Investigating the relationship between knowledge sharing and organizational creativity with citizenship behavior among employees of education departments in Bandar Abbas city

Number of pages: 124 File Format: word File Code: 29881
Year: 2014 University Degree: Master's degree Category: Educational Sciences
  • Part of the Content
  • Contents & Resources
  • Summary of Investigating the relationship between knowledge sharing and organizational creativity with citizenship behavior among employees of education departments in Bandar Abbas city

    Master's Thesis Field: Educational Sciences (M.A)

    Tension: Educational Management

    Abstract

    The purpose of this research is to investigate the relationship between knowledge sharing and organizational creativity with citizenship behavior in employees of education departments in Bandar Abbas city. This research is applied in terms of purpose and correlational in terms of nature and method. The statistical population of this research consists of all employees of education departments in Bandar Abbas, whose number has reached 402 in 2013. A sample size of 181 people has been determined from the aforementioned statistical population based on Cochran's formula, and they were selected by stratified random method. In this research, three questionnaires, including a 21-item questionnaire on knowledge sharing based on the Nancy Dixon model (2000), a 15-item citizenship behavior questionnaire (Oregon), and a 30-item organizational creativity questionnaire (Randsip) were used to collect data. After collecting the data, they were analyzed with the help of descriptive statistics and inferential statistics, Pearson correlation and multiple regression. The results of the research showed that there is a significant relationship between knowledge sharing and citizenship behavior, there is also a significant relationship between organizational creativity and citizenship behavior, and a significant relationship was seen between (serial, expert, close, distant, and strategic transfer) and citizenship behavior.

    Key words: knowledge sharing, serial transfer, hidden transfer, open transfer, strategic transfer, expert transfer, organizational creativity and citizenship behavior

    Introduction

         Although the term organizational citizenship behavior[1] was used for the first time by Oregon[2] and his colleagues in 1983, but before him, people like Katz[3] and Kahn[4] by distinguishing between role performance and innovative and self-motivated behaviors[5] in the 70s and 80s and before them Chester Barnard[6] by expressing the concept of willingness to cooperate[7] in 1938 paid attention to this issue they gave Oregon considers employees' citizenship behavior as positive measures taken by some employees to improve productivity and solidarity and cohesion in the work environment, which is beyond the organizational requirements (Maqimi, 2014), and also believes that organizational citizenship behavior is individual and voluntary behavior, but nevertheless it improves the effectiveness and efficiency of the organization's performance (Islami and Siyar, 2016). have been Social etiquette is a behavior that shows attention to participation in the social life of an organization, work conscience is a behavior that goes beyond the requirements set by the organization in the work environment. Altruism is helping colleagues in the performance of their duties, chivalry and decency are components that show avoiding harm to the organization. Chivalry is the willingness to be patient in the face of unavoidable annoyances and work injustices without complaining. While politeness is about thinking about how people's actions affect others (Haqighi, 2019).

    But organizations should create an environment for sharing, transferring and exchanging knowledge among members and train people to conceptualize their interactions. Due to the increasing complexity and speed of environmental changes in organizations, it is felt to create systemic thinking and common vision in the organization, as well as the implementation of organizational learning and the transformation of individual learning into an organization. Therefore, if it is possible to adapt and adapt a set of elements such as structures, methods, strategies, processes, and human resources with the desired model of organizational learning, it is possible to better react to organizational competition (Qaltash, Javadani and Sina, 2013).

          In order to survive in today's turbulent environment, which sees only change as a constant, organizations must be innovative and gain or maintain superiority, and they must act quickly to gain this superiority (Anuri, 2007). Creativity in any organization is based on logical order and a function of the creativity of the people who make up the system.  For the flourishing of creativity, its employees need a suitable space to deal with and create new ideas (Tareq Khalili, 2013). Perhaps one of the obstacles to creativity in the organization is the lack of knowledge sharing among the employees of an organization.

