The effect of the combination of ownership and board of directors of companies on the social responsibility of companies admitted to the Tehran Stock Exchange

Number of pages: 120 File Format: word File Code: 29800
Year: 2014 University Degree: Master's degree Category: Librarianship
  • Part of the Content
  • Contents & Resources
  • Summary of The effect of the combination of ownership and board of directors of companies on the social responsibility of companies admitted to the Tehran Stock Exchange

    Dissertation for M.A.

    Abstract:

    The present study examines the relationship between the effect of ownership composition and the board of directors of companies on corporate social responsibility in companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange. The purpose of this research is to identify the factors affecting the level of social responsibility compliance as an effective factor on investors' decisions. The research period is between 1988 and 1992, which has been considered from various industries in the Tehran Stock Exchange. It has been tested using a simple and multivariable regression method. The results of the research indicate that among the independent variables, ownership concentration and the proportion of responsible members had the greatest impact on social responsibility, and among the control variables, the only variable was the level of education. It has an effect on the dependent variable, which is the social responsibility of companies.

    Key words: ownership composition, board of directors, social responsibility

    Introduction

    The existence of capital markets is one of the tools of economic development. Capital markets and joint stock companies make it possible for a large number of capital owners, with small and large capital, to participate in an economic unit and thus, the problem The provision of large capitals for the creation of large industrial projects is eliminated. By creating a safe and secure stock market, any country can collect the wandering capital of the society and direct it in the ways of production and creation of added value, and through this added value (rights, dividends and government share as taxes, etc.) take a step towards the economic development of the country.

    Accounting has a social nature that separates ownership from management, grows and develops, and emphasizes the protection of actual and potential investors. To control fake accounting, most countries have emphasized the concept of disclosure and transparency. The topic of information disclosure is considered the most important part of the ownership structure and corporate governance. The clearer the internal operations of the company and its cash flow are and the more accurately reported, the more limited the areas of embezzlement and mismanagement for managers and major shareholders. The most important topic in the field of information disclosure is that all factors affecting the stock price must be reported at the right time and with sufficient accuracy. This information in the first stage consists of: 1- Income statement 2- Purchase and sale of assets 3- Changes in the board of directors 4- Percentage of ownership of executive directors 5- Change in the ownership of the company 6- Other information that can be disclosed in the next stage are: 7- The amount of the bonus of the board of directors 8- Company strategy 9- Balance sheet risky transaction

    In the first chapter, after stating the research problem, we will express the importance and necessity of the research. We also express the research objectives in the form of general and special objectives. The theoretical framework of the research, which was the main basis of the research question and topic, is presented in this chapter, and the research model and research hypotheses are also mentioned. At the end of this chapter, the definitions of words and terms are given. 1-2 Statement of the problem Corporate social responsibility [1] has been a sensitive and attention-grabbing issue in recent years and is considered the basic factor of the remnants of any organization, and leading organizations as accountable organizations, for transparency and accountability to their stakeholders for their performance, must express their commitment to social responsibility through their values ??and ensure that this Obligations flow throughout the organization, it can be safely said that one of the few very important variables that have not been measured by the social responsibilities of companies and is still vague and unknown is the ownership structure in companies. Ownership structure has a core and specific position in corporate literature. Determining the type of structure and composition of the company's shareholders is a control and governance tool in companies. This dimension of governance can be examined in the form of different dimensions that determine the type of ownership of the company, such as ownership distribution, ownership concentration, the presence of major, minor and minority shareholders in the company's ownership composition and their ownership percentage. One of the groups that use the financial statements are the shareholders, therefore it is generally thought that the ownership structure of companies may lead to a change in the behavior of companies. This originates from the monitoring activities that different investors perform in this structure. According to the above, the main goal of this research is to examine the relationship between corporate social responsibility and the structure and composition of ownership in companies.

    According to the above, the main purpose of this research is to examine the relationship between corporate social responsibility and the structure and composition of ownership in companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange. Among other factors affecting the level of social responsibility compliance by companies is the senior management of companies, the type of management's view of the company's role and duty in society can be effective on this role of companies, if managers are indifferent to this issue and only consider their short-term interests and shareholders, they will show less social responsibility. In this research, we aim to examine these two factors - the composition of shareholders and the composition of managers - on the level of social responsibility of companies. In this case, the question is, does the different ownership structure of the companies have an effect on the social responsibility of the companies? That is, if the owners of the companies are formed by different groups, such as the government, financial institutions, banks and other companies, how will their responsibility be? And which of these different combinations of ownership is more effective.

    1-3 Necessity and importance of conducting research

    One of the most important goals of business entities is to maximize the rights of its owners (maximizing the value of the company's shares), although today, social considerations can also be considered the main goal of for-profit entities.

    For example, saving energy or minimizing environmental pollution or meeting the needs of society are considered among social goals. The policies of a for-profit unit are strategies that are chosen and used to achieve goals (Shabahang, 2017, 4). Theoretically, the goals and policies of a joint-stock company are determined by its owners (shareholders) through the board of directors elected by the general assembly of shareholders. However, due to the major powers given to the top management of companies, the goals and policies are actually determined by the management. In particular, this research is the first research to investigate whether the combination of ownership and the board of directors of companies can affect the social responsibility of organizations or not?

    The importance of this research is that it empirically shows financial analysts, investors, managers and users of accounting information how to evaluate the responsibility of companies based on their ownership structure.

    1-4 research objectives

    General objective:

    Identifying and explaining the factors affecting the degree of compliance with social responsibility as an effective factor on the decisions of investors in the stock exchange.

    Specific objectives of this research:

    Identifying the existence of a relationship between the composition of shareholders on the degree of social responsibility of companies

    Identifying the existence of a relationship between the composition of the board of directors and the degree of social responsibility of companies

    Application objective:

    Investors from the information used in this end use letters to plan and make better decisions.

    1-5 research questions

    Is there a significant relationship between the degree of ownership concentration of companies and the level of social responsibility of companies?

    Is there a significant relationship between the type of ownership of companies and the level of social responsibility of companies? Is there a significant relationship between the dual role of the chairman of the board of directors and the level of social responsibility of companies? Is there a significant relationship between the ratio of changes in the board of directors of companies and the level of social responsibility of companies?

    Leverage ratio

     

    Return on assets ratio

    Opinion type

    Independent auditor

    Control variables

    Proportion of mandated board of directors

    Dual role of the chairman of the board of directors

    Dependent variable:

    Social responsibility

    Independent variable:

    Combination of ownership and tenure of the board

    Percentage of board changes

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    1-6-1 Research Hypotheses

    Hypothesis 1.

  • Contents & References of The effect of the combination of ownership and board of directors of companies on the social responsibility of companies admitted to the Tehran Stock Exchange

    List:

    Table of Contents

    Page Title

    Abstract .. 1

    Chapter One: General 2

    . Introduction .. 3

    . Statement of the problem .. 4

    . The necessity and importance of research. 5

    . Research objectives .. 5

    . Solat research.. 6

    . Research model. . 7

    1-6-1. Research hypotheses. 8

    1-6-2. Methods of determining the independent variable. 8

    . The method of determining the dependent variable. 9

    . Control variables. . 9

    1-9. The scope of research. Statistical sample(n). 10

    . Operational definitions. . . 12

    . Research users. 13

    . The overall structure of the research. 13

    Chapter Two: Theoretical and previous foundations 15

    2-1. Introduction... 16

    2-2. Theoretical foundations of the independent variable. 16

    2-2-1. Introduction. . 16

    2-2-2. Ownership structure theory. . 17

    2-2-3. Definitions of corporate governance. . 18

    2-2-4. Representation theory. . 20

    2-2-5. Institutional ownership. . 22

    2-2-6. The combination of ownership and corporate governance. 23

    2-2-7. Ownership composition and major shareholders. . 24

    2-2-7-1. Effective supervision hypothesis. . . . 25

    2-2-7-2. Strategic alignment hypothesis. . 25 2-2-7-3. The influence of major financial stakeholders on agency costs. 26

    2-2-8. The relationship between ownership structure and capital market efficiency. 26

    2-2-9. The relationship between ownership composition and market liquidity. 27

    2-2-10. Institutional and major shareholders as observers. 31

    2-2-11. The effect of ownership concentration on stock prices. 32

    2-2-12. Ownership structure and valuation of discretionary accruals. 33

    2-2-12-1. Conflict of interest between shareholders and management. 34

    2-2-12-2. Exercising absolute control by major shareholders. 34

    2-2-12-3. Exclusive decision-making by managers. 34

    2-2-12-4. Violation of shareholders' rights. 35

    2-3. theoretical foundations of the dependent variable; social responsibility 36

    2-3-1. Introduction. . 36

    2-3-2. Definition of social responsibility. 37

    2-3-3. Dimensions of social responsibility. . 40

    2-3-4. Creating value through social responsibility. . 41

    2-3-5. Scientific analysis of socially concerned programs of companies. 45

    2-3-6. . Some key concepts of corporate social responsibility. 46

    2-3-7. Corporate social responsibility in Iran and existing obstacles. 47

    2-3-8. The relationship between the development of human resources in the organization and social responsibility. 52

    2-3-9. Types of responsibility of organizations. 54

    2-4. Research background.. 54

    2-4-1. An overview of research done in Iran. 54

    2-4-2. History of research and studies conducted abroad. 56

    Chapter 3: Methodology and method of conducting research 61

    3-1. Introduction .. 62

    3-2. Research plan.. 62

    3-3. Research questions. . 62

    3-4. Research assumptions. 62

    3-5. Variables. . . . 63

    3-5-1. Independent variable .. 63

    3-5-1-1. Concentration of ownership.. 63

    3-5-1-2. Type of ownership.. 64

    3-5-1-3. The proportion of non-obligatory members of the board of directors. 64

    3-5-1-4. The ratio of board changes. 64

    3-5-1-5. The dual role of the board of directors. 64

    3-5-2. Dependent variables. . 64

    3-5-2-1. Social responsibility of companies. 64

    3-5-3. Control variables ..65

    3-5-3-1. Leverage ratio ..65

    3-5-3-2. The number of years of continuous activity of the companies. 65

    3-5-3-3. The level of university education of employees. 65

    3-5-3-4. Asset return ratio. 65

    3-5-3-5. The type of opinion of the independent auditor. 66

    3-6.Statistical population, how to take samples and samples.   66

    3-7. The scope of research.   67

    3-8. Phases of hypothesis testing.   68

    3-8-1.  Regression model fit.    68

    3-8-2. The design of the statistical test of the hypotheses.     68

    3-9. Summary of the third chapter.    70

    Chapter Four: Data analysis and hypothesis testing 71

    4-1. Introduction   71

    4-2. Precondition tests for the appropriateness of the regression model.    72

    4-2-1. Descriptive statistics.  73

    4-3. Investigating the correlation between variables. 74

    4-4. Regression significance test.    76

    4-5. The significance test of the coefficients. 78

    Chapter five: Research results and suggestions 100

    5-1. Introduction    101

    5-2. Expression of results.   .   101

    5-2-1. The results of the main hypothesis test. .  101

    5-2-2. The results of the first sub-hypothesis test.   102

    5-2-3. The results of the second sub-hypothesis test.    103

    5-2-4. The results of the third sub-hypothesis test.    105

    5-2-5. The results of the fourth sub-hypothesis test.    106

    5-2-6. The results of the fifth sub-hypothesis test.    106

    5-3. General conclusion.     .   107

    5-4. Suggestions.    .    108

    5-4-1. Suggestions from the research. 108

    5-4-2. Future research proposal.    108

    5-5     . Research limitations. .  .    109

    Sources and references 110

    English abstract 114

    List of tables

    Title

    Page 114

    Table 2-1 Views of social responsibility. 39

    Table 2-2 Actions taken by actors related to social responsibility in organizations. 48

    Table 4-1 Summary table of descriptive statistics. 73

    Table 4-2 shows the table of correlation coefficients between variables. 75 Table 4-3 Summary table of multiple regression model (interpretation R2) 76 Table 4-4 Table of results of linear significance test of regression model 77 Table 4-5 Table of results of significance test of coefficients for hypothesis. . 79 Table 4-6 Multiple R table related to the first hypothesis.  .  80

    Table 7-4 Variance analysis table (first hypothesis). .    81

    Table 8-4 Table of the results of the significance test of the coefficients (for the first hypothesis).      82

    Table 9-4 The table related to the second multiple R hypothesis.    83

    Table 4-10 of the analysis of variance table of the second hypothesis. 84

    Table 4-11 of the results of the significance test of the coefficients for the second hypothesis. 85

    Table 4-12 of the multiple R table related to the third hypothesis. 85

    Table 4-13 of the analysis of variance of the hypothesis Third. 86. Table 14-4 Table of the results of the significance test of the coefficients for the third hypothesis. 88. Table 4-15 Multiple R table related to the fourth hypothesis. 88. Table 4-16 Variance analysis table for the fourth hypothesis.  89

    Table 17-4 Table of the results of the significance test of the coefficients for the fourth hypothesis 90.

    Persian sources

    Azer, Adel; Momeni, Rahim, (1387), statistics and its application in management, Payam Noor University Publications.

    Ahmedvand, Zhila, (1385), investigation of the effect of ownership structure on the performance of companies listed in the Tehran Stock Exchange, master's thesis in accounting, Faculty of Social Sciences and Economics, Al-Zahra University (S).

    Information and usefulness of performance accounting criteria, Quarterly Journal of Accounting and Auditing, No. 42.

The effect of the combination of ownership and board of directors of companies on the social responsibility of companies admitted to the Tehran Stock Exchange