbal intelligence and self-regulatory competencies: joint predictors of boys' aggression. Journal of Research in Personality, 14(2), 374– 388.
Bembenutty, H. (2009). Academic delay of gratification, self-regulation of learning, gender differences, and expectancy-value. Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 347-352. Bembenutty, H. (2007). Self-regulation of learning and academic delay of gratification: Gender and ethnic differences among college students. Journal of Advanced Academics, 18(4), 586–616.
Bembenutty, H. (2010). Academic delay of gratification, self-efficacy, and time management among academically unprepared college students. Psychological Reports, 104,613-623.
Bembenutty, H., & Karabenick, S. A. (2003). Academic delay of gratification, future goals, and self-regulated learning. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL, and April 21–25.
Winters, F., Azevedo, R., & Levin, D. (2004).