    The importance of sharing and creating new knowledge, in the citizenship behavior of employees in organizations and companies, emphasizes the importance of extensive investment in this field, and this knowledge sharing is not only in the scientific and technical fields, but also in the field of human resources. Knowledge in these companies has been considered as a source of power and knowledge management in the direction of connecting those who have questions, and those who have the answers to these questions.   Knowledge management has resulted in the creation of creative and innovative platforms for these companies (Pirovisiani, 2009). 12 Statement of the problem Human resources, which today are referred to as human capital [8], is one of the most important assets of any organization, whose quality can play a significant role in the growth and excellence of the organization, and due to the complexities of these issues, various issues in behavioral dimensions are emerging. One of them in recent years is the issue of citizenship behavior, which in general is a kind of valuable and useful behavior that people show willingly and willingly (Samband and Angui, 2019). In this context, dimensions such as helping behaviors, chivalry, forgiveness, organizational loyalty, following orders, individual innovation, conscience, personal development, politeness and consideration, civil behavior and altruism have been mentioned in this field (Mostabasri and Najabi, 2017). which may be considered the most reliable classification presented about the components of organizational citizenship behavior by Oregon, which has been used in various researches and they are: social manners, altruism, work conscience, chivalry and politeness. Knowledge sharing reported. The regression results also showed that citizenship behavior predicted 18.4% of the variance of knowledge sharing.  Today, in different countries of the world, including Iran, knowledge management is considered a more important category than knowledge itself, and organizations are looking for it, to explain and clarify how to transform individual and organizational information and knowledge into individual and group knowledge and skills. Therefore, in this third millennium, the implementation of knowledge management has become necessary, and institutions should plan for its implementation (Qaltash, Javadani and Sina, 2013).

         Improving knowledge sharing between individuals in the organization and also between individuals and the organization is to create a competitive advantage. Effective knowledge sharing among the members of the organization leads to the reduction of costs in the production of knowledge and ensures the dissemination of the best working methods within the organization and enables the organization to solve its problems and problems. In this regard, persuading people to transfer their knowledge to other colleagues and the correct way of this transfer is very important. Includes: 1- Serial transfer is a type of knowledge transfer, which implicit and explicit knowledge obtained in one field or field is transferred to another field or field for later use. 2- Explicit transfer includes explicit transfer and specific information that a team needs to perform a task is transferred to another team that performs the same task. 3-Hidden transfer refers to the sharing of knowledge between teams in an organization. 4- Strategic transfer is the transfer of knowledge that affects the entire organization; And 5- expert transfer means obtaining explicit knowledge from experts and specialists. Each of these are different depending on the goals, methods and methods that are used (Mohammadi Fateh, Sobhani and Mohammadi, 2015). According to the research conducted, including Mustafa Nejad et al. (2010), the relationship between creativity and organizational citizenship behavior has been mentioned. Creativity is considered as a high human need in all stages of life and it consists of wide-ranging and directional changes in human thinking so that they have an ability to combine previous factors in new ways. Creative efforts are a means of innovation. Creativity is more of a mental and intellectual activity and innovation is more of a practical aspect and in fact it is the final product of innovation (Aghaei Fishani, 2017).

  • Contents & References of Investigating the relationship between knowledge sharing and organizational creativity with citizenship behavior among employees of education departments in Bandar Abbas city

    List:

    Title

    Chapter One: General Research

    1-1- Introduction 2

    1-2- State the basic problem. 3

    1-3- The importance and necessity of conducting research: 6

    1-4- Research objectives. 8

    16. 1-4-1- The main objectives of the research

    1-4-2- Sub-objectives of the research. 8

    1-5- Research questions. 9

    1-5-2- research sub-questions. 9

    1-6-Research assumptions. 10

    1-6-1- The main assumptions of the research. 10

    1-6-2- Research sub-hypotheses. 10-7-1 definitions of variables 11-1-7-1 conceptual definitions of variables 11-7-2 operational definitions of variables 12-1-8- Research scope. 13

    1-9 research variables. 13

    Chapter Two: Research Literature

    2-1- The first part of the basics of citizenship behavior. 16

    2-1- 1- Organizational citizenship behavior. 16

    2-1- Key characteristics of citizenship behavior. 17

    2-1-3- elements of citizenship behavior. 18

    2-1-4- Components of organizational citizenship behavior. 19

    2-1-5- Factors affecting organizational citizenship behavior. 22

    2-1-6- Consequences and results of organizational citizenship behavior. 23

    2-2- The second part: Theoretical foundations of knowledge sharing. 24

    2-3- The third part: Theoretical foundations of career creativity. 34

    2-3-3- Definition of creativity. 36

    2-3-4- Necessity and importance of creativity. 36

    2-3-5- Creativity models. 37

    2-3-6- Characteristics of creative people. 37

    2-3-7- The impact of individual creativity on the organization. 43

    2-3-8- Necessary tasks to create group creativity and innovation. 44

    2-3-9- Principles of management for innovation: 45

    2-3-10- Conditions for creation of creativity and innovation: 45

    2-3-11- Methods of increasing creativity. 46

    2-3-12- Management of strengthening creativity in the organization: 47

    2-4- Fourth part: Experimental background. 47

    Chapter three: research method

    3-1- Introduction. 58

    3-2- Research method. 58

    3-3- Research process. 60

    3-4- Statistical population, sample size and sampling method. 61

    3-5- Data collection tools 62

    3-6-Statistical analysis method 65

    Chapter 4: Research findings

    4-1 Data description 68

    B- Examining the frequency distribution of the investigated people based on age. 69

    P- Investigating the frequency distribution of the surveyed people based on education. 70

    C- Examining the distribution of the frequency of the examined people based on work experience. 72

    4-1-2 Quantitative description of research variables. 73

    4-1-3 Qualitative description of research variables. 74

    4-2 Examining the normal assumption. 77

    Chapter Five: Discussion and Conclusion

    Introduction: 92

    5-1- Conclusion. 92

    5-2- Discussion: 93

    5-2-1- The first main hypothesis of the research: 93

    5-2-2- The second main hypothesis of the research: 94

    5-2-3- The first sub-hypothesis of the research: 95

    5-2-4- The second sub-hypothesis of the research: 95

    5-2-5- The third sub-hypothesis of the research: 96

    5-2-6- The fourth sub-hypothesis of the research: 96

    5-2-7- The fifth sub-hypothesis of the research: 97

    3-5- Limitations of the research. 97

    4-5- Research suggestions. 98

    1-4-5- Suggestions based on research results. 98

    2-4-5- Suggestions for future research 100

    English sources: 105

    Appendix.

    Table 3-1. The content of the knowledge sharing questionnaire. 64

    Table 4-2 Distribution of the frequency of the examined people based on age. 69

    Table 4-3 Frequency distribution of surveyed people based on education. 70

    Table 4-5 distribution of the frequency of the surveyed people based on work history. 72

    Table 4-6 Values ??of quantitative description indices of research variables (n=181) 73

    Table 4-7 Frequency distribution of knowledge sharing. 74

    Table 4-8 Frequency distribution of organizational creativity. 75

    Table 4-10 Kolmogorov-Smirnov test results to check the normality of data distribution 78

    Table 4-11 Correlation coefficient between knowledge sharing and citizenship behavior. 79

    Table 4-12 Correlation coefficient between organizational creativity and citizenship behavior. 81

    Table 13-4 Correlation coefficient between expert transfer and citizenship behavior. 82

    Table 14-4 Correlation coefficient between transfers82

    Table 14-4 Correlation coefficient between hidden transfer and citizenship behavior. 84

    Table 15-4 Correlation coefficient between open transfer and citizenship behavior. 85

    Table 16-4 Correlation coefficient between strategic transfer and citizenship behavior. 87

    Table 4-17 Correlation coefficient between serial transmission and citizenship behavior. 88

    Table 4-18 model summary. 90

    Table 4-19 analysis of variance. 90

    Table 4-20 coefficients. 90

    List Charts

    Page Title

    Chart 1-5. Research process. 60

    Chart 4-1 Distribution of the frequency of the surveyed people according to gender. 68

    Chart 4-2 Distribution of the frequency of the surveyed people based on age. 69

    Chart 4-4 frequency distribution of the surveyed people based on marriage. 71

    Chart 4-5 distribution of the frequency of the surveyed people based on work history. 72

    Figure 6-4 Scatter diagram of knowledge sharing and citizenship behavior. 80

    Chart 4-7 Scatter diagram of organizational creativity and citizenship behavior. 81

    Chart 4-8 Scatter diagram of expert transfer and citizenship behavior. 83

    Chart 4-9 Scatter diagram of latent transfer and citizenship behavior. 84

    Chart 4-10 Scatter diagram of apparent transfer and citizenship behavior. 86

    Chart 4-11 Scatter diagram of strategic transfer and citizenship behavior. 87

    Chart 4-12 Scatter diagram of serial transfer and citizenship behavior. 89

    Source:

    Persian sources:

    Azer, A. and Momeni, M. (1389). Statistics and its application in management, second volume, seventh edition, Tehran: Semit.

    Aghaz. A. crown jewel F. (1391). Intra-organizational trust: a key factor towards real sharing of knowledge, Iranian Management Sciences Quarterly. The seventh year, number 28, pp. 67-86.

    Aghaei Fashiani, F. (1387). Investigating and analyzing the effects of organizational culture on organizational creativity in Qom industrial units, Qom Higher Education Complex, master's thesis, public administration.

    Islami. h; Sayar. A (2006). Organizational citizenship behavior, Tadbir Magazine, No. 187, pp. 56-59.

    Ahmadi, S.A. and Salehi, A. (2008). Knowledge Management, Journal of Public Administration, No. 3 and 4, pp. 1-160. Ahmadi, A.A.; Iranian, S.J. and Parsanjad, M. (2017). The relationship between organizational creativity and job satisfaction with job stress among the employees of Fars Province Agricultural Jihad Organization, New Industrial/Organizational Psychology Quarterly, 2nd year, 8th issue, pp. 71-84.

    Barzinpour, F. and Asadi, A. (2018). Presenting the conceptual framework of drawing a knowledge map based on the extraction of key success factors, the second executive management conference, Allameh Tabatabai University, pp. 1-12. Pirkhalaki, Ali, (2004), Basics and methods of fostering creativity, Tehran: Hazare Qaqnos Publications. Investigating factors affecting the establishment of knowledge management, case study: Housing and Urban Development Organization, Master's Thesis, Azad University, Research Sciences Unit.

    Taqvi, M. and Shafizadeh, H. (2008). Principles and basics of knowledge management, Rushd Technology Quarterly, Year 5, Number 18, pp. 40-58. Jafarzadeh Kermani. Z. (1387). Infrastructures of knowledge sharing in higher education: survey of library and information training groups, Daneshvar, pp. 1-10. Jalilian, H.R.; Moradi, M. and Kakai Mamoui, H. (2010). Transformational leadership and employees' creativity, bi-monthly police human development journal, 7th year, number 32, pp. 60-78. Hafez Niya, A.R. (1389). An introduction to research methods in humanities, Tehran: Samit Publications, pp. 69-74. Hosseini, M.S. and Mousavi, Z. (2011). Determining the relative contribution of knowledge management on organizational health in the General Directorate of Physical Education and Sports Boards of Isfahan, Sports Management and Movement Sciences Researches, second year, number 3, pp. 51-63. g; Fattah. N. (1387). Managers' creativity, organizational health and employee productivity of medical schools of the country, health information management, fourth term, first issue, pp. 143-151.

    Haqighi. M. A. Mirzadeh L. (1389). The place of justice in Islam and its role in promoting organizational citizenship behavior, Mishkoh, No. 108, pp. 58-80.

    Khadem Hosseini, Leila, (1386), the relationship between the creativity of educational managers and the job stress of secondary and middle school teachers in Arsanjan city, Master's thesis, Islamic Azad University, Maroodasht branch.

    Khaki, M. (1386).

    Khanalizadeh, R; Kurdnaich, A.A.; Fani, A.A. and Mashbaki, A. (2008).

Investigating the relationship between knowledge sharing and organizational creativity with citizenship behavior among employees of education departments in Bandar Abbas